Is the assessment of the mandibular molar danger zone affected by field of view and voxel size in cone beam computed tomography examinations?

OBJECTIVE: To verify if assessment of the danger zone (DZ) in the mesial root of mandibular molars is affected by field of view (FOV) and voxel sizes in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. STUDY DESIGN: Forty mandibular molars were scanned by micro-computed tomography, creating the reference standard. The teeth were then submitted for CBCT scans with FOVs of 10 × 5.5 cm and 5 × 5.5 cm and voxel sizes of 0.4, 0.2, 0.15, and 0.075 mm3. The smallest dentin thickness in the DZ from the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals was measured at 2, 4, and 6 mm apical to the root furcation. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis with significance established at P < .05. RESULTS: All CBCT measurements overestimated the DZ dentin thickness (P < .001) compared to the reference standard. The greatest overestimation occurred in the 5 × 5.5 cm FOV with 0.4 mm3 voxels (P = .007). Dentin thickness measured with the 5 × 5.5 cm FOV and 0.075 mm3 voxels was significantly smaller and produced the best ICC value with the reference standard (0.936). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT overestimates the dentin thickness of the DZ regardless of FOV and voxel sizes. The 5 × 5.5 cm FOV showed the best performance with the 0.075 mm3 voxel size, but it performed poorly with 0.4 mm3 voxels.

Factors associated with advanced-stage oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in a Brazilian population

Diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in advanced stages may be associated with social nature factors, access to health care, education, occupation, and behavioral/ cultural factors. Aim: To determine the factors related to high clinical-staging in patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma in the oral and oropharyngeal region in a Cancer Center in Brazil between 2009 and 2015. Methods: It is an epidemiological, retrospective, and exploratory study. Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma had their medical records analyzed. The variables considered were sociodemographic, lifestyle, and disease characteristics. Descriptive and exploratory tests (Pearson's, chi-square test and, Student's t-test) were realized. Results: We analyzed 365 patient records, among which 289 (79.17%) were male, and 73 (20.0%) were female. Age ranged from 16 to 101 years, with a mean of 61.13. Regarding education, 157 (43.01%) studied < 8 years, 103 (28.21%) were illiterate and 102 (27.94%) studied > 8 years. 305 (83.56%) patients live in urban areas. There was an association between high clinical-staging and low educational level. For high clinical-staging, symptomatology, tobacco, and alcohol intake as well. Conclusion: Patients with low educational levels tend to report the disease later, and their diagnostics occurred in advanced stages. Thus, specific public health policies for this population, including access to dental care to recognize the clinical signs and early diagnosis, are necessary

Assessment of the Metal Artifact Reduction Tool for the Detection of Root Isthmus in Mandibular Molars with Intraradicular Posts in Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the performance of the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool in cone-beam computed tomographic scans using different fields of view (FOVs) in the detection of a root isthmus in mandibular molars with intraradicular posts. METHODS: Twenty-eight teeth were scanned by micro-computed tomographic imaging (gold standard images). Thereafter, specimens were allocated into the following groups: gutta-percha (teeth without posts, n = 10), a prefabricated metal post (n = 9), and a fiberglass post (n = 9). Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were taken using 8 acquisition protocols, varying the size of the FOV (10 × 5.5 cm and 5 × 5.5 cm) and the MAR tool (disabled, low, normal, and high modes). A root isthmus was evaluated considering a 5-point scale. Data were analyzed considering a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Intra- and interexaminer agreement varied from moderate to substantial. The frequency of correct diagnosis varied significantly in all groups regardless of the image acquisition protocol selected (P < .05). In the gutta-percha group, there was no difference in the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values between the tested protocols. In the metal and fiberglass post groups, the accuracy values were higher with the "disabled" and "low" modes of the MAR tool regardless of the FOV size. This was also observed for the sensitivity values in the metal post group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The size of the FOV did not affect the performance of the MAR tool in the diagnosis of a root isthmus in molars with intraradicular posts. Our findings suggest that the use of the tool in the "normal" and "high" modes is contraindicated for this purpose.