RESUMO
Extra-axial ependymomas are very rare but have been reported in the ovary, broad ligament, sacrococcygeal region, lung, and mediastinum. The histogenesis is obscure, and a thorough immunohistochemical analysis is lacking. We reviewed the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of 5 extra-axial ependymomas occurring in adults, 1 arising in an infantile sacrococcygeal teratoma, and a control group of 10 central nervous system (CNS) ependymomas in adults. All cases were evaluated for expression of epithelial membrane antigen, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), WT1, CD99, CK18, AE1:3, CAM 5.2, 34betaE12, CK7, CK20, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. One hundred twelve ovarian carcinomas in 3 tissue microarrays were also studied with GFAP. The adult extra-axial cases demonstrated more architectural variability than the CNS cases. We observed that both the CNS and adult extra-axial ependymomas expressed GFAP diffusely, whereas only 9 stage III, high-grade ovarian serous papillary carcinomas stained with GFAP (2 strongly and diffusely and 7 exhibiting focally weak expression). There were significant immunophenotypic differences between adult extra-axial and CNS ependymomas, with extra-axial cases preferentially expressing 34betaE12 (60% vs. 0%), CK18 (100% vs. 20%), CAM 5.2 (60% vs. 10%), CK7 (80% vs. 10%), ER (100% vs. 10%), and PR (80% vs. 20%). Two spinal cord ependymomas expressed CK18, 1 expressed CK7, and 1 expressed CAM 5.2. CNS ependymomas more frequently expressed CD99 (100% vs. 20%). The following stains were not differentially expressed: epithelial membrane antigen (expressed in 2 of 15 cases, including both extra-axial and CNS ependymomas), synaptophysin (1/15), chromogranin (0/15), WT1 (8/15), AE1:3 (10/15), and CK20 (0/15). The ependymal elements of the sacrococcygeal tumor failed to express 34betaE12, CK18, CAM 5.2, and CK7, like most CNS ependymomas. The morphologic and immunophenotypic differences between extra-axial and CNS ependymomas suggest that they derive from distinct precursors and/or differentiate along distinct pathways. The differential diagnosis of extra-axial ependymomas is extensive, and GFAP expression in primary ovarian serous carcinomas, although rare, could theoretically contribute to diagnostic difficulties. ER and PR expression in extra-axial ependymomas may provide targets for hormonal therapy.
