Burden of disease in pediatric narcolepsy: a claims-based analysis of health care utilization, costs, and comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed a privately insured pediatric population with and without narcolepsy to determine the impact of pediatric narcolepsy on comorbidities, health care utilization, and cost. Additional analyses compared narcolepsy type 1 and type 2. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study identified US patients with narcolepsy <18 years of age with ≥2 claims with a diagnosis code of narcolepsy using Truven MarketScan® data 2011 to 2015. Patients were matched to controls without narcolepsy. Comorbid conditions, health care utilization, and costs were measured by calendar year. P values are nominal, and no adjustments for multiplicity or multiple comparisons were made. RESULTS: A total of 1427 pediatric patients with narcolepsy were identified and matched with 4281 controls from 2011 to 2015. Patients with narcolepsy had more comorbid conditions (mean 5.8 vs 2.4, nominal P < 0.001). Respiratory diseases and mood disorders were more common in patients with narcolepsy than controls (57% vs 32% and 56% vs 14%, respectively; both nominal P < 0.001). Compared to controls, patients with narcolepsy underwent more diagnostic tests (electroencephalogram, EEG [0.13 vs 0.0053]) and brain computed tomography, CT/magnetic resonance imaging, MRI (0.26 vs 0.022; both nominal P < 0.001). Mean annual inpatient days (0.71 vs 0.15), emergency department visits (0.51 vs 0.15), and outpatient office visits (8.6 vs 2.3) were higher for patients with narcolepsy than controls (all nominal P < 0.001). Annual mean health care costs were higher for patients with narcolepsy versus controls ($15,797 vs $2449, nominal P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with narcolepsy had greater comorbidity, higher health care utilization, and higher costs than patients without narcolepsy.

Comorbidities, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Work Productivity Among People With Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Excessive Sleepiness: Findings From the 2016 US National Health and Wellness Survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Few population-based studies have explored how excessive sleepiness (ES) contributes to burden of illness among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: This study utilized data from the annual, cross-sectional 2016 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Respondents self-reporting an OSA diagnosis were categorized as having ES (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score ≥ 11) or not having ES (ESS score < 11). Comorbidities, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and productivity were examined in three groups: OSA with ES (n = 731), OSA without ES (n = 1,452), and non-OSA controls (n = 86,961). RESULTS: The OSA with ES group had significantly higher proportions of respondents reporting depression (62.4% versus 48.0%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (39.0% versus 29.4%), asthma (26.3% versus 20.7%), and angina (7.8% versus 6.7%) compared to the OSA without ES group (P < .05). After controlling for covariates, the OSA with ES group had significantly lower (worse) scores for mental component score (41.81 versus 45.65 versus 47.81), physical component score (46.62 versus 48.68 versus 51.36), and SF-6D (0.65 versus 0.69 versus 0.73) compared with OSA without ES and non-OSA controls (all P < .001). The OSA with ES group had significantly higher (greater burden) mean rates of presenteeism (25.98% impairment versus 19.24% versus 14.75%), work impairment (29.41% versus 21.82% versus 16.85%), and activity impairment (31.09% versus 25.46% versus 19.93%) compared with OSA without ES and non-OSA controls (all P < .01) after controlling for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: OSA with ES is associated with higher prevalence of comorbidities, reduced HRQoL, and greater impairment in productivity compared to OSA without ES and compared to non-OSA controls.

Indirect costs associated with premature mortality among those with veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with multiorgan dysfunction post-hematopoietic stem-cell-transplant.

PURPOSE: The study objective was to develop an economic model to assess projected costs of lost productivity associated with premature deaths due to veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/ sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) with multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) among patients in the US who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) in 2013. METHODS: Data sources included the US Census Bureau and Department of Health, epidemiologic research organizations, and medical research literature. The model considered only lost productivity associated with premature death, with lifetime salary assumed to reflect productivity. Average annual salary was assumed to be the same for HSCT survivors and the general population, with a working age range between 18 and 65 years. Key data inputs included number of HSCTs by graft type (allogeneic and autologous) performed in the US in 2013, HSCT-related mortality, mortality associated with VOD/SOS with MOD, and life-expectancy reduction for HSCT survivors vs the general population. Excess mortality equaled total deaths among patients with VOD/SOS and MOD minus deaths in these patients due to causes other than VOD/SOS with MOD. RESULTS: Among 18,284 patients who underwent HSCT in the US in 2013, the model estimated that 361 excess deaths due to VOD/SOS with MOD occurred (158 following allogeneic and 203 after autologous transplants). These deaths accounted for total lost work productivity of 5,990 years and $124,212,173 in lost wages, averaging 17 years and $343,791 per patient. A sensitivity analysis incorporating adjustment factors for epidemiologic and economic inputs calculated total financial loss of $84 million to $194 million. LIMITATION: Estimates of post-HSCT VOD/SOS with MOD incidence and mortality were approximated, due to changing HSCT practices. CONCLUSION: Premature death due to VOD/SOS with MOD imposes a substantial economic burden in this population in terms of lost productivity. Additional studies of this economic burden are warranted.

Changes in Medical Services and Drug Utilization and Associated Costs After Narcolepsy Diagnosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare utilization and the cost implications associated with undiagnosed and/or misdiagnosed narcolepsy have not been evaluated, and there is scant literature characterizing the newly diagnosed population with narcolepsy with respect to treatment patterns and resource utilization. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the changes in medication use, healthcare utilization, and the associated costs after a new diagnosis of narcolepsy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Databases, between January 2006 and March 2013, to identify patients who had a probable new diagnosis of narcolepsy-defined as a de novo medical claim for a multiple sleep latency test-which was preceded by ≥6 months of continuous insurance and was followed by a de novo diagnosis of narcolepsy. The utilization and cost of medical services and the percentage of patients filling prescriptions for narcolepsy-related medications were evaluated in 3 consecutive 1-year periods from the date of a positive multiple sleep latency test result (ie, index date), and each year's findings were compared with the annualized results from the 6-month preindex period. RESULTS: A total of 3757 patients who met the definition of a new diagnosis of narcolepsy were identified. The total medical service utilization decreased each year from a preindex average of 28.2 visits per patient per year (PPPY) to 26.9 visits (P <.05), 23.1 visits (P <.0001), and 22.5 visits (P <.0001) PPPY in years 1, 2, and 3 postdiagnosis, respectively. In each outpatient service category, the medical services utilization decreased from preindex to year 3 postdiagnosis, including hospital outpatient and physician visits (P <.0001), and other outpatient and emergency department visits (P <.05). The percentage of patients receiving narcolepsy-related medications increased from 54.0% preindex to 77.4%, 70.0%, and 66.9% for years 1, 2, and 3 postindex (all P <.0001 vs preindex). The total medical service cost PPPY was $12,159 preindex and decreased to $10,708, $8543, and $9136 in years 1, 2, and 3 postindex (all P <.0001 vs preindex). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the confirmation of a diagnosis of narcolepsy was associated with decreasing utilization and associated costs of medical services in the first 3 years after diagnosis. The total costs encompassing medical services and pharmacy costs were relatively stable during this period.

The Cost of Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) requires highly specialized, resource-intensive care. Myeloablative conditioning regimens used before HSCT generally require inpatient stays and are more intensive than other preparative regimens, and may therefore be more costly. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the costs associated with inpatient HSCT according to the type of the conditioning regimen used and other potential contributors to the overall cost of the procedure. METHOD: We used data from the Truven Health MarketScan insurance claims database to analyze healthcare costs for pediatric (age <18 years) and adult (age ≥18 years) patients who had autologous or allogeneic inpatient HSCT between January 1, 2010, and September 23, 2013. We developed an algorithm to determine whether conditioning regimens were myeloablative or nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity. RESULTS: We identified a sample of 1562 patients who had inpatient HSCT during the study period for whom the transplant type and the conditioning regimen were determinable: 398 patients had myeloablative allogeneic HSCT; 195 patients had nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT; and 969 patients had myeloablative autologous HSCT. The median total healthcare cost at 100 days was $289,283 for the myeloablative allogeneic regimen cohort compared with $253,467 for the nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity allogeneic regimen cohort, and $140,792 for the myeloablative autologous regimen cohort. The mean hospital length of stay for the index (first claim of) HSCT was 35.6 days in the myeloablative allogeneic regimen cohort, 26.6 days in the nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity allogeneic cohort, and 21.8 days in the myeloablative autologous regimen cohort. CONCLUSION: Allogeneic HSCT was more expensive than autologous HSCT, regardless of the regimen used. Myeloablative conditioning regimens led to higher overall costs than nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity regimens in the allogeneic HSCT cohort, indicating a greater cost burden associated with inpatient services for higher-intensity preparative conditioning regimens. Pediatric patients had higher costs than adult patients. Future research should involve validating the algorithm for identifying conditioning regimens using clinical data.

Burden of illness associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

AIMS: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality were assessed in HSCT patients diagnosed with SOS, with and without multi-organ dysfunction (MOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study identified real-world patients undergoing HSCT between January 1, 2009 and May 31, 2014 using the Premier Healthcare Database. In absence of a formal ICD-9-CM diagnostic code, SOS patients were identified using a pre-specified definition adapted from Baltimore and Seattle criteria and clinical practice. Severe SOS (SOS/MOD) and non-severe SOS (SOS/no-MOD) were classified according to clinical evidence for MOD in the database. RESULTS: Of the 5,418 patients with a discharge diagnosis of HSCT, 291 had SOS, with 134 categorized as SOS/MOD and 157 as SOS/no-MOD. The remaining 5,127 patients had HSCT without SOS. Overall SOS incidence was 5.4%, with 46% having evidence of MOD. Distribution of age, gender, and race were similar between the SOS cohorts and non-SOS patients. After controlling for hospital profile and admission characteristics, demographics, and clinical characteristics, the adjusted mean LOS was 31.0 days in SOS/MOD compared to 23.9 days in the non-SOS cohort (medians = 26.9 days vs 20.8 days, p < .001). The adjusted mean cost of SOS/MOD patients was $140,653, which was $41,702 higher than the non-SOS cohort (medians = $105,749 vs $74,395, p < .001). An almost 6-fold increased odds of inpatient mortality was associated with SOS/MOD compared to the non-SOS cohort (odds ratio = 5.88; 95% CI = 3.45-10.33). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of retrospective observational studies apply, since the study was not randomized. Definition for SOS was based on ICD-9 diagnosis codes from a hospital administrative database and reliant on completeness and accuracy of coding. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of real-world data shows that SOS/MOD is associated with significant increases in healthcare utilization, costs, and inpatient mortality.

The budget impact and cost-effectiveness of defibrotide for treatment of veno-occlusive disease with multi-organ dysfunction in patients post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

BACKGROUND: A Phase-3 study of defibrotide compared with historical controls demonstrated a 23% improvement in 100-day survival post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) among patients with veno-occlusive disease with multi-organ dysfunction (VOD with MOD). AIM: To estimate the budget impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing defibrotide to a transplant center. METHODS: The authors developed a budget impact model from the perspective of a bone-marrow transplant center. It was estimated that 2.3% of adults and 4.2% of children would develop VOD with MOD following HSCT based on a retrospective hospital database analysis and the effect that treating patients with defibrotide would have on costs for adult and pediatric centers was estimated. A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was also developed to capture the long-term cost-effectiveness of defibrotide. Projected life expectancies in the two groups were estimated based on trial data, transplant registry data, studies of long-term survival among HSCT patients, and US population life-tables. RESULTS: There was an estimated 3% increase ($330,706) per year in total adult transplantation center costs associated with adopting defibrotide, and a <1% increase ($106,385) for pediatric transplant centers, assuming 100 transplants per year. In the CUA, the lifetime increase in cost per patient was $106,928, life expectancy increased by 3.74 years, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) increased by 2.24. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $47,736 per QALY gained; 88% probability defibrotide was cost-effective at a $100,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: The budget impact of defibrotide for a transplant center is relatively modest compared to the overall cost of transplantation. Defibrotide provides an important survival advantage for VOD with MOD patients, and the life years gained lead to defibrotide being highly cost-effective.

The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Narcolepsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the burden of narcolepsy--with respect to psychiatric comorbidities, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), direct costs for healthcare resource utilization, and indirect costs for reported work loss-through comparison of patients to matched controls. METHODS: This analysis was conducted on data from the 2011, 2012, and 2013 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS; 2011 NHWS n = 75,000, 2012 NHWS n = 71,157, and 2013 NHWS n = 75,000). Patients who reported a narcolepsy diagnosis (n = 437) were matched 1:2 with controls (n = 874) on age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, household income, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol use, exercise, and physical comorbidity. Chi-square tests and one-way analyses of variance were used to assess whether the narcolepsy and control groups differed on psychiatric comorbidities, HRQoL, labor force participation, work productivity, and healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: Patients with narcolepsy, in comparison to matched controls, reported substantially (two to four times) greater psychiatric comorbidity, HRQoL impairment, prevalence of long-term disability, absenteeism, and presenteeism, and greater resource use in the past 6 mo as indicated by higher mean number of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, traditional healthcare professional visits, neurologist visits, and psychiatrist visits (each p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These population-based data suggest that a narcolepsy diagnosis is associated with substantial adverse impact on mental health, HRQoL, and key economic burdens that include work impairment, resource use, and both direct and indirect costs. Although this study is cross-sectional, the results highlight the magnitude of the potential opportunity to improve mental health, lower costs, and augment work-related productivity through effective assessment and treatment of narcolepsy.

The humanistic and economic burden of providing care for a patient with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a debilitating disorder that often requires the affected individual to receive part- or full-time care from a caregiver. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine the humanistic and economic burden of caring for an individual with Schizophrenia with regard to the measures of quality of life (QoL), work productivity, healthcare resource use and estimated economic costs. METHODS: Data for this study came from the 2012 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS; n = 71,149). Specifically, this analysis focused on those individuals in the survey who indicated that they were currently the primary caregiver for an individual with Schizophrenia (C-SCZ; n = 174). These individuals were matched via two separate 1:2 propensity score matches with both caregivers of other disorders (C-Other; n = 294) and non-caregivers (Non-C; n = 294) on significant covariates. Individuals were then compared across the outcomes of QoL, work productivity, healthcare resource use and estimated economic costs. RESULTS: C-SCZ respondents had worse outcomes on all outcomes measured than C-Other respondents and Non-C respondents even when controlling for significant differences between the groups on sociodemographic characteristics. However, due to the small sample sizes, these comparisons were only significant in most cases for the C-SCZ to Non-C comparisons. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that caregivers of those with Schizophrenia experience a heightened humanistic and economic burden, especially relative to the burden experienced by non-caregivers. The fact that Schizophrenia not only affects the individual but also those who care for that individual is underscored by these results.

Resource utilization and cost in a commercially insured population with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a serious public health concern and a leading cause of disability. Previous studies have shown this disease is associated with an economic burden of more than $60 billion annually in direct and indirect costs in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the annual and longitudinal costs associated with the treatment of patients with schizophrenia from a payer perspective. METHODS: Two claim-based analyses were conducted using data from the Truven Health MarketScan database of a commercially insured population: (1) an annual snapshot of patients with newly diagnosed and chronic schizophrenia, and (2) a 24-month longitudinal analysis of patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia. The snapshot analysis included individuals who had ≥2 claims with a diagnosis code for schizophrenia on separate dates during 2011 (with the date of the first claim designated as the index date), and who were enrolled for 12 months before the index date. For the longitudinal analysis, patients were included if they were continuously enrolled for 24 months after the date of schizophrenia diagnosis, which was designated as the index date. The claims were grouped by inpatient, outpatient, professional, and prescription drug categories, and were further segmented by claims for schizophrenia, other psychiatric, and nonschizophrenia/nonpsychiatric conditions. RESULTS: A total of 8985 patients with schizophrenia met the inclusion criteria for the snapshot analysis. The mean cost per patient per month (PPPM) for a patient with schizophrenia was $1806 versus $419 per member per month for the demographically adjusted nonschizophrenic (ie, matched for age and sex) population. The PPPM cost of $1806 for patients with schizophrenia was 42% for inpatient expenditures, 33% for outpatient, and 25% for prescription drug costs. The annual inpatient admission rates were 636 per 1000 patients with schizophrenia and 48 per 1000 persons for the demographically adjusted population without schizophrenia. The annual emergency department visits for patients with schizophrenia were 2270 per 1000 patients and 158 per 1000 persons without schizophrenia for the demographically adjusted population. For the longitudinal analysis, 1902 patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia were identified. The total claim costs for patients increased from $800 monthly in the 12 months before the index date to approximately $2000 in the month before the index date. The highest costs occurred in the month of diagnosis (designated as the index month; mean cost, $6601). The total all-cause claim cost after the index date decreased to $1635 monthly for months 2 to 6, $1456 monthly for months 7 to 12, $1324 monthly for months 13 to 18, and $1218 monthly for months 19 to 24. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of schizophrenia is low in a commercially insured US population, this analysis shows that the average total claim cost per patient with schizophrenia is more than 4 times the average total claim cost for a demographically adjusted population without schizophrenia. Furthermore, for newly diagnosed patients with schizophrenia, the cost, which is largely driven by inpatient charges, is highest in the month of diagnosis.

Adherence to dornase alfa treatment among commercially insured patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate adherence to dornase alfa therapy among commercially-insured patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and to examine the impact of adherence on health and economic outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis included CF patients with ≥1 dornase alfa (Pulmozyme) pharmacy claim between 1 October 2006 and 30 September 2008 and with continuous enrollment in the health insurance plan at least 1 year before and 1 year after their index dornase alfa claim. Adherence was measured with the medication possession ratio (MPR). Multivariate models were used to estimate the relationship between adherence and exacerbations, utilization, and cost. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 19.5 years (SD = 11.5) and 49.1% were female. Overall MPR was 0.59 and by age was 0.66 for patients of 5-12 years, 0.57 for 13-20 years, 0.54 for 21-30 years, and 0.56 for patients ≥31 years. Adherence was better in fall and winter than in spring and summer. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with inpatient respiratory exacerbations across groups with low (<0.5), moderate (0.5-0.79), and high (≥0.8) adherence (24.5%, 22.3%, and 19.1%, respectively, p = 0.250). There was a trend toward higher total charges in more-adherent patients (mean $58,612 in the least-adherent group and mean $69,427 in the most adherent group, p = 0.107). In multivariate models, MPR was not significantly associated with the risk of inpatient respiratory exacerbations (hazard ratio = 1.16 for MPR <0.5 vs ≥0.8; 95% CI = 0.83-1.61). LIMITATIONS: Study data were derived from insurance claims; adherence measures were based on prescription fills, not observed medication use. CONCLUSION: Adherence to dornase alfa was generally low, but varied by age and season. Adherence was not found to be significantly associated with respiratory exacerbations or total charges, but was associated with shorter hospital length of stay.

The cost burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: a systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate average annual cost per multiple sclerosis (MS) patient in the US using published estimates from the literature. METHODS: A search was performed of English-language literature published between 2007 and June 2012 in PubMed and Embase using the term 'multiple sclerosis' and the subject heading 'healthcare costs'. Included articles were primary studies with MS cost figures that could be converted to per patient per year values. Costs were inflated to 2011 dollars using the medical component of the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight presented only direct cost calculations; the remaining seven presented estimates of total cost, broken down into direct and indirect costs. Total all-cause healthcare costs for MS as reported by studies that included direct and indirect costs ranged from $8528-$54,244 per patient per year. On average, direct costs comprised 77% (range 64-91%) of total costs. Prescription medications accounted for the majority of direct costs. On average, indirect costs comprised 23% (range 9-36%) of total costs. Compared with direct all-cause medical costs for other chronic conditions reported in the literature, MS ranked second behind congestive heart failure. LIMITATIONS: Data sources in these studies were dated, ranging from 1999-2008, and therefore do not include some of the newer, more costly therapies. In addition, this review does not include either assessment of the decrements in quality-of-life associated with MS or costs associated with increasing levels of disability or early retirement. Furthermore, variations in study designs, populations, methodologies, and cost inputs preclude more precise cost estimates. CONCLUSIONS: MS is a costly chronic disease. Further research is needed to understand: costs by MS type, costs associated with increasing disability and early retirement, and the potential impact of new treatments expected to launch in coming years.

A model of cost-effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator in patient subgroups 3 to 4.5 hours after onset of acute ischemic stroke.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III (ECASS III) showed that recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) administered 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke led to improvement in patient disability versus placebo. We evaluate the long-term incremental cost-effectiveness of rtPA administered 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke onset versus no treatment according to patient clinical and demographic factors. METHODS: We developed a disease-based decision analytic model to project lifetime outcomes of patients post-acute ischemic stroke from the payer perspective. Clinical data were derived from the ECASS III trial, longitudinal cohort studies, and health state preference studies. Cost data were based on Medicare reimbursement and other published sources. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in the analysis. RESULTS: rtPA in a hypothetical cohort resulted in a gain of 0.07 years of life (95% credible range 0.0005 to 0.17) and 0.24 quality-adjusted life-years (95% credible range 0.01 to 0.60) and a difference in cost of $1,495 (95% credible range -$4,637 to $6,100) compared with placebo. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for all patients was $6,255 per quality-adjusted life-year gained; for patients younger than 65 years, cost saving; for patients aged 65 years or older, $35,813 per quality-adjusted life-year; for patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0 to 9, $16,322 per quality-adjusted life-year; for patients with NIHSS score 10 to 19, $37,462 per quality-adjusted life-year; and for patients with NIHSS score greater than or equal to 20, $2,432 per quality-adjusted life-year. The majority of other subgroups such as sex, history of stroke, and history of hypertension were either cost saving or cost-effective, with the exceptions of diabetes and atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that rtPA in the 3- to 4.5-hour therapeutic window provides improvement in long-term patient outcomes in most patient subgroups and is a good economic value versus no treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: A hub-and-spoke telestroke network is an effective way to extend quality acute stroke care to remote hospitals and to improve patient outcomes. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a telestroke network in the management of acute ischemic stroke from the perspectives of a network, a hub hospital, and a spoke hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: A model was developed to compare costs and effectiveness with and without a telestroke network over a 5-year time horizon. The model considered differences in rates of teleconsultations, intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapies, and spoke-to-hub transfers. These inputs were estimated through the use of data from Georgia Health Sciences University and Mayo Clinic telestroke networks. A network model with 1 hub and 7 spokes predicted that 45 more patients would be treated with intravenous thrombolysis and 20 more with endovascular stroke therapies per year compared with no network, leading to an estimate of 6.11 more home discharges. Each year, a telestroke network was associated with $358 435 in cost savings; each spoke had $109 080 in cost savings, whereas the hub had positive costs of $405 121. However, cost sharing can be arranged so that each hospital could achieve an equal amount of cost savings ($44 804/y). Results were sensitive to the number of spokes, marginal treatment costs in spokes and rates of transfer, and endovascular stroke therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a telestroke network may increase the number of patients discharged home and reduce the costs borne by the network hospitals. Hospitals should consider their available resources and the network features when deciding whether to join or set up a network.

Cost utility of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks from societal perspective.

BACKGROUND: A hub-and-spoke telestroke network is an effective way to extend quality emergency stroke care to remote hospitals and improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost utility of a telestroke network in the management of acute ischemic stroke from the societal perspective. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the incremental costs and effectiveness of a telestroke network. One-year transition probabilities between the 3 health states based on the modified Rankin scale--minimal-to-no disability, moderate-to-severe disability, and death--were derived from literature. Costs included telemedicine setup and maintenance, initial and recurrent stroke treatment, rehabilitation, long-term care, and caregiver costs. Effectiveness was defined as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Model inputs were obtained from the literature supplemented by data from Georgia Health Sciences University and Mayo Clinic. The base case network included 1 hub and 7 spokes, and assumed no survival benefits from acute treatment in a network. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Compared with no network, patients treated in a telestroke network incurred $1436 lower costs and gained 0.02 QALYs over a lifetime. Incremental costs decreased from $444 for the first year to -$1436 over a lifetime; incremental QALYs increased from 0.002 for the first year to 0.02 over a lifetime. Overall, results were robust in the 1-way sensitivity analyses. A telestroke network became less cost-effective with increasing spoke-to-hub transfer rates. CONCLUSIONS: A telestroke network is cost savingand more effective compared with no network from the societal perspective in most modeled scenarios.

The cost-effectiveness of primary stroke centers for acute stroke care.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Primary stroke centers (PSC) have demonstrated improved survival in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating AIS patients in a PSC compared with a nonPSC hospital setting. METHODS: We developed a decision analytic model to project the lifetime outcomes and costs of 2 hypothetical cohorts of 75 AIS patients. Clinical data were derived from a recent observational study comparing PSC- and nonPSC-admitted patients, clinical trials, longitudinal cohort studies, and health state preference studies. Cost data were based on Medicare reimbursement and other published sources. We used a healthcare payer perspective, and the primary outcomes were incremental life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years, and healthcare costs. We performed sensitivity and scenario analyses to evaluate uncertainty in the results. RESULTS: Admission to a PSC resulted in a gain of 0.22 years of life (95% credible range [CR], 0.12-0.33) and 0.15 quality-adjusted life years (95% CR, 0.08-0.23) per patient, at a cost of $3600 (95% CR, $2400-$5000) per patient, compared with admission to a nonPSC hospital. The incremental cost/quality-adjusted life year gained was $24 000, and all probabilistic simulation results were below the $100 000/quality-adjusted life year threshold. In scenario analyses accounting for as few as 7 and as many as 500 AIS patients/year per PSC, cost-effectiveness improved as the number of AIS patients admitted per year increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that care at a PSC for patients with AIS is cost-effective and improves outcomes across a wide range of possible scenarios.