Preoperative Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: Implementing a Systematic Stepwise Approach during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Major adverse cardiac events, defined as death or myocardial infarction, are common causes of perioperative mortality and major morbidity in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Reduction of perioperative cardiovascular risk in relation to non-cardiac surgery requires a stepwise patient evaluation that integrates clinical risk factors, functional status and the estimated stress of the planned surgical procedure. Major guidelines on preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment recommend to establish, firstly, the risk of surgery per se (low, moderate, high) and the related timing (elective vs. urgent/emergent), evaluate the presence of unstable cardiac conditions or a recent coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting), assess the functional capacity of the patient (usually expressed in metabolic equivalents), determine the value of non-invasive and/or invasive cardiovascular testing and then combine these data in estimating perioperative risk for major cardiac adverse events using validated scores (Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) or National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)). This stepwise approach has the potential to guide clinicians in determining which patients could benefit from cardiovascular therapy and/or coronary artery revascularization before non-cardiac surgery towards decreasing the incidence of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Finally, it should be highlighted that there is a need to implement specific strategies in the 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19 infection during the preoperative risk assessment process.

Noninvasive Assessment of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Heart Failure.

The heart and the arterial system are anatomically and functionally linked together. Noninvasive assessment of ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) can be done using different methods that are promising tools to assess individual hemodynamics and tailor treatment in patients with heart failure (HF). Moreover, different methods available can be appropriately used in different settings such as acute and chronic HF. VAC parameters also can add incremental value over the conventional risk factors in predicting cardiac outcome.

Diagnostic Comparability and Interchangeability Between Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Detecting Masked Hypertension.

Background The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the level of diagnostic overlap between daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (DT-ABPM) and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (24-h ABPM) in detecting masked hypertension (MH). Methods This is a prospective study that was performed in a sample of 196 soldiers aged between 21 and 50 years (without a history of hypertension) undergoing ABPM testing. The diagnosis of MH based on DT-ABPM defined as (office blood pressure (OBP) <140/90 and DT-ABPM ≥135/85) was compared with the 24-h ABPM defined as (OBP <140/90 mm Hg and 24-h ABPM ≥130/80 mm Hg). We critically analyzed the results to see the agreement between the two methods. Results The number of subjects classified as having MH based on both DT-ABPM and 24-h ABPM, only on 24-h ABPM, and only on DT-ABPM were 11 (5.6%), 29 (14.8%), and 18 (9.2%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for DT-ABPM in detecting MH were: sensitivity = 100% (95% CI: 97.82% - 100%), specificity = 62.07% (95% CI: 42.26% - 79.31%), PPV = 93.82% (95% CI: 90.50% - 96.03%), and NPV = 100%, respectively. The level of agreement between DT-ABPM and 24-h ABPM in diagnosing MH was 94.4% and discordance in 5.6% (11/196); (kappa=0.736, p < 0.001). Conclusion The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values all showed agreement between the two BP methods to confirm the diagnoses of MH. DT-ABPM can be used as an alternative to the 24-h ABPM. DT-ABPM eliminates sleep disturbance attributable to ABPM and maximizes patient compliance with the ABPM test. A further larger trial is needed for more confirmation and to affect the guidelines for using daytime ABPM.