Psychotropic Medication Prescribing: Youth in Foster Care Compared with Other Medicaid Enrollees.

Objective: To compare the prevalence of psychotropic medication prescriptions among youth in foster care with those among nonfoster youth on Medicaid. Methods: Children ages 1-18 years in a region of a large southern state who were enrolled in their respective Medicaid plan for at least 30 days between 2014 and 2016 and had at least one health care claim were included. Medicaid prescription claims were categorized by class: alpha agonists, anxiolytics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and stimulants. Primary mental health (MH) or developmental disorder (DD) diagnostic groups were identified for each class. Analyses included chi-square tests, t-tests, Wilcoxon sign rank tests, and logistic regression. Results: A total of 388,914 nonfoster and 8426 children in foster care were included. Overall, 8% of nonfoster and 35% of foster youth were dispensed at least one prescription for a psychotropic medication. Prevalence was higher for youth in care within each drug class and, with one exception, across all age groups. Among children prescribed a psychotropic medication, the mean number of drug classes prescribed was 1.4 (SD 0.8) and 2.9 (SD 1.4) for nonfoster and foster youth, respectively (p < 0.000). Except for anxiolytics and mood stabilizers, more children in foster care were prescribed psychotropic medications without an MH or DD diagnosis. Finally, children in foster care experienced 6.8 (95% CI: 6.5-7.2) times higher odds of being prescribed a psychotropic medication than their nonfoster peers, after controlling for age group, gender, and number of mental and developmental diagnoses. Conclusions: Across all age groups, children in foster care on Medicaid were prescribed psychotropic medications disproportionately more than their nonfoster peers on Medicaid. In addition, children in foster care were significantly more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication absent an MH or DD diagnosis.

Longer wait time after identification of peripartum depression symptoms is associated with increased symptom burden at psychiatric assessment.

Untreated peripartum depression (PD) affects one in seven women and is associated with negative maternal outcomes. This retrospective observational study used health record data from an integrated health system in Texas to assess the extent to which time to access reproductive psychiatry influences the mental health of peripartum women. Women with at least one screening for depression symptoms conducted in obstetric or pediatric settings between May 2014 and October 2019 and subsequently seen by the reproductive psychiatry clinic (n=490) were included. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to assess timing and factors related to psychiatry follow-up. Findings from this study demonstrated that the average time between a positive screen and a psychiatry assessment was 5 weeks. At psychiatry referral appointments, 85% of women continued to screen positive for PD symptoms. Depression symptom scores at the psychiatry appointment were significantly higher than scores precipitating the referral (p = 0.002). Wait time between initial positive screen and referral appointment was positively correlated with clinically meaningful increases in depression symptom scores (p < 0.001). Each week spent waiting for an appointment produced a 13% increase in odds of clinically meaningful worsening of PD scores and 9% increase in odds of developing new self-harm ideation. Given the findings that a longer period between primary care referral and subspecialty appointment has a negative impact on the mental health of women, this study supports the need for earlier psychiatric assessment to minimize decompensation. Expansion of reproductive psychiatry services are needed to support peripartum women and improve maternal outcomes.

Mental Health and Developmental Disorder Diagnoses of Foster and Nonfoster Children Enrolled in Medicaid.

OBJECTIVE: This study used Medicaid claims to compare the prevalence of mental health disorders (MHDs) and developmental disorders (DDs) between foster and nonfoster youth. METHODS: Medicaid claims data were used to identify MHDs and DDs. Diagnosis codes were categorized into 16 MHD and 8 DD groups. Children were enrolled in their respective Medicaid plan for at least 30 days and had at least 1 health care encounter generating a claim. Prevalence was compared between children in foster care and children not in foster care overall and by age group. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of having an MHD or DD diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 8706 children in foster care, 20.1% had an MHD compared with 9.7% of the 392,815 nonfoster children. Overall, the 5 most prevalent MHD and DD conditions among foster youth were attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (11.0%), miscellaneous (9.3%), bipolar disorders (5.6%), communication disorders (5.4%), and depressive disorders (5.1%). The 5 most prevalent conditions among children not in foster care were ADHD (6.1%); communication disorders (3.0%); disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders (2.7%); specific learning disorders (2.5%); and trauma and stressor-related disorders (2.4%). Anxiety was significantly higher among nonfoster children. The prevalence of the most common conditions by age group is reported. Overall, children in foster care had 2.5 and 2.3 times higher odds of having an MHD or DD diagnosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Children in foster care had significantly higher rates of mental health and DD diagnoses compared with children not in foster care.

A Comparison Study of Primary Care Utilization and Mental Health Disorder Diagnoses Among Children In and Out of Foster Care on Medicaid.

The purpose of this study was to compare the utilization of primary care services and presence of mental health disorder diagnoses among children in foster care to children on Medicaid not in foster care in a large health system. The data for this study were analyzed from a clinical database of a multipractice pediatric health system in Houston, Texas. The sample included more than 95 000 children covered by Medicaid who had at least one primary care visit during the 2-year study period. The results of the study demonstrated that children not in foster care had a greater number of primary care visits and the odds of having >3 visits were significantly lower for children in foster care with a mental health disorder diagnosis. Additionally, more than a quarter of children in foster care had a diagnosis of a mental health disorder, compared with 15% of children not in foster care.

First-time maltreatment in children ages 2-10 with and without specific birth defects: A population-based study.

Children with disabilities are at an increased risk for maltreatment. However, little is known about the risk of maltreatment in children with specific types of birth defects. This study was conducted to determine whether the risk and predictors of maltreatment in children 2 to 10 years of age differ between those without and with specific birth defects: Down syndrome, cleft lip with/without cleft palate, and spina bifida. State administrative and United States Census data were linked to identify study groups, variables of interest, and outcome measures. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify study groups and variables associated with an increased risk for maltreatment. The prevalence of substantiated maltreatment was consistently highest among children with cleft lip with/without cleft palate. After adjusting for birth-level factors, children with Down syndrome and cleft lip with/without cleft palate were 34% and 26% more likely to have been maltreated than those without birth defects, respectively. In all three birth defect groups, the risk of medical neglect was higher (relative risks ranged from 3 to 11) than in the unaffected group. The factors associated with increased risk for maltreatment were similar across all groups. Of note, parity, maternal education, and maternal Medicaid use at birth were all associated with greater than 2-fold increased risk for maltreatment. Our findings suggest that the families of children with birth defects may need support services throughout early childhood to help families cope with the needs of their children and reduce the risk of maltreatment.