Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 185: 109230, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35122906

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe rates and trends in hospitalizations, inpatient mortality, total hospital charges, and mean lengths of stay among adult patients hospitalized for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS). METHODS: The study included NIS databases 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. These databases were searched for hospitalizations with a principal discharge diagnosis of HHS in patients with T2DM using ICD codes (25020, 25022, and E110). Patients less than 18 years, elective hospitalizations, HHS in patients with T1DM or secondary diabetes mellitus were excluded. We used multivariable regression analysis to obtain trends in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges (THC). RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2018, there was a trend towards increasing hospitalizations for T2DM with HHS (p trend < 0.001). The mean age over the period ranged from 56.9 to 59.1 years old. Men made up the majority of hospitalizations. Over the decade, there was a steady rise in the proportion of Whites and Hispanics with HHS, and Medicare was the most prevalent insurer overall. Inpatient mortality for HHS decreased from 1.44% in 2008 to 0.77% in 2018 (p trend 0.007). There was also a statistically significant decrease in both LOS and THC over the studied period. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in HHS showed increased hospitalizations, LOS, and THC over the decade in the study period, but inpatient mortality declined.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Coma Hiperglicêmico Hiperosmolar não Cetótico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Postgrad Med ; 133(7): 791-797, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096455

RESUMO

Background: With increasing utilization of cannabis in the United States (US), clinicians may encounter more cases of Gastroparesis (GP) in coming years.Objective: The primary outcome was inpatient mortality for GP with cannabis use. Secondary outcomes included system-based complications and the burden of the disease on the US healthcare system.Methods: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we identified adult hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of GP for 2016 and 2017. Individuals ≤18 years of age were excluded. The study population was subdivided based on a secondary diagnosis of cannabis use. The outcomes included biodemographic characteristics, mortality, complications, and burden of disease on the US healthcare system.Results: For 2016 and 2017, we identified 99,695 hospitalizations with GP. Of these hospitalizations, 8,870 had a secondary diagnosis of cannabis use while 90,825 served as controls. The prevalence of GP with cannabis use was 8.9%. For GP with cannabis use, the patients were younger (38.5 vs 48.1 years, p < 0.001) with a Black predominance (Table 1) and lower proportion of females (52.3 vs 68.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the non-cannabis use cohort. Additionally, the cannabis use cohort had higher percentage of patients with co-morbidities like hypertension, diabetes mellitus and a history of smoking. The inpatient mortality for GP with cannabis use was noted to be 0.27%. Furthermore, we noted shorter mean length of stay (LOS) (3.4 vs 4.4 days, aMD: -0.7, 95%CI: -0.9 - [-0.5], p < 0.001), lower mean total hospital charge (THC) ($30,400 vs $38,100, aMD: -5100, 95%CI: -6900 - [-3200], p < 0.001), and lower rates of sepsis (0.11 vs 0.60%, aOR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.91, p = 0.036) for GP hospitalizations with cannabis use compared to the non-cannabis use cohort.Conclusion: Inpatient mortality for GP hospitalizations with cannabis use was 0.27%. Additionally, these patients had shorter LOS, lower THC, and lower sepsis rates.


Assuntos
Gastroparesia/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso da Maconha/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Comorbidade , Feminino , Gastroparesia/mortalidade , Preços Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
J Investig Med ; 69(6): 1196-1200, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972382

RESUMO

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a known complication of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), but less common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital with DKA in T1DM versus T2DM. This was a population-based, retrospective, cohort study using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The group of patients hospitalized for DKA was divided based on a secondary diagnosis of either T1DM or T2DM. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcomes were rate of complications, length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospital charge (THC). The inpatient mortality for DKA was 0.27% (650 patients). In T2DM, the adjusted OR (aOR) for mortality was 2.13 (95% CI 1.38 to 3.28, p=0.001) with adjusted increase in mean THC of $6035 (95% CI 4420 to 7652, p<0.001) and mean LOS of 0.5 day (95% CI 0.3 to 0.6, p<0.001) compared with T1DM. Patients with T2DM had significantly higher odds of having septic shock (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.160 to 3.524, p=0.013) compared with T1DM. T2DM was associated with higher inpatient mortality, septic shock and increase in healthcare utilization costs compared with T1DM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cetoacidose Diabética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Cetoacidose Diabética/complicações , Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 150: 69-76, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001343

RESUMO

Heart failure (HF) and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are considered significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Concurrent presentation of HF with AECOPD can pose a diagnostic challenge due to an overlap in symptomatology. We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to assess outcomes of HF hospitalizations with a secondary diagnosis of AECOPD. We performed a retrospective analysis of discharge data from the Healthcare Cost Utilization Project NIS between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014, with a primary diagnosis of HF with and without a secondary diagnosis of AECOPD. Data was abstracted from the NIS using International Classification of Disease 9 codes. Primary outcomes included mortality, length of stay, and inflation-adjusted cost of stay. During 2004-2014, a total of (n = 10,392,628) HF hospitalizations were identified without a secondary diagnosis of AECOPD while (n = 989,713) HF hospitalizations were identified with a secondary diagnosis of AECOPD. We identified higher mortality (3.25% vs 3.56%, p <0.001), length of stay (5.2 vs 6.1 days, p <0.001) and inflation-adjusted cost of stay (12,562 vs 13,072 USD, p <0.001) in HF hospitalizations with AECOPD when compared to HF without AECOPD from 2004 to 2014. We presented AECOPD as an independent predictor of mortality in patients admitted for HF. In conclusion, further interdisciplinary collaboration between pulmonologists and cardiologists is needed for the identification and stratification of patients who present with concurrent HF and COPD for better outcomes.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Preços Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816942

RESUMO

A narrative review was conducted to examine the current state of the utilisation of telemedicine amid the current COVID-19 pandemic and to evaluate the benefits of continuing telemedicine usage in the future. A literature review was performed for articles related to telemedicine. Databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and Ovid MEDLINE were searched. Three reviewers independently performed article selection based on relevance to our topic. We included all articles between 1990 and 2020 related to telemedicine using the following keywords: 'telemedicine', 'telehealth', 'policy', 'COVID-19', 'regulation', 'rural', 'physical examination', 'future'. A total of 60 articles were identified, and through careful selection we narrowed the final number of articles to 42 based on relevance to our topic. Telemedicine has been rapidly evolving over the past several decades. Issues with regulation and reimbursement have prevented its full immersion into the healthcare system. During the current pandemic, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services have expanded access to telemedicine services. The advantages of telemedicine moving forward include its cost-effectiveness, ability to extend access to specialty services and its potential to help mitigate the looming physician shortage. Disadvantages include lack of available technological resources in certain parts of the country, issues with security of patient data, and challenges in performing the traditional patient examination. It is critically important that changes are made to fully immerse telemedicine services into the healthcare landscape in order to be prepared for future pandemics as well as to reap the benefits of this service in the future.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Telemedicina , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Análise Custo-Benefício , Previsões , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA