Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Promot J Austr ; 34(3): 629-633, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37379857

RESUMO

Health in All Policies approaches support the integration of health considerations into the policies of traditionally siloed governance systems. These siloed systems are often ignorant of the fact that health is created outside of the health system and starts long before you see a health professional. Thus, the purpose of Health in All Policies approaches is to raise the importance of the broad-based impacts on health from these public policies and to implement healthy public policy that delivers human rights for all. This approach requires significant adjustments to current economic and social policy settings. A well-being economy similarly aspires to create policy incentives that increase the importance of social and non-monetized outcomes, such as increased social cohesion environmental sustainability and health. These outcomes can evolve deliberately alongside economic benefits and are impacted by economic and market activities. The principles and functions underpinning Health in All Policies approaches, such as joined-up policy making can be helpful to transition towards a well-being economy. Governments will need to move beyond the currently held principle of "economic growth and profit above all else" if countries are to tackle growing societal inequity and catastrophic climate changes. Rapid digitization and globalization have further entrenched the focus on monetary economic outcomes rather than other aspects of human welfare. This has created an increasingly difficult context within which to prioritize social policies and efforts aimed to achieve primarily social and not profit-oriented goals. In the face of this larger context, alone, Health in All Policies approaches will not bring about the needed transformation to achieve healthy populations and economic transition. However, Health in All Policies approaches do offer lessons and a rationale that is aligned with, and can support the transition to, a well-being economy. Transforming current economic approaches to a well-being economy is imperative to achieve equitable population health, social security and climate sustainability.


Assuntos
Formulação de Políticas , Política Pública , Humanos , Nível de Saúde
3.
J Urban Health ; 98(Suppl 1): 60-68, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34435262

RESUMO

Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) represent a significant global public health burden. As more countries experience both epidemiologic transition and increasing urbanization, it is clear that we need approaches to mitigate the growing burden of NCDs. Large and growing urban environments play an important role in shaping risk factors that influence NCDs, pointing to the ineluctable need to engage sectors beyond the health sector in these settings if we are to improve health. By way of one example, the transportation sector plays a critical role in building and sustaining health outcomes in urban environments in general and in megacities in particular. We conducted a qualitative comparative case study design. We compared Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) policies in 3 megacities-Lagos (Africa), Bogotá (South America), and Beijing (Asia). We examined the extent to which data on the social determinants of health, equity considerations, and multisectoral approaches were incorporated into local politics and the decision-making processes surrounding BRT. We found that all three megacities paid inadequate attention to health in their agenda-setting, despite having considerable healthy transportation policies in principle. BRT system policies have the opportunity to improve lifestyle choices for NCDs through a focus on safe, affordable, and effective forms of transportation. There are opportunities to improve decision-making for health by involving more available data for health, building on existing infrastructures, building stronger political leadership and commitments, and establishing formal frameworks to improve multisectoral collaborations within megacities. Future research will benefit from addressing the political and bureaucratic processes of using health data when designing public transportation services, the political and social obstacles involved, and the cross-national lessons that can be learned from other megacities.


Assuntos
Doenças não Transmissíveis , Saúde da População , Cidades , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Nigéria , Doenças não Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Meios de Transporte
4.
Bull World Health Organ ; 94(6): 462-7, 2016 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27274598

RESUMO

Governments in low- and middle-income countries are legitimizing the implementation of universal health coverage (UHC), following a United Nation's resolution on UHC in 2012 and its reinforcement in the sustainable development goals set in 2015. UHC will differ in each country depending on country contexts and needs, as well as demand and supply in health care. Therefore, fundamental issues such as objectives, users and cost-effectiveness of UHC have been raised by policy-makers and stakeholders. While priority-setting is done on a daily basis by health authorities - implicitly or explicitly - it has not been made clear how priority-setting for UHC should be conducted. We provide justification for explicit health priority-setting and guidance to countries on how to set priorities for UHC.


Les gouvernements des pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire sont en train de légitimer la mise en place de la couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU), suite à une résolution des Nations Unies de 2012 sur la CSU et à son entérinement dans les objectifs de développement durable fixés en 2015. La CSU variera selon les pays, en fonction de leur contexte et de leurs besoins, ainsi qu'en fonction de la demande et de l'offre de soins. Des questions fondamentales ont ainsi été soulevées par les responsables politiques et les parties prenantes, portant notamment sur les objectifs, les utilisateurs et le rapport coût-efficacité de la CSU. Si les autorités sanitaires déterminent quotidiennement des priorités, de façon implicite ou explicite, la marche à suivre pour définir les priorités en matière de CSU n'a pas été clairement établie. Nous justifions ici la nécessité de définir explicitement les priorités dans le domaine de la santé tout en donnant des orientations aux pays pour définir les priorités en matière de CSU.


Los gobiernos de países con ingresos bajos y medios están legitimando la implementación de una cobertura sanitaria universal (CSU) tras un acuerdo de las Naciones Unidas acerca de la cobertura sanitaria universal en 2012 y su consolidación en los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible establecidos en 2015. Cada país tendrá una cobertura sanitaria universal distinta, según el contexto y las necesidades de cada uno, así como la oferta y la demanda de atención sanitaria. Por tanto, los responsables políticos y partes interesadas han abordado los asuntos fundamentales como los objetivos, los usuarios y la rentabilidad de la cobertura sanitaria universal. A pesar de que las autoridades sanitarias han establecido prioridades diarias (de forma implícita o explícita), no se ha aclarado cómo se debería gestionar el establecimiento de prioridades para la cobertura sanitaria universal. Se ofrece una justificación para el establecimiento de prioridades sanitarias explícitas y orientación a los países en la definición de prioridades para la cobertura sanitaria universal.


Assuntos
Prioridades em Saúde/organização & administração , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Nações Unidas
5.
Health Syst Reform ; 2(3): 229-240, 2016 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31514599

RESUMO

Women make up approximately 75% of the health workforce and yet their representation at higher levels of health leadership is limited. Untapped potential of women in health undermines the contribution they could make to effective leadership for health systems strengthening. Lived experiences of women leaders can help understand how to unlock this potential by identifying the challenges, highlighting enablers, and sharing successful strategies used to become effective health leaders. This article uses phenomenological inquiry to understand the subjective experiences of five influential women in their paths to health leadership. Interviews were conducted with these women and key messages were identified. A grounding theme-defined as the essential element for the subjective experience of leading as a woman in the health system-was revealed to be the women's "drive for equity." This drive motivated them to pursue a career in health and to break through perceived gender-related barriers. Three figural themes around how to practice effective health leadership to promote equity were identified: (1) challenging status quos and norms; (2) leading by listening and leveraging others' expertise to build a common vision for health; and (3) having social support early on to develop confidence and credibility. Stories from the individual women's experiences are presented. Finally, three recommendations are made for system-level mechanisms that could contribute to expanding the number of women leaders in health.

6.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 38(1): 17-27, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26506317

RESUMO

Monitoring inequalities in health is fundamental to the equitable and progressive realization of universal health coverage (UHC). A successful approach to global inequality monitoring must be intuitive enough for widespread adoption, yet maintain technical credibility. This article discusses methodological considerations for equity-oriented monitoring of UHC, and proposes recommendations for monitoring and target setting. Inequality is multidimensional, such that the extent of inequality may vary considerably across different dimensions such as economic status, education, sex, and urban/rural residence. Hence, global monitoring should include complementary dimensions of inequality (such as economic status and urban/rural residence) as well as sex. For a given dimension of inequality, subgroups for monitoring must be formulated taking into consideration applicability of the criteria across countries and subgroup heterogeneity. For economic-related inequality, we recommend forming subgroups as quintiles, and for urban/rural inequality we recommend a binary categorization. Inequality spans populations, thus appropriate approaches to monitoring should be based on comparisons between two subgroups (gap approach) or across multiple subgroups (whole spectrum approach). When measuring inequality absolute and relative measures should be reported together, along with disaggregated data; inequality should be reported alongside the national average. We recommend targets based on proportional reductions in absolute inequality across populations. Building capacity for health inequality monitoring is timely, relevant, and important. The development of high-quality health information systems, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting practices that are linked to review and evaluation cycles across health systems, will enable effective global and national health inequality monitoring. These actions will support equity-oriented progressive realization of UHC.


Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde , Países em Desenvolvimento , Humanos , América Latina , Vigilância da População , Saúde da População Rural , Classe Social , Saúde da População Urbana , Populações Vulneráveis/classificação
7.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 38(1): 17-27, jul. 2015. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-761793

RESUMO

El monitoreo de las desigualdades en la salud es fundamental para el logro progresivo y equitativo de la cobertura universal de salud. Para que tenga éxito, el monitoreo global de las desigualdades debe ser lo suficientemente intuitivo a fin de que pueda adoptarse ampliamente y debe mantener al mismo tiempo su credibilidad técnica. En este artículo se analizan algunas consideraciones metodológicas para el monitoreo de la cobertura universal de salud orientado a la equidad y se proponen recomendaciones con respecto al monitoreo y el establecimiento de metas. La desigualdad es multidimensional, de modo que el grado de desigualdad puede variar considerablemente entre distintas dimensiones, como la posición económica, la educación, el sexo y la residencia urbana o rural. Por ello, el monitoreo global debe incluir dimensiones complementarias de la desigualdad (como la posición económica y la residencia urbana o rural) y el sexo. Para una dimensión dada de la desigualdad, deben establecerse subgrupos para el monitoreo considerando la aplicabilidad de los criterios entre los países y la heterogeneidad de los subgrupos. En el caso de la desigualdad asociada a la posición económica, recomendamos formar subgrupos utilizando quintiles y para la desigualdad por residencia urbana o rural, recomendamos una categorización binaria. La desigualdad abarca las poblaciones, por lo que los enfoques apropiados para el monitoreo deben basarse en comparaciones entre dos subgrupos (enfoque de brecha) o entre múltiples subgrupos (enfoque de gradiente o espectro completo). Al medirse la desigualdad, las mediciones absolutas y relativas deben comunicarse al mismo tiempo, junto con los datos desagregados; la desigualdad debe informarse junto con el promedio nacional. Recomendamos establecer metas que se basen en reducciones proporcionales de la desigualdad absoluta en los grupos poblacionales. Crear la capacidad de monitorear las desigualdades en la salud es oportuno, pertinente e importante. El desarrollo de sistemas de información de salud de alta calidad, incluidas la recolección, el análisis y la interpretación de los datos y las prácticas de presentación de informes vinculadas a los ciclos de revisión y evaluación en los sistemas de salud, permitirá realizar un monitoreo eficaz de las desigualdades en la salud a escala mundial y nacional. Estas medidas apoyarán el logro progresivo de la cobertura universal de salud orientado a la equidad.


Monitoring inequalities in health is fundamental to the equitable and progressive realization of universal health coverage (UHC). A successful approach to global inequality monitoring must be intuitive enough for widespread adoption, yet maintain technical credibility. This article discusses methodological considerations for equity-oriented monitoring of UHC, and proposes recommendations for monitoring and target setting. Inequality is multidimensional, such that the extent of inequality may vary considerably across different dimensions such as economic status, education, sex, and urban/rural residence. Hence, global monitoring should include complementary dimensions of inequality (such as economic status and urban/rural residence) as well as sex. For a given dimension of inequality, subgroups for monitoring must be formulated taking into consideration applicability of the criteria across countries and subgroup heterogeneity. For economic-related inequality, we recommend forming subgroups as quintiles, and for urban/rural inequality we recommend a binary categorization. Inequality spans populations, thus appropriate approaches to monitoring should be based on comparisons between two subgroups (gap approach) or across multiple subgroups (whole spectrum approach). When measuring inequality absolute and relative measures should be reported together, along with disaggregated data; inequality should be reported alongside the national average. We recommend targets based on proportional reductions in absolute inequality across populations. Building capacity for health inequality monitoring is timely, relevant, and important. The development of high-quality health information systems, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting practices that are linked to review and evaluation cycles across health systems, will enable effective global and national health inequality monitoring. These actions will support equity-oriented progressive realization of UHC.


Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde , Acesso Universal aos Serviços de Saúde , Cobertura Universal de Saúde
9.
PLoS Med ; 11(9): e1001727, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25243463

RESUMO

Monitoring inequalities in health is fundamental to the equitable and progressive realization of universal health coverage (UHC). A successful approach to global inequality monitoring must be intuitive enough for widespread adoption, yet maintain technical credibility. This article discusses methodological considerations for equity-oriented monitoring of UHC, and proposes recommendations for monitoring and target setting. Inequality is multidimensional, such that the extent of inequality may vary considerably across different dimensions such as economic status, education, sex, and urban/rural residence. Hence, global monitoring should include complementary dimensions of inequality (such as economic status and urban/rural residence) as well as sex. For a given dimension of inequality, subgroups for monitoring must be formulated taking into consideration applicability of the criteria across countries and subgroup heterogeneity. For economic-related inequality, we recommend forming subgroups as quintiles, and for urban/rural inequality we recommend a binary categorization. Inequality spans populations, thus appropriate approaches to monitoring should be based on comparisons between two subgroups (gap approach) or across multiple subgroups (whole spectrum approach). When measuring inequality absolute and relative measures should be reported together, along with disaggregated data; inequality should be reported alongside the national average. We recommend targets based on proportional reductions in absolute inequality across populations. Building capacity for health inequality monitoring is timely, relevant, and important. The development of high-quality health information systems, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting practices that are linked to review and evaluation cycles across health systems, will enable effective global and national health inequality monitoring. These actions will support equity-oriented progressive realization of UHC.


Assuntos
Saúde Global/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/economia , Saúde Global/tendências , Recursos em Saúde/tendências , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/tendências
10.
Lancet ; 384(9960): 2164-71, 2014 Dec 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24793339

RESUMO

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) represent almost half the world's population, and all five national governments recently committed to work nationally, regionally, and globally to ensure that universal health coverage (UHC) is achieved. This analysis reviews national efforts to achieve UHC. With a broad range of health indicators, life expectancy (ranging from 53 years to 73 years), and mortality rate in children younger than 5 years (ranging from 10·3 to 44·6 deaths per 1000 livebirths), a review of progress in each of the BRICS countries shows that each has some way to go before achieving UHC. The BRICS countries show substantial, and often similar, challenges in moving towards UHC. On the basis of a review of each country, the most pressing problems are: raising insufficient public spending; stewarding mixed private and public health systems; ensuring equity; meeting the demands for more human resources; managing changing demographics and disease burdens; and addressing the social determinants of health. Increases in public funding can be used to show how BRICS health ministries could accelerate progress to achieve UHC. Although all the BRICS countries have devoted increased resources to health, the biggest increase has been in China, which was probably facilitated by China's rapid economic growth. However, the BRICS country with the second highest economic growth, India, has had the least improvement in public funding for health. Future research to understand such different levels of prioritisation of the health sector in these countries could be useful. Similarly, the role of strategic purchasing in working with powerful private sectors, the effect of federal structures, and the implications of investment in primary health care as a foundation for UHC could be explored. These issues could serve as the basis on which BRICS countries focus their efforts to share ideas and strategies.


Assuntos
Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/organização & administração , Brasil , China , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Financiamento da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Índia , Federação Russa , África do Sul , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/economia , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 34(6): 468-472, dic. 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-702723

RESUMO

Underpinning the global commitment to universal health coverage (UHC) is the fundamental role of health for well-being and sustainable development. UHC is proposed as an umbrella health goal in the post-2015 sustainable development agenda because it implies universal and equitable effective delivery of comprehensive health services by a strong health system, aligned with multiple sectors around the shared goal of better health. In this paper, we argue that social determinants of health (SDH) are central to both the equitable pursuit of healthy lives and the provision of health services for all and, therefore, should be expressly incorporated into the framework for monitoring UHC. This can be done by: (a) disaggregating UHC indicators by different measures of socioeconomic position to reflect the social gradient and the complexity of social stratification; and (b) connecting health indicators, both outcomes and coverage, with SDH and policies within and outside of the health sector. Not locating UHC in the context of action on SDH increases the risk of going down a narrow route that limits the right to health to coverage of services and financial protection.


El respaldo al compromiso mundial con la cobertura universal de salud representa la principal función de la salud en favor del bienestar y el desarrollo sostenible. La cobertura universal de salud se propone como una meta general de salud en el programa de desarrollo sostenible para después del 2015, pues conlleva una prestación eficaz, universal y equitativa de servicios de salud integrales por medio de un sistema de salud fuerte, en consonancia con múltiples sectores en torno a la meta compartida de una mejor salud. En el presente artículo, se sostiene que los determinantes sociales de la salud son centrales en la búsqueda equitativa de vidas saludables y también en la prestación de servicios de salud para todos y, por consiguiente, estos determinantes se deben incorporar explícitamente en el marco de la vigilancia de la cobertura universal de salud. Esto puede llevarse a cabo: a) desglosando los indicadores de la cobertura universal en función de las diferentes mediciones de la situación socioeconómica a fin de que reflejen el gradiente social y la complejidad de la estratificación social; y b) vinculando los indicadores de salud, tanto de resultados como de cobertura, con los determinantes sociales de la salud y con las políticas dentro y fuera del sector sanitario que influyen sobre la salud. Si no se sitúa la cobertura universal en el contexto de la acción sobre los determinantes sociales de la salud, aumenta el riesgo de interpretar el derecho a la salud como un derecho circunscrito a la cobertura de servicios y la protección económica.


Assuntos
Humanos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Integração de Sistemas , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/organização & administração , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Atenção à Saúde , Saúde Global , Objetivos , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Modelos Teóricos , Política Pública , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Nações Unidas , Organização Mundial da Saúde
13.
Salud pública Méx ; 55(6): 572-579, nov.-dic. 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-705994

RESUMO

Objetivo. Analizar barreras y facilitadores de acceso a control prenatal en adolescentes urbanas de 15-19 años en Santiago, Chile. Material y métodos. Estudio cualitativo con 17 madres adolescentes basado en la teoría fundamentada. Se realizaron 11 entrevistas semiestructuradas y un grupo focal. Resultados. La negación y ocultamiento del embarazo es la principal barrera para ingresar a control en el grupo de acceso tardío; no se identificaron facilitadores. Para mantenerse en control, todas las participantes identifican como facilitador contar con una figura de apoyo. La vulnerabilidad familiar y social explica que algunas adolescentes ingresen a control tardíamente. Conclusión. La presencia de facilitadores es determinante para el ingreso oportuno y mantenerse en control, ya que reduce o anula el efecto de las barreras. El sistema de salud debe constituirse en un facilitador que acompañe desde muy temprano a las adolescentes favoreciendo un vínculo de confianza y respeto.


Objective. Analyze barriers and facilitators of access to prenatal care in pregnant urban adolescents between 15-19 years of age in Santiago, Chile. Materials and methods. Qualitative study based on grounded theory with 17 adolescent mothers. Eleven semi-structured interviews and one focus group were conducted. Results. The denial and concealment of pregnancy is the main barrier to start the prenatal care in the "delayed access group". This group does not identify facilitators. For maintenance in antenatal care, all participants identified a support figure as a facilitator. Family and social vulnerabilities explain why some adolescents start the prenatal care late. Conclusion. The presence of facilitators is crucial for both, the timely entry and the maintenance in antenatal care because they reduce or nullify the effect of barriers. The health system must become a facilitator to accompany adolescents and promote a bond of trust and respect.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem , Serviços de Saúde do Adolescente/provisão & distribuição , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/provisão & distribuição , Chile , Pesquisa Qualitativa
14.
Global Health ; 9: 51, 2013 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24160168

RESUMO

As the UK reiterates its commitment to protecting and growing its development aid budget amidst an adverse economic environment for the UK and Europe, we discuss the potential to use the country's National Health Service (NHS) model as a vehicle for promoting the country's economic as well as global health diplomacy and development priorities, through a coordinated cross-government plan of action. With the country's Prime Minister serving as a co-chair of the UN post-2015 development agenda panel,a this is a unique opportunity for the UK to put forward its health system architecture as a highly applicable and well-tested model for providing access to efficient and cost-effective care, with minimal financial hardship. Arguably, such a model tailored to the needs of specific countries could consequently lead to commercial opportunities for UK plc. in areas such as consulting, training, education and healthcare products. Finally, this approach would be consistent with the current thinking on the evolving role of UK aid, especially in the case of emerging powers such as India, where the focus has shifted from aid to investment in technical assistance and cooperation as a means of boosting bilateral business and trade.


Assuntos
Comércio , Atenção à Saúde , Cooperação Internacional , Medicina Estatal , Análise Custo-Benefício , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Índia , Reino Unido
17.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 34(6): 468-72, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24569977

RESUMO

Underpinning the global commitment to universal health coverage (UHC) is the fundamental role of health for well-being and sustainable development. UHC is proposed as an umbrella health goal in the post-2015 sustainable development agenda because it implies universal and equitable effective delivery of comprehensive health services by a strong health system, aligned with multiple sectors around the shared goal of better health. In this paper, we argue that social determinants of health (SDH) are central to both the equitable pursuit of healthy lives and the provision of health services for all and, therefore, should be expressly incorporated into the framework for monitoring UHC. This can be done by: (a) disaggregating UHC indicators by different measures of socioeconomic position to reflect the social gradient and the complexity of social stratification; and (b) connecting health indicators, both outcomes and coverage, with SDH and policies within and outside of the health sector. Not locating UHC in the context of action on SDH increases the risk of going down a narrow route that limits the right to health to coverage of services and financial protection.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Integração de Sistemas , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/organização & administração , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Atenção à Saúde , Saúde Global , Objetivos , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Política Pública , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Nações Unidas , Organização Mundial da Saúde
20.
Bull World Health Organ ; 86(4): 282-91, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18438517

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report on socioeconomic inequality in childhood malnutrition in the developing world, to provide evidence for an association between socioeconomic inequality and the average level of malnutrition, and to draw attention to different patterns of socioeconomic inequality in malnutrition. METHODS: Both stunting and wasting were measured using new WHO child growth standards. Socioeconomic status was estimated by principal component analysis using a set of household assets and living conditions. Socioeconomic inequality was measured using an alternative concentration index that avoids problems with dependence on the mean level of malnutrition. FINDINGS: In almost all countries investigated, stunting and wasting disproportionately affected the poor. However, socioeconomic inequality in wasting was limited and was not significant in about one third of countries. After correcting for the concentration index's dependence on mean malnutrition, there was no clear association between average stunting and socioeconomic inequality. The latter showed different patterns, which were termed mass deprivation, queuing and exclusion. Although average levels of malnutrition were higher with the new WHO reference standards, estimates of socioeconomic inequality were largely unaffected by changing the growth standards. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic inequality in childhood malnutrition existed throughout the developing world, and was not related to the average malnutrition rate. Failure to tackle this inequality is a cause of social injustice. Moreover, reducing the overall rate of malnutrition does not necessarily lead to a reduction in inequality. Policies should, therefore, take into account the distribution of childhood malnutrition across all socioeconomic groups.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Nutrição Infantil/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Transtornos da Nutrição Infantil/economia , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA