Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus sutureless aortic valve replacement: a single-centre cost analysis.

AIMS: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are both viable therapeutic interventions for aortic stenosis in elderly patients. Meta-analyses show similar all-cause mortality for both techniques albeit with a different pattern of adverse effects. This study means to compare costs and, to a lesser extent, clinical outcomes of both techniques. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre analysis was performed for patients receiving SU-AVR or TAVI from 2008 to 2019. Perioperative clinical data were collected from patient files. Costs were assessed by a cost allocation tool. In an attempt to avoid confounding, propensity score matching was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients underwent either TAVI (n = 100) or SU-AVR (n = 268). After matching, there were 61 patients per treatment group. Length of stay was significantly longer in the SU-AVR group. Excluding device costs, total expenses for SU-AVR (median: €11,630) were significantly higher than TAVI (median: €9240). For both groups, these costs were mostly incurred on intensive care units, followed by nursing units. Non-medical staff was the largest contributor to expenses. Including device costs, SU-AVR (median: €14,683) was shown to be cost-saving compared to TAVI (median: €24,057). CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, we found SU-AVR to be cost-saving compared to TAVI, largely due to higher device costs associated with the latter. Excluding device costs, TAVI was associated with lower expenses and shorter length of stay. Non-medical staff was the largest source of costs, suggesting length of stay to be a major financial determinant.

Stiffness matters: Improved failure risk assessment of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Objectives: Rupture and dissection are feared complications of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms caused by mechanical failure of the wall. The current method of using the aortic diameter to predict the risk of wall failure and to determine the need for surgical resection lacks accuracy. Therefore, this study aims to identify reliable and clinically measurable predictors for aneurysm rupture or dissection by performing a personalized failure risk analysis, including clinical, geometrical, histologic, and mechanical data. Methods: The study cohort consisted of 33 patients diagnosed with ascending aortic aneurysms without genetic syndromes. Uniaxial tensile tests until failure were performed to determine the wall strength. Material parameters were fitted against ex vivo planar biaxial data and in vivo pressure-diameter relationships at diastole and systole, which were derived from multiphasic computed tomography (CT) scans. Using the resulting material properties and in vivo data, the maximal in vivo stress at systole was calculated, assuming a thin-walled axisymmetric geometry. The retrospective failure risk was calculated by comparing the peak wall stress at suprasystolic pressure with the wall strength. Results: The distensibility coefficient, reflecting aortic compliance and derived from blood pressure measurements and multiphasic CT scans, outperformed predictors solely based on geometrical features in assessing the risk of aneurysm failure. Conclusions: In a clinical setting, multiphasic CT scans followed by the calculation of the distensibility coefficient are of added benefit in patient-specific, clinical decision-making. The distensibility derived from the aneurysm volume change has the best predictive power, as it also takes the axial stretch into account.

Global cardiac surgery: Access to cardiac surgical care around the world.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, responsible for 17.5 million deaths every year, of which 80% occur in low- and middle-income countries. Some 75% of the world does not have access to cardiac surgery when needed because of lack of infrastructure, human resources, and financial coverage. This study aims to map access to cardiac surgery around the world. METHODS: A scoping review was done on access to cardiac surgery for an undifferentiated population. Workforce data were collected from the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network database and used to calculate numbers and ratios of adult and pediatric cardiac surgeons to population. RESULTS: A total of 12,180 adult cardiac surgeons and 3858 pediatric cardiac surgeons were listed in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network in August 2017, equaling 1.64 (0-181.82) adult cardiac surgeons and 0.52 (0-25.97) pediatric cardiac surgeons per million population globally. Large disparities existed between regions, ranging from 0.12 adult cardiac surgeons and 0.08 pediatric cardiac surgeons per million population (sub-Saharan Africa) to 11.12 adult cardiac surgeons and 2.08 pediatric cardiac surgeons (North America). Low-income countries possessed 0.04 adult cardiac surgeons and 0.03 pediatric cardiac surgeons per million population, compared with 7.15 adult cardiac surgeons and 1.67 pediatric cardiac surgeons in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study maps the current global state of access to cardiac surgery. Disparities exist between and within world regions, with a positive correlation between a nation's economic status and access to cardiac surgery. Low early mortality rates in low-resource settings suggest the possibility of high-quality cardiac surgery in low- and middle-income countries. There is the need to increase human and physical resources, while focusing on safety, quality, and efficiency to improve access to cardiac surgery for the 4.5 billion people without.

Clinical outcomes of heart-team-guided treatment decisions in high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis in a health-economic context with limited resources for transcatheter valve therapies.

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the preferred treatment modality for patients with severe aortic stenosis at high or prohibitive risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes after treatment according to the decisions of the multidisciplinary heart team in a Belgian health-economic context.Methods and results: Four hundred and five high-risk patients referred to a tertiary centre between 1 March 2008 and 31 December 2015 were screened and planned to undergo SAVR, TAVI or medical treatment (MT). Patients undergoing SAVR had lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores and Euroscore-II when compared to TAVI or MT (median [IQR]: 6[4-8]; 7[5-10]; 8[6-13]; p < .001 and 6[4-10]; 8[5-15]; 8[4-16]; p = .006). At 1 year all-cause mortality was 14, 17 and 51% with SAVR, TAVI and MT, respectively (p < .001). Cardiovascular death and disabling stroke occurred in 9, 7 and 35% (p < .001) and 2, 2.7 and 1.7% (p = .91). According to Valve-Academic-Research-Consortium-II criteria, device success was 95 and 92% for TAVI and SAVR. The combined safety endpoint at 30 days favoured TAVI (22% vs. 47%) (p < .001). The combined efficacy endpoint at 1 year was comparable between groups (38 and 40%; p = .703). Finally, hospital stay was shorter with TAVI vs. SAVR (9[6-14] and 16[12-22] days; p < .001).Conclusions: Limited resources for transcatheter valve therapies in Belgium push a significant number of patients to SAVR, while TAVI in even higher risk patients translates into similar outcomes and shorter hospital stay. These findings underscore the need for broadening indications for TAVI, as well as readjustment of the budgetary allocations for hospitals in Belgium.

Hospital cost savings and other advantages of sutureless vs stented aortic valves for intermediate-risk elderly patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes and hospital costs of using sutureless aortic valves vs conventional stented aortic valves. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 52 elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in our center had a sutureless valve inserted. From among 180 patients who had a stented valve inserted during the same period, 52 patients were matched to the sutureless group, based on age, gender, and operation type. We compared clinical outcomes and hospital costs between the two groups. RESULTS: The sutureless group had a higher Euroscore (logistic Euroscore I) risk (12.8 vs 9.7; p = 0.02), with significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time (p < 0.01), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (p < 0.01), intensive care unit stay (p < 0.01), intubation time (p < 0.01), and overall hospital stay (p = 0.05). The sutureless group also revealed a significant hospital cost saving of approximately 8200€ (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of using the sutureless bioprosthesis were excellent. The reduced ACC and CPB times had a favorable effect on the duration of intubation and intensive care stay, resulting not only in faster recovery and discharge home, but also in a significant hospital cost reduction.

Strain assessment in the carotid artery wall using ultrasound speckle tracking: validation in a sheep model.

The aim of this study was to validate carotid artery strain assessment in-vivo using ultrasound speckle tracking. The left carotid artery of five sheep was exposed and sonomicrometry crystals were sutured onto the artery wall to obtain reference strain. Ultrasound imaging was performed at baseline and stress, followed by strain estimation using an in-house speckle tracking algorithm tuned for vascular applications. The correlation between estimated and reference strain was r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.87 (p < 0.01) for longitudinal and circumferential strain, respectively. Moreover, acceptable limits of agreement were found in Bland-Altman analysis (longitudinally: -0.15 to 0.42%, circumferentially: -0.54 to 0.50%), which demonstrates the feasibility of estimating carotid artery strain using ultrasound speckle tracking. However, further studies are needed to test the algorithm on human in-vivo data and to investigate its potential to detect subclinical cardiovascular disease and characterize atherosclerotic plaques.