Epidemiology of Postoperative Complications After Esophagectomy: Implications for Management.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in operative techniques and postoperative care, esophagectomy remains a morbid operation. Leveraging complication epidemiology and the correlation of these complications may improve rescue and refine early recovery pathways. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed all esophagectomies performed at a tertiary academic center from 2014 to 2021 and quantified the timing of the most common complications. Daily incidence values for index complications were calculated, and a covariance matrix was created to examine the correlation of the complications with each other. Study investigators performed a Cox proportional hazards analysis to clarify the association between early diagnosis of postoperative atrial fibrillation and pneumonia with subsequent anastomotic leak. RESULTS: The study analyzed 621 esophagectomies, with 580 (93.4%) cervical anastomoses and 474 (76%) patients experiencing complications. A total of 159 (25.6%) patients had postoperative atrial fibrillation, and 155 (25.0%) had an anastomotic leak. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) postoperative day of these complications was day 2 (IQR, days 2-3) and day 8 (IQR, days 7-11), respectively. Our covariance matrix found significant associations in the variance of the most common postoperative complications, including pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, anastomotic leak, and readmissions. Early postoperative atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio, 8.1; 95% CI, 5.65-11.65) and postoperative pneumonia (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.98-7.38) were associated with anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining a high index of suspicion for early postoperative complications is crucial for rescuing patients after esophagectomy. Early postoperative pneumonia and atrial fibrillation may be sentinel complications for an anastomotic leak, and their occurrence may be used to prompt further clinical investigation. Early recovery protocols should consider the development of early complications into postoperative feeding and imaging algorithms.

Quantitative assessment of gastric ischemic preconditioning on conduit perfusion in esophagectomy: propensity score weighting study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric ischemic preconditioning prior to esophagectomy has been studied as a method to improve gastric conduit perfusion and reduce anastomotic complications, without conclusive results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of gastric ischemic preconditioning in terms of post-operative outcomes and quantitative gastric conduit perfusion. METHODS: Patients who underwent an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between January 2015 and October 2022 at a single high-volume academic center were reviewed. Patient characteristics, surgical approach, post-operative outcomes, and indocyanine green fluorescence angiography data (ingress index for arterial inflow and ingress time for venous outflow, and the distance from the last gastroepiploic branch to the perfusion assessment point) were analyzed. Two propensity score weighting methods were used to investigate whether gastric ischemic preconditioning reduces anastomotic leaks. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the conduit perfusion quantitatively. RESULTS: There were 594 esophagectomies with gastric conduit performed, with 41 having a gastric ischemic preconditioning. Among 544 with cervical anastomoses, leaks were seen in 2/30 (6.7%) in the ischemic preconditioning group and 114/514 (22.2%) in the control group (p = 0.041). Gastric ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced anastomotic leaks on both weighting methods (p = 0.037 and 0.047, respectively). Ingress index and time of the gastric conduit with ischemic preconditioning were significantly better than those without preconditioning (p = 0.013 and 0.025, respectively) after removing the effect of the distance from the last gastroepiploic branch to the perfusion assessment point. CONCLUSION: Gastric ischemic preconditioning results in a statistically significant improvement in conduit perfusion and reduction in post-operative anastomotic leaks.

Quantitative perfusion assessment of gastric conduit with indocyanine green dye to predict anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Impaired gastric conduit perfusion is a risk factor for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative quantitative assessment of gastric conduit perfusion with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography as a predictor for cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography using the SPY Elite system was performed in patients undergoing a transhiatal or McKeown esophagectomy from July 2015 through December 2020. Ingress (dye uptake) and Egress (dye exit) at two anatomic landmarks (the tip of a conduit and 5 cm from the tip) were assessed. The collected data in the leak group and no leak group were compared by univariate and multivariable analyses. Of 304 patients who were evaluated, 70 patients developed anastomotic leak (23.0%). There was no significant difference in patients' demographic between the groups. Ingress Index, which represents a proportion of blood inflow, at both the tip and 5 cm of the conduit was significantly lower in the leak group (17.9 vs. 25.4% [P = 0.011] and 35.9 vs. 44.6% [P = 0.019], respectively). Ingress Time, which represents an estimated time of blood inflow, at 5 cm of the conduit was significantly higher in the leak group (69.9 vs. 57.1 seconds, P = 0.006). Multivariable analysis suggested that these three variables can be used to predict future leak. Variables of gastric conduit perfusion correlated with the incidence of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak. Intraoperative measurement of gastric conduit perfusion can be predictive for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.

COVID-19 guidance for triage of operations for thoracic malignancies: A consensus statement from Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network.

The extraordinary demands of managing the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the world's ability to care for patients with thoracic malignancies. As a hospital's COVID-19 population increases and hospital resources are depleted, the ability to provide surgical care is progressively restricted, forcing surgeons to prioritize among their cancer populations. Representatives from multiple cancer, surgical, and research organizations have come together to provide a guide for triaging patients with thoracic malignancies as the impact of COVID-19 evolves as each hospital.

Impact of insurance status on receipt of definitive surgical therapy and posttreatment outcomes in early stage lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of insurance on outcomes in the modern era of evidence-based guidelines is unclear. We sought to examine differences in receipt of therapy and outcomes for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer patients by insurance coverage. METHOD: Clinical T1-3 N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer cases were identified in the 2004 to 2014 National Cancer Database and compared across 4 groups: private, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. A multivariable, linear regression model was used to examine the effects of insurance status on time to curative surgical therapy, adjusting for patient and facility characteristics. Receipt of different therapies was examined with multivariable logistic regression. Survival analysis was conducted with Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 240,361 patients presented with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (60,532 private, 164,377 Medicare, 11,001 Medicaid, and 4,451 uninsured). After adjustment, Medicaid and uninsured patients received surgical therapy later than privately insured patients (9.5 days and 7.0 days, respectively, P < .001), were more likely to be delayed > 8 weeks (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.55-1.73 and odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.58), and were significantly less likely to receive surgery (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.56 and odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.55). Uninsured patients were more likely to receive no treatment (odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.92-2.41), followed by Medicaid patients (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.53-1.80). The 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in the Medicaid and uninsured populations. CONCLUSION: Even in the modern era, uninsured and Medicaid early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients have decreased odds of receiving a potentially curative operation and experience inferior outcomes. Given substantial expenditures on the Medicaid program, strategies for increasing utilization of curative surgery in Medicaid patients with lung cancer are needed.

Variation in the cost of 5 common operations in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Health care costs are an important policy focus in the United States. The magnitude and drivers of variation in the costs of common operative procedures are not well understood. We sought to characterize variation in costs across hospitals. METHODS: We used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001-2011 for 5 elective operations: colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, total knee arthroplasty, cesarean section, and lung resection. Hospitals were benchmarked for each using hierarchical risk- and reliability-adjustment methods to generate an observed-to-expected cost ratio, which was adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidity, wage index, and procedure complexity. Hospitals were divided into quintiles. Characteristics of high- and low-quintile hospitals and their adjusted outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Cost observed-to-expected ratios ranged widely for all 5 procedures: 14.9-fold for colectomy, 5.5-fold for coronary artery bypass graft, 12.5-fold for lung resection, 10.6-fold for total knee arthroplasty, and 28.0-fold for cesarean section. Comparing highest to lowest cost quintiles of hospitals, high-cost hospitals were more likely to serve minority and Medicaid patients. Mortality was elevated significantly in high-cost hospitals for colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, and lung resection (adjusted odds ratio 1.99, 1.32, 2.57; respectively). Service lines were correlated at low-cost hospitals. There was a significant association between greater procedure volume and low-cost hospitals for colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, and total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Despite robust adjustment, there is wide cost variation for common operative procedures in the United States. High-cost hospitals may need to focus on cost reduction at the hospital level to reduce cost across service lines. Benchmarking costs may identify significant opportunities to promote value, or the balance between cost and quality, in operative care in the United States.

Preoperative consent for patients with limited English proficiency.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is important for limited English proficient (LEP) patients undergoing surgery, as many surgical procedures are complicated, making patient comprehension difficult even without language barriers. The study objectives were to (1) understand surgeons' preoperative consenting process with LEP patients, (2) examine how surgeons self assess their non-English language proficiency levels using a standardized scale, and (3) identify the relationship between self assessed non-English language proficiency and surgeons' self-reported use of interpreters during preoperative informed consent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thirty-two item survey assessing surgeons' reported preoperative informed consent process, with questions related to demographics, level of medical training, non-English language skills and their clinical use, language learning experiences, and hypothetical scenarios with LEP patients. RESULTS: Surgeons who were not fluent in non-English languages reported they often used those limited skills to obtain informed consent from their LEP patients. Many surgeons reported relying on bilingual hospital staff members, family members, and/or minors to serve as ad-hoc interpreters when obtaining informed consent. If a professional interpreter was not available in a timely manner, surgeons more frequently reported using ad-hoc interpreters or their own nonfluent language skills. Surgeons reported deferring to patient and family preferences when deciding whether to use professional interpreters and applied different thresholds for different clinical scenarios when deciding whether to use professional interpreters. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons reported relying on their own non-English language skills, bilingual staff, and family and friends of patients to obtain informed consent from LEP patients, suggesting that further understanding of barriers to professional interpreter use is needed.

Outcomes and Costs for Major Lung Resection in the United States: Which Patients Benefit Most From High-Volume Referral?

BACKGROUND: Accountable care organizations are designed to improve value by decreasing costs and maintaining quality. Strategies to maximize value are needed for high-risk surgery. We wanted to understand whether certain patient groups were differentially associated with better outcomes at high-volume hospitals in terms of quality and cost. METHODS: In all, 37,746 patients underwent elective major lung resection in 1,273 hospitals in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2007 to 2011. Patients were stratified by hospital volume quartile and substratified by preoperative mortality risk, age, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status. Mortality was evaluated using clustered multivariable hierarchical logistic regression controlling for patient comorbidity, demographics, and procedure. Adjusted cost was evaluated using generalized linear models fit to a gamma distribution. RESULTS: Patients were grouped into volume quartiles based on cases per year (less than 21, 21 to 40, 40 to 78, and more than 78). Patient characteristics and procedure mix differed across quartiles. Overall, mortality decreased across volume quartiles (lowest 1.9% versus highest 1.1%, p < 0.0001). Patients aged more than 80 years were associated with greater absolute and relative mortality rates than patients less than 60 years old in highest volume versus lowest volume hospitals (age more than 80 years, 4.2% versus 1.3%, p < 0.0001, odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.89 to 5.80; age less than 60 years, 1.0% versus 0.8%, p = 0.19, odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 2.56). Patients with high preoperative risk (more than 75th percentile) were also associated with lower absolute mortality in high-volume hospitals. Adjusted costs were not significantly different across quartiles or patient strata. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients show a significantly stronger volume-outcome relationship than patients less than 60 years of age. Costs were equivalent across volume quartile and patient strata. Selective patient referral may be a strategy to improve outcomes for elderly patients undergoing lung resection.

Comparing Preoperative Targets to Failure-to-Rescue for Surgical Mortality Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Failure-to-rescue (FTR or death after postoperative complication) is thought to explain surgical mortality excesses across hospitals, and FTR is an emerging performance measure and target for quality improvement. We compared the FTR population to preoperatively identifiable subpopulations for their potential to close the mortality gap between lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing small bowel resection, pancreatectomy, colorectal resection, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, lower extremity arterial bypass, and nephrectomy were identified in the 2007 to 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals were defined using risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality quintiles. Five target subpopulations were established a priori: the FTR population, predicted high-mortality risk (predicted highest-risk quintile), emergency surgery, elderly (>75 years old), and diabetic patients. RESULTS: Across the lowest mortality quintile (n=282 hospitals, 56,893 patients) and highest-mortality quintile (282 hospitals, 45,784 patients), respectively, the size of target subpopulations varied only for the FTR population (20.2% vs 22.4%, p=0.002) but not for other subpopulations. Variation in mortality rates across lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals was greatest for the high-mortality risk (7.5% vs 20.2%, p<0.0001) and FTR subpopulations (7.8% vs 18.9%, p<0.0001). The FTR and high-risk populations had comparable sensitivity (81% and 75%) and positive predictive value (19% and 20%, respectively) for mortality. In Monte Carlo simulations, the mortality gap between the lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals was reduced by nearly 75% when targeting the FTR population or the high-risk population, 78% for the emergency surgery population, but less for elderly (51%) and diabetic (17%) populations. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively identifiable patients with high estimated mortality risk may be preferable to the FTR population as a target for surgical mortality reduction.

The association of intensivists with failure-to-rescue rates in outlier hospitals: results of a national survey of intensive care unit organizational characteristics.

PURPOSE: Critical care is often an integral part of rescue for patients with surgical complications. We sought to understand critical care characteristics predictive of failure-to-rescue (FTR) performance at the hospital level. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2011 FTR data from Hospital Compare, we identified 144 outlier hospitals with significantly better/worse performance than the national average. We surveyed intensive care unit (ICU) directors and nurse managers regarding physical structures, patient composition, staffing, care protocols, and rapid response teams (RRTs). Hospitals were compared using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 67 hospitals completing the survey, 56.1% were low performing, and 43.9% were high performing. Responders were more likely to be teaching hospitals (40.9% vs 25.0%; P=.05) but were similar to nonresponders in terms of size, region, ownership, and FTR performance. Poor performers were more likely to serve higher proportions of Medicaid patients (68.4% vs 20.7%; P<.0001) and be level 1 trauma centers (55.9% vs 25.9%; P=.02). After controlling for these 2 characteristics, an intensivist on the RRT (adjusted odds ratio, 4.27; confidence interval, 1.45-23.02; P=.005) and an internist on staff in the ICU (adjusted odds ratio, 2.13; P=.04) were predictors of high performance. CONCLUSIONS: Intensivists on the RRT and internists in the ICU may represent discrete organizational strategies for improving patient rescue. Hospitals with high Medicaid burden fare poorly on the FTR metric.

Failure to rescue in safety-net hospitals: availability of hospital resources and differences in performance.

IMPORTANCE: Failure to rescue (FTR), the mortality rate among surgical patients with complications, is an emerging quality indicator. Hospitals with a high safety-net burden, defined as the proportion of patients covered by Medicaid or uninsured, provide a disproportionate share of medical care to vulnerable populations. Given the financial strains on hospitals with a high safety-net burden, availability of clinical resources may have a role in outcome disparities. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between safety-net burden and FTR and to evaluate the effect of clinical resources on this relationship. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort of 46,519 patients who underwent high-risk inpatient surgery between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2010, was assembled using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Hospitals were divided into the following 3 safety-net categories: high-burden hospitals (HBHs), moderate-burden hospitals (MBHs), and low-burden hospitals (LBHs). Bivariate and multivariate analyses controlling for patient, procedural, and hospital characteristics, as well as clinical resources, were used to evaluate the relationship between safety-net burden and FTR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: FTR. RESULTS: Patients in HBHs were younger (mean age, 65.2 vs 68.2 years; P = .001), more likely to be of black race (11.3% vs 4.2%, P < .001), and less likely to undergo an elective procedure (39.3% vs 48.6%, P = .002) compared with patients in LBHs. The HBHs were more likely to be large, major teaching facilities and to have high levels of technology (8.6% vs 4.0%, P = .02), sophisticated internal medicine (7.7% vs 4.3%, P = .10), and high ratios of respiratory therapists to beds (39.7% vs 21.1%, P < .001). However, HBHs had lower proportions of registered nurses (27.9% vs 38.8%, P = .02) and were less likely to have a positron emission tomographic scanner (15.4% vs 22.0%, P = .03) and a fully implemented electronic medical record (12.6% vs 17.8%, P = .03). Multivariate analyses showed that HBHs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19-1.53; P < .001) and MBHs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .005) were associated with higher odds of FTR compared with LBHs, even after adjustment for clinical resources. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite access to resources that can improve patient rescue rates, HBHs had higher odds of FTR, suggesting that availability of hospital clinical resources alone does not explain increased FTR rates.