Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32842493

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing ileostomy surgery often experience electrolyte disturbances and dehydration, especially during the first post-operative period. Recently, research has also begun on how the newly constructed ileostomy affects the patient's nutritional status. AIM: The aim of the present pilot study was to assess the nutritional status of patients before and after the construction of the ileostomy as well as nutrition-related factors. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was a pilot study. The sample consisted of 13 adult patients diagnosed with colorectal or colon cancer who underwent scheduled ileostomy surgery. The evaluation tool used was "Original Full Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)". Patients underwent nutritional assessment before the surgery (time 0), on the 7th post-operative day (time 1), and on the 20th post-operative day (time 2). The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: All patients had a drop in MNA score on the 7th and 20th post-operative days. Factors associated with MNA were weight loss, mobility, body mass index (BMI), number of full meals consumed per day, portions of fruits and vegetables consumed per day, and mid-arm circumference, p < 0.05, respectively. Pre-operatively, 38.5%, of patients had severe weight loss (>3 kg), 23% moderate weight loss and 38.5% minimal weight loss. Pre-operatively, 92.3% of participants were able to move on their own and 69.2% on the 20th post-operatively day. Furthermore, BMI >23 kg/m2 had 84.6% of participants pre-operatively and 30.8% on the 20th post-operative day. In terms of portions of fruits and vegetables consumed per day, 30.8% of patients consumed at least 2 times, pre-operatively and no one (0%) on the 20th post-operative day. Moreover, pre-operatively all participants (100%) had arm circumference >22 cm while on the 20th post-operative day, only 38.5% of participants had arm circumference >22 cm. CONCLUSIONS: In the first 20 days after the construction of an ileostomy, the nutritional status of the patients is significantly affected. Decreased patient nutrition in both quantity and ingredients and reduced fluid intake appear to adversely affect the patient's nutritional status.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Desnutrição/etiologia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Projetos Piloto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Redução de Peso
2.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds ; 19(2): 165-179, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31973632

RESUMO

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus that needs a multidisciplinary approach. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patients' characteristics, anxiety/depression, and adherence to guidelines on the QoL of patients with diabetic ulcer. The sample of the study consisted of 195 patients. Data collected by the completion of SF-36 Health Survey, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a questionnaire that measured adherence to self-care activities. Patients had moderate- to high-quality levels in emotional well-being, pain, social functioning, and energy/fatigue (median: 68, 68, 63, and 60, respectively), while they had low levels of quality in physical functioning, role physical, and role emotional (median: 21, 0, and 33, respectively). In their general health, patients had moderate levels (median: 50). High levels of anxiety and depression were observed in 13.8% and 20.0% of the participants, respectively. After multiple regression, regarding general QoL, patients living in the capital city had 9.89 points worse general health than patients living in Attica (ß = -9.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -16.86 to 2.93, P = .006). Patients with moderate or high levels of anxiety had 9.37 and 16.08 points, respectively, worse general health than those with low levels (ß = -9.37, 95% CI = -17.04 to 1.70, P = .017, and ß = -16.08, 95% CI = -26.65 to -5.51, P = .003, respectively). Clinically, these findings may help health professionals attain effective treatment of emotional burden to DFU patients and increase adherence to self-care.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Depressão , Complicações do Diabetes , Pé Diabético , Cooperação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Autocuidado , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/fisiopatologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Complicações do Diabetes/psicologia , Pé Diabético/epidemiologia , Pé Diabético/psicologia , Pé Diabético/terapia , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Feminino , Grécia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/psicologia , Interação Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA