Comparison of bracket bonding between two CAD/CAM guided bonding devices: GBD-U vs GBD-B.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bracket bonding accuracy, efficiency, reproducibility, and three-dimensional (3D) printing duration of the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) unilateral contact guided bonding device (GBD-U) and the bilateral contact guided bonding device (GBD-B) in vitro. METHODS: Five resin dental model sets were scanned and virtually bonded with brackets. GBD-U and GBD-B were designed and 3D printed for each model. GBD-Us had guide blocks that fit the occlusal sides of the bracket tie-wings, while GBD-Bs had guide arms that fit the occlusal and distal sides of the tie-wings. Five orthodontic residents were recruited to bond brackets on the same 3D-printed copies of resin models in a dental mannequin using GBD-Us and GBD-Bs, respectively. The time for 3D printing of GBDs and bracket bonding was recorded. The linear and angular deviations between the bonded brackets and the virtually bonded ones were measured. RESULTS: A total of 50 sets of resin models (1000 brackets/tubes) were bonded. The time for 3D printing and bracket bonding was shorter for GBD-Us (41.96 mins/6.38 mins) than for GBD-Bs (78.04 mins/7.20 mins). In both devices, 100% linear deviations and over 95% angular deviations were below 0.5 mm or 2°, respectively. Deviations in the mesiodistal dimension, torque, angulation, and rotation were significantly lower in the GBD-U group (P<0.01). High inter-operator reproducibility of bracket bonding was confirmed for both devices. CONCLUSION: GBD-U was more time-efficient in 3D printing. Both GBDs showed clinically acceptable accuracy, whereas GBD-U had higher bonding accuracy in the mesiodistal dimension, torque, angulation, and rotation than GBD-B. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: CAD/CAM GBD-U provides high bracket bonding accuracy in a time-efficient manner and has the potential to be clinically applied.

A Peer Data Benchmarking Intervention to Reduce Opioid Overprescribing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Driving physician behavior change has been an elusive goal for quality improvement efforts aimed at reducing low-value care. We proposed the use of "nudge" interventions at the surgeon level in order to reduce post-surgical opioid overprescribing in accordance with consensus guidelines. METHODS: We used 2017 Medicare data to identify outlier surgeons. A peer data benchmarking report that showed each surgeon the average number of opioid tablets they prescribed for an open inguinal hernia repair procedure from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. We conducted a 1:1 randomized controlled trial providing outlier surgeons a report of their opioid prescribing patterns for a standard operation compared to the national average and prescribing guidelines. RESULTS: There were 489 surgeons randomized to the intervention, of which 180 (36.8%) had data in the post-intervention period. Data was available for 87 surgeons in the intervention group and 93 surgeons in the control group. 97.7% of surgeons in the intervention group reduced their opioid prescribing pattern compared to 95.7% in the control group. Surgeons who received the data benchmarking report intervention prescribed 14.3% less opioids than surgeons in the control group (10.54 (SD 5.34) vs. 12.30 (SD 6.02), P = .04). The intervention was associated with a 1.83 lower mean number of opioid tablets prescribed per patient in the multivariable linear regression model after controlling for other factors (Intervention group vs. control group 95% CI [-3.61, -.04], P = .04). DISCUSSION: The implementation of a peer data benchmarking intervention can drive physician behavior change towards high-value care.

Endophthalmitis Rates among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Cataract Surgery between 2011 and 2019.

PURPOSE: To determine national incidence and risk factors associated with developing endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years undergoing cataract surgery between 2011 and 2019. METHODS: Medicare claims were used to identify all patients who underwent ≥1 cataract surgery between 2011 and 2019. Endophthalmitis cases within 90 days of the cataract surgery were identified using diagnostic codes. Patients with a history of endophthalmitis 12 months before their cataract surgery procedure were excluded. Annual and aggregate 9-year incidences were determined for all cataract surgeries and for stand-alone cataract procedures. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate factors associated with occurrence of postoperative endophthalmitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 90-day postoperative endophthalmitis rate and patient risk factors associated with onset of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. RESULTS: A total of 14 396 438 cataract surgeries were performed among Medicare beneficiaries between 2011 and 2019. The overall 90-day postoperative endophthalmitis rate was 1.36 per 1000 cataract surgeries for all cataract procedures and 1.30 per 1000 cataract surgeries for stand-alone cataract procedures. A decreasing trend was noted for postoperative endophthalmitis rates during the 9-year study period. On multivariable analysis, the risk of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery was increased for cases performed among those aged ≥75 years versus those aged <75 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.18), Blacks (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20), Native Americans (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.73), and eyes with any history of invasive glaucoma surgery (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.65). Cataract cases combined with retinal surgery (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.15-3.16) and those performed when the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was greater than 0 also had an increased likelihood of developing endophthalmitis. The risk of endophthalmitis was lower for cases performed on women versus men (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The overall 90-day postoperative endophthalmitis rate after cataract surgery was 1.36 per 1000 cataract surgeries between 2011 and 2019. Patient age, gender, race, and CCI were associated with risk of endophthalmitis.

Use of Atherectomy During Index Peripheral Vascular Interventions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe physician practice patterns and examine physician-level factors associated with the use of atherectomy during index revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. BACKGROUND: There are minimal data to support the routine use of atherectomy over angioplasty and/or stenting for the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service claims (January 1 to December 31, 2019) were used to identify all beneficiaries undergoing elective first-time femoropopliteal peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with atherectomy. RESULTS: A total of 58,552 patients underwent index femoropopliteal PVI by 1,627 physicians. There was a wide distribution of physician practice patterns in the use of atherectomy, ranging from 0% to 100% (median 55.1%). Independent characteristics associated with atherectomy included treatment for claudication (vs. chronic limb-threatening ischemia; odds ratio [OR]: 1.51), patient diabetes (OR: 1.09), physician male sex (OR: 2.08), less time in practice (OR: 1.41 to 2.72), nonvascular surgery specialties (OR: 2.78 to 5.71), physicians with high volumes of femoropopliteal PVI (OR: 1.67 to 3.51), and physicians working primarily at ambulatory surgery centers or office-based laboratories (OR: 2.19 to 7.97) (p ≤ 0.03 for all). Overall, $266.8 million was reimbursed by Medicare for index femoropopliteal PVI in 2019. Of this, $240.6 million (90.2%) was reimbursed for atherectomy, which constituted 53.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide distribution of physician practice patterns for the use of atherectomy during index PVI. There is a critical need for professional guidelines outlining the appropriate use of atherectomy in order to prevent overutilization of this technology, particularly in high-reimbursement settings.

Underutilization of Needle Biopsy Before Breast Surgery: A Measure of Low-Value Care.

BACKGROUND: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) can obviate the need for breast surgery in patients with an unknown breast lesion; however, variation in compliance with this guideline may represent a disparity in health care and a surrogate measure of unnecessary surgery. We evaluated variation in breast CNB rates prior to initial breast cancer surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using Medicare claims from 2015 to 2017 to evaluate the proportion of patients who received a CNB within 6 months prior to initial breast cancer surgery. Outlier practice pattern was defined as a preoperative CNB rate ≤ 70%. Logistic regression was used to evaluate surgeon characteristics associated with outlier practice pattern. RESULTS: We identified 108,935 female patients who underwent initial breast cancer surgery performed by 3229 surgeons from July 2015 to June 2017. The mean CNB rate was 86.7%. A total of 7.7% of surgeons had a CNB performed prior to initial breast surgery ≤ 70% of the time, and 2.0% had a CNB performed ≤ 50% of the time. Outlier breast surgeons were associated with practicing in a micropolitan area (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.73), in the South (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.84) or West region (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11-2.86), > 20 years in practice (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.11), and low breast cancer surgery volume (< 30 cases in the study period; OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.75-5.90). CONCLUSIONS: Marked variation exists in whether a breast core biopsy is performed prior to initial breast surgery, which may represent unnecessary surgery on individual patients. Providing surgeon-specific feedback on guideline compliance may reduce unwarranted variation.

Contemporary Trends in Physician Utilization Rates of CEA and CAS for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis among Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) has become increasingly controversial in the past few decades as the best medical therapy has improved. The aim of this study was to assess and define contemporary trends in the rate of carotid revascularization procedures for ACAS in the United States and to characterize outlier physicians performing a higher rate of asymptomatic revascularization compared to their peers. METHODS: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all patients who were newly diagnosed with ACAS between 01/2011-06/2018. Patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, those with prior carotid revascularization, and surgeons who performed ≤10 CEAs during the study period were excluded. We used a hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate patient and physician characteristics associated with undergoing a carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stent procedure within 3 months after the initial diagnosis of ACAS. We also assessed temporal trends in carotid revascularization rates over time using the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test. RESULTS: Overall, 795,512 patients (median age 73.9 years, 50.9% male, 87.6% white) had a first-time diagnosis of ACAS during the study period, of which 23,481 (3.0%) underwent carotid revascularization within 3 months. There was a significant decline in overall carotid artery revascularization rates over time (2011: 3.2% vs. 2018: 2.1%; P < 0.001). The median and mean physician-specific carotid revascularization rates were 2.0% (IQR 0.0%-6.3%) and 4.7% ± 7.1%, respectively. Three-hundred and fifty physicians (5.2%) had carotid revascularization rates ≥19%, which was more than 2 standard deviations above the mean. After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, physician-level variables associated with carotid revascularization for newly diagnosed ACAS included male sex (adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.35-1.89), more years in practice (≥31 vs. <10 years, aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.32-2.04), rural practice location (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52), Southern region practice location (versus Northeast, aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.39-1.69), and lower volume of ACAS patients (lower versus upper tertile, aOR 2.62, 95% CI 2.39-2.89). Cardiothoracic surgeons had a 1.52-fold higher odds of carotid revascularization compared to vascular surgeons (95% CI 1.36-1.68), whereas cardiologists and radiologists had lower intervention rates (both, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current early revascularization rate for newly diagnosed ACAS is <5% among proceduralists in the United States, and has been decreasing steadily since 2014. There are particular physician-level characteristics that are associated with higher rates of carotid revascularization that cannot be fully contextualized without high-level contemporary outcomes data to guide decision making in ACAS.

Risk Factors for Repeat Keratoplasty after Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Medicare Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term rates of repeated keratoplasty after endothelial keratoplasty (EK), and to explore risk factors associated with graft failure. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. METHODS: Population-based using 2010-2019 Medicare carrier claims. STUDY POPULATION: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who underwent endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures. Main outcome measures were 1) occurrence of repeated keratoplasty for the overall cohort as well as stratified by clinical indication, and 2), risk factors associated with repeated keratoplasty. The probability of undergoing repeated keratoplasty for different indications was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was constructed to determine patient and physician factors associated with the risk of repeated keratoplasty. RESULTS: A total of 94,829 Medicare EK procedures (N = 71,040 unique patients) were included in the analysis. Over the study period, 11,013 of 94,829 EK procedures were followed by repeated keratoplasty. The overall probability of receiving a repeated keratoplasty was 6.1% at 6 months, 7.6% at 1 year, 14.3% at 5 years and 16.9% at 8 years. The probability of repeated keratoplasty was highest for procedures performed for prior failed grafts: 10.2% at 1 year, 29.9% at 8 years. Whereas 6.4% and 11.4% of grafts performed for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) required repeated keratoplasty at 1 and 8 years of follow-up, respectively. For bullous keratoplasty and/or corneal edema, 8.6% and 22% of grafts underwent repeated keratoplasty at 1 and 8 years, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, patient factors associated with increased risk of repeated keratoplasty were black (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-1.38) or Asians (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.45) having a glaucoma diagnosis (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.46-1.60), prior glaucoma surgery (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.18-1.35), and concurrent glaucoma surgery (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20-1.44). Surgeons with higher EK volumes had a decreased risk of repeated keratoplasty. Physicians who graduated medical school >30 years previously had increased risk of repeated keratoplasty compared to those who graduated within 10 years (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Blacks or Asians, comorbid glaucoma, concurrent or prior glaucoma surgery, and lower volumes of surgery are associated with increased risk of repeated keratoplasty. Racial disparities identified in this study warrant further investigation.

Postoperative Complications in Medicare Beneficiaries Following Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine national-level incidence rates of major postoperative complications following endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures and to stratify these rates based on EK indications over an 8-year period using Medicare claims data. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. METHODS: Setting: population-based; study population: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who underwent EK procedures; main outcome measurements: 1) occurrence of major postoperative complications (i.e., endophthalmitis, choroidal hemorrhage, infectious keratitis, cystoid macular edema [CME], retinal detachment [RD], or RD surgery) following EK surgery; 2) time-to-event analysis for glaucoma surgery; and 3) occurrence of graft complications. RESULTS: A total of 94,829 EK procedures (n = 71,040 unique patients) were included in the analysis. Of the total, 29% of patients had pre-existing glaucoma. The overall 90-day cumulative incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis and choroidal hemorrhage following EK was 0.03% and 0.05%, respectively. The overall 1-year cumulative rates of RD or RD surgery, infectious keratitis, and CME were 1.0%, 0.8%, and 4.1%, respectively. Approximately 7.6%, 12.2%, and 13.8% of all eyes in this study needed glaucoma surgery at 1-, 5-, and 8-years of follow-up, respectively. The probability of glaucoma surgery among patients with pre-existing glaucoma was 29% vs. 8% among those without pre-existing glaucoma at 8 years. The cumulative probabilities of developing any graft complications were 13%, 23.2%, and 27.1% at 1, 5, and 8 years, respectively, of follow-up. On average, patients undergoing EK procedures for a prior failed graft had the highest rate of complications, whereas those with Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy had the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major postoperative complications including endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and choroidal hemorrhage following EK procedures is low. A high proportion of eyes undergoing EK eventually require glaucoma surgery and experience graft-related complications. Postoperative outcomes are typically worse for patients undergoing EK for prior failed grafts than for those undergoing EK for Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy.

Physician Practice Variability in the Use of Extended-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases: Are We Choosing Wisely?

PURPOSE: Routine use of extended-fraction (> 10 fractions) radiation therapy (RT) for palliation of bone metastases is recognized as a low-value intervention by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. We examined contemporary practice patterns of, and physician characteristics associated with extended-fraction RT use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service data. We included patients who underwent 2- or 3-dimensional external-beam RT for bone metastases between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Physicians treating > 10 patients over the study period were analyzed for their individual practice. Hierarchic logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient- and physician-level factors associated with extended-fraction RT use. RESULTS: A total of 12,221 patients (median age, 75.6 years; 40.9% women, 87.6% white) were included. The rate of extended-fraction RT was 23.4%. A total of 1,432 physicians treated any patient. Among the 382 physicians treating > 10 patients, 127 (33.2%) used extended-fraction RT > 30% (consensus threshold). Physician factors associated with decreased odds of extended-fraction RT were years since medical school graduation (≤ 10 years and 11-20 years v ≥ 31 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.32 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.51] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.93]) and practicing in the Northeast or Midwest versus the South (aOR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.58] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.74]). Physicians treating > 20 patients (v 11-14 patients) over the study period had increased odds of delivering extended-fraction RT (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.10 to 2.12]). CONCLUSION: In this study, almost one fourth of patients received extended-fraction RT, and one third of physicians had an extended-fraction RT use rate of > 30%. Personalized feedback of performance data, clinical pathways and peer review, and updated reimbursement models are potential mechanisms to address this low-value care.

Race and socioeconomic differences associated with endovascular peripheral vascular interventions for newly diagnosed claudication.

BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines cautioning against the use of endovascular peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) for claudication, more than 1.3 million PVI procedures are performed annually in the United States. We aimed to describe national rates of PVI for claudication, and identify patient and county-level risk factors associated with a high rate of PVI. METHODS: We used the Medicare claims database to identify all Medicare beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of claudication between January 2015 and June 2017. A hierarchical logistic regression model accounting for patient age, sex, comorbidities; county region and setting; and a patient race-county median income interaction was used to assess the associations of race and income with a high PVI rate. RESULTS: We identified 1,201,234 patients with a new diagnosis of claudication for analysis. Of these, 15,227 (1.27%) underwent a PVI. Based on hierarchical logistic regression accounting for patient and county-level factors, black patients residing in low-income counties had a significantly higher odds of undergoing PVI than their white counterparts (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.40), whereas the odds of PVI for black versus white patients was similar in high-income counties (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.14). PVI rates were higher for low versus high-income counties in both the black (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.31-1.64) and white (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.27) groups. There were no significant associations of Hispanic, Asian, North American native, or other races with PVI in either low- or high-income counties after risk adjustment (all P ≥ .09). CONCLUSIONS: In the Medicare population, the mean rate of PVI of 12.7 per 1000 claudication patients varies significantly based on race and income. Our data suggest there are racial and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of claudication across the United States.

Prescribing Patterns and Costs Associated with Postoperative Eye Drop Use in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine costs and prescribing patterns of postoperative eye drops for cataract surgery and estimate potential savings of generic or therapeutic drug substitutions. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with Part D coverage who underwent cataract surgery in 2016. METHODS: Medicare Part D claims were used to extract information on eye drop prescriptions that were filled during the postoperative period of cataract surgery. Savings from generic or therapeutic drug substitutions were estimated for brand medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total cost of postoperative eye drops for cataract surgery and physician and patient factors associated with medication cost. RESULTS: Postoperative eye drops were prescribed in 2016 to 88% of 591 733 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent cataract surgery during that calendar year, with brand medications accounting for 57.5% of prescription volume. The overall cost totaled more than $167 million, 76.5% of which was attributable to use of brand medications. The mean costs of medications were $228 and $324 for those undergoing 1 and 2 surgeries, respectively. Topical antibiotics (89%) were the most commonly prescribed drug class by volume, followed by topical steroids (86%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (66%), and accounted for 26%, 37%, and 36% of the total cataract surgery eye drop cost, respectively. Use of therapeutic and generic alternatives could have resulted in cost savings of as much as $118 million, or 70% of the total cost of postoperative eye drops. In adjusted analysis, patient factors associated with increased eye drop cost included older age, female gender, and race or ethnicity. Physician characteristics associated with increased eye drop cost included female gender, greater number of years in practice, practicing in metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan areas, and practicing in the Northeast versus the South and in the South versus the Midwest. CONCLUSIONS: The cost to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for eye drops prescribed for postoperative use after cataract surgery in 2016 was approximately $170 million. In the absence of evidence of clinical superiority of expensive versus less costly options, substantial opportunity exists to improve the value of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.

Overuse of early peripheral vascular interventions for claudication.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery and the Choosing Wisely campaign recommend that peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) be limited to claudication patients with lifestyle-limiting symptoms only after a failed trial of medical and exercise therapy. We sought to explore practice patterns and physician characteristics associated with early PVI after a new claudication diagnosis to evaluate adherence to these guidelines. METHODS: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify patients diagnosed with claudication for the first time between 2015 and 2017. Early PVI was defined as an aortoiliac or femoropopliteal PVI performed within 6 months of initial claudication diagnosis. A physician-level PVI utilization rate was calculated for physicians who diagnosed >10 claudication patients and performed at least one PVI (regardless of indication) during the study period. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to identify physician-level factors associated with early PVI. RESULTS: Of 194,974 patients who had a first-time diagnosis of claudication during the study period, 6286 (3.2%) underwent early PVI. Among the 5664 physicians included in the analysis, the median physician-level early PVI rate was low at 0% (range, 0%-58.3%). However, there were 320 physicians (5.6%) who had an early PVI rate ≥14% (≥2 standard deviations above the mean). After accounting for patient characteristics, a higher percentage of services delivered in ambulatory surgery center or office settings was associated with higher PVI utilization (vs 0%-22%; 23%-47%: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.23; 48%-68%: aOR, 1.49; 69%-100%: aOR, 1.72; all P < .05). Other risk-adjusted physician factors independently associated with high PVI utilization included male sex (aOR, 2.04), fewer years in practice (vs ≥31 years; 11-20 years: aOR, 1.23; 21-30 years: aOR, 1.13), rural location (aOR, 1.25), and lower volume claudication practice (vs ≥30 patients diagnosed during study period; ≤17 patients: aOR, 1.30; 18-29 patients: aOR, 1.35; all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Outlier physicians with a high early PVI rate for patients newly diagnosed with claudication are identifiable using a claims-based practice pattern measure. Given the shared Society for Vascular Surgery and Choosing Wisely initiative goal to avoid interventions for first-line treatment of claudication, confidential data-sharing programs using national benchmarks and educational guidance may be useful to address high utilization in the management of claudication.

Frequency and Predictors of Polypharmacy in US Medicare Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at the Patient and Physician Levels.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy in older patients increases the risk of medication-related adverse events and can be a marker of unnecessary care. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of polypharmacy among patients 65 years of age or older and identify factors associated with the occurrence of patient-level and physician-level polypharmacy. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 100% Medicare claims data from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. All patients with continuous Medicare coverage (Parts A, B, and D) throughout 2016 who were 65 years of age or older and who were prescribed at least one medication for at least 30 days were included in the analysis. Each patient was attributed to the primary care physician who prescribed them the most medications. Physicians treating fewer than ten patients were excluded. We defined polypharmacy based on the highest number of concurrent medications at any point during the year. We used hierarchical linear regression to study patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with high prescribing rates. RESULTS: We identified 25,747,560 patients attributed to 147,879 primary care physicians. The patient-level mean [standard deviation (SD)] concurrent medication rate was 5.6 (3.3), and the physician-level mean (SD) was 5.6 (1.1). A total of 6108 physicians (4.1% of sample) had a mean concurrent number of medications greater than two SDs above the physician-level mean. At the patient level in the adjusted model, a history of HIV/AIDS, diabetes mellitus, solid organ transplant, and systolic heart failure were the comorbidities most strongly associated with polypharmacy. The relative difference in number of medications associated with these comorbidities were 1.89, 1.39, 1.32, and 1.06, respectively. At the physician level, increased time since medical school graduation and smaller practice size were associated with lower rates of polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of high prescribing to older patients is common and measurable at the physician level. Addressing high outlier prescribers may represent an opportunity to reduce avoidable harm and excessive costs.

Billing of cataract surgery as complex versus routine for Medicare beneficiaries.

PURPOSE: To estimate ophthalmologist-level variation in cataract surgery billing and evaluate patient and ophthalmologist characteristics associated with complex cataract surgery coding. SETTING: Cross-sectional study. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who had cataract surgery between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were included. Billing of cataract surgery as complex versus routine and patient and physician characteristics associated with billing of cataract surgery as complex were evaluated. RESULTS: An estimated 3.5 million cataract procedures were performed on Medicare beneficiaries in 2016 and 2017. Men (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-1.82), patients 75 years or older (versus those aged 65 to 74 years: OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.33-1.36), and racial minorities (blacks versus whites: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.75-1.85) had increased odds of having cataract surgery coded as complex. The mean rate of coding for complex cataract surgery by individual surgeons (n = 10 075) in the United States was 11.2%, with significant variation. A high-risk clinical diagnosis code was associated with 40.0% of complex cataract surgeries. Adjusted for patient characteristics, ophthalmologists who graduated from medical school within the past 10 years (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49) were more likely to code for complex cataract surgery. Higher volume ophthalmologists were less likely to code for complex cataract surgery than low-volume ophthalmologists. CONCLUSIONS: There was marked variation among ophthalmologists in the use of complex cataract surgery. Some variability might represent inaccurate coding and was not entirely based on differences in referral patterns for more complex patients.

Significant physician practice variability in the utilization of endovenous thermal ablation in the 2017 Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: There has been a substantial increase in the use of procedures to treat lower extremity venous disease in the United States over the past decade. A specialty society-selected metric was applied to evaluate the use of endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) in Medicare beneficiaries and factors associated with physician practice variations. We used confidential physician reports of this benchmark data to increase physician recognition of individualized usage relative to their peers. METHODS: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all patients 18 years of age and older who underwent at least one lower extremity EVTA over a 1-year period (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017). A physician-specific annual rate of EVTA performed per patient was calculated. Individual physician results were shared confidentially with each provider billing Medicare for more than 10 ablations during the study period by mail, benchmarked to the distribution of use by their peers nationally. Hierarchical multivariable linear regression was used to identify patient and provider characteristics associated with high rates of thermal ablations per patient. RESULTS: A total of 102,145 Medicare beneficiaries (median age, 72.1 years; 67.8% female) underwent an EVTA by 2462 physicians during the study period. The majority (96.4%) of patients underwent 1 to 5 ablations, 3.3% underwent 6 to 10 ablations, and 0.3% underwent 11 or more ablations. The median and mean physician ablation rates were 1.6 (interquartile range, 1.3-2.2) and 1.9 ± 0.8 ablations per patient annually, respectively. There were 106 physicians (4.3%) who had an ablation rate of 3.4 or greater, which is two or more standard deviations above the national mean. After adjusting for patient-level variables, characteristics independently associated with outlier physicians included specialties other than vascular surgery, fewer years in practice, and higher overall venous ablation practice volume (P ≤ .03). CONCLUSIONS: Using a physician-generated metric of performance, the physician use EVTA performed annually per patient is highly variable, and this variability correlated with physician discipline, years in practice, and is more common in physicians who perform ablation the most. Our data show that there is considerable variability in the use of EVTA in Medicare beneficiaries, and that outlier physicians performing a high number of venous ablation procedures per patient are identifiable using a peer-benchmarked practice pattern measure via claims-based data.

Assessment of Use of Arteriovenous Graft vs Arteriovenous Fistula for First-time Permanent Hemodialysis Access.

Importance: Initial hemodialysis access with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with arteriovenous graft (AVG) and should be the procedure of choice whenever possible. To address the national underuse of AVF in the United States, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid has established an AVF goal of 66% or greater in 2009. Objective: To explore contemporary practice patterns and physician characteristics associated with high AVG use compared with AVF use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This review of 100% Medicare Carrier claims between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, includes both inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims data. All patients undergoing initial permanent hemodialysis access placement with an AVF or AVG were included. All surgeons performing more than 10 hemodialysis access procedures during the study period were analyzed. Exposures: Placement of an AVF or AVG for initial permanent hemodialysis access. Main Outcomes and Measures: A surgeon-level AVG (vs AVF) use rate was calculated for all included surgeons. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient-level and surgeon-level factors associated with AVG use. Results: A total of 85 320 patients (median age, 70 [range, 18-103] years; 47 370 men [55.5%]) underwent first-time hemodialysis access placement, of whom 66 489 (77.9%) had an AVF and 18 831 (22.1%) had an AVG. Among the 2397 surgeons who performed more than 10 procedures per year, the median surgeon level AVG use rate was 18.2% (range, 0.0%-96.4%). However, 498 surgeons (20.8%) had an AVG use rate greater than 34%. After accounting for patient characteristics, surgeon factors that were independently associated with AVG use included more than 30 years of clinical practice (vs 21-30 years; odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96]), metropolitan setting (odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.54]), and vascular surgery specialty (vs general surgery; odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.86]). Surgeons in the Northeast region had the lowest rate of AVG use (vs the South; odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96]). First-time hemodialysis access benchmarking reports for individual surgeons were created for potential distribution. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, one-fifth of surgeons had an AVG use rate above the recommended best practices guideline of 34%. Although some of these differences may be explained by patient referral practices, sharing benchmarked performance data with surgeons could be an actionable step in achieving more high-value care in hemodialysis access surgery.

Same-Day vs Different-Day Elective Upper and Lower Endoscopic Procedures by Setting.

Importance: Performing elective upper and lower endoscopic procedures on the same day is a patient-centered and less costly approach than a 2-stage approach performed on different days, when clinically appropriate. Whether this practice pattern varies based on practice setting has not been studied. Objectives: To estimate the rate of different-day upper and lower endoscopic procedures in 3 types of outpatient settings and investigate the factors associated with the performance of these procedures on different days. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective analysis was conducted of Medicare claims between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2018, for Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a pair of upper and lower endoscopic procedures performed within 90 days of each other at hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), and physician offices. Main Outcomes and Measures: Undergoing an upper and a lower endoscopic procedure on different days, adjusted for patient characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, residence location and region, comorbidity, and procedure indication) and physician characteristics (sex, years in practice, procedure volume, and primary specialty). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were calculated. Results: A total of 4 028 587 procedure pairs were identified, of which 52.5% were performed in HOPDs, 43.3% in ASCs, and 4.2% in physician offices. The rate of different-day procedures was 13.6% in HOPDs, 22.2% in ASCs, and 47.7% in physician offices. For the 7564 physicians who practiced at both HOPDs and ASCs, their different-day procedure rate changed from 14.1% at HOPDs to 19.4% at ASCs. For the 993 physicians who practiced at both HOPDs and physician offices, their different-day procedure rate changed from 15.8% at HOPDs to 37.4% at physician offices. Patients were more likely to undergo different-day procedures at physician offices and ASCs compared with HOPDs, even after adjusting for patient and physician characteristics (physician office vs HOPD: aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.85-2.20; ASC vs HOPD: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.23-1.32). Older age (85-94 years vs 65-74 years: aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08-1.11; 95 years or older vs 65-74 years: aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.26), black and Hispanic race/ethnicity (black: aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.12-1.17; Hispanic: aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.14), and residing in the Northeast region (adjusted OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.28-1.36) were risk factors for undergoing different-day procedures. Micropolitan location (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96) and rural location (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93), more comorbidities (≥5: aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.74-0.76), physician's fewer years in practice (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.87), physician's higher procedure volume (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62-0.68), and physician's specialty of general surgery (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) were protective factors. Conclusions and Relevance: Physician offices and ASCs had much higher different-day procedure rates compared with HOPDs. This disparity may represent an opportunity for quality improvement and financial savings for common endoscopic procedures.

Surgeon Re-Excision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Measure of Low-Value Care.

BACKGROUND: To better understand re-excision practice patterns after breast-conserving therapy (BCT), we evaluated variation in surgeon-specific re-excision rates and associated factors. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis using Medicare claims from 2012 to 2018 to identify patients undergoing BCT and subsequent breast resection procedures within 12 months. We compared rates before and after the 2014 "no tumor on ink" consensus guideline. A hierarchical logistic regression model was also used to evaluate patient and physician characteristics associated with re-excision. RESULTS: We identified 291,065 female Medicare beneficiaries who underwent an initial BCT procedure, of which 19.0% had a re-excision. The overall re-excision rate was 22.1% in the pre-guideline period and 17.2% in the post-guideline period. For the 5,337 physicians that performed more than 10 initial BCT procedures during the study period, their physician-level re-excision rate ranged from 0% to 91.7% (median 18.2%). In total, 17.5% of the physicians had a re-excision rate greater than the expert consensus cutoff of 30%. The percentage of outlier physicians decreased from 22.2% in 2012 to 8.8% in 2017. High surgeon volume of BCT was associated with a lower re-excision odds (≥51 cases vs ≤20 cases: adjusted odds ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.82; 21 to 50 cases vs ≤20 cases: adjusted odds ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96). Patient factors associated with decreased odds of re-excision were age older than 75 years and Northeast region of the US (adjusted odds ratio 0.93; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Marked variation exists in surgeon re-excision rates among patients undergoing BCT, which might represent unnecessary operations for patients and a financial burden to the healthcare system. Formalizing a re-excision frequency metric could have implications for quality improvement and data-driven surgeon feedback aimed at reducing unwarranted variation.