Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis and Dosing Simulations Of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients with Pulmonary Infection.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for meropenem to optimize dosing regimens for critically ill patients with pulmonary infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective PPK study of meropenem was conducted on a pooled dataset of 236 blood samples obtained from 48 patients with pulmonary infection in the intensive care unit. Meropenem plasma concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, and the data were analyzed using NONMEM. The effect of covariates on meropenem pharmacokinetics was investigated. The probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve the target of 100% fT>MIC at the proposed dosage regimens were investigated by Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: A two-compartment model adequately described the data with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a covariate significantly associated with the clearance (CL) from the central compartment. The typical value of CL was 7.48 L/h, with an eGFR adjustment factor of 0.0103 mL•1.73 m2/min, and the typical values of volume of the central compartment (V1), peripheral compartmental clearance (Q), and volume of the peripheral compartment (V2) were 15.9 L, 15.8 L/h, and 14.8 L, respectively. The goodness-of-fit plots, normalized prediction distribution error, and visual predictive checks showed good fitting and predictability of the final PPK model. When eGFR was >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, and there was a short duration of infusion (<60min), it was difficult for the probability target attainment (PTA) to reach >90% for MIC ≥ 2. Continuous infusion and frequent administration were necessary to achieve the target of 100% fT>MIC for critically ill patients with pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION: To achieve the optimal PTA, meropenem must be administered by frequent administration or continuously by an intravenous infusion. Our findings provide important information to optimize the meropenem regime in critically ill patients with pulmonary infection depending on eGFR values.

Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid Dose Adjustment for Creatinine Clearance in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label, Observational Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to use a population pharmacokinetic (PK) approach to evaluate the optimal dosing strategy for linezolid (LNZ) in critically ill patients. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study was conducted in 152 patients, and 117 of them were included in the PK model, whereas the rest were in the validation group. The percentage of therapeutic target attainment (PTTA) comprising two pharmacodynamic indices and one toxicity index was used to evaluate dosing regimens based on Monte Carlo simulations stratified by low, normal, and high renal clearance for MICs of 0.25-4 mg/L. RESULTS: A single-compartment model with a covariate creatinine clearance (CrCL) was chosen as the final model. The PK parameter estimates were clearance of 5.60 L/h, with CrCL adjustment factor of 0.386, and a distribution volume of 43.4 L. For MIC ≤2 mg/L, the standard dosing regimen (600 mg q12h) for patients with severe renal impairment (CrCL, 40 mL/min) and standard dosing or 900 mg q12h for patients with normal renal functions (CrCL, 80 mL/min) could achieve PTTA ≥74%. The dose of 2400 mg per 24-h continuous infusion was ideal for augmented renal clearance (ARC) with MIC ≤1 mg/L. For MICs >2 mg/L, rare optimal dose regimens were found regardless of renal function. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, the standard dose of 600 mg q12h was sufficient for MIC ≤2 mg/L in patients without ARC. Moreover, a 2400 mg/day 24-h continuous infusion was recommended for ARC patients.

Development and Validation of an HPLC-MS/MS Method for Rapid Simultaneous Determination of Cefprozil Diastereomers in Human Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Both cis- and trans-cefprozil have antimicrobial activity, but their potencies are quite different. It is therefore necessary to develop a sensitive method to simultaneously determine both isomers for pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies. METHODS: An LC-MS/MS method, using stable isotope-labeled cefprozil as the internal standard, was developed and validated. The analytes were extracted from plasma by protein precipitation and separated on a reverse-phase C18 column using a gradient program consisting of 0.5% formic acid and acetonitrile within 4 min. The mass spectrometry acquisition was performed with multiple reaction monitoring in positive ion mode using the respective [M+H]+ ions, m/z 391.2→114.0 for cefprozil and 395.0→114.5 for cefprozil-D4. RESULTS: The calibration curves were linear over the ranges of 0.025-15 µg/mL for cis-cefprozil and 0.014-1.67 µg/mL for trans-cefprozil. The accuracies for the cis and trans isomers of cefprozil were 93.1% and 103.0%, respectively. The intra- and interassay precisions for the QC samples of the isomers were < 14.3%. The intra- and interassay precisions at the LLOQ were < 16.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The method was sensitive and reproducible and was applied in a pilot pharmacokinetic study of healthy volunteers.

Population pharmacokinetics and safety of eptifibatide in healthy Chinese volunteers and simulations on the dose regimens approved for a Western population.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of eptifibatide in healthy Chinese volunteers and provide information for the further study in the Chinese population. METHODS: 30 healthy volunteers (15 male) were enrolled in the study and divided into three dose groups (45 µg x kg⁻¹, 90 µg x kg⁻¹, and 180 µg x kg⁻¹). Plasma and urine samples were drawn after one single-bolus administration and measured by LC-MS/MS. The plasma and urine data were analyzed simultaneously by the population approach using the NONMEM software and evaluated by the visual predicted check (VPC) and bootstraping. The PK profiles of dose regimens approved for a Western population in the Chinese population were simulated. RESULTS: A two-compartment model adequately described the PK profiles of eptifibatide. The clearance (CL) and the distribution volume (V1) of the central compartment were 0.128 L x h⁻¹ x kg⁻¹ and 0.175 L x kg⁻¹, respectively. The clearance (Q) and V2of the peripheral compartment were 0.0988 L x h⁻¹ x kg⁻¹ and 0.147 L x kg⁻¹, respectively. The elimination fraction from plasma to urine (F0) was 17.2%. No covariates were found to have a significant effect. Inter-individual variabilites were all within 33.9%. The VPC plots and bootstrap results indicated good precision and prediction of the model. The simulations of the approved regimens in the Chinese population showed much lower steady-state concentrations than the target concentration obtained from the Western clinical trials. No severe safety events were found in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The PK model of eptifibatide was established and could provide PK information for further studies in the Chinese population.