Comparative assessment of chondral defect repair using migratory chondroprogenitors suspended in either gelled or freeze-dried platelet-rich plasma: An in vitro and ex vivo human osteochondral unit model study.

BACKGROUND: Chondroprogenitors, with enhanced chondrogenic potential, have emerged to be a promising alternative for cell-based therapy in cartilage repair. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), widely used for intra-articular treatment, has a short half-life. Freeze-dried PRP (FD-PRP), with an extended half-life and retained growth factors, is gaining attention. This study compares the efficacy of Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) in gelled PRP and FD-PRP using in-vitro and ex-vivo models, assessing FD-PRP as a potential off-the-shelf option for effective cartilage repair. METHODOLOGY: MCPs were isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage samples (n = 3), characterized through FACS and RT-PCR. For in-vitro analysis, cells were loaded into gelled PRP and FD-PRP scaffolds at a density of 1x106 cells per scaffold. Trilineage differentiation studies and live-dead assays were conducted on MCPs using Calcein AM/Propidium Homodimer-1. In ex-vivo analysis, MCPs of the same density were added to Osteochondral Units (OCU) with chondral defects containing PRP gel and FD-PRP scaffolds, harvested on the 15th and 35th days for histological examination. Controls included cell-free scaffolds. RESULTS: Our in-vitro analysis demonstrates the robust viability of MCPs in both scaffolds, with no discernible impact on their differentiation capacity. Ex-vivo analysis of the OCU for cartilage repair showed that the chondrogenic potential characterized by the accumulation of extracellular matrix containing glycosaminoglycans and collagen type II production (with no alteration in collagen type X), was observed to be better with the gel PRP and the gel PRP containing MCP groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the preference for gel PRP as a superior synergistic scaffold for chondroprogenitor delivery.

Assessment of the inherent chondrogenic potential of human articular cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors in pellet culture using a novel whole pellet processing approach.

Purpose: Cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors have been reported to possess the biological potential for cartilage repair. However, its inherent chondrogenic potential in pellet culture needs evaluation. In-vitro cartilage regeneration models based on pellet cultures have been employed to evaluate the chondrogenic potential of stem cells. Evaluation of the degree of differentiation routinely involves paraffin embedding, sectioning, and immunohistochemical staining of the pellet. However, since chondrogenic differentiation is commonly non-uniform, processing random sections could lead to inaccurate conclusions. The study aimed at assessing the inherent lineage bias of chondroprogenitors with and without chondrogenic induction, using a novel whole pellet processing technique. Methods: Human chondroprogenitors (n=3) were evaluated for MSC markers and processed in pellet cultures either with stromal medium (uninduced) or chondrogenic differentiation medium (induced) for 28 days. The whole pellets and the conventional paraffin-embedded sectioned pellets were subjected to Collagen type II immunostaining and assessed using confocal laser microscopy. The staining intensities of the whole pellet were compared to the paraffin sections and revalidated using qRT-PCR for COL2A1 expression. Results: Uninduced and induced pellets displayed Collagen type II in all the layers with comparable fluorescence intensities. COL2A1 expression in both pellets was comparable to confocal results. The study demonstrated that uninduced chondroprogenitors in pellet culture possess promising inherent chondrogenic potential. Confocal imaging of whole pellets displayed different degrees of chondrogenic differentiation in the entire pellet, thus its probable in-vivo behavior. Conclusion: The novel approach presented in this study could serve as an efficient in-vitro alternative for understanding translational application for cartilage repair.

An assessment of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell and human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitor cocultures vs. monocultures.

BACKGROUND: Cell based therapy in cartilage repair predominantly involves the use of chondrocytes and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). Co-culture systems, due to their probable synergistic effect on enhancement of functional chondrogenesis and reduction in terminal differentiation have also been attempted. Chondroprogenitors, derived from articular cartilage and regarded as MSCs, have recently garnered interest for consideration in cartilage regeneration to overcome limitations associated with use of conventional cell types. The aim of this study was to assess whetherco-culturing bone marrow (BM)-MSCs and chondroprogenitors at different ratios would yield superior results in terms of surface marker expression, gene expression and chondrogenic potential. METHODS: Human BM-MSCs and chondroprogenitors obtained from three osteoarthritic knee joints and subjected to monolayer expansion and pellet cultures (10,000 cells/cm2) as five test groups containing either monocultures or co-cultures (MSC: chondroprogenitors) at three different ratios (75:25, 50:50 and 25:75) were utilized. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that all groups exhibited a high expression of CD166, CD29 and CD49e. With regard to gene expression, high expression of SOX9, Aggrecan and Collagen type I; a moderate expression of Collagen type X and RUNX2; with a low expression of Collagen type II was seen. Analysis of pellet culture revealed that chondroprogenitor monoculture and chondroprogenitor dominant coculture, exhibited a subjectively larger pellet size with higher deposition of Collagen type II and glycosaminoglycan. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study is suggestive of chondroprogenitor monoculture superiority over MSCs, either in isolation or in a coculture system and proposes further analysis of chondroprogenitors for cartilage repair.