Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: "(bone quality". Ti,ab.) AND "(human bone specimens)". RESULTS: The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens.

Assessment of the efficiency of different chemical treatments and ultrasonic cleaning for defatting of cancellous bone samples.

Our study aimed to asses the defatting efficiency of different methods, which are commonly used and easily available in the laboratory in order to find a method that is effective, convenient, safe, and economical. Cylindrical cancellous bone specimens were obtained from fresh-frozen human cadaver femoral condyles, cut into multiple small specimens (Ø8 × 2 mm), and assigned to two groups that were treated with either chemical solvent soaking (Solvent group) or ultrasonic cleaning (Ultrasound group). Each group was divided into several subgroups based on different treatments. Digital photographs were taken of each specimen. The difference of material density (Δρb), apparent density (Δρapp), and porosity (ΔP) before and after treatment were used as evaluation indicators. For the solvent group, in Δρb, only the combination of 99% ethanol and detergent solution showed a significant difference before and after treatment (P = 0.00). There was no significant difference in ΔP among acetone, the mixture of 99% ethanol and acetone, and the combination of 99% ethanol and detergent solution (P = 0.93). For the ultrasound group, the median of all subgroups in Δρapp and ΔP were all lower than the solvent group. The combination of 99% ethanol and detergent solution (v/v = 1:20), as well as the mixture of 99% ethanol and acetone (v/v = 1:1), seem to be the optimal defatting methods for 2 mm thick cancellous bone slices due to their effectiveness, availability, low-cost and safety. Chemical soaking for 24 h is more effective than ultrasonic cleaning with 99% ethanol or acetone for 20 or 40 min.