Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative donor-recipient matching model for liver transplantation: results from a multicenter Spanish study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is an increasing discrepancy between the number of potential liver graft recipients and the number of organs available. Organ allocation should follow the concept of benefit of survival, avoiding human-innate subjectivity. The aim of this study is to use artificial-neural-networks (ANNs) for donor-recipient (D-R) matching in liver transplantation (LT) and to compare its accuracy with validated scores (MELD, D-MELD, DRI, P-SOFT, SOFT, and BAR) of graft survival. METHODS: 64 donor and recipient variables from a set of 1003 LTs from a multicenter study including 11 Spanish centres were included. For each D-R pair, common statistics (simple and multiple regression models) and ANN formulae for two non-complementary probability-models of 3-month graft-survival and -loss were calculated: a positive-survival (NN-CCR) and a negative-loss (NN-MS) model. The NN models were obtained by using the Neural Net Evolutionary Programming (NNEP) algorithm. Additionally, receiver-operating-curves (ROC) were performed to validate ANNs against other scores. RESULTS: Optimal results for NN-CCR and NN-MS models were obtained, with the best performance in predicting the probability of graft-survival (90.79%) and -loss (71.42%) for each D-R pair, significantly improving results from multiple regressions. ROC curves for 3-months graft-survival and -loss predictions were significantly more accurate for ANN than for other scores in both NN-CCR (AUROC-ANN=0.80 vs. -MELD=0.50; -D-MELD=0.54; -P-SOFT=0.54; -SOFT=0.55; -BAR=0.67 and -DRI=0.42) and NN-MS (AUROC-ANN=0.82 vs. -MELD=0.41; -D-MELD=0.47; -P-SOFT=0.43; -SOFT=0.57, -BAR=0.61 and -DRI=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: ANNs may be considered a powerful decision-making technology for this dataset, optimizing the principles of justice, efficiency and equity. This may be a useful tool for predicting the 3-month outcome and a potential research area for future D-R matching models.

Immunosuppressant treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and quality of life in renal and liver transplant recipients in Spain.

To assess the adherence to immunosuppressant therapy (IST) and perceived barriers affecting IST adherence and quality of life (QOL) in patients who had received a renal (RT) or liver transplant (LT), a questionnaire was sent to over 9000 RT and LT recipients in Spain. Questionnaire comprised questions about patient's socio-demographic, organ transplant and medication characteristics; IST adherence and patient's perceived barriers to adherence; and patient's QOL using the EuroQol. Data from 1983 RT patients and 1479 LT patients were analyzed. Self-reported adherence to IST in RT (92.6%) and LT (88.5%) recipients was high. Daily medication intake (mean of 2-3 doses/d per patient) was considered a lifestyle restriction in about 25% of transplant recipients and was the most common barrier to adherence perceived by over 30% of RT and LT patients. Overall, high-intensity treatment regimens were associated with poorer QOL (EuroQol <70) compared with low-intensity treatment regimens. Most RT (71.0%) and LT (61.4%) patients would prefer to suppress the evening dose if they were able to. Although high adherence rates to IST were reported in this first large Spanish survey in RT and LT patients, adjustment of daily treatment intensity by less frequent dosing may be an adequate strategy to minimize barriers to adherence and improve QOL.

[Chronic nephropathy in non-kidney transplantation: [prevention, early diagnosis and management]. / Nefropatía crónica en trasplante no renal: prevención, diagnóstico precoz y manejo.

Transplant from solid nonrenal organ has experienced an important increase in the last decades. It is due to the increasing improvement of the results obtained with the above mentioned transplants. Parallel, many nonrenal transplanted patients have developed a chronic renal failure that has determined, in some cases, the need of beginning the substitution of renal function by means of dialysis and/or transplant. The origin of the same one is multifactorial and the consequences derived from it are very important so much in morbimortality as of economic nature for the set of the system. The present review tries to help to the identification of risk factors of renal insufficiency in the nonrenal transplanted patient and to determine which might be the basic concepts of prevention, early diagnosis and of derivation to the nephrologist expert in transplants and renal dysfunction. Finally, we check the possibilities of managing of the immunosuppressive treatment and substitution of renal function by means of dialysis and/or simple or double transplant.