Cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis in Greece.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib versus other treatment options currently available for the management of adult patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, who have had an inadequate response, loss of response, or were intolerant to conventional therapy or a biologic agent, in Greece. METHODS: A Markov model was adapted for projecting lifetime costs and outcomes, for a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis from a Greek payer perspective. Patients entered the model in the active ulcerative colitis state and transitioned to a remission or response state or they underwent colectomy. Following an initial 8-week induction treatment period, patients received maintenance therapy until loss of response. Nonresponders could switch to up to two subsequent biologic lines. Clinical efficacy, adverse event rates and utilities derived from OCTAVE trials and a network-meta-analysis (NMA), while adverse event-related disutilities were obtained from the literature. Information on treatment pathways and resource use was provided by an advisory board due to a lack of local data. Unit costs derived from official national sources (€, 2018). RESULTS: Over a life-time horizon, treating moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis with tofacitinib resulted in additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lower total costs compared to vedolizumab (0.018; €6408), infliximab (biosimilar) (0.009; €3031), golimumab (0.042; €1988) and infliximab (originator) (0.009; €6724). Hence, tofacitinib was estimated to be dominant over all comparators. CONCLUSION: The results of the analysis suggest that in the Greek setting, tofacitinib could be considered a cost-effective (dominant) treatment option for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis.

The Economic Burden of Asthma in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence rates of asthma worldwide and the chronic nature of the disease make asthma a major cause of morbidity, imposing a significant socio-economic burden in many countries. Specifically in Greece, the self-reported prevalence of asthma reached 9% in 2017. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to estimate the total management cost of asthma in Greece and its potential determinants. METHODS: A population-based, random-digit-dialed telephone nationwide survey was conducted to recruit patients with asthma in Greece (n = 353). A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on demographic and lifestyle characteristics, exacerbations, asthma control, medical resource utilization, and productivity loss during the past 12 months. The total annual direct cost from the societal, payer, and patient perspective as well as the indirect cost was calculated. All costs refer to the year 2017 (€). The significance level was set to α = 0.05. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) annual total cost per patient for asthma management from the societal, payer, and patient perspective was €895 (696-1105), €673 (497-861), and €151 (119-188), respectively. The direct medical cost accounted for almost 90% of the total cost, whereas only 4% was attributed to the indirect cost. The direct medical cost was mainly driven by the medication cost (48%). The total annual societal cost was statistically significantly higher in those with not well-controlled asthma (p = 0.014) and those experiencing exacerbations during the past 12 months (p < 0.001) than in their counterparts. The total annual economic burden of asthma in Greece was estimated at €727 million and €547 million from the societal and payer perspective, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that asthma imposes a high economic burden on society and the healthcare system in Greece. Therefore, greater investment in interventions aimed at asthma control and prevention of acute exacerbations may reduce the overall burden of asthma in Greece.

The self-reported prevalence and disease burden of asthma in Greece.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to estimate the self-reported prevalence of asthma in Greece. The secondary one was to assess the impact of asthma control on patients' health related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL), productivity loss, daily activities and psychological distress. METHODS: A population-based, random-digit dialing, telephone nationwide survey was conducted to recruit patients with asthma. Among the responders, 3,946 met the age criterion (≥18 years) and completed the screening questions regarding asthma. Of them, 353 subjects reported that they had been diagnosed with asthma sometime in their life and completed the survey. Data on demographic and lifestyle characteristics, asthma control, comorbidities, limitations in daily activities, psychological distress, productivity loss, as well as HRQoL, were collected through telephone interview. RESULTS: The lifetime self-reported prevalence of asthma was found to be 9.10% (95% CI:8.14%-9.94%). Sixty three percent of patients had well-controlled (WC) asthma. Asthma control was associated with gender, age, and specific comorbidities. Moreover, patients with not well-controlled (NWC) asthma were more likely to have missed work and reduced productivity during the past 12 months due to their asthma (p < 0.01). Patients with NWC asthma were more likely to declare psychological distress and limitations in their daily living activities. Patients' HRQoL with NWC asthma was significantly worse (0.65 ± 0.24) compared to those with WC asthma (0.86 ± 0.17, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey revealed the link between the asthma control and burden of disease demonstrating the need for the implementation of programs aiming at the management of chronic symptoms related to this condition.

A literature review to evaluate the economic value of ranolazine for the symptomatic treatment of chronic angina pectoris.

To conduct a systematic review of the evidence regarding the economic value of ranolazine relative to standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment of symptomatic chronic stable angina (CSA). Electronic databases were searched using relevant keywords. The identified studies were independently reviewed by two investigators against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Their data were extracted using a relevant form and consequently were synthesized. Studies were also evaluated using the Quality of Health Economic Studies scale. The main outcomes considered were the cost and effectiveness for each comparator and the incremental cost per quality-adjusted-life year (QALY) gained. Six studies were included in the review. Five of these assessed the cost-utility of ranolazine added to SOC, compared to SOC alone, using decision trees or Markov models whereas one was a retrospective cost evaluation study. The analysis was conducted from a payer perspective in five studies and from a societal perspective in one study with the time horizon varying between six months and a year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), ranged from €4000 to €15,000 per QALY gained. Ranolazine appears to be dominant or cost-effective, mainly due to its ability to decrease angina-related hospitalizations and also due to a marginal improvement in quality of life. The acquisition cost of ranolazine was the variable with the greatest impact upon the ICER. The existing evidence, although limited, indicates that ranolazine may be a dominant or cost-effective therapy option, for the treatment of patients with symptomatic CSA. Further research is required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ranolazine.