Comparative Effectiveness of Retromuscular and Intraperitoneal Repair: What Is the Value of Posterior Sheath Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: The authors hypothesize that posterior sheath reconstruction to achieve retromuscular mesh placement provides outcomes comparable to traditional retromuscular mesh placement and superior to intraperitoneal repair. METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups: (1) retromuscular mesh placement with repaired posterior sheath defects, (2) retromuscular repair with an intact posterior sheath, and (3) intraperitoneal repair. Primary outcomes included recurrence, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. RESULTS: Overall, 179 patients were included. Posterior sheath defects were repaired primarily with absorbable suture or biological mesh. Recurrence rates differed significantly between standard retromuscular repair and intraperitoneal repair groups (p < 0.009), trended toward significance between repaired posterior sheath and intraperitoneal repair groups (p < 0.058), and showed no difference between repaired posterior sheath and standard retromuscular repair (p < 0.608). Retromuscular repair was clinically protective and cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of posterior sheath reconstruction suggests outcomes comparable to traditional retromuscular repair and a trend toward superiority compared with intraperitoneal repair. Achieving retromuscular closure appears to demonstrate clinical and cost efficacy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Ventral Hernia Repair: Designing a Qualitative Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: Current hernia patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were developed without patient input, greatly impairing their content validity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a conceptual model for PRO measures for ventral hernia (VH) patients. METHODS: Fifteen semi-structured, concept elicitation interviews and two focus groups employing nominal group technique were conducted with VH patients. Patients were recruited between November 2015 and July 2016 over the telephone from a five-surgeon patient cohort at our institution. Iterative thematic analysis identified domains. Reliability and validation were achieved using inter-rater reliability checks and triangulation. RESULTS: Seven framework domains were established: (1) expectations; (2) self and others; (3) surgeon and surgical team; (4) sensation; (5) function; (6) appearance; and (7) overall satisfaction. Overall patient satisfaction was associated with two themes: (1) provider-patient relationship; and (2) patient assessment of post-repair improvement. CONCLUSIONS: VH patients experience a profoundly broad range of reactions to VH repair. A patient-informed PRO instrument that addresses the spectrum of patient-identified outcomes can guide practice, optimizing care targeting VH patients' needs.

The Value of a Resident Aesthetic Clinic: A 7-Year Institutional Review and Survey of the Chief Resident Experience.

BACKGROUND: With the evolving plastic surgery training paradigm, there is an increasing emphasis on aesthetic surgery education during residency. In an effort to improve aesthetic education and to encourage preparation for independent practice, our institution has supported a resident-run aesthetic clinic for over two decades. OBJECTIVES: To provide insight into the educational benefits of a resident-run cosmetic clinic through longitudinal resident follow up and institutional experiential review. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all clinic-based aesthetic operations performed between 2009 and 2016. To capture residents' perspectives on the cosmetic resident clinic, questionnaires were distributed to the cohort. Primary outcome measures included: volume and types of cases performed, impact of clinic experience on training, confidence level performing cosmetic procedures, and satisfaction with chief clinic. Unpaired t tests were calculated to compare case volume/type with level of confidence and degree of preparedness to perform cosmetic procedures independently. RESULTS: Overall, 264 operations performed by 18 graduated chief residents were reviewed. Surveys were distributed to 28 chief residents (71.4% completion rate). Performing twenty or more clinic-based procedures was associated with higher levels of preparedness to perform cosmetic procedures independently (P = 0.037). Residents reported the highest confidence when performing cosmetic breast procedures when compared to face/neck (P = 0.005), body/trunk procedures (P = 0.39), and noninvasive facial procedures (P = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The continued growth of aesthetic surgery highlights the need for comprehensive training and preparation for the new generation of plastic surgeons. Performing cosmetic procedures in clinic is a valuable adjunct to the traditional educational curriculum and increases preparedness and confidence for independent practice.

Development of a Clinically Actionable Incisional Hernia Risk Model after Colectomy Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia remains a persistent and burdensome complication after colectomy. Through individualized risk-assessment and prediction models, we aimed to improve preoperative risk counseling for patients undergoing colectomy; identify modifiable preoperative risk factors; and encourage the use of evidence-based risk-prediction instruments in the clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data was conducted for all patients undergoing either open or laparoscopic colectomy as identified through the state inpatient databases of California, Florida, and New York in 2009. Incidence of incisional hernia repair was collected from both the state inpatient databases and the state ambulatory surgery and services databases in the 3 states between index surgery and 2011. Hernia risk was calculated with multivariable hierarchical logistic regression modeling and validated using bootstrapping techniques. Exclusion criteria included concurrent hernia, metastasis, mortality, and age younger than 18 years. Inflation-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 30,741 patients underwent colectomy, one-third of these procedures performed laparoscopically. Incisional hernia repair was performed in 2,563 patients (8.3%) (27-month follow-up). Fourteen significant risk factors were identified, including open surgery (odds ratio = 1.49; p < 0.0001), obesity (odds ratio = 1.49; p < 0.0001), and alcohol abuse (odds ratio = 1.39; p = 0.010). Extreme-risk patients experienced the highest incidence of incisional hernia (19.8%) vs low-risk patients (3.9%) (C-statistic = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: We present a clinically actionable model of incisional hernia using all-payer claims after colectomy. The data presented can structure preoperative risk counseling, identify modifiable patient-specific risk factors, and advance the field of risk prediction using claims data.

A risk model and cost analysis of post-operative incisional hernia following 2,145 open hysterectomies-Defining indications and opportunities for risk reduction.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is a complication following open abdominal hysterectomy. This study addresses the incidence and health care cost of IH repair after open hysterectomy, and identify perioperative risk factors to create predictive risk models. METHODS: We conduct a retrospective review of patients who underwent open hysterectomy between 2005 and 2013 at the University of Pennsylvania. The primary outcome was post-hysterectomy IH. Univariate/multivariate cox proportional hazard analyses identified perioperative risk factors. We performed cox hazard regression modeling with bootstrapped validation, risk stratification, and assessment of model performance. RESULTS: 2145 patients underwent open hysterectomy during the study period. 76 patients developed IH, and all underwent repair. 31.3% underwent reoperation, generating higher costs ($71,559 vs. $23,313, p < 0.001). 8 risk factors were included in the model, the strongest being presence of a vertical incision (HR = 3.73 [2.01-6.92]). Extreme-risk patients experienced the highest incidence of IH (22%) vs. low-risk patients (0.8%) [C-statistic = 0.82]. CONCLUSIONS: We identify perioperative risk factors for IH and provide a risk prediction instrument to accurately stratify patients in effort to offer risk reductive techniques. SUMMARY: Open hysterectomies account for a magnitude of surgical procedures worldwide. This study presents an internally validated risk model of IH in patients undergoing open hysterectomy after a review of 2145 cases. With an increasing emphasis on prevention in healthcare, we create a risk model to improve outcomes after open hysterectomies in effort to identify high-risk patients, facilitate preoperative risk counseling, and implement evidence-based strategies to improve outcomes.