Association of program-specific variation in bariatric surgery volume for Medicaid patients and access to care: a tale of inequality?

BACKGROUND: Although patients with lower socioeconomic status are at higher risk of obesity, bariatric surgery utilization among patients with Medicaid is low and may be due to program-specific variation in access. Our goal was to compare bariatric surgery programs by percentage of Medicaid cases and to determine if variation in distribution of patients with Medicaid could be linked to adverse outcomes. METHODS: Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry that included 43 programs performing 97,207 cases between 2006 and 2020, we identified all patients with Medicaid insurance (n = 4780, 4.9%). Bariatric surgery programs were stratified into quartiles according to the percentage of Medicaid cases performed and we compared program-specific characteristics as well as baseline patient characteristics, risk-adjusted complication rates and wait times between top and bottom quartiles. RESULTS: Program-specific distribution of Medicaid cases varied between 0.69 and 22.4%. Programs in the top quartile (n = 11) performed 18,885 cases in total, with a mean of 13% for Medicaid patients, while programs in the bottom quartile (n = 11) performed 32,447 cases in total, with a mean of 1%. Patients undergoing surgery at programs in the top quartile were more likely to be Black (20.2% vs 13.5%, p < 0.0001), have diabetes (35.1% vs 29.5%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (55.1% vs 49.6%, p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (47.6% vs 45.2%, p < 0.0001). Top quartile programs also had higher complication rates (8.4% vs 6.6%, p < 0.0001), extended length of stay (5.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.0001), Emergency Department visits (8.1% vs 6.5%, p < 0.0001) and readmissions (4.7% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001). Median time from initial evaluation to surgery date was also significantly longer among top quartile programs (200 vs 122 days, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery programs that perform a higher proportion of Medicaid cases tend to care for patients with greater disease severity who experience delays in care and also require more resource utilization. Improving bariatric surgery utilization among patients with lower socioeconomic status may benefit from insurance standardization and program-centered incentives to improve access and equitable distribution of care.

Financial Impact of Metabolic Surgery on Prescription Diabetes Medications in Michigan.

This study compares expenditures for diabetes medications before and after metabolic surgery among patients with diabetes in Michigan.

Evaluating the impact of metabolic surgery on patients with prior opioid use.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity and may improve obesity-related pain syndromes. However, the effect of surgery on the persistent use of opioids in patients with a history of prior opioid use remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of metabolic surgery on opioid use behaviors in patients with prior opioid use. SETTING: A consortium of public and private hospitals in Michigan. METHODS: Using a statewide metabolic-specific data registry, we identified 16,820 patients who self-reported opioid use before undergoing metabolic surgery between 2006 and 2020 and analyzed the 8506 (50.6%) patients who responded to 1-year follow-up. We compared patient characteristics, risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative outcomes, and weight loss between patients who self-reported discontinuing opioid use 1 year after surgery and those who did not. RESULTS: Among patients who self-reported using opioids before metabolic surgery, 3864 (45.4%) discontinued use 1 year after surgery. Predictors of persistent opioid use included an annual income of <$10,000 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.44; P = .006), Medicare insurance (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32-1.66; P < .0001), and preoperative tobacco use (OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.16-1.59; P = .0001). Patients with persistent use were more likely to have a surgical complication (9.6% versus 7.5%, P = .0328) and less percent excess weight loss (61.6% versus 64.4%, P < .0001) than patients who discontinued opioids after surgery. There were no differences in the morphine milligram equivalents prescribed within the first 30 days following surgery between groups (122.3 versus 126.5, P = .3181). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients who reported taking opioids before metabolic surgery discontinued use at 1 year. Targeted interventions aimed at high-risk patients may increase the number of patients who discontinue opioid use after metabolic surgery.

Peer Assessment of Operative Videos with Sleeve Gastrectomy to Determine Optimal Operative Technique.

BACKGROUND: Global assessments of technical skill have been associated with surgical outcomes. More detailed understanding of which specific aspects of technique combine to make the "optimal" sleeve gastrectomy are necessary to help surgeons improve their practice. STUDY DESIGN: Practicing bariatric surgeons (n = 30) voluntarily submitted a de-identified video of a typical sleeve gastrectomy that was reviewed by a minimum of 10 peer surgeons on the technical quality of 9 operative maneuvers (ie mobilization of the fundus, stapler location, and sleeve width). An "optimal sleeve gastrectomy score" (OSGS) was calculated as a percentage of the total possible optimal maneuvers performed. Risk-adjusted 30-day complication rates and 1-year weight loss were compared between surgeons in the top and bottom quartile for OSGS for all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy during the time period. RESULTS: OSGS ranged from 49.1% to 82.9%. Surgeons in the top quartile for OSGS had lower rates of surgical complications (1.54% vs 2.75%; odds ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88; p = 0.013), hemorrhage (0.61% vs 1.48%; odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.86; p = 0.013) and reoperation (0.37% vs 0.91%; odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.81; p = 0.010) compared with surgeons in the bottom quartile. The median bougie size was 34F and the optimal location of the stapler near the pylorus and incisura was 5 cm and 2.25 cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sleeve gastrectomy videos thought to have "optimal" technique by peer surgeons were associated with lower complication rates. Understanding how to quantify and assess optimal vs suboptimal techniques can serve as a guide for surgeons to improve their practice.

Incidence and Efficacy of Stent Placement in Leak Management After Bariatric Surgery: An MBSAQIP Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates of use and efficacy of stent placement for postoperative leak following bariatric surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Endoscopically placed stents can successfully treat anastomotic and staple line leaks after bariatric surgery. However, the extent to which stents are used in the management of bariatric complications and rates of reoperation remain unknown. METHODS: Data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participant use files were analyzed for patients who experienced anastomotic or staple line leaks after bariatric surgery, and then evaluated for use of an endoscopically placed stent. Patient and procedure-level data were compared between those who underwent stent placement versus those who required reoperation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: A total of 354,865 bariatric cases were captured in 2015 to 2016. One thousand one hundred thirty patients (0.3%) required intervention for a leak, of whom 275 (24%) were treated with an endoscopically placed stent. One hundred seven (39%) of the patients who received stents required reoperation as part of their care pathway. Patient characteristics were statistically similar when comparing leaks managed with stents to those treated with reoperation alone. Those treated with stents, however, had a higher likelihood of readmission (odds ratio 2.59, 95% confidence interval -1.59 to 4.20). CONCLUSION: Placement of stents for management of leaks after bariatric surgery is common throughout the United States. The use of stents can be effective; however, it does not prevent reoperation and is associated with an increased likelihood of readmission. Both technique and resource utilization should be considered when choosing a management pathway for leaks.

Financial impact of improving patient care setting selection after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Potentially avoidable emergency department (ED) visits are a significant source of excess healthcare spending. Despite improvement in postoperative readmissions, 20% of bariatric surgery patients use the ED postoperatively. Many of these visits may be appropriately managed in lower-acuity centers. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the economic impact of shifting potentially avoidable ED visits after bariatric surgery to lower-acuity centers. SETTING: Statewide quality improvement collaborative. METHODS: We performed an observational study of patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2011 and 2017 using a linked data registry, including clinical data from a large-quality improvement collaborative and payment data from a statewide value collaborative. Postoperative ED visits and readmission rates were determined. Ninety-day ED and urgent care center (UCC) visit claims were matched to a clinical registry. Price-standardized payments for UCC and ED visits without admission were compared. RESULTS: Among the 36,071 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, 8.4% presented to the ED postoperatively. Approximately 50% of these visits resulted in readmission. Three hundred eighty-eight ED visits without readmission (i.e., potentially avoidable ED visits) and 110 UCC encounters with claims data were identified. Triaging a potentially avoidable ED visit to an UCC would generate a savings of $4238 per patient, reducing spending in this cohort by $1.6 million. CONCLUSION: Shifting potentially avoidable ED visits after bariatric surgery could result in significant cost savings. Efforts to improve patients' selection of healthcare setting and increase utilization of lower-acuity centers may serve as a template for appropriately meeting the needs of patients and containing spending after bariatric surgery.

Assessment of mammographic breast density after sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density (BD) is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. The effects of bariatric surgery on BD are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate BD changes after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). SETTING: University hospital, United States. METHODS: Fifty women with mammograms before and after SG performed from 2009 to 2015 were identified after excluding patients with a history of breast cancer, hormone replacement, and/or breast surgery. Patient age, menopausal status, co-morbidities, hemoglobin A1C, and body mass index were collected. Craniocaudal mammographic views before and after SG were interpreted by a blinded radiologist and analyzed by software to obtain breast imaging reporting and data system density categories, breast area, BD, and absolute dense breast area (ADA). Analyses were performed using χ2, McNemar's test, t test, and linear regressions. RESULTS: Radiologist interpretation revealed a significant increase in breast imaging reporting and data system B+C category (68% versus 54%; P = .0095) and BD (9.8 ± 7.4% versus 8.3 ± 6.4%; P = .0006) after SG. Software analyses showed a postoperative decrease in breast area (75,398.9 ± 22,941.2 versus 90,655.9 ± 25,621.0 pixels; P < .0001) and ADA (7287.1 ± 3951.3 versus 8204.6 ± 4769.9 pixels; P = .0314) with no significant change in BD. Reduction in ADA was accentuated in postmenopausal patients. Declining breast area was directly correlated with body mass index reduction (R2 = .4495; P < 0.0001). Changes in breast rather than whole body adiposity better explained ADA reduction. Neither diabetes status nor changes in hemoglobin A1C correlated with changes in ADA. CONCLUSIONS: ADA decreases after SG, particularly in postmenopausal patients. Software-generated ADA may be more accurate than radiologist-estimated BD or breast imaging reporting and data system for capturing changes in dense breast tissue after SG.