Multiple Sclerosis Multidisciplinary Care: A National Survey and Lessons for the Global Community.

BACKGROUND: Access to, standardization and reimbursement of multidisciplinary care for people with MS (PwMS) is lacking in many countries. Therefore, this study aims to describe the current multidisciplinary care for people with MS (PwMS) in Belgium and identify benefits, needs and future perspectives METHODS: A survey for PwMS questioned various aspects of MS and viewpoints on care. For MS nurses (MSN) and neurologists, employment, education, job-content, care organization and perspectives were inquired. Descriptive and univariate statistics were performed RESULTS: The PwMS survey comprised 916 respondents with a mean age of 46±12.7 years and 75,4 % of the respondents being female. The majority of the participants had relapsing remitting MS (60.8 %) and the mean patient determined disease steps (PDDS) was 2.0 (IQR=3). 65.3 % and 60.4 % of the PwMS reported having access to a multidisciplinary team (MDT) or MSN. Access to an MSN was associated with more frequent disease modifying treatment (p=.015), spasticity (p=.042) and gait treatment (p=.035), but also more physiotherapy (p=.004), driver's license adjustment (p<.001) and a higher employment rate (p=.004). MDT access was associated with more frequent symptomatic bladder treatment (p=.047), higher physiotherapy rate (p<.001), higher work- (p=.002), insurance- (p<.001) and home support measures (p=.019). PwMS without an available MDT more often indicated that MS care needs improvement (p<.001). MSN's (n = 22) were mainly funded through various budgets, including hospital and neurology practice budgets. Finally, 69 % and 75 % neurologists (n = 62) working without an MSN or MDT stated a need of such support and 61 % agreed that MDT's should be organized at hospital-network level CONCLUSION: MDT and MSN availability may enhance medical and socio-economic support for PwMS. Guidelines, alignment and reimbursement are needed.

Usefulness of serum neurofilament light in the assessment of neurologic outcome in the pediatric population: a systematic literature review.

Children undergoing general anesthesia and surgery in the early years of life are exposed to the possible neurotoxicity of anesthetic agents. Prospective studies have shown deficits in behavior, executive function, social communication, and motor function in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Different biomarkers of neuronal injury have been evaluated neuronal injury in the pediatric population, among which neurofilaments represent a significant advantage as they are proteins exclusively expressed in neuronal tissue. Our aim was to evaluate the utility of serum neurofilament light (NfL) as a prognostic biomarker of neuronal injury in the pediatric population. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases in November 2022 for studies concerning serum NfL in the pediatric population in addition to a neurological assessment. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) prospective or retrospective studies, (2) studies including pediatric population until the age of 18 years, (3) serum NfL sampling, and (4) evaluation of neurological outcome. Data collection regarding study design, pediatric age, serum NfL levels, and results for neurological assessment were extracted from each study. Four manuscripts met the inclusion criteria and evaluated the prognostic utility of serum NfL in neonatal encephalopathy in correlation with the neurodevelopmental outcome that was assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development until the age of 2 years. Children with neonatal encephalopathy showed significantly higher serum NfL vs. healthy controls and high serum NfL levels predicted an adverse neurological outcome. The decrease of serum NfL to a nadir point between 10 and 15 years old reflects the brain growth in healthy controls. No studies were available in the perioperative period.  Conclusions: Serum NfL is a valuable biomarker in evaluating neuronal injury in the pediatric population. Further studies with perioperative serial sampling of serum NfL combined with standardized neurodevelopmental tests should be conducted to evaluate the neurotoxicity of anesthetic agents and monitor the effectiveness of specific neuroprotective strategies in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. What is Known: • Preclinical animal data have shown neurotoxicity of the anesthetic agents in the developing brain. • Data regarding anesthetic neurotoxicity in humans show limitations and no objective tools are available. What is New: • This systematic review showed that serum NfL is a valuable biomarker of neuronal injury in the pediatric population. • Perioperative use of serum NfL may be considered in future trials evaluating anesthetic neurotoxicity in the pediatric population and in monitoring neuroprotective strategies.

Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Natalizumab and Fingolimod in Patients with Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Therapies in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis inadequately responding to first-line therapies (interferon-based therapies, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide, known collectively as "BRACETD") often switch to natalizumab or fingolimod. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to estimate the comparative effectiveness of switching to natalizumab or fingolimod or within BRACETD using real-world data and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of switching to natalizumab versus fingolimod using a United Kingdom (UK) third-party payer perspective. METHODS: Real-world data were obtained from MSBase for patients relapsing on BRACETD in the year before switching to natalizumab or fingolimod or within BRACETD. Three-way-multinomial-propensity-score-matched cohorts were identified, and comparisons between treatment groups were conducted for annualised relapse rate (ARR) and 6-month-confirmed disability worsening (CDW6M) and improvement (CDI6M). Results were applied in a cost-effectiveness model over a lifetime horizon using a published Markov structure with health states based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Other model parameters were obtained from the UK MS Survey 2015, published literature, and publicly available UK sources. RESULTS: The MSBase analysis found a significant reduction in ARR (rate ratio [RR] = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.72; p < 0.001) and an increase in CDI6M (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67; 95% CI 1.30-2.15; p < 0.001) for switching to natalizumab compared with BRACETD. For switching to fingolimod, the reduction in ARR (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.81-1.03; p = 0.133) and increase in CDI6M (HR = 1.30; 95% CI 0.99-1.72; p = 0.058) compared with BRACETD were not significant. Switching to natalizumab was associated with a significant reduction in ARR (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.79; p < 0.001) and an increase in CDI6M (HR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.01-1.62; p = 0.040) compared to switching to fingolimod. No evidence of difference in CDW6M was found between treatment groups. Natalizumab dominated (higher quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] and lower costs) fingolimod in the base-case cost-effectiveness analysis (0.453 higher QALYs and £20,843 lower costs per patient). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This novel real-world analysis suggests a clinical benefit for therapy escalation to natalizumab versus fingolimod based on comparative effectiveness results, translating to higher QALYs and lower costs for UK patients inadequately responding to BRACETD.