RESUMO
Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a major cause of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) reports that over 80% of these sepsis deaths could be prevented through improved treatment, the efficacy of the currently recommended first- and second-line treatment regimens for this condition is increasingly affected by high rates of drug resistance. Here we assess three well known antibiotics, fosfomycin, flomoxef and amikacin, in combination as potential antibiotic treatment regimens by investigating the drug resistance and genetic profiles of commonly isolated GNB causing neonatal sepsis in LMICs. The five most prevalent bacterial isolates in the NeoOBS study (NCT03721302) are Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae complex. Among these isolates, high levels of ESBL and carbapenemase encoding genes are detected along with resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and cefotaxime, the current WHO recommended empiric regimens. The three new combinations show excellent in vitro activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates. Our data should further inform and support the clinical evaluation of these three antibiotic combinations for the treatment of neonatal sepsis in areas with high rates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Sepse Neonatal , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Sepse Neonatal/microbiologia , Sepse Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Recém-Nascido , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/genética , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Amicacina/farmacologia , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Fosfomicina/farmacologia , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamases/genética , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Países em Desenvolvimento , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Quimioterapia Combinada , Serratia marcescens/efeitos dos fármacos , Serratia marcescens/genética , Serratia marcescens/isolamento & purificação , Enterobacter cloacae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacter cloacae/genética , Enterobacter cloacae/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the leading nosocomial infections worldwide, resulting in a significantly increasing burden on the healthcare systems. However, Pan-European data about cost and resource utilization of CDI treatment do not exist. METHODS: A retrospective analysis within the Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe CDI project was conducted based on resource costs for inpatient treatment and productivity costs. Country-specific cost values were converted to EURO referred to 1 January, 2019 values. Differences in price levels for healthcare services among the participating countries were adjusted by using an international approach of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. As the study focused on patients with recurrent CDI, the observed study population was categorized into (a) patients with CDI but without CDI recurrence (case group), (b) patients with CDI recurrence (recurrence group), and (c) patients without CDI (control group). RESULTS: Overall, 430 hospitalized patients from 12 European countries were included into the analysis between July 2018 and November 2018. Distribution of mean hospital length of stay and mean overall costs per patient between the case group, recurrence group, and control group were as follows: 22 days (95% CI 17-27 days) vs. 55 days (95% CI 17-94 days) vs. 26 days (95% CI 22-31 days; p 0.008) and 15 242 (95% CI 10 593-19 891) vs. 52 024 (95% CI 715-103 334) vs. 21 759 (95% CI 16 484-27 035; p 0.010), respectively. The CDI recurrence rate during the observational period was 18%. Change escalation in CDI medication (OR 3.735) and treatment in an intensive care unit (OR 5.454) were found to be the most important variables associated with increased overall costs of patients with CDI. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with recurrent CDI results in a significant burden. Prevention of CDI recurrences should be in focus of daily patient care to identify the most cost-effective treatment strategy.