Cost savings for pVAD compared to ECMO in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An episode-of-care analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) occurs in up to 10% of acute myocardial infarction admissions and is associated with high mortality, frequent adverse outcomes, prolonged hospitalizations, extensive medical resource utilization, and major cost. Using hospital cost data for Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) patients with AMICS, we sought to evaluate in hospital and 45-day outcomes and cost, comparing patients treated with percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The goal of this study was to better understand clinical and economic outcomes of AMICS to help clinicians and hospitals optimize outcomes most economically for AMICS patients. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis identified patients from the full census Medicare Standard Analytic Files compiled by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) including: Inpatient, Outpatient, Skilled Nursing Facility and Home Health files for Medicare FFS beneficiaries. Study costs were defined as the total costs incurred by providers for treating a population with AMICS. Medicare FFS beneficiaries who experienced an inpatient admission during the index period (January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2017) with a diagnosis of AMICS were eligible for study inclusion and were identified by the presence of appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Versions (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes. To create a matched sample and control for any baseline differences, a 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed based on criteria such as age, gender, race, geographic distribution, and 11 high-cost comorbidities (e.g., congestive HF, coronary artery disease, diabetes, etc.). Index length of stay (LOS), index costs, discharge disposition (including mortality), post-index utilization, and episode-of-care (EOC) costs were reviewed. EOC was defined as index admission for all patients plus a 45-day post index period for patients who survived the index admission. RESULTS: Each cohort included 338 patients. Index in-hospital mortality rates were 53% for pVAD versus 64% for ECMO (178 vs. 217; p = .0023), and total EOC in-hospital mortality rates were 66% for pVAD versus 74% for ECMO (222 vs. 250; p = .0160). Index LOS for pVAD was 27% lower versus ECMO (12.12 vs. 16.59; p = .0006). The index LOS for patients discharged alive was 25% lower for pVAD versus ECMO (17.73 vs. 23.62; p = .0016). For patients that experienced in-hospital mortality during their index stay, pVAD had a 44% lower LOS compared to ECMO (7.08 vs. 12.66; p < .0001). Following index hospitalization, the average cost savings with additional inpatient care was 31% lower for pVAD patients ($62,188 vs. $90,087; p = NS). During the EOC, pVAD patients incurred 32% lower costs compared to ECMO patients ($117,849 vs. $172,420; <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study of Medicare FFS patients demonstrates that hospitals utilizing pVAD for appropriately selected AMICS patients have reduced mortality rates and reduced index LOS with lower index facility costs and lower post index 45-day costs. The study results offer hospitals and clinicians an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes and reduce total EOC costs in treating patients with AMI complicated by CS.

One-year post-discharge resource utilization and treatment patterns of patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare 1-year real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU), associated charges, and antiplatelet treatment patterns among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel. METHODS: Using the ProMetis-Lx database, adult ACS-PCI patients treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel post-discharge were identified between 1 August 2011 and 31 May 2013 and propensity matched to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: Before matching, ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 2991) were older with increased baseline ischemic and bleeding risks compared with prasugrel-treated patients (n = 12,797). After matching, ticagrelor patients had higher all-cause HRU (2.5 vs. 2.4 per patient per month; P = 0.012) and cardiovascular (CV) HRU (0.4 vs. 0.3 per patient per month; P = 0.026), with the difference in CV rehospitalizations (17.7 vs. 15.7 %; P = 0.011) primarily driven by congestive heart failure (CHF) (4.9 vs. 3.8 %; P = 0.02). All-cause charges within 1 year did not significantly differ between groups ($US5456 vs. 4844 per patient per month; P = 0.37), but dyspnea-related total charges were significantly higher with ticagrelor ($US139 vs. 95 per patient per month; P = 0.005). Although infrequent, switching was slightly higher with ticagrelor (8.3 vs. 6.0 %; P < 0.001) at 1 year, and mean persistence was slightly longer with prasugrel (150 vs. 159 days; P = 0.002), with no significant difference in mean adherence (61 vs. 63 %; P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Overall monthly HRU was slightly lower with prasugrel than with ticagrelor, with no significant difference in bleeding HRU. Prasugrel was associated with slightly higher pharmacy charges, but lower dyspnea charges, resulting in no significant difference in total charges. Patients receiving prasugrel tended to use it for longer than those receiving ticagrelor as less switching occurred. These findings may aid decision making, but must be tempered due to inherent study limitations.

Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. METHODS: Hospital charge master data were used to identify ACS-PCI patients aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 1 in-hospital claim for prasugrel or ticagrelor between August 1, 2011-April 30, 2013. Treatment groups were propensity matched for baseline and index hospitalization characteristics. HCRU and costs were assessed through 90-days post-discharge. Costs were determined based on hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios and adjusted to 2013 US dollars. RESULTS: Before matching, ticagrelor patients were older, more-often female, and had increased cardiovascular (CV) and bleeding risks compared with prasugrel patients. Propensity-matched length of index hospital stay (4.7 vs 4.9 days, p = 0.23) and risk for all-cause [30-day: relative risk (RR) = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.73-1.0; 90-day: RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.80-1.0, and CV-related (30-day: RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.59-1.0; 90-day: RR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.73-1.1) re-hospitalizations did not significantly differ between prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. Compared to ticagrelor, the propensity-matched risk of re-hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) (30-day: RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.21-0.75; 90-day: RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34-0.81) and an outpatient medical encounter for dyspnea (30-day: RR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33-0.74; 90-day: RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.80) were significantly lower for prasugrel patients, with no significant differences in bleeding encounters between groups (30-day: RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.54-1.40; 90-day: RR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.71-1.50). Matched total healthcare costs were not significantly different between groups during the index hospitalization ($36,011 vs $37,247, p = 0.21), 30-days post-discharge ($2007 vs $2522, p = 0.48), 90-days post-discharge ($4564 vs $5242, p = 0.49), and aggregate of the index hospitalization through 90-day follow-up ($40,576 vs $42,494, p = 0.09) timeframes. CONCLUSIONS: Re-hospitalization for MI and outpatient encounters for dyspnea were lower in prasugrel treated than in ticagrelor treated ACS-PCI patients up to 90-days post-index hospitalization discharge, with no difference in bleeding encounters or healthcare costs between the two populations. This data supports the utility of prasugrel in routine clinical practice. These findings should be considered within limitations of observational research.

Hemoglobin levels predict exercise performance, ST-segment depression, and outcome in patients referred for routine exercise treadmill testing.

BACKGROUND: While the role of hemoglobin in heart failure and renal disease has been investigated, little is known about its effect on clinical exercise test performance and mortality in patients referred for routine exercise treadmill testing (ETT). HYPOTHESIS: Patients with low hemoglobin will have poor exercise capacity and would be at increased risk of mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events. METHODS: Clinical variables, laboratory values, and exercise treadmill data were obtained for 1,799 patients referred for routine ETT from 1997 to 2004. All-cause mortality was obtained from the United States Social Security death index and autopsy reports or clinical notes were used to determine CV events and mortality. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Our population had a mean age of 58 +/- 12 years, 16% had diabetes, 53% had hypertension, 35% had hypercholesterolemia, and 67% had a history of smoking. During follow-up, 10.3% of patients died, 3.9% of patients died of CV causes, and 11.6% had cardiovascular events. Anemic patients (hemoglobin [Hgb] < 13 g/dL) achieved lower metabolic equivalents (METs) than nonanemic patients and had more ST-segment depression (15.5% versus 8.6%, p < 0.004). Proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that hemoglobin was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (p < 0.0007), CV mortality (p < 0.009), and CV events (p < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that anemic patients had significantly higher mortality and CV events. CONCLUSION: Hemoglobin is significantly associated with exercise performance, ST-segment depression during ETT, mortality, and cardiovascular events. The incorporation of hemoglobin may add diagnostic and prognostic information to ETT.

Safety of drug-eluting stents in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Recent studies have reported a higher incidence of late stent thrombosis in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES). Reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is considered a risk factor for this complication after both bare-metal stent (BMS) and DES implantation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of DES on long-term follow-up in patients with LV dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We retrospectively selected all patients with an EF <45% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of > or =1 sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent at our institution. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality, retrieved using both Social Security Database and hospital records. We also compared the results of this group with a historical cohort of patients with LV dysfunction undergoing BMS implantation; 121 patients who received > or =1 DES were enrolled. The mean LVEF was 36 +/- 8%, with 20 patients (16%) with a LVEF < or =25%; 36 patients (30%) had diabetes mellitus, and DES implantation was considered off-label in 100 patients (83%). Survival at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88 to 100), 90% (95% CI 82 to 98) and 88% (95% CI 80 to 96), respectively. In conclusion, the favorable results of this study demonstrate the safety of DES in patients with LV dysfunction.

Effect of statins and white blood cell count on mortality in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: While morbidity and mortality were shown to be increased in the setting of an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count for patients with acute coronary syndrome, the impact of statin therapy on mortality for patients with an elevated WBC count is unknown in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine whether statin therapy improved survival in patients with elevated WBC count undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, a population at high risk for adverse outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patient procedures performed at our institution from 1996 through 1999. Patients had a technically adequate angiographic left ventriculogram with a calculated ejection fraction (EF) < or = 50%. Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft were excluded. Mortality data were retrieved using the U.S. Social Security Death Index. Follow-up ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 years. Means are provided with +/- standard deviation, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of the study population of 238 patients (average EF 39 +/- 9.8%, mean age 57.5 +/- 12 years, 68% men) 61% underwent PCI for a recent myocardial infarction, 68% received stents, and 65% were discharged on statins. Mean WBC count was 9,000 +/- 3,100 cells/mm3, with 28% of patients having a WBC > or = 10,000 cells/mm3. During follow-up, 27% of our population died. Patients with a WBC > or = 10,000 had worse survival than patients with WBC < 10,000 (1-year survival: 86 vs. 96%, p < 0.05; 3-year survival: 79 vs. 89%, p < 0.05). Survival was significantly improved in patients on statin therapy regardless of WBC count, but the greatest benefit tended to be in patients with WBC > or = 10,000 (WBC > or = 10,000; odds ratio [OR] 5.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-19.0, WBC < 10,000; OR 2.79,95% CI 1.13-7.1). Proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that both statin therapy and WBC count predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PCI with LV dysfunction discharged on statins had improved survival regardless of WBC count, with a trend for greater improvement in patients with elevated WBC counts. In addition, WBC count predicts mortality in this high-risk population with LV dysfunction undergoing PCI.

Improved survival for stenting vs. balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

While earlier studies of balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction suggested high late mortality, a study directly comparing coronary stenting and BA has not been performed. Since stenting provides a more durable revascularization, we sought to compare long-term survival in patients undergoing stenting vs BA in patients with decreased left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF). We evaluated consecutive patient procedures performed in our institution from 1996 through 1999. Patients were considered part of the stent group if they received at least one stent. To be included, patients had to have a technically adequate angiographic LV gram with a calculated LVEF