Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(7): 782-790, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30884089

RESUMO

AIM: The aim was to define risk factors for postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery for obstructing colon cancer (OCC) and to propose a dedicated score. METHOD: From 2000 to 2015, 2325 patients were treated for OCC in French surgical centres by members of the French National Surgical Association. A multivariate analysis was performed for variables with P value ≤ 0.20 in the univariate analysis for 30-day mortality. Predictive performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: A total of 1983 patients were included. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 7%. Multivariate analysis found five significant independent risk factors: age ≥ 75 (P = 0.013), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ III (P = 0.027), pulmonary comorbidity (P = 0.0002), right-sided cancer (P = 0.047) and haemodynamic failure (P < 0.0001). The odds ratio for risk of postoperative death was 3.42 with one factor, 5.80 with two factors, 15.73 with three factors, 29.23 with four factors and 77.25 with five factors. The discriminating capacity in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality was 0.80. CONCLUSION: Thirty-day postoperative mortality after emergency surgery for OCC is correlated with age, ASA score, pulmonary comorbidity, site of tumour and haemodynamic failure, with a specific score ranging from 0 to 5.


Assuntos
Colectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Tratamento de Emergência/mortalidade , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Visc Surg ; 154(1): 21-28, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27865742

RESUMO

Internal rectal prolapse (IRP) is a well-recognized pelvic floor disorder mainly seen during defecatory straining. The symptomatic expression of IRP is complex, encompassing fecal continence (56%) and/or evacuation disorders (85%). IRP cannot be characterized easily by clinical examination alone and the emergence of dynamic defecography (especially MRI) has allowed a better comprehension of its pathophysiology and led to the proposition of a severity score (Oxford score) that can guide management. Decision for surgical management should be multidisciplinary, discussed after a complete work-up, and only after medical treatment has failed. Information should be provided to the patient, outlining the goals of treatment, the potential complications and results. Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) has been considered as the gold standard for IRP treatment. However, inconsistent results (failure observed in up to 20% of cases, and fecal incontinence occurring in up to 25% of patients at one year) have led to a decrease in its indications. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy has substantial advantages in solving the functional problems due to IRP (efficacy on evacuation and resolution of continence symptoms in 65-92%, and 73-97% of patients, respectively) and is currently considered as the gold standard therapy for IRP once the decision to operate has been made.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Prolapso Retal/diagnóstico , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Grampeamento Cirúrgico , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Defecografia , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Qualidade de Vida , Prolapso Retal/complicações , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA