Insurance Status But Not Race and Ethnicity Are Associated With Outcomes in a Large Hospitalized Cohort of Patients With Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Insurance, race, and ethnicity can affect outcomes of patients with cirrhosis, but findings from prospective studies are unclear. We investigated the role of insurance status and race and ethnicity (race/ethnicity) on inpatient and 90-day postdischarge outcomes in a large inpatient cohort of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We used data from the North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease (NACSELD) database, from 13 tertiary care centers. Insurance status (uninsured, Medicare, Medicaid, private, and Canadian), race, and ethnicity, were analyzed independent of clinical covariates for their association with transfer to the intensive care unit, acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF), length of hospital stay, inpatient and 90-day death or liver transplantation, and readmission to the hospital within 90 days. Multi-variable analyses and interaction terms were created for insurance, race/ethnicity, and for each outcome, with or without Canadian patients. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 2640 patients in the NACSELD database (971 with private insurance, 770 with Medicare, 456 Canadians, 265 with Medicaid, 178 uninsured, 540 non-Caucasian and 220 Hispanic); 23% required admittance to the intensive care unit, 12% developed NACSELD-defined ACLF, 7% died, 5% underwent liver transplantation. Of the 2288 patients discharged from hospital, 13% underwent liver transplantation, 19% died, and 42% were readmitted within 90 days. In the univariate model, uninsured patients accounted for the highest percentage of alcohol- or bleeding-related admissions and the lowest proportion of outpatient cirrhosis-related medication users. Canadians had the lowest rifaximin use and but higher proportions had hepatic encephalopathy, compared with other groups. Lack of insurance was higher among non-Caucasians, regardless of Hispanic ethnicity. In multi-variable analysis, lack of insurance was associated with ACLF (P = .02) and inversely associated with inpatient liver transplant (P = .05) and 90-day liver transplant (P = .02), regardless of whether Canadians were included or specific insurance type. Race or ethnicity were not significantly associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In analyzing the NACSELD database, we found that insurance status, but not race or ethnicity, were independently associated with ACLF and inpatient or 90-day liver transplantation, regardless of inclusion of Canadian patients.

Increased access to liver transplantation for patients with acute on chronic liver failure after implementation of Share 35 Rule: An analysis from the UNOS database.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF), leads to high mortality. These patients are at risk of being delisted for liver transplantation (LT). Emerging data shows 1y post-transplant survival of 80-92%. The Share 35 (S35) policy was implemented to prioritize patients with MELD ≥35 on the LT waitlist. Our aim was to compare the LT outcomes of ACLF patients as a result of S35. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the UNOS scientific registry were used to classify ACLF patients using the NACSELD criteria. For the analyses, data were divided into two eras; 2 years before S35 (Era 1) and 2 years after S35 (Era 2). Waitlist status was classified into categories: Transplanted, Death or Too Sick to Transplant and Still Waiting/Other. LT cumulative incidence between the populations in the eras was calculated using Fine and Gray's method. A proportional hazards model was used to investigate the era effect on cumulative incidence of LT. RESULTS: 46,861 patients were reviewed, of which 817 had ACLF. 366 patients (mean MELD: 37.1) were identified in Era 1 and 451 patients (mean MELD: 37.3) in Era 2. We found that ACLF patients were more likely to receive a liver transplant in Era 2 (p=0.0074). In both eras, transplanted patients had a significantly higher survival than those who were not transplanted (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that S35 improved LT rate for ACLF suggesting that there should be broader recognition of ACLF and early transplantation should be pursued.

Liver transplantation: from Child to MELD.

The widespread availability of transplantation in most major medical centers in the United States, together with a growing number of transplant candidates, has made it necessary for primary care providers, especially internal medicine and family practice physicians to be active in the clinical care of these patients before and after transplantation. This review provides an overview of the liver transplantation process, including indications, contraindications, time of referral to a transplant center, the current organ allocation system, and briefly touches on the expanding field of living donor liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation in the MELD era: a single-center experience.

Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score has been used to allocate organs since February 2002. This policy allocates organs to candidates with regard to severity of their underlying liver disease except in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of MELD on waiting times, dropout rates, and transplantation rates in all patients awaiting liver transplantation at our center. The records of all patients listed for liver transplantation between May 28, 1999, and February 27, 2004, at the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, were reviewed. Candidates were grouped by two time periods as pre-MELD or post-MELD based on date of MELD implementation (February 27, 2002). The incidence of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), waiting time to DDLT, dropout rate from the waiting list because of clinical deterioration or death, and survival while waiting for or after DDLT were determined for each group. Three hundred fifty-one patients were listed for liver transplantation (195 pre-MELD, 156 post-MELD) during the study period. HCC patients had an improved rate of transplantation after MELD (pre-MELD, 1.39 persons per year; post-MELD, 3.48 persons per year). In all groups, with the exception of hepatitis C virus, the transplantation rates were the same for both categories. The hepatitis C virus group also had improved transplantation rates in the post-MELD period. HCC candidates under the new allocation policy have an increased incidence of DDLT in our institution. However, this has not disadvantaged patients with non-HCC diagnoses. Thus, the new MELD-based allocation policy has benefited all candidates by allowing more timely transplants.

Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system.

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is used to assign priority for liver transplantation candidates. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved recognized exceptional diagnoses (RED's) for which MELD fails to accurately measure priority. Centers can request increased MELD points in cases not recognized by this policy (non-RED's). Our aim was to compare regional practices to justify non-RED requests for MELD adjustments. The UNOS/OPTN database was queried to extract all adult cases for which a non-RED MELD adjustment was requested from 2/27/02 until 8/27/03. The data were stratified by region and justification. Data for 29,510 listings were available. 26,947 had complete diagnosis information. There were 827 non-RED requests of which 477 (57.7%) petitions were approved by the regional review boards (RRBs). The approval rate varied significantly among regions (range: 28-75%, p<0.0001). The most common non-RED's were complications of portal hypertension (48%). The percentage of patients listed with non-RED's varied significantly among regions (0.7-8.3 %, p<0.0001), as did the proportion of patients transplanted with non-RED's (2.1-31.9%, p<0.0001). Demographics did not differ among regions requesting non-REDs.Widespread regional variations exist in the handling of requests for non-REDs. These variations point to the need for reform to standard exception criteria.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.

The new allocation policy of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) gives candidates with stage T1 or stage T2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a priority MELD score beyond their degree of hepatic decompensation. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the new allocation policy on HCC candidates before and after the institution of MELD. The UNOS database was reviewed for all HCC candidates listed between July 1999 and July 2002. The candidates were grouped by two time periods, based on the date of implementation of new allocation policy of February 27, 2002. Pre-MELD candidates were listed for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) before February 27,2002, and post-MELD candidates were listed after February 27, 2002. Candidates were compared by incidence of DDLT, time to DDLT, and dropout rate from the waiting list because of clinical deterioration or death, and survival while waiting and after DDLT. Incidence rates calculated for pre-MELD and post-MELD periods were expressed in person years. During the study, 2,074 HCC candidates were listed for DDLT in the UNOS database. The DDLT incidence rate was 0.439 transplant/person years pre-MELD and 1.454 transplant/person years post-MELD (P < 0.001). The time to DDLT was 2.28 years pre-MELD and 0.69 years post-MELD (P < 0.001). The 5-month dropout rate was 16.5% pre-MELD and 8.5% post-MELD (P < 0.001). The 5-month waiting-list survival was 90.3% pre-MELD and 95.7% post-MELD (P < 0.001). The 5-month survival after DDLT was similar for both time periods. The new allocation policy has led to an increased incidence rate of DDLT in HCC candidates. Furthermore, the 5-month dropout rate has decreased significantly. In addition, 5-month survival while waiting has increased in the post-MELD period. Thus, the new MELD-based allocation policy has benefited HCC candidates.

A concise update on the status of liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: the challenges in 2002.

Significant improvements in both patient and graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure have been made during the last decade. Recurrence of HBV infection has decreased, even in high-risk patients. Despite ongoing progress, challenges remain for the next millennium, including the determination of cost-effective dosing strategies, treatment of HBV infection in liver transplant recipients, and ramifications of the use of new antiviral agents, specifically, the appearance of resistant strains. This review summarizes the relevant history of OLT for chronic viral hepatitis B, details accepted preventive and therapeutic treatments, and discusses ongoing experimental trials. Emphasis also is placed on new approaches in transplantation as they impact on the care of HBV-infected patients.