Assessment of perinatal anxiety: diagnostic accuracy of five measures.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety in pregnancy and after giving birth (the perinatal period) is highly prevalent but under-recognised. Robust methods of assessing perinatal anxiety are essential for services to identify and treat women appropriately. AIMS: To determine which assessment measures are most psychometrically robust and effective at identifying women with perinatal anxiety (primary objective) and depression (secondary objective). METHOD: We conducted a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 2243 women who completed five measures of anxiety and depression (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD) two- and seven-item versions; Whooley questions; Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10); and Stirling Antenatal Anxiety Scale (SAAS)) during pregnancy (15 weeks, 22 weeks and 31 weeks) and after birth (6 weeks). To assess diagnostic accuracy a sample of 403 participants completed modules of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). RESULTS: The best diagnostic accuracy for anxiety was shown by the CORE-10 and SAAS. The best diagnostic accuracy for depression was shown by the CORE-10, SAAS and Whooley questions, although the SAAS had lower specificity. The same cut-off scores for each measure were optimal for identifying anxiety or depression (SAAS ≥9; CORE-10 ≥9; Whooley ≥1). All measures were psychometrically robust, with good internal consistency, convergent validity and unidimensional factor structure. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified robust and effective methods of assessing perinatal anxiety and depression. We recommend using the CORE-10 or SAAS to assess perinatal anxiety and the CORE-10 or Whooley questions to assess depression. The GAD-2 and GAD-7 did not perform as well as other measures and optimal cut-offs were lower than currently recommended.

A prospective analysis of the role of uterine artery Doppler waveform notching in the assessment of at-risk pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of second trimester uterine artery Doppler waveform notching in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in a high-risk group. DESIGN: Analysis of data from a consecutively collected cohort. SETTING: St. James University Hospital, Leeds, UK. POPULATION: Three hundred thirty women known to be at risk of preeclampsia (PET) or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were assessed for notching of the uterine artery Doppler waveform between 24-30 weeks of pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preeclampsia (PET), small-for-gestational-age at birth (SGA), preterm delivery (PTD), perinatal death. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-two women (70.3%) had a normal uterine artery Doppler waveforms, and 98 (29.7%) demonstrated either unilateral or bilateral notching. In women where notching was present, 20 (20%) developed PET compared with 8 (3.5%) in the normal group [Odds ratio (OR) 7.2, CI 3-17]; SGA birthweight was present in 24 (24.5%) of the notched group and in 21 (9%) of normal group (OR 3.3; CI 1.7-6.2); 40 (41%) of the notched group delivered preterm ( < 37 weeks) as compared with 37 (16%) of the normal group (OR 7.9; CI 4.6-13). This difference was even more marked when delivery before 32 weeks was considered, occurring in 8 (8%) of the notched group and 4 (1.7%) of the normal group (OR 11.5; CI 4.5-29.4). Of the six perinatal deaths, five (5.1%) occurred in the notched group (OR 12.4; CI 1.4-108). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the addition of uterine Doppler waveform analysis to the monitoring profile of women at risk of PET, SGA, IUD and preterm delivery can further define those in a higher risk group and the majority that have a risk no higher than the background.