Functional Assessment of Intermediate Vascular Disease.

Interventional treatment in various vascular beds has advanced tremendously. However, there are several problems to be considered. We searched the literature and tried to analyze major parts of it. One is safety and applicability of coronary proven methods in other vascular beds. An unresolved problem is the functional assessment of intermediate lesions, as far as various target organs have quite different circulation from the coronary one and the functional tests should be modified in order to be applicable and meaningful. In the majority of the acute vascular syndromes, the culprit lesion is of intermediate size on visual assessment. On the other hand, a procedurally successfully managed high-degree stenosis is not always followed by clinical and prognostic benefit. In vascular beds, where collateral network naturally exists, the readings from the functional assessment are complicated and thus the decision for interventional treatment is even more difficult. Here come into help the functional assessment and imaging with IVUS, OCT, high-resolution MRI, and contrast enhanced CT or SPECT. The focus of the current review is on the functional assessment of intermediate stenosis in other vascular beds, unlike the coronary arteries.

Prediction of troponin elevation by means of intracoronary electrocardiogram during percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions (from COronary SIde Branch Residual IschemiA and COllateralization Assessment Study; COSIBRIA & Co Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of periprocedural ischaemia on coronary artery bifurcation stenting (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) remains uncertain. AIM: To determine the differences in rates of end procedural ischaemia after bifurcation lesion PCI detected with intracoronary electrocardiography (icECG). METHODS: Unipolar icECGs were recorded before, during, and after stent placement and at the end of procedure in side branch (SB) and main branch (MB). Coronary wire was placed in all distal vessels with diameter > 1.5 mm to "map" the distal zones of ischaemia. The patient population consisted of patients with stable/unstable angina with troponin I evaluated before and after PCI. RESULTS: We studied 147 patients (68% males) with mean age of 64 ± 9 years. One hundred and forty-two patients had icECG recordings at the end of PCI from all locations of the treated region; 36% of patients had MB ST segment elevation (STE) and 31% had icECG STE in the SB region (p = 0.378). The icECG had sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81% to detect troponin I elevation, with positive predictive value of 81% and negative predictive value of 83%. The independent predictors of troponin increase (> 5 × N) were: sex (for female gender, OR = 0.130, CI 0.017-0.995, p = 0.049), previous myocardial infarction (OR = 33.23, CI 2.802-394.1, p = 0.005), and icECG STE in MB or SB or occlusion of secondary SB (OR = 7.877, CI 2.474-25.07, p < 0.001) and for any troponin elevation were double product - SBPxHR (OR = 0.999, CI 0.999-1.00, p = 0.022) and icECG STE in MB or SB or occlusion of secondary SB (OR = 9.762, CI 3.273-29.12, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary electrocardiography is a highly sensitive and specific method for determination of ischaemic regions and prediction of elevated troponin I.

Assessment of clinical, electrocardiographic, and physiological relevance of diagonal branch in left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcation lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the clinical, electrocardiographic, and physiological relevance of main and side branches in coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Discrepancy exists between stenosis severity and clinical outcomes in bifurcation lesions. However, its mechanism has not been fully evaluated yet. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) bifurcation lesions were prospectively enrolled. Chest pain and 12-lead electrocardiogram were assessed after 1-min occlusion of coronary flow and coronary wedge pressure (Pw) was measured using a pressure wire. RESULTS: ST-segment elevation was more frequent during LAD occlusion (92%) than during diagonal branch occlusion (37%) (p < 0.001). Pain score was also higher with the occlusion of LAD than with the diagonal branch (p < 0.001). However, both Pw and Pw/aortic pressure (Pa) were lower in the LAD than in diagonal branches (Pw: 21.0 ± 6.5 vs. 26.7 ± 9.4, p < 0.0001; Pw/Pa: 0.22 ± 0.07 vs. 0.27 ± 0.08, p = 0.001). The corrected QT interval was prolonged with LAD occlusion (435.0 ± 39.6 ms to 454.0 ± 45.4 ms, p < 0.0001) but not with diagonal branch occlusion. There was no difference in vessel size between the diagonal branches with and without ST-segment elevation during occlusion. Positive and negative predictive values of vessel size (≥2.5 mm) to determine the presence of ST-segment elevation were 48% and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diagonal branch occlusion caused fewer anginas, less electrocardiogram change, less arrhythmogenic potential, and higher Pw than did a LAD occlusion. These differences seem to be the main mechanism explaining why aggressive treatment for side branches has not translated into clinical benefit in coronary bifurcation lesions. (Comparison Between Main Branch and Side Branch Vessels; NCT01046409).