Qualitative development of the PROMIS Profile v1.0-Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (FCS) 28.

PURPOSE: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by high triglyceride levels, significant disease burden, and negative impacts on health-related quality of life. This project aimed to create a PROMIS-based patient-reported outcome measure that represents valid and important concerns for patients with FCS. METHODS: We reviewed the literature and data from a previous qualitative study of FCS to identify key FCS symptoms and impacts, which were mapped to PROMIS domains to create a pool of eligible items. Candidate items were reduced per expert feedback and patients with FCS completed cognitive interviews to confirm content validity and measure content. RESULTS: Literature and qualitative data review identified ten key symptoms and 12 key impacts of FCS, including abdominal pain, fatigue, difficulty thinking, and worry about pancreatitis attacks. We identified 96 items primarily from PROMIS, supplemented with items from the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders™ (Neuro-QoL™) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement systems. This pool was reduced to 32 candidate items, which were assessed via cognitive interviews with eight participants with FCS. Cognitive interview results and additional expert feedback led to the removal of four items and finalization of the PROMIS Profile v1.0-familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) 28. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS Profile v1.0-familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) 28 provides strong content validity for assessing quality of life among patients with FCS. The benefits of PROMIS, including norm-referenced mean values for each measure, will facilitate comparison of patients with FCS to other clinical populations.

Clinical manifestations and healthcare utilization before diagnosis of transthyretin amyloidosis.

Introduction: Initial clinical manifestations of transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) are not well understood, making timely diagnosis challenging. Methods: Patients aged ≥68 years newly diagnosed with ATTR were identified using Medicare Research Identifiable Files. Symptom manifestation and healthcare utilization were measured during 3 years pre-diagnosis; demographics and comorbidity index during 1-year pre-diagnosis. Controls (ATTR-free) were matched 1:1 to patients with ATTR based on age, sex and region; same index date and enrollment as match. Results: We identified 552 matched ATTR-control pairs: mean age 78.3 (standard deviation 6.3) and 64.5% male. Among patients with ATTR (vs controls), cardiovascular conditions (92.9 vs 75.9%) and hospitalization (54.0 vs 35.5%) were frequent during 3 years pre-diagnosis. Conclusion: Patients with ATTR have multiple symptoms and hospitalizations pre-diagnosis, recognition of which may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns Associated With Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the United States: A Retrospective Claims Study.

GOALS: This US-based, retrospective claims study aimed to investigate disease burden and treatment patterns in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and to compare health care resource use (HCRU) in patients with EoE and matched controls without EoE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of EoE and ≥12 months of prediagnosis data were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Research databases (January 2008 to September 2016) and followed up from the diagnosis date until termination of eligibility for a health plan. Patient clinical characteristics and HCRU were recorded in the 12 months before diagnosis; HCRU and treatment patterns were recorded during follow-up. HCRU in patients with EoE and matched controls was compared during the 12-month postdiagnosis period. RESULTS: Among the 23,003 patients with EoE (mean age: 34.3 y; 64.8% male), gastroesophageal reflux disease was the most common prediagnosis condition (34.6%). After diagnosis, the most common off-label, first-line treatments were proton pump inhibitor monotherapy (52.8%) and topical corticosteroid monotherapy (21.5%). Overall, 3336 patients (14.5%) received at least 3 lines of off-label pharmacotherapy. Outpatient visits (recorded in 99.9% of patients on and postdiagnosis) were most frequently to gastroenterologists/pediatric gastroenterologists (49.5% prediagnosis, 72.6% on and postdiagnosis). Inpatient admissions and outpatient and emergency room visits were more likely in patients with EoE than in matched controls (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EoE in the USA experience a high disease burden both before and after diagnosis, which requires significant HCRU. Our findings highlight the unmet need for adequate control of EoE-related symptoms.

Responder analysis for neuropathic impairment and quality-of-life assessment in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the NEURO-TTR study.

OBJECTIVE: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN) is a rare disease characterized by rapid neuropathic progression. In pivotal studies of gene-silencing treatments, the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score + 7 tests (mNIS + 7) and Norfolk-Quality of Life (QOL)-Diabetic Neuropathy (DN) questionnaire assessed treatment impact on neuropathic progression. Establishing responder definition (RD) thresholds for these measures would enable evaluation of clinically meaningful treatment benefit. METHODS: mNIS + 7 and Norfolk-QOL-DN were administered at baseline and week 65 to 165 adults with ATTRv-PN receiving inotersen (n = 106) or placebo (n = 59) in the NEURO-TTR study. Anchor-based approaches for estimating RD thresholds were used for Norfolk QOL-DN, while distribution-based approaches were used for both measures. Responders were patients with a score change < RD, indicating improvement or stabilization (i.e., no clinically meaningful progression). Odds ratios (ORs) and Fisher's exact tests compared proportions of responders by treatment. RESULTS: The mean RD estimates were 12.2 points and 8.8 points for mNIS + 7 and Norfolk QOL-DN, respectively. The proportions of patients whose change in score indicated improvement or stabilization were statistically significantly larger for inotersen than placebo for all estimated RD thresholds for mNIS + 7 (64-86% responders for inotersen vs. 27-46% for placebo, ORs = 3.8-7.2, ps < 0.001) and Norfolk QOL-DN (66-81% vs. 35-56%, ORs = 2.4-3.6, ps < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Establishing RD thresholds for these instruments enables evaluation of clinically relevant and individual-level treatment benefit on neuropathic progression. Across RDs estimated using multiple methods, a higher proportion of patients receiving inotersen than placebo showed improved or stabilized neuropathic progression at week 65. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01737398; Date of registration: November 29, 2012.

The patient journey toward a diagnosis of hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite emerging treatments for hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis, the disease is often misdiagnosed, with reported diagnostic delays of up to several years. Knowledge of the patient journey leading up to diagnosis may help to promote earlier intervention. The study's objective was to examine patient clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization prior to ATTRv amyloidosis diagnosis. METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years and newly diagnosed with ATTRv amyloidosis identified in IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental data using a claims-based algorithm as follows: diagnosis required ≥ 1 medical claim with relevant amyloidosis diagnosis code (ICD-10-CM: E85.0-.4, E85.89, E85.9; excludes light chain and wild type) during identification (ID) period (1/1/2016-12/31/2017), and ≥ 1 occurrence of qualifying criteria during 2011-2017: ≥ 15 days diflunisal use without > 30-day gap, liver transplant, or claim with specific codes E85.1 or E85.2. The index date was defined as the date of first claim with amyloidosis diagnosis code in ID period. Patients had continuous enrollment ≥ 5 years pre-index date (look-back period). Occurrence of selected comorbid conditions and symptoms and healthcare utilization (testing, emergency department visits and hospitalization) measured during the look-back period; demographics, physician specialty, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) measured 1 year pre-index. Patients with an ICD-9/10 amyloidosis code during the look-back period were excluded. An ATTRv-free reference cohort was created from a random sample of enrollees who lacked any diagnosis of amyloidosis and matched 3:1 to ATTRv patients on age, gender, and region to provide reference values; same index and enrollment requirement as match. RESULTS: For the 141 qualifying patients with ATTRv and 423 matched controls, mean (standard deviation) age was 62.5 (14.2) years and 53.9% were female. Mean CCI for ATTRv cohort was 2.7 (3.0) versus 1.1 (1.9) among controls. Selected comorbidities, testing, visits, and hospitalization were common among patients with ATTRv during the look-back period with higher rates versus controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ATTRv amyloidosis experience multiple neurological, cardiovascular, and other clinical manifestations, testing, and hospitalization prior to diagnosis. Occurrence of potential markers of illness is most common in the year before diagnosis.

The Clinical and Economic Burden of Newly Diagnosed Hereditary Transthyretin (ATTRv) Amyloidosis: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the burden of hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis, a genetic, progressive, and fatal disease caused by extracellular deposition of transthyretin amyloid fibrils. The study's aim was to estimate costs and disease burden associated with ATTRv amyloidosis in a real-world setting. METHODS: Using IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental data, we identified patients at least 18 years of age with newly diagnosed ATTRv amyloidosis. Diagnosis required at least one medical claim with relevant diagnosis code (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] 277.30-.31, 277.39; ICD-10-CM E85.0-.4, E85.89, E85.9) between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016, and at least one additional criterion occurring during study period (2013-2017): at least 15 days diflunisal use without more than a 30-day gap; liver transplant; or claim with codes E85.1 or E85.2. First diagnosis date was study index. Continuous enrollment 1-year pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up) was required. Patients with baseline amyloidosis diagnosis were excluded. Outcomes of interest were comorbidities and 1-year follow-up healthcare utilization and costs (also reported quarterly). RESULTS: Among 185 qualifying patients, mean age was 59.2 years (standard deviation 15.2), 54.1% were female, and baseline Charlson comorbidity index was 2.2 (2.5). Neuropathy (30.3%), diabetes (27.0%), and cardiovascular-related comorbidities, including dyspnea (25.9%) and congestive heart failure (21.6%), were common during follow-up. Nearly a quarter of patients (24.9%) were hospitalized during follow-up. Most hospitalizations and emergency department visits occurred in the first quarter post-diagnosis (18.9%, 17.8%, respectively) and dropped in subsequent quarters. The annual mean total cost was $64,066, with inpatient services contributing the majority of the expenses ($34,461), followed by outpatient ($23,853), and then pharmacy ($5752). As with utilization, costs were highest in the first quarter post-diagnosis and dropped in subsequent quarters. CONCLUSION: Patients newly diagnosed with ATTRv amyloidosis have substantial healthcare utilization and costs in the first year, primarily the initial months, post-diagnosis. Further research should examine later costs associated with disease progression and end-of-life care.

Family Spillover Effects in Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Childhood illness can impose significant costs and health strains on family members, but these are not routinely captured by pediatric economic evaluations. This review investigated how family "spillover effects" related to costs and health outcomes are considered in pediatric cost-utility analyses (CUAs). METHODS: We reviewed pediatric CUAs published between 2000 and 2015 using the Tufts Medical Center Cost-effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry and the Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) Registry. We selected studies conducted from the societal perspective and included in both registries. We investigated how frequently family spillover was incorporated into analyses, and how the inclusion of spillover health effects and costs changed CUA results. RESULTS: We found 142 pediatric CUAs meeting inclusion criteria. Of those, 105 (72%) considered either family spillover costs (n = 98 time costs, n = 33 out-of-pocket costs, n = 2 caregiver healthcare costs) or health outcomes (n = 15). Twenty-four studies included 43 pairs of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with and without spillover. In 19 pairs of ICERs, adding spillover changed the ICER enough to cross a common cost-effectiveness threshold (i.e., $50,000/QALY, $100,000/QALY, $150,000/QALY; values are in 2016 US$). Incorporating spillover generally made interventions more cost-effective (n = 18; 42%), or did not change CUA results enough to cross a threshold (n = 24; 56%). Including family spillover reduced ICERs by 31% ($40,000/QALY) on average. CONCLUSION: Most pediatric CUAs conducted from a societal perspective include family costs but fewer include family health effects. Inclusion of family spillover effects tends to make CUA results more favorable. Future pediatric CUAs should aim to more fully incorporate the family burden of illness.

Assessment of motivating factors associated with the initiation and completion of treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

BACKGROUND: Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with high morbidity and increased mortality but many patients avoid initiation of treatment or report challenges with treatment completion. The study objective was to identify motivators and barriers for treatment initiation and completion in a community sample of HCV-infected patients in the United States. METHODS: Survey methods were employed to identify factors reported by patients as important in their decision to start or complete HCV treatment. Study participants included 120 HCV-infected individuals: 30 had previously completed treatment with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PR), 30 had discontinued PR, 30 were treated with PR at the time of the survey, and 30 were treatment‒naïve. Telephone interviews occurred between May and August of 2011 and employed a standardized guide. Participants assigned factors a rating from 1 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important). Trained researchers coded and analyzed interview transcripts. RESULTS: Of 33 factors, expected health problems from not treating HCV infection was reported as most encouraging for treatment initiation and completion, while treatment side effects was most discouraging. Sixty-nine percent of participants reported that the ability to obtain information during treatment on the likelihood of treatment success (i.e., results of viral load testing) would motivate them to initiate therapy. Median preferred timing for learning about test results was 5 weeks (range: 1-23 weeks). CONCLUSION: Understanding challenges and expectations from patients is important in identifying opportunities for education to optimize patient adherence to their HCV treatment regimen.

Healthcare costs in patients with metastatic lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To characterize healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with metastatic lung cancer receiving chemotherapy in the US. METHODS: Using data from a large private multi-payer health insurance claims database (2000-2006), we identified all patients beginning chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer. Healthcare resource use (inpatient, outpatient, medications) and costs were tallied over time from date of therapy initiation ("index date") to date of disenrollment from the health plan (in most instances, presumably due to death) or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. Healthcare utilization and costs were characterized using Kaplan-Meier sample average methods. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 4068 patients; mean (SD) age was 65 (11) years. Over a median follow-up of 334 days, study subjects averaged 1.5 hospital admissions, 8.9 total inpatient days, and 69 physician office and hospital outpatient visits. Mean (95% CI) cumulative total healthcare costs were $125,849 ($120,228, $131,231). Costs of outpatient medical services and inpatient care constituted 34% and 20% of total healthcare costs, respectively; corresponding estimates for outpatient chemotherapy and other medication were 22% and 24%. CONCLUSION: Our study sheds additional light on the burden of metastatic lung cancer among patients receiving chemotherapy, in terms of total cost thru end of life as well as component costs by setting and type of service, and may be useful in informing medical resource allocation in this patient population.

Healthcare costs in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy as their principal treatment modality.

BACKGROUND: The economic costs of treating patients with metastatic breast cancer have been examined in several studies, but available estimates of economic burden are at least a decade old. In this study, we characterize healthcare utilization and costs in the US among women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy as their principal treatment modality. METHODS: Using a large private health insurance claims database (2000-2006), we identified all women initiating chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer with no evidence of receipt of concomitant or subsequent hormonal therapy, or receipt of trastuzumab at anytime. Healthcare utilization and costs (inpatient, outpatient, medication) were estimated on a cumulative basis from date of chemotherapy initiation ("index date") to date of disenrollment from the health plan or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. Study measures were cumulated over time using the Kaplan-Meier Sample Average (KMSA) method; 95% CIs were generated using nonparametric bootstrapping. Findings also were examined among the subgroup of patients with uncensored data. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1444 women; mean (SD) age was 59.1 (12.1) years. Over a mean follow-up of 532 days (range: 3 to 2412), study subjects averaged 1.7 hospital admissions, 10.7 inpatient days, and 83.6 physician office and hospital outpatient visits. Mean (95% CI) cumulative total healthcare costs were $128,556 ($118,409, $137,644) per patient. Outpatient services accounted for 29% of total costs, followed by medication other than chemotherapy (26%), chemotherapy (25%), and inpatient care (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare costs-especially in the outpatient setting--are substantial among women with metastatic breast cancer for whom treatment options other than chemotherapy are limited.

Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin versus venlafaxine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: findings from a Spanish perspective.

The objective of the present study was to describe a new model of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and its application to a comparison of pregabalin versus venlafaxine extended-release (XR) from a Spanish healthcare perspective. Microsimulation techniques, including Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score, number of weeks with minimal or no anxiety (HAM-A

Patient-reported measurements of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: demonstration of increased frequency, severity, resistance to palliation, and impact on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The risk, severity, and patient-reported outcomes of radiation-induced mucositis among head and neck cancer patients were prospectively estimated. METHODS: A validated, patient-reported questionnaire (OMDQ), the FACT quality of life (QOL), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) fatigue scales were used to measure mucositis (reported as mouth and throat soreness), daily functioning, and use of analgesics. Patients were studied before radiotherapy (RT), daily during RT, and for 4 weeks after RT. RESULTS: Contrary to previous reports, the risk of mucositis was virtually identical in the 126 patients with oral cavity or oropharynx tumors (99% overall; 85% grade 3-4) compared with 65 patients with tumors of the larynx or hypopharynx (98% overall; 77% grade 3-4). The mean QOL score decreased significantly during RT, from 85.1 at baseline to 69.0 at Week 6, corresponding with the peak of mucositis severity. The mean functional status score decreased by 33% from 18.3 at baseline to 12.3 at Week 6. The impact of mucositis on QOL was proportional to its severity, although even a score of 1 or 2 (mild or moderate) was associated with a significant reduction in QOL (from 93.6 at baseline to 74.7 at Week 6). Despite increases in analgesic use from 34% at baseline to 80% at Week 6, mean mucositis scores exceeded 2.5 at Week 6. CONCLUSIONS: Mucositis occurs among virtually all patients who are undergoing radiation treatment of head and neck cancers. The detrimental effects on QOL and functional status are significant, and opioid analgesia provides inadequate relief. Preventive rather than symptom palliation measures are needed.

Cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists.

OBJECTIVE: To assess cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists (anti-TNF). METHODS: We developed a simulation model to depict progression of disability [in terms of Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] in women aged 55-64 years with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to anti-TNF. At model entry, patients were assumed to receive either oral disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) only or oral DMARD plus abatacept. Patients were then tracked from model entry until death. Future health-state utilities and medical-care costs (except study therapy) were estimated based on predicted values of the HAQ-DI. The model was estimated using data from a Phase III clinical trial of abatacept plus secondary sources. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in terms of incremental cost (2006 US$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained alternatively over 10 years and a lifetime. Future costs and health effects were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Over 10 years, abatacept would yield 1.0 additional QALY (undiscounted) per patient (4.0 vs 3.0 for oral DMARD) at an incremental (discounted) cost of $45,497 (100,648 vs $55,151) respectively; over a lifetime, corresponding figures were 1.6 QALY (5.8 vs 4.2) and $64,978 ($140,714 vs $82,489). Cost-effectiveness was [mean (95% CI)] $50,576 ($47,056, $54,944) per QALY gained over 10 years, and $45,979 ($42,678, $49,932) per QALY gained over a lifetime. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Abatacept is cost-effective by current standards of medical practice in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to an anti-TNF.

Cost-effectiveness of add-on therapy with pregabalin in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of pregabalin as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. METHODS: We developed a model to estimate clinical and economic outcomes over 1 year in a hypothetical cohort of patients with refractory partial epilepsy assumed alternatively to receive add-on therapy with pregabalin (300 mg/day) or no add-on therapy. For each patient in the model, we estimated the occurrence of seizure and side effects, using techniques of stochastic simulation. We assigned health-state utilities to each day of follow-up based on whether or not seizure or side effects were predicted to occur. Patients could discontinue therapy due to lack of efficacy or side effects. Outcomes included expected numbers of days without seizure ("seizure-free [SF] days"), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs of therapy. Cost-effectiveness was assessed alternatively in terms of incremental cost per SF day gained and incremental cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: Add-on therapy with pregabalin was estimated to result in an average gain of 23.8 SF days over one year; the estimated additional cost of therapy was $678. Incremental cost (mean, 95% CI) per SF day gained was $28.45 ($27.25, $29.44); corresponding estimates of incremental cost per QALY gained were $52,893 ($49,249, $56,983). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory partial epilepsy, the cost-effectiveness of pregabalin 300 mg/day compares favorably with published estimates of cost-effectiveness for other add-on antiepileptic drugs.

Oral mucositis and outcomes of autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation following high-dose melphalan conditioning for multiple myeloma.

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between oral mucositis (OM) and adverse clinical and economic outcomes of autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) following high-dose melphalan (Alkeran) conditioning in patients with multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of 115 consecutive autologous HSCT recipients with multiple myeloma who received high-dose melphalan conditioning before transplantation was undertaken at a single academic center. OM severity was assessed twice weekly using a validated scale beginning 3-4 days following conditioning and continuing until hospital discharge or day 28, whichever occurred first. OM was graded, based on presence/extent of erythema/ulceration across eight oropharyngeal sites, as follows: 0 = no erythema or ulceration; I = erythema but no ulceration; II = ulceration, 1 site; III = ulceration, 2 sites; IV = ulceration, 3 sites; and V = ulceration, > or = 4 sites. Analyses examined the relationship between worst OM grade and selected clinical and economic outcomes, including days with fever, days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN),days of parenteral narcotic therapy, incidence of significant infection, and inpatient days and charges. The mean age of study subjects was 54 years; 19 patients (17%) received total-body irradiation, and 55 patients (48%) experienced OM grade > or = II (ie, ulceration). The worst OM grade was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with numbers of days of TPN and parenteral narcotic therapy, length of hospitalization, and total inpatient charges. Worst OM grade was not associated with the number of febrile days or the risk of significant infection. OM is associated with worse clinical and economic outcomes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous HSCT following high-dose melphalan conditioning.

Oral mucositis and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

GOALS OF THE WORK: To assess the relationship between oral mucositis (OM) and adverse clinical and economic outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review study of 281 allogeneic HSCT recipients with hematologic malignancies was undertaken at a single academic center. OM extent and severity were assessed across eight oropharyngeal sites using a validated scale, which was scored as follows: no erythema/ulceration=0; erythema only=I; ulceration, one site=II; ulceration, two sites=III; ulceration, three sites=IV and ulceration, four or more sites=V. OM assessments began on the day of conditioning and continued twice weekly within 28 days or hospital discharge. Analyses examined the relationship between the worst OM grade and selected adverse outcomes, including days with fever, days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), days of parenteral narcotic therapy, incidence of significant (common terminology criteria (CTC) grade 3 or 4) infection, mortality and inpatient days and charges. MAIN RESULTS: The mean age of the study subjects was 41 years. Of the patients, 96% (n = 269) received total body irradiation and 76% (n = 214) experienced an OM grade of > or =II (i.e., ulceration). The worst OM grade was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the number of days of TPN and parenteral narcotic therapy, number of days with fever, incidence of significant infection, time in hospital and total inpatient charges. CONCLUSIONS: OM is associated with worse clinical and economic outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

Clinical and economic consequences of bleeding following major orthopedic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major orthopedic surgery patients who receive antithrombotics as prophylaxis against VTE may be at higher risk of bleeding. The clinical and economic consequences of this complication may be relevant to therapeutic decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of major bleeding following major orthopedic surgery on length of stay (LOS) and inpatient charges. METHODS: Using a database with information on approximately 750,000 admissions annually to 100+ US acute-care hospitals, we identified all patients who underwent major orthopedic surgery between January 1, 1998 and December 13, 2000. Patients were stratified according to whether or not they experienced major postoperative bleeding prior to hospital discharge, defined as (a) fatal bleeding; (b) nonfatal bleeding at critical site; (c) re-operation due to bleeding; and (d) overt bleeding with bleeding index (BI)>or=2, where BI=number of blood units transfused plus pre-bleeding minus post-bleeding hemoglobin (g/dL) values. LOS and total inpatient charges were compared between patients with and without major bleeding. RESULTS: The incidence of major bleeding among 23,518 patients who underwent major orthopedic surgery was 2.6%. In multivariate analyses controlling for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without major bleeds, adjusted mean LOS was 1.8 days longer among those with major bleeding (95% CI: 1.5, 2.0) (6.1 days vs. 4.3 days for those without bleeds); adjusted mean total inpatient charges were 7,593 dollars higher (95% CI: 6,622 dollars, 8,646 dollars) (25,669 dollars vs. 18,076 dollars). CONCLUSION: Bleeding following major orthopedic surgery may increase length of stay and total hospital charges and should be an important consideration in choice of VTE prophylaxis.

Treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: a simulation model.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of a generalizable stochastic-simulation model of the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with peripheral neuropathies. METHODS: We developed a model to simulate treatment outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of patients with peripheral neuropathies. Each patient was randomly assigned an average pretreatment daily pain score (on a 0-10 scale), based on an assumed distribution of mean pretreatment pain scores in the cohort. Patients were randomly assigned daily pain scores, based on their pretreatment average and an assumed distribution of daily pain scores around this mean. Treatment outcomes were then simulated using the expected mean change (vs. baseline) in pain scores. Model outcomes include the expected increase in days with no or mild pain (score < or = 3), days with > or = 30% and > or = 50% reductions in pain intensity, and days with 2- and 3-point absolute reductions in pain intensity. To illustrate its use, the model was estimated over a 12-week period using data from a recent clinical trial of a new antiepileptic (pregabalin). RESULTS: Treatment over 12 weeks (84 days) was projected to result in 26 (+/-0.4) (mean [+/-SE]) additional (vs. no treatment) days with no or mild pain, 33 (+/-0.5) days with a > or = 30% reduction in pain intensity, 28 (+/-0.4) days with > or = 50% reduction in pain intensity, and 34 (+/-0.5) and 30 (+/-0.5) days with > or = 2-point and > or = 3-point absolute reductions in pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with data on health-state utilities and treatment costs, this new analytical tool can provide a foundation for formal cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions for painful peripheral neuropathies.

Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia: a Canadian perspective.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a chronic condition that occurs frequently with diabetes and herpes zoster infection. In addition to potentially lasting many years, the relationship between chronic pain, anxiety/depression, and sleep, also referred to as the triad of pain, causes functional impairment in many areas of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the 12-week cost-effectiveness of 2 treatments of NeP, pregabalin versus gabapentin, in managing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in a Canadian setting. METHODS: A stochastic simulation model evaluating NeP treatment was adapted to the Canadian setting. Using data from clinical trials of pregabalin (150-600 mg/d) and gabapentin (900-3600 mg/d), the model simulated 12-week treatment outcomes for patients with DPN or PHN. Resource utilization was identified through an Internet-based survey among 80 Canadian physicians. Utility values (as measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D) were obtained from 126 NeP patients participating in a cross-sectional study conducted at Canadian primary care sites. The economic analysis was expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and as incremental cost per day with no or mild pain. Model sensitivity to changes in key parameters was assessed. RESULTS: Following 12-week treatment, compared with gabapentin, pregabalin was projected to result in 6 and 9 additional days with no or mild pain for patients with DPN and PHN, respectively. Pregabalin therapy was estimated to provide an additional 0.0047 QALY and 0.0086 QALY over gabapentin administration, for DPN and PHN, respectively. Mean (SE) direct costs per DPN patient were estimated as 837.53 Can dollars (37.31 dollars) (2004 dollars) with gabapentin and 818.49 dollars (36.50 dollars) with pregabalin, and per PHN patient as 720.61 dollars (33.70 dollars) with gabapentin and 667.07 dollars (25.33 dollars) with pregabalin. Model findings were sensitive to variation in the dose and corresponding cost of the comparator, but not in other parameters. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this analysis, in the treatment of NeP associated with DPN or PHN, pregabalin was a dominant or cost-effective treatment strategy compared with gabapentin.

Outcomes and costs of risperidone versus olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders: a Markov model.

OBJECTIVE: To compare expected outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders who are treated with risperidone versus olanzapine. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to examine outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders receiving risperidone or olanzapine. The time frame of interest was 1 year. The model focused particular attention on the likelihood of therapy switching and discontinuation as a result of treatment-emergent side effects, as the efficacy of these two agents is similar. Measures of interest included the incidence of relapse and selected side effects including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin-related disorders and diabetes, expected change in body weight, and the percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year. Costs of antipsychotic therapy and psychiatric and nonpsychiatric services also were examined. RESULTS: At 1 year, the rate of EPS was estimated to be slightly higher for risperidone, as was the incidence of symptomatic prolactin-related disorders. The expected incidence of diabetes mellitus, while low, was slightly higher for olanzapine. Approximately 25% and 4% of olanzapine and risperidone patients, respectively, were projected to experience an increase in body weight > or = 7%. The estimated percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year was higher for risperidone than olanzapine (76.9% vs. 45.6%, respectively). Expected mean total costs of care per month of therapy were $2163 for risperidone and $2316 for olanzapine. Results from sensitivity analyses suggest that the probability of therapy discontinuation following weight gain >5 kg would have to be lower than 0.1 for the number of patients remaining on therapy at the end of 1 year to be the same for risperidone and olanzapine. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with risperidone, treatment with olanzapine may result in greater increases in body weight, higher rates of therapy discontinuation, and higher costs of medical-care services.