Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(12): 3005-3012, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34258724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A great deal of research has focused on how hospitals influence readmission rates. While hospitals play a vital role in reducing readmissions, a significant portion of the work also falls to primary care practices. Despite this critical role of primary care, little empirical evidence has shown what primary care characteristics or activities are associated with reductions in hospital admissions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between practices' readmission reduction activities and their readmission rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of 1,788 practices who responded to the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (fielded 2017-2018) and 415,663 hospital admissions for Medicare beneficiaries attributed to those practices from 2016 100% Medicare claims data. We constructed mixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate practice-level readmission rates and a linear regression model to evaluate the association between practices' readmission rates with their number of readmission reduction activities. INTERVENTIONS: Standardized composite score, ranging from 0 to 1, representing the number of a practice's readmission reduction capabilities. The composite score was composed of 12 unique capabilities identified in the literature as being significantly associated with lower readmission rates (e.g., presence of care manager, medication reconciliation, shared-decision making, etc.). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Practices' readmission rates for attributed Medicare beneficiaries. KEY RESULTS: Routinely engaging in more readmission reduction activities was significantly associated (P < .05) with lower readmission rates. On average, practices experienced a 0.05 percentage point decrease in readmission rates for each additional activity. Average risk-standardized readmission rates for practices performing 10 or more of the 12 activities in our composite measure were a full percentage point lower than risk-standardized readmission rates for practices engaging in none of the activities. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices that engaged in more readmission reduction activities had lower readmission rates. These findings add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that engaging in multiple activities, rather than any single activity, is associated with decreased readmissions.


Assuntos
Medicare , Readmissão do Paciente , Idoso , Hospitais , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 32(4): 1872-1888, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34803048

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health, including food insecurity, housing instability, social isolation, and unemployment are important drivers of health outcomes and utilization. To inform implementation of social needs screening and response protocols, there is a need to identify the associated costs in routine primary care encounters. METHODS: We interviewed key stakeholders in four diverse community health centers that had adopted a widely used social needs screening and response protocol. We evaluated costs using an activity-based costing tool across both the initial implementation phase and ongoing maintenance phase. RESULTS: Clinic costs were associated with workforce development, planning, and electronic health record integration. These initial implementation costs varied by site ($6,644-$49,087). On a per-patient basis, ongoing maintenance costs ranged from $9.76 to $47.98. CONCLUSION: Our findings can aid in designing reimbursement mechanisms tied to social needs screening and response to accelerate translational efforts and promote health equity.


Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Instabilidade Habitacional , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde
3.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(10): 1895-1903, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Near elimination of cervical cancer in the United States is possible in coming decades, yet inequities will delay this achievement for some populations. We sought to explore the effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on disparities in cervical cancer incidence between high- and low-poverty U.S. counties. METHODS: We calibrated a dynamic simulation model of HPV infection to reflect average counties in the highest and lowest quartile of poverty (percent of population below federal poverty level), incorporating data on HPV prevalence, cervical cancer screening, and HPV vaccination. We projected cervical cancer incidence through 2070, estimated absolute and relative disparities in incident cervical cancer for high- versus low-poverty counties, and compared incidence with the near-elimination target (4 cases/100,000 women annually). RESULTS: We estimated that, on average, low-poverty counties will achieve near-elimination targets 14 years earlier than high-poverty counties (2029 vs. 2043). Absolute disparities by county poverty will decrease, but relative differences are estimated to increase. We estimate 21,604 cumulative excess cervical cancer cases in high-poverty counties over the next 50 years. Increasing HPV vaccine coverage nationally to the Healthy People 2020 goal (80%) would reduce excess cancer cases, but not alter estimated time to reach the near-elimination threshold. CONCLUSIONS: High-poverty U.S. counties will likely be delayed in achieving near-elimination targets for cervical cancer and as a result will experience thousands of potentially preventable cancers. IMPACT: Alongside vaccination efforts, it is important to address the role of social determinants and health care access in driving persistent inequities by area poverty.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Erradicação de Doenças/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Áreas de Pobreza , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 975, 2021 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34530826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening in primary care for unmet individual social needs (e.g., housing instability, food insecurity, unemployment, social isolation) is critical to addressing their deleterious effects on patients' health outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply an implementation science framework to identify implementation factors and best practices for social needs screening and response. METHODS: Guided by the Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF), we collected qualitative data from clinicians and patients to evaluate barriers and facilitators to implementing the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE), a standardized social needs screening and response protocol, in a federally qualified health center. Eligible patients who received the PRAPARE as a standard of care were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. We also obtained front-line clinician perspectives in a semi-structured focus group. HEIF domains informed a directed content analysis. RESULTS: Patients and clinicians (i.e., case managers) reported implementation barriers and facilitators across multiple domains (e.g., clinical encounters, patient and provider factors, inner context, outer context, and societal influence). Implementation barriers included structural and policy level determinants related to resource availability, discrimination, and administrative burden. Facilitators included evidence-based clinical techniques for shared decision making (e.g., motivational interviewing), team-based staffing models, and beliefs related to alignment of the PRAPARE with patient-centered care. We found high levels of patient acceptability and opportunities for adaptation to increase equitable adoption and reach. CONCLUSION: Our results provide practical insight into the implementation of the PRAPARE or similar social needs screening and response protocols in primary care at the individual encounter, organizational, community, and societal levels. Future research should focus on developing discrete implementation strategies to promote social needs screening and response, and associated multisector care coordination to improve health outcomes and equity for vulnerable and marginalized patient populations.


Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Ciência da Implementação , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa
5.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 342, 2021 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34261446

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health systems are increasingly using standardized social needs screening and response protocols including the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Risks, Assets, and Experiences (PRAPARE) to improve population health and equity; despite established relationships between the social determinants of health and health outcomes, little is known about the associations between standardized social needs assessment information and patients' clinical condition. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we examined the relationship between social needs screening assessment data and measures of cardiometabolic clinical health from electronic health records data using two modelling approaches: a backward stepwise logistic regression and a least absolute selection and shrinkage operation (LASSO) logistic regression. Primary outcomes were dichotomized cardiometabolic measures related to obesity, hypertension, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) 10-year risk. Nested models were built to evaluate the utility of social needs assessment data from PRAPARE for risk prediction, stratification, and population health management. RESULTS: Social needs related to lack of housing, unemployment, stress, access to medicine or health care, and inability to afford phone service were consistently associated with cardiometabolic risk across models. Model fit, as measured by the c-statistic, was poor for predicting obesity (logistic = 0.586; LASSO = 0.587), moderate for stage 1 hypertension (logistic = 0.703; LASSO = 0.688), and high for borderline ASCVD risk (logistic = 0.954; LASSO = 0.950). CONCLUSIONS: Associations between social needs assessment data and clinical outcomes vary by cardiometabolic condition. Social needs assessment data may be useful for prospectively identifying patients at heightened cardiometabolic risk; however, there are limits to the utility of social needs data for improving predictive performance.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Síndrome Metabólica/terapia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Aterosclerose/terapia , Fatores de Risco Cardiometabólico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/terapia , Masculino , Assistência Médica , Síndrome Metabólica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Am J Med Qual ; 36(2): 90-98, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32686484

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/Clostridioides difficile and quality and clinical outcomes in US acute care hospitals. The population was all Medicare-certified US acute care hospitals with MRSA/C difficile standardized infection ratio (SIR) data available from 2013 to 2017. Hospital-level data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were used to estimate hospital and time fixed effects models for 30-day hospital readmissions, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and days in the intensive care unit. The key explanatory variables were SIR for MRSA and C difficile. No association was found between MRSA or C difficile rates and any of the 4 outcomes. The null results add to the mixed evidence in the field, but there are likely residual confounding factors. Future research should use larger samples of patient-level data and appropriate methods to provide evidence to guide efforts to tackle antimicrobial resistance.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Idoso , Clostridioides , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Medicare , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Health Serv Res ; 56(2): 275-288, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33006158

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test the relationship between the supply of select nonpharmacologic providers (physical therapy (PT) and mental health (MH)) and use of nonpharmacologic services among older adults with a persistent musculoskeletal pain (MSP) episode. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Claims data from a 5 percent random sample of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled fee-for-service (2007-2014) and the Area Health Resource File (AHRF). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study used generalized estimating equations to estimate the association between the county nonpharmacologic provider supply and individual service use with opioid prescriptions filled during Phase 1 (first three months of an episode) and Phase 2 (three months following Phase 1). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified beneficiaries (>65 years) with ≥2 MSP diagnoses ≥90 days apart and no opioid prescription six months before the first pain diagnosis (N = 69 456). Beneficiaries' county characteristics were assigned using the AHRF. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: About 13.9 percent of beneficiaries used PT, 1.8 percent used MH services, and 10.7 percent had an opioid prescription during the first three months of a persistent MSP episode. An additional MH provider/10 000 people/county [aOR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98] and PT/10 000 people/county [aOR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00] was associated with lower odds of filling an opioid prescription in Phase 1. An additional MH provider/10 000 people/county [aOR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98] and PT use in Phase 1 [aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.58-0.67] were associated with lower odds of filling an opioid prescription in Phase 2. The associations between the supply of providers and nonpharmacologic service use in Phase 1 and Phase 1 opioid prescriptions significantly differed by metropolitan and rural counties (P-value: .019). CONCLUSIONS: Limited access to nonpharmacologic services is associated with opioid prescriptions at the onset of a persistent MSP episode. Initiating PT at the onset of an episode may reduce future opioid use. Strategies for engaging beneficiaries in nonpharmacologic services should be tailored for metropolitan and rural counties.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Musculoesquelética/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Comorbidade , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Musculoesquelética/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(3): 298-304, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998788

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of California's antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) mandate on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates in acute-care hospitals. POPULATION: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-certified acute-care hospitals in the United States. DATA SOURCES: 2013-2017 data from the CMS Hospital Compare, Provider of Service File and Medicare Cost Reports. METHODS: Difference-in-difference model with hospital fixed effects to compare California with all other states before and after the ASP mandate. We considered were standardized infection ratios (SIRs) for MRSA and CDI as the outcomes. We analyzed the following time-variant covariates: medical school affiliation, bed count, quality accreditation, number of changes in ownership, compliance with CMS requirements, % intensive care unit beds, average length of stay, patient safety index, and 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: In 2013, California hospitals had an average MRSA SIR of 0.79 versus 0.94 in other states, and an average CDI SIR of 1.01 versus 0.77 in other states. California hospitals had increases (P < .05) of 23%, 30%, and 20% in their MRSA SIRs in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. California hospitals were associated with a 20% (P < .001) decrease in the CDI SIR only in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The mandate was associated with a decrease in CDI SIR and an increase in MRSA SIR.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Clostridioides , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Medicare , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
9.
Pediatrics ; 146(6)2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33199466

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We sought to prioritize interventions for increasing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage based on cost-effectiveness from a US state perspective to inform decisions by policy makers. METHODS: We developed a dynamic simulation model of HPV transmission and progression scaled to a medium-sized US state (5 million individuals). We modeled outcomes over 50 years comparing no intervention to a one-year implementation of centralized reminder and recall for HPV vaccination, school-located HPV vaccination, or quality improvement (QI) visits to primary care clinics. We used probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess a range of plausible outcomes associated with each intervention. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated relative to a conservative willingness-to-pay threshold; $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) . RESULTS: All interventions were cost-effective, relative to no intervention. QI visits had the lowest cost and cost per QALY gained ($1538 versus no intervention). Statewide implementation of centralized reminder and recall cost $28 289 per QALY gained versus QI visits. School-located vaccination had the highest cost but was cost-effective at $18 337 per QALY gained versus QI visits. Scaling to the US population, interventions could avert 3000 to 14 000 future HPV cancers. When varying intervention cost and impact over feasible ranges, interventions were typically preferred to no intervention, but cost-effectiveness varied between intervention strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Three interventions for increasing HPV vaccine coverage were cost-effective and offered substantial health benefits. Policy makers seeking to increase HPV vaccination should, at minimum, dedicate additional funding for QI visits, which are consistently effective at low cost and may additionally consider more resource-intensive interventions (reminder and recall or school-located vaccination).


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Vacinação/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Estados Unidos
10.
Health Place ; 66: 102452, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011490

RESUMO

In Afghanistan, the risk of maternal death is among the highest in the world, with wide variation across the country. One explanation may be wide geographic disparities in access and use of maternal health care services. This study describes the spatial distribution of public facilities providing maternal health care in Afghanistan, specifically emergency obstetric care (EmOC), and the differences in travel time estimates using different transportation modes from 2010 to 2015 at the national and subnational levels. We conducted mapping and spatial analyses to measure the proportion of pregnant women able to access any EmOC health facility within 2 h by foot, animal, motor vehicle and a combination of transport modes. In 2015, adequate coverage of active public health facilities within 2 h of travel time was 36.6% by foot and 71.2% by a combination of transport modes. We found an 8.3% and 63.2% increase in access to EmOC facilities within 2 h of travel time by a combination of transport modes and by foot only, respectively, by 2015. Access to a combination of transportation options such as motor vehicles and animals may benefit pregnant women in reaching health facilities efficiently. Afghanistan made impressive gains in maternal healthcare access; despite these improvements, large disparities remain in geographic access by province and overall access to facilities is still poor.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Afeganistão , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Gravidez , Viagem
11.
Am J Manag Care ; 26(6): 262-266, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549063

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Scholars have highlighted the importance of preventing hospital admissions and readmissions for individuals with costly chronic conditions. Providing effective care management strategies can help reduce inpatient admissions, thereby reducing rising health care costs. However, implementing effective care management strategies may be more difficult for independent physician associations (IPAs) that contract with multiple organizations that have competing interests and agendas. This study aims to identify and investigate strategies that facilitate the implementation of evidence-based best practices among IPAs. STUDY DESIGN: The research synthesized peer-reviewed literature to identify best practices in chronic disease management for Medicare beneficiaries. Subsequently, 20 key informant interviews were conducted to explore barriers and facilitators in adapting these best practices in IPA settings. Informant interviews were conducted with 3 key groups: executives, medical directors, and care managers. METHODS: Key informant interviews were conducted to explore barriers and facilitators in implementing best care management practices. RESULTS: Key informants provided unique insights regarding the challenges of implementing best care management practices among IPAs. These challenges included implementing and sustaining the operations of evidence-based care management programs while maintaining contractual obligations to health plans, engaging physicians in large and diverse networks, and building high-touch programs in large geographic areas using risk-stratifying algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: IPA managed care organizations require unique considerations in regard to selected strategies used to manage chronic disease in Medicare populations. These considerations are critical for optimal management of the population, particularly in a risk-based or pay-for-performance environment.


Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/economia , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estados Unidos
12.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(8): 2304-2313, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates that the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is associated with improved clinical outcomes and quality of care, and the populations that can most benefit from this model require long-term management, e.g., persons with chronic illness and behavioral health conditions. However, different populations may not benefit equally from the PCMH, and empirical evidence about the effects of this model on racial disparities is limited. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the association between enrollment in National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)-recognized PCMHs and racial disparities in quality of care for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid medical conditions. DESIGN: Applying a quasi-experimental instrumental variable design to account for differential selection into the PCMH, we used generalized estimating equations to determine the probability of receiving eight disease-specific quality measures. SUBJECTS: Medicaid enrollees in three states not dually enrolled in Medicare, ages 18-64 with MDD and > 1 other chronic condition. A subgroup analysis was conducted for enrollees with comorbid diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Enrollment in an NCQA-recognized PCMH. MAIN MEASURES: Disease-specific quality indicators for MDD (e.g., antidepressant use, receipt of psychotherapy), and for diabetes, (e.g. A1c testing, LDL-C testing, retinal exams, and medical attention for nephropathy). KEY RESULTS: PCMH enrollment was associated with an increase in the overall likelihood of receiving six of eight recommended services and a decrease in the likelihood of receiving any psychotherapy (4.94 percentage points, p < 0.01) and retinal exams (5.51 percentage points, p < 0.05). Although both groups improved, PCMH enrollment was associated with an exacerbation of the Black-white disparity in adequate antidepressant use by 4.20 percentage points (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While PCMH enrollment may improve the overall quality of care, the effect is inconsistent across racial groups and not always associated with reductions in racial disparities in quality.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
13.
Med Care ; 58(5): 433-444, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028525

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioids are prescribed more frequently than nonpharmacologic treatments for persistent musculoskeletal pain (MSP). We estimate the association between the supply of physical therapy (PT) and mental health (MH) providers and early nonpharmacologic service use with high-risk opioid prescriptions among Medicare beneficiaries with persistent MSP. RESEARCH DESIGN: We retrospectively studied Medicare beneficiaries (>65 y) enrolled in Fee-for-Service and Part D (2007-2014) with a new persistent MSP episode and no opioid prescription during the prior 6 months. Independent variables were nonpharmacologic provider supply per capita and early nonpharmacologic service use (any use during first 3 mo). One year outcomes were long-term opioid use (LTOU) (≥90 days' supply) and high daily dose (HDD) (≥50 mg morphine equivalent). We used multinomial regression and generalized estimating equations and present adjusted odds ratios (aORs). RESULTS: About 2.4% of beneficiaries had LTOU; 11.9% had HDD. The supply of MH providers was not associated with LTOU and HDD. Each additional PT/10,000 people/county was associated with greater odds of LTOU [aOR: 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.11). Early MH use was associated with lower odds of a low-risk opioid use (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96), but greater odds of LTOU (aOR: 1.93; 95% CI, 1.28-2.90). Among beneficiaries with an opioid prescription, early PT was associated with lower odds of LTOU (aOR: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89), but greater odds of HDD (aOR: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of nonpharmacologic services on opioid use may be limited. Research on effective delivery of nonpharmacologic services to reduce high-risk opioid use for older adults with MSP is needed.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/terapia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Musculoesquelética/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(3): 753-761, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31650402

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Persons living with serious illness often need skilled symptom management, communication, and spiritual support. Palliative care addresses these needs and may be delivered by either specialists or clinicians trained in other fields. It is important to understand core elements of palliative care to best provide patient-centered care. OBJECTIVE: To describe frequency, predictors, and timing of core elements of palliative care during the last 6 months of life. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Inpatient academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Decedents with cancer, dementia, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) admitted during the 6 months preceding death. EXPOSURES: We identified receipt and timing of core elements of palliative care: pain and symptom management, goals of care, spiritual care; and specialty palliative care utilization; hospital encounters; demographics; and comorbid diagnoses. We ran Poisson regression models to assess whether diagnosis or hospital encounters were associated with core elements of palliative care. RESULTS: Among 402 decedents, the mean (SD) number of appropriately screened and treated symptoms was 2.9 (1.7)/10. Among 76.1% with documented goals of care, 58.0% had a primary goal of comfort; 55.0% had documented spiritual care. In multivariable models, compared with decedents with cancer, those with dementia or CKD were less likely to have pain and symptom management (respectively, 31% (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85) and 17% (IRR, 0.83; CI, 0.71-0.97)). There was a median of 3 days (IQR, 0-173) between transition to a goal of comfort and death, and a median of 12 days (IQR, 5-47) between hospice referral and death. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although a high proportion of patients received elements of palliative care, transitions to a goal of comfort or hospice happened very near death. Palliative care delivery can be improved by systematizing existing mechanisms, including prompts for earlier goals-of-care discussion, symptom screening, and spiritual care, and by building collaboration between primary and specialty palliative care services.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Neoplasias , Assistência Terminal , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Medicare , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
15.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(10): 2114-2122, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31388914

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Helping Invested Families Improve Veterans' Experiences Study (HI-FIVES), a skills training program for caregivers of persons with functional or cognitive impairments. DESIGN: A two-arm RCT. SETTING: Single Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and their primary caregivers referred in the past 6 months to home and community-based services or geriatrics clinic. INTERVENTION: All caregivers received usual care. Caregivers in HI-FIVES also received five training calls and four group training sessions. MAIN MEASURES: Cumulative patient days at home 12 months post-randomization, defined as days not in an emergency department, inpatient hospital, or post-acute facility. Secondary outcomes included patients' total VA health care costs, caregiver and patient rating of the patient's experience of VA health care, and caregiver depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Of 241 dyads, caregivers' (patients') mean age was 61 (73) years, 54% (53%) Black and 89% (4%) female. HI-FIVES was associated with a not statistically significant 9% increase in the rate of days at home (95% CI 0.72, 1.65; mean difference 1 day over 12 months). No significant differences were observed in health care costs or caregiver depressive symptoms. Model-estimated mean baseline patient experience of VA care (scale of 0-10) was 8.43 (95% CI 8.16, 8.70); the modeled mean difference between HI-FIVES and controls at 3 months was 0.29 (p = .27), 0.31 (p = 0.26) at 6 months, and 0.48 (p = 0.03) at 12 months. For caregivers, it was 8.34 (95% CI 8.10, 8.57); the modeled mean difference at 3 months was 0.28 (p = .18), 0.53 (p < .01) at 6 months, and 0.46 (p = 0.054) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: HI-FIVES did not increase patients' days at home; it showed sustained improvements in caregivers' and patients' experience of VA care at clinically significant levels, nearly 0.5 points. The training holds promise in increasing an important metric of care quality-reported experience with care.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/educação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Veteranos , Idoso , Cuidadores/economia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Família , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
16.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(12): 2740-2748, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31452032

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke care delivery may be affected by provider participation in Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) through systematic changes to discharge planning, care coordination, and transitional care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of MSSP with patient outcomes in the year following hospitalization for ischemic stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort SETTING: Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke (2010-2014) PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalizations for mild to moderate incident ischemic stroke were linked with Medicare claims for fee-for-service beneficiaries ≥ 65 years (N = 251,605). MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included discharge to home, 30-day all-cause readmission, length of index hospital stay, days in the community (home-time) at 1 year, and 1-year recurrent stroke and mortality. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare outcomes before and after hospital MSSP implementation for patients (1) discharged from hospitals that chose to participate versus not participate in MSSP or (2) assigned to an MSSP ACO versus not or both. Unique estimates for 2013 and 2014 ACOs were generated. KEY RESULTS: For hospitals joining MSSP in 2013 or 2014, the probability of discharge to home decreased by 2.57 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = - 4.43, - 0.71) percentage points (pp) and 1.84 pp (CI = - 3.31, - 0.37), respectively, among beneficiaries not assigned to an MSSP ACO. Among discharges from hospitals joining MSSP in 2013, beneficiary ACO alignment versus not was associated with increased home discharge, reduced length of stay, and increased home-time. For patients discharged from hospitals joining MSSP in 2014, ACO alignment was not associated with changes in utilization. No association between MSSP and recurrent stroke or mortality was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke, meaningful reductions in acute care utilization were observed only for ACO-aligned beneficiaries who were also discharged from a hospital initiating MSSP in 2013. Only 1 year of data was available for the 2014 MSSP cohort, and these early results suggest further study is warranted. REGISTRATION: None.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicare , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Estados Unidos
17.
Glob Adv Health Med ; 8: 2164956119858034, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31223518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder and the sixth biggest cause of disability worldwide. The World Health Organization has declared migraine a major public health problem due to a paucity of knowledge about cause and effective treatment options. Both in incidence and severity, migraine disproportionately affects people occupying marginalized social locations (SL). Managed pharmacologically, migraine is treated with daily preventive and as-needed abortive medications. Both come with high literal and figurative costs: intolerable side effects, medication interactions, and prohibitive prices. Cost prohibitive, ineffective, and unsustainable pharmacological treatment options have contributed to high levels of interest in complementary approaches by people with migraine, but little is known about their motivations, patterns of use or access, or how these may vary by SL. METHOD: We conducted focus groups with 30 people with migraine to explore their desires and recommendations for migraine clinicians and researchers. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes.Outcomes: We identified 4 themes: a more holistic, collaborative, long-term treatment approach; medication as a short-term solution; high personal and economic costs of medication; and desire for more information and access to natural approaches. Across SL, participants expressed keen interest in integrative approaches and wanted better access to complementary modalities. Participants in marginalized SL described reliance on traditional/folk remedies, including engagement with family and community healers, who they described as more affordable and culturally accessible. CONCLUSIONS: Holistic and integrative approaches were preferred over medication as long-term migraine management strategies. However, people in marginalized SL, while disproportionately disabled by migraine, did not feel as comfortable accessing integrative approaches through currently available channels. Engaging with these communities and using a critical lens to explore barriers to access can develop options to make complementary modalities more approachable, while also attending to systemic blind spots that may unintentionally alienate socially marginalized groups.

18.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(7): 1402-1409, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30835818

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Palliative care services have the potential to improve the quality of end-of-life care and reduce cost. Services such as the Medicare hospice benefit, however, are often underutilized among stroke patients with a poor prognosis. We tested the hypothesis that the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) is associated with increased hospice enrollment and inpatient comfort measures only among incident ischemic stroke patients with a high mortality risk. DESIGN: A difference-in-differences design was used to compare outcomes before and after hospital participation in the MSSP for patients discharged from MSSP hospitals (N = 273) vs non-MSSP hospitals (N = 1490). SETTING: Records from a national registry, Get with the Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke, were linked to Medicare hospice claims (2010-2015). PARTICIPANTS: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older hospitalized for incident ischemic stroke at a GWTG-Stroke hospital from January 2010 to December 2014 (N = 324 959). INTERVENTION: Discharge from an MSSP hospital or beneficiary alignment with an MSSP Accountable Care Organization (ACO). MEASUREMENTS: Hospice enrollment in the year following stroke. RESULTS: Among patients with high mortality risk, ACO alignment was associated with a 16% increase in odds of hospice enrollment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.26), increasing the probability of hospice enrollment from 20% to 22%. In the low mortality risk group, discharge from an MSSP vs non-MSSP hospital was associated with a decrease in the predicted probability of inpatient comfort measures or discharge to hospice from 9% to 8% (OR = .82; CI = .74-.91), and ACO alignment was associated with reduced odds of a short stay (<7 days) (OR = .86; CI = .77-.96). CONCLUSION: Among ischemic stroke patients with severe stroke or indicators of high mortality risk, MSSP was associated with increased hospice enrollment. MSSP contract incentives may motivate improved end-of-life care among the subgroups most likely to benefit.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/economia , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidade , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Assistência Terminal/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 28(5): 882-889, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30733307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although rural cancer patients encounter substantial barriers to care, they more often report receiving timely care than urban patients. We examined whether geographic distance, a contributor to urban-rural health disparities, differentially influences treatment initiation and completion among insured urban and rural cervical cancer patients. METHODS: We identified women diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 from a statewide cancer registry linked to multipayer, insurance claims. Primary outcomes were initiation of guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis and, among stage IB2-IVA cancer patients, completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 56 days. We estimated risk ratios using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural status, to examine the association between distance and treatment timing (initiation or completion). RESULTS: Among 999 stage IA-IVA patients, 48% initiated guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis, and 37% of 492 stage IB2-IVA cancer patients completed CCRT in 56 days. In urban areas, stage IA-IVA patients who lived ≥15 miles from the nearest treatment facility were less likely to initiate timely treatment compared with those <5 miles [risk ratio (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.54-0.95]. Among IB2-IVA stage cancer patients, rural women residing ≥15 miles from the nearest radiation facility were more likely to complete CCRT in 56 days (RR: 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.51). CONCLUSIONS: Geographic distance differentially influences the initiation and completion of treatment among urban and rural cervical cancer patients. IMPACT: Distance was an access barrier for insured cervical cancer patients in urban areas whereas rural patients may require more intensive outreach, support, and resources, even among those living closer to treatment.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
20.
Implement Sci ; 13(1): 105, 2018 07 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30064454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many state Medicaid programs are implementing pharmacist-led medication management programs to improve outcomes for high-risk beneficiaries. There are a limited number of studies examining implementation of these programs, making it difficult to assess why program outcomes might vary across organizations. To address this, we tested the applicability of the organizational theory of innovation implementation effectiveness to examine implementation of a community pharmacy Medicaid medication management program. METHODS: We used a hurdle regression model to examine whether organizational determinants, such as implementation climate and innovation-values fit, were associated with effective implementation. We defined effective implementation in two ways: implementation versus non-implementation and program reach (i.e., the proportion of the target population that received the intervention). Data sources included an implementation survey administered to participating community pharmacies and administrative data. RESULTS: The findings suggest that implementation climate is positively and significantly associated with implementation versus non-implementation (AME = 2.65, p < 0.001) and with program reach (AME = 5.05, p = 0.001). Similarly, the results suggest that innovation-values fit is positively and significantly associated with implementation (AME = 2.17, p = 0.037) and program reach (AME = 11.79, p < 0.001). Some structural characteristics, such as having a clinical pharmacist on staff, were significant predictors of implementation and program reach whereas other characteristics, such as pharmacy type or prescription volume, were not. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supported the use of the organizational theory of innovation implementation effectiveness to identify organizational determinants that are associated with effective implementation (e.g., implementation climate and innovation-values fit). Unlike broader environmental factors or structural characteristics (e.g., pharmacy type), implementation climate and innovation-values fit are modifiable factors and can be targeted through intervention-a finding that is important for community pharmacy practice. Additional research is needed to determine what implementation strategies can be used by community pharmacy leaders and practitioners to develop a positive implementation climate and innovation-values fit for medication management programs.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Inovação Organizacional , Farmacêuticos , Humanos , Medicaid , Farmácias , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA