What will it take to end AIDS in Asia and the Pacific region by 2030?

The 2016 global commitments towards ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 require the Asia-Pacific region to reach the Fast-Track targets by 2020. Despite early successes, the region is well short of meeting these targets. The overall stalled progress in the HIV response has been further undermined by rising new infections among young key populations and the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the HIV situation, assesses the gaps, and analyses what it would take the region to end AIDS by 2030. Political will and commitments for ending AIDS must be reaffirmed and reinforced. Focused regional strategic direction that answers the specific regional context and guides countries to respond to their specific needs must be put in place. The region must harness the power of innovative tools and technology in both prevention and treatment. Community activism and meaningful community engagement across the spectrum of HIV response must be ensured. Punitive laws, stigma, and discrimination that deter key populations and people living with HIV from accessing health services must be effectively tackled. The people-centred public health approach must be fully integrated into national universal health coverage while ensuring domestic resources are available for community-led service delivery. The region must utilise its full potential and draw upon lessons that have been learnt to address common challenges of the HIV and COVID-19 pandemics and achieve the goal of ending AIDS by 2030, in fulfillment of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.

Fast-tracking the end of HIV in the Asia Pacific region: domestic funding of key population-led and civil society organisations.

Ending AIDS in Asia Pacific by 2030 requires countries to give higher priority to financing community-based and key population-led service delivery. Mechanisms must be developed for civil society organisations to deliver health and HIV/AIDS services for key populations, especially men who have sex with men, and transgender people, within national health policy frameworks. Current investments in the HIV response in the Asia Pacific region reflect inadequate HIV financing for key populations, particularly for civil society and key population-led organisations that are optimally positioned to advance HIV epidemic control. These organisations are typically supported by international agencies whose investments are starting to decline. Domestic investments in key population-led organisations are often hampered by punitive laws against their communities, pervasive stigma and discrimination by policy makers, an insufficient understanding of the most effective HIV epidemic control strategies, and financing systems that limit access to funding for these organisations from the national budget. Countries in the Asia Pacific region are evolving their community-based and key population policies and programmes. We need accessible, disaggregated financial data and in-depth case studies that showcase effective key population-led programmes, to enable countries to learn from each other.