Economics of Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the 3M-TAVR Economic Study.

BACKGROUND: The 3M-TAVR trial (3M-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) demonstrated the feasibility and safety of next-day hospital discharge after transfemoral TAVR with implementation of a minimalist pathway. However, the economic impact of this approach is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated costs for patients undergoing minimalist TAVR compared with conventional TAVR. METHODS: We used propensity matching to compare resource utilization and costs (from a US health care system perspective) for patients in the 3M-TAVR trial with those for transfemoral TAVR patients enrolled in the contemporaneous S3i trial (PARTNER SAPIEN-3 Intermediate Risk). Procedural costs were estimated using measured resource utilization for both groups. For the S3i group, all other costs through 30-day follow-up were assessed by linkage with Medicare claims; for 3M, these costs were assessed using regression models derived from S3i cost and resource utilization data. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity matching, 351 pairs were included in our study (mean age 82, mean Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score 5.3%). There were no differences in death, stroke, or rehospitalization between the 3M-TAVR and S3i groups through 30-day follow-up. Index hospitalization costs were $10 843/patient lower in the 3M-TAVR cohort, driven by reductions in procedure duration, anesthesia costs, and length of stay. Between discharge and 30 days, costs were similar for the 2 groups such that cumulative 30-day costs were $11 305/patient lower in the 3M-TAVR cohort compared with the S3i cohort ($49 425 versus $60 729, 95% CI for difference $9378 to $13 138; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional transfemoral TAVR, use of a minimalist pathway in intermediate-risk patients was associated with similar clinical outcomes and substantial in-hospital cost savings, which were sustained through 30 days. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02287662.

Impact of prior oral anticoagulant use and outcomes on patients from secondary analysis in the AUGUSTUS trial.

OBJECTIVE: Managing antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging and can be affected by prior oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. We examined the relationship between prior OAC use and outcomes in the AUGUSTUS trial. METHODS: This prespecified secondary analysis is from AUGUSTUS, an open-label, 2-by-2 factorial, RCT to evaluate the safety of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin versus placebo in patients with AF and ACS and/or PCI. The primary endpoint, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and clinical outcomes were compared in patients receiving (n=2262) or not receiving (n=2352) an OAC prior to enrolment. RESULTS: Patients with prior OAC use had more comorbidities, higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores, and were more likely enrolled following elective PCI. There was no difference in major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding with or without prior OAC (30 days: 5.1% vs 5.9% (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06); 180 days: 13.5% vs 13.5% (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.16)). Patients with prior OAC use had a lower risk of death or ischaemic events (30 days: 1.7% vs 2.8% (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.92); 180 days: 5.4% vs 7.6% (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.88)). No interactions between randomised treatment (apixaban vs VKA, aspirin vs placebo) and prior OAC status were observed for outcomes, apart from apixaban (vs VKA) being associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction with prior OAC use (180 days: 2.0% vs 3.7% (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91(). CONCLUSIONS: In AUGUSTUS, prior OAC use was associated with fewer ischaemic events but not more bleeding. In patients with AF and ACS and/or undergoing PCI, clinicians can be assured that the trial results can be applied to patients regardless of their prior OAC status. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02415400.

Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease in a Population-Based Cohort of High-Cost Healthcare Services Users.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited data on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and multimorbidity in contemporary cohorts of high-cost users (HCUs) in Canada.We examined the following: (i) the prevalence of CVD, with a comparison of total healthcare costs among HCUs with vs without CVD; (ii) the contribution of other comorbidities to costs among HCUs with CVD; and (iii) the trajectory of healthcare costs in the years before and after becoming an HCU. METHODS: The study included adult Alberta patients in the Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canadian Institute for Health Information Dynamic Cohort of Complex, High System Users from 2011-2012 through 2014-2015. We examined total healthcare costs, including hospital, ambulatory care, physician services, and drugs. RESULTS: Among 88,536 HCUs, 23.4% had no CVD, 28.9% were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of CVD, and 47.7% were hospitalized with a secondary diagnosis of CVD. Total healthcare costs were $2.0 billion (20.4% non-hospital costs), $2.8 billion (24.1% non-hospital costs), and $4.9 billion (19.8% non-hospital costs), respectively, in the 3 groups. Many HCUs with CVD were frail (74.2%) and many had diabetes (33.8%) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (27.9%), which contributed to higher costs and mortality. Healthcare expenditures in HCUs with CVD were several times higher than per capita health expenditures in the years prior to, and following, their inclusion in the dynamic HCU cohort. CONCLUSIONS: CVD is very common in HCUs of healthcare. HCUs with CVD have high rates of frailty and multimorbidity. Further research is needed to identify and intervene earlier, in order to flatten the cost curve in these complex patients.

INTRODUCTION: Les données sur la prévalence des maladies cardiovasculaires (MCV) et de la multimorbidité au sein des cohortes contemporaines de grands utilisateurs (GU) du Canada sont limitées. Nous avons examiné ce qui suit : (i) la prévalence des MCV en comparant les coûts totaux des soins de santé entre les GU atteints de MCV et les GU non atteints de MCV; (ii) la contribution des autres comorbidités aux coûts liés aux GU atteints de MCV; (iii) la trajectoire des coûts des soins de santé dans les années avant et après avoir été considérés comme un GU. MÉTHODES: L'étude portait sur des patients adultes de l'Alberta de la Cohorte dynamique de grands utilisateurs du système de santé aux besoins complexes de 2011-2012 à 2014-2015 des Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada et de l'Institut canadien d'information sur la santé. Nous avons examiné les coûts totaux des soins de santé, notamment les coûts hospitaliers, les coûts des soins ambulatoires, des services médicaux et des médicaments. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 88 536 GU, 23,4 % n'avaient pas de MCV, 28,9 % étaient hospitalisés et avaient un diagnostic principal de MCV, et 47,7 % étaient hospitalisés et avaient un diagnostic secondaire de MCV. Les coûts totaux des soins de santé des 3 groupes étaient respectivement de 2,0 G$ (20,4 % de coûts non hospitaliers), 2,8 G$ (24,1 % de coûts non hospitaliers) et 4,9 G$ (19,8 % de coûts non hospitaliers). Plusieurs GU atteints de MCV étaient fragiles (74,2 %) et beaucoup avaient le diabète (33,8 %) ou une maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique (27,9 %), qui contribuaient à des coûts et à une mortalité plus élevés. Les dépenses de santé par personne liées aux GU atteints de MCV étaient beaucoup plus élevées que les dépenses de santé par personne dans les années qui précédaient ou suivaient leur inclusion dans la cohorte dynamique de GU atteints de MCV. CONCLUSIONS: Les GU de soins de santé sont très fréquemment atteints de MCV. Les GU atteints de MCV présentent des taux de fragilité et de multimorbidité élevés. D'autres recherches sont nécessaires pour cerner et intervenir plus tôt afin d'aplatir la courbe des coûts chez ces patients aux besoins complexes.

The Healthcare Cost Burden in Adults with High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

OBJECTIVE: We calculated the short- and long-term care resource use and costs in adults with high-risk conditions for cardiovascular disease (HRCVD) as defined by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines. METHODS: We linked Alberta health databases to identify patients aged ≥ 18 years with HRCVD between fiscal year (FY) 2012 and FY2016. The first HRCVD event was the index event. Patients were categorized into (1) primary prevention patients and (2) secondary prevention patients at the index event and were followed until death, they moved out of the province, or they were censored at March 2018. We calculated the resource use and costs for each of the 5 years after the index event. RESULTS: The study included 459,739 HRCVD patients (13,947 [3%] were secondary prevention patients). The secondary prevention patients were older (median age 61 years vs. 55 years; p < 0.001), and there were fewer females in this group (30.4% vs. 51.3%; p < 0.001). The total healthcare costs in the first year decreased over time (FY2012: 1.16 billion Canadian dollars (CA$); FY2016: CA$1.05 billion; p < 0.001). An HRCVD patient incurred CA$12,068, CA$5626, and CA$4655 during the first, second, and fifth year, respectively (p for trend < 0.001). During the first year, healthcare costs per secondary prevention patient (CA$36,641) were triple that for a primary prevention patient (CA$11,299; p < 0.001), primarily due to higher hospitalization costs in secondary prevention patients (CA$26,896 vs. CA$6051; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The healthcare costs for HRCVD patients were substantial but decreased over time. The costs were highest in the year following the index event and decreased thereafter. Secondary prevention patients incurred higher costs than the primary prevention patients.

Outcome and Cost of Optimal Control of Dyslipidemia in Adults With High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of optimal dyslipidemia control on mortality and costs in adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease (HRCVD). METHODS: We linked Alberta health databases to identify patients aged ≥ 18 years with HRCVD between April 2012 and March 2017. The first HRCVD event was considered the index event. Patients were categorized into (1) optimal control and (2) suboptimal control of dyslipidemia based on biomarkers and lipid-lowering therapy during the year post-index event. We measured the association between optimal dyslipidemia control and mortality and health care costs using difference-in-difference and propensity score-matching methods. RESULTS: The study included 459,739 patients with HRCVD (43,776 [9.5%] optimal patients). The optimal patients were older (median age = 62 vs 55 years; P < 0.001), included fewer female patients (37.7% vs 52%; P < 0.001), and featured a higher proportion of secondary prevention patients (15.7% vs 1.7%; P < 0.001). Compared with suboptimal patients, the optimal patients had lower adjusted mortality (0.7% vs 1.9% at 1-year and 2.9% vs 5.1% at 3-year post-index event; both P < 0.001), and higher adjusted health care costs (CA$3758 and CA$6844 at 1-year and 3-year post-index event, respectively; both P < 0.001). Among the secondary prevention group, the optimal patients had lower adjusted mortality (2.4% and 5% absolute reduction at 1-year and 3-year post-index event, respectively; both P < 0.001) at no additional costs. The results were robust across 5 definitions of optimal dyslipidemia control. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with optimal dyslipidemia control have lower mortality and incur modestly higher costs. However, secondary prevention patients experience lower mortality at no additional costs.

Inequity in Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Pan-Canadian Evaluation of Wait-Times.

BACKGROUND: There has been an exponential increase in the demand for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our goal was to examine trends in TAVR capacity and wait-times across Canada. METHODS: All TAVR cases were identified from April 1, 2014, to March 31, 2017. Wait-time was defined as the duration in days from the initial referral to the TAVR procedure. TAVR capacity was defined as the number of TAVR procedures per million population/province/fiscal year. We performed multivariable multilevel Cox proportional hazards modelling of the time to TAVR as the dependant variable and the effect of provinces as random effects. We quantified the variation in wait-times among provinces using the median hazard ratio. RESULTS: We identified a total of 4906 TAVR procedures across 9 provinces. Despite a year over year increase in overall capacity, there was a greater than 3-fold difference in capacity between provinces. Crude median wait-times increased over time in all provinces, with marked variation from 71.5 days in Newfoundland to 190.5 and 203 days in Manitoba and Alberta, respectively. This suggests increasing demand outpaced the growth in capacity. We found a median hazard ratio of 1.62, indicating that in half of the possible pairwise comparisons, the time to TAVR for identical patients was at least 62% longer between different provinces. CONCLUSION: We found substantial geographic inequity in TAVR access. This calls for policy makers, clinicians, and administrators across Canada to address this inequity through revaluation of provincial funding mechanisms, as well as implementation of efficient care pathways.

Precautions and Procedures for Coronary and Structural Cardiac Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance from Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology.

The globe is currently in the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. This pandemic has placed considerable stress on health care resources and providers. This document from the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology- Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention, specifically addresses the implications for the care of patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. The key principles of this document are to maintain essential interventional cardiovascular care while minimizing risks of COVID-19 to patients and staff and maintaining the overall health care resources. As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, procedures will be increased or reduced based on the current level of restriction to health care services. Although some consistency across the country is desirable, provincial and regional considerations will influence how these recommendations are implemented. We believe the framework and recommendations in this document will provide crucial guidance for clinicians and policy makers on the management of coronary and structural procedures in the CCL as the COVID-19 pandemic escalates and eventually abates.

Utilization and Costs of Noninvasive Cardiac Tests After Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Alberta COAPT Study.

BACKGROUND: Although appropriate noninvasive cardiac tests (NICTs) after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) provide useful prognostic information, inappropriate use leads to inefficient expenditure of existing healthcare resources. By using the Alberta Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patient Invasive Treatment Strategies (COAPT) Registry, we evaluated the use and costs of NICTs among patients discharged within 1 year after ACS. METHODS: All patients discharged from the hospital with a primary diagnosis of ACS in Alberta between 2004/2005 and 2015/2016 were included. Frequency of NICTs (stress tests [± imaging] and nonstress imaging tests) was determined from linked provincial databases. Costs were obtained from the Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan Medical Procedure List. RESULTS: Of 55,516 patients with ACS, 30,760 had at least 1 NICT (55.4%), with 13,505 (24.3%) having > 1 NICT performed within 1 year. Temporal trends of NICT increased over time (stress tests: P trend < 0.001; nonstress imaging tests: P trend < 0.001). NICT most commonly occurred within the first 4 months after hospital discharge (stress tests at 2 months; nonstress imaging tests at 3-4 months). In 2015/2016, the total estimated costs of NICT were $1.35M, a 22.4% increase from 2004/2005 (1.10M) (P < 0.001), whereas a decrease in incidence of ACS over the same time period was noted (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of NICT 1 year after ACS are high and increasing over time. Estimated costs of NICT appear to be escalating out of proportion to the ACS growth. Further investigation is warranted because it is speculative whether the increase in NICT and costs results in clinical benefit after ACS.

CONTEXTE: Bien que les différents examens cardiaques non effractifs (ECNE) effectués après un syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) fournissent des renseignements utiles au pronostic, leur emploi dans des situations inappropriées entraîne un gaspillage des ressources en santé. À l'aide du registre COAPT ( Co ntemporary A cute Coronary Syndrome P atient Invasive T reatment Strategies) de l'Alberta, nous avons évalué l'emploi des ECNE et les coûts qui y sont associés chez les patients qui ont reçu leur congé de l'hôpital dans l'année suivant un SCA. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Tous les patients qui ont reçu leur congé de l'hôpital après un diagnostic primaire de SCA en Alberta entre 2004-2005 et 2015-2016 ont été inclus. La fréquence des ECNE (épreuves d'effort [avec ou sans examen d'imagerie] et examens d'imagerie au repos) a été déterminée à partir des bases de données provinciales couplées. Les coûts ont été établis à partir de la liste des actes médicaux du régime d'assurance-maladie de l'Alberta. RÉSULTATS: Des 55 516 patients ayant présenté un SCA, 30 760 ont subi au moins un ECNE (55,4 %) dans l'année qui a suivi l'événement; 13 505 (24,3 %) d'entre eux ont subi plus d'un ECNE. Les tendances temporelles en matière d'ECNE affichent une hausse (épreuves d'effort : p tendance < 0,001; examens d'imagerie au repos : p tendance < 0,001). Les ECNE ont généralement été effectués au cours des 4 premiers mois après la sortie de l'hôpital (épreuves d'effort, dans les 2 mois; examens d'imagerie au repos, dans les 3 à 4 mois). Le coût total des ECNE effectués en 2015-2016 a été évalué à 1,35 M$, soit une hausse de 22,4 % par rapport à 2004-2005 (1,10 M$) (p < 0,001), tandis que l'incidence des SCA a diminué au cours de la même période (p = 0,008). CONCLUSIONS: Les taux d'ECNE effectués dans l'année suivant un SCA sont élevés et augmentent au fil du temps. Le coût estimatif de ces ECNE semble s'accroître de façon disproportionnée par rapport à la croissance des SCA. Une enquête plus approfondie s'impose; à l'heure actuelle, on ne peut que spéculer quant aux bienfaits cliniques qui découlent de l'augmentation des ECNE effectués après un SCA et des coûts qu'ils engendrent.

Resource Use and Burden of Hospitalization, Outpatient, Physician, and Drug Costs in Short- and Long-term Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the resource use and cost burden of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) beyond the index event. We examined resource use and care costs during the first and each subsequent year, among patients with incident AMI. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted with incident AMI at emergency departments or hospitals in Alberta, Canada, between April 2004 and March 2014 were included. Incident cases were defined as those without an AMI hospitalization in the previous 10 years. Inpatient, outpatient, practitioner claims, drug claims, and vital statistics were linked and follow-up data were available until March 2016. Resource use and care costs per patient for each year after the AMI were calculated. RESULTS: The analysis included 41,210 patients with incident AMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI] = 50.8%, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction = 36.8%, and undefined myocardial infarction [MI] = 12.5%). Resource use and care costs were highest during the first year. Compared with other MI groups, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction had more frequent outpatient visits (mean 1.64 vs 0.99 [NSTEMI] and 0.87 [undefined MI] visits) but spent fewer days in hospital (mean 7.72 vs 9.23 [NSTEMI] and 8.5 [undefined MI] days) during the first year. AMI costs were $19,842 during the first year and $845 per year for the next 5 years. Hospitalization costs accounted for the majority of costs during the first year (81.1%), whereas drug costs did for the next 5 years (62.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term annual cost burden of AMI is modest compared with care costs during the first year. Although hospitalization dominates first year costs, pharmaceuticals do so in the long term.

The Healthcare Cost Burden of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Alberta, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the cost burden of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on healthcare systems. Accordingly, we examined the long-term trends of healthcare costs for AMI in the province of Alberta, Canada. METHODS: We linked five Albertan health databases, including ambulatory care, hospitalization, practitioner claims, pharmaceutical information network, and population registry to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI between 2004 and 2013. We used the Alberta Interactive Health Data Application to provide unit costs for ambulatory care and inpatient services, claim paid amounts for physician services, and the Alberta Drug Benefit List for drug prices. Healthcare costs for AMI were grouped into ambulatory care, hospitalization, physician costs, and drug costs. All costs were converted to 2016 Canadian dollar values ($Can). RESULTS: A total of 52,912 patients with AMI were included in the analysis. Patient age decreased over time, as did the proportion of females. AMI cost the Alberta healthcare system Can$1033 million during the study period; of which the largest proportion was hospitalization costs (Can$716.4 million, 63.1%), followed by drug costs (Can$147.2 million, 21.1%), ambulatory care costs (Can$94.5 million, 8.8%) and physician costs (Can$74.9 million, 7.0%). The cost per AMI hospitalization decreased from Can$14,116 in 2004 to Can$11,792 in 2013 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare costs for AMI are significant; however, they decreased slightly during the study period. Hospital services accounted for the largest share of the costs. There are opportunities for further savings in AMI care.

Population-level incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): Insights from the Alberta contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients invasive treatment strategies (COAPT) study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a known clinical conundrum with limited investigation. Using a large population-based cohort, we examined the incidence, demographic profile, use of evidence-based medicines (EBM) and clinical outcomes of MINOCA patients. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of MI who underwent coronary angiography between 01/04/2002 and 31/03/2014 in Alberta, Canada, were included in the study. Comparisons were made between patients with MINOCA versus obstructive coronary disease (OCD). The primary composite endpoint was 1-year all-cause death or re-MI. RESULTS: Of 35,928 patients hospitalized with MI, 2092 (5.8%) had MINOCA. In-hospital mortality rate was 0.8% among MINOCA, and 2.7% among patients with OCD (p < 0.0001). At 6 months, cardiovascular EBM rates were significantly lower among MINOCA patients compared to OCD patients. One-year death/re-MI rate was 5.3% in MINOCA and 8.9% in patients with OCD (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.92, p < 0.0001). Five-year mortality rates were 10.9% in MINOCA and 16.0% in patients with OCD. Upon further stratification, 770 (36.8%) of MINOCA patients had no angiographic evidence of CAD (i.e. normal angiograms). EBM rates were even lower among these patients. One-year death/re-MI rate among these patients was 3.9% as compared to 6.1% among MINOCA patients with stenosis <50% (AHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.07, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The population-level incidence of MINOCA is approximately 5%. Despite their apparently benign anatomic findings, efforts must be made to improve secondary prevention strategies to reduce the burden of long-term adverse outcomes in this population.

Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of the "debrief" to address issues related to patient safety and systematic flaws in care is frequently overlooked. In our study, we interview surgical leaders who have developed successful strategies of debriefing within a comprehensive program of quality improvement. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of four implementation leaders were performed. The observations, beliefs and strategies of surgical leaders are compared and contrasted. Common themes are identified related to program success and failure. Quality and safety researchers performed, coded and categorized the interviews and coordinated the analysis and interpretation of the results. The authors from the four institutions aided in interpretation and framing of the results. RESULTS: The debriefing programs evaluated were part of comprehensive quality improvement projects. Seven high-level themes and 24 subthemes were identified from the interviews. Themes related to leadership included early engagement, visible ongoing commitment and enforcement. Success appeared to depend upon meaningful and early debriefing feedback. The culture of safety that promoted success included a commitment to open and fair communication and continuous improvement. There were many challenges to the success of debriefing programs. The loss of institutional commitment of resources and personnel was the instigating factor behind the collapse of the program at Michigan. Other areas of potential failure included communication issues and loss of early and meaningful feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders of four surgical systems with strong debriefing programs report success using debriefing to improve system performance. These findings are consistent with previously published studies. Success requires commitment of resources, and leadership engagement. The greatest gains may be best achieved by programs that provide meaningful debriefing feedback in an atmosphere dedicated to open communication.

Early Results From the Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program: The Beaumont Health System Experience.

PURPOSE: In 2010, a new study published by the National Lung Screening Trial showed a 20% reduction in mortality for those patients screened with low-dose computed topography (CT) versus x-ray. Recently, the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid have agreed to cover this service for those patients who meet the screening criteria. We compare the outcomes and costs associated with developing and implementing a lung cancer screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand sixty-five patients were screened from January 2014 to December 2014. These patients were screened on a low-dose CT screening protocol throughout Beaumont Health System. The American College of Radiology Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) were used to assign the score for each patient. Screening eligibility criteria were based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Downstream activity and revenue was determined after initial low-dose CT screening. RESULTS: At 1 year, 20 patients (1.6%) were diagnosed with lung cancer and another 15 patients were diagnosed with another form of cancer after screening. The median age, packs per day, and pack years smoked for all patients was 63, 1.0, and 39.0 years, respectively. Lung-RADS scores for all patients was 18% (1), 24.1% (2), 6.3% (3), and 5.4% (4). The net revenue for all activity after screening was $3.2 million. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a low-dose CT lung cancer screening program improved the ability to screen patients as demonstrated by the number of patients screened and those diagnosed with a malignancy. These findings were also consistent with the findings from the National Lung Screening Trial study.

Kidney function modifies the selection of treatment strategies and long-term survival in stable ischaemic heart disease: insights from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry.

Aims: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been under-represented in stable ischaemic heart disease (SIHD) trials despite their heightened risk of cardiovascular mortality. We examine associations between kidney disease, treatment selection, and long-term survival in patients with SIHD. Methods and results: SIHD patients with angiographically significant stenosis (≥70%) were categorized by renal function [dialysis-dependent, severe CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30], mild-moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59), and no CKD (eGFR ≥ 60)] and by treatment groups [revascularization ≤3 months of angiogram (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) vs. medical therapy]. The association between renal function category and treatment on long-term survival was examined and adjusted for differences in age, sex, co-morbidities, and coronary anatomy. Of the 17 910 SIHD patients, 0.7% (n = 118) were dialysis-dependent, 1.2% (n = 215) severe CKD, 12.0% (n = 2157) mild-moderate CKD, and 86.1% (n = 15420) no CKD. The presence of CKD was associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of receiving revascularization [reference no CKD: dialysis-dependent: odds ratio (OR) 0.52 (0.35, 0.79), severe (non-dialysis) CKD: OR 0.54 (0.40, 0.73), and mild-moderate CKD: OR 0.80 (0.71, 0.89)]. Over a median follow-up of 8.0 (interquartile range 3.2) years, patients with progressive CKD had higher long-term mortality (dialysis-dependent, 53.4%; severe CKD, 30.2%; mild-moderate CKD, 22.2%; no CKD, 11.9%, Ptrend < 0.0001). Revascularization was associated with improved long-term survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): dialysis-dependent: HR 0.29 (0.15, 0.55), severe CKD: HR 0.63 (0.36, 1.08), mild-moderate CKD: HR 0.49 (0.40, 0.60), and no CKD: HR 0.47 (0.42, 0.52)] (Pinteraction < 0.001). Conclusion: In SIHD, the presence of CKD was accompanied by lower revascularization rates and a higher risk of mortality. However, revascularization in CKD was associated with improved long-term survival.

Predictors of readmission in nonagenarians: analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset.

BACKGROUND: Increased longevity has led to more nonagenarians undergoing elective surgery. Development of predictive models for hospital readmission may identify patients who benefit from preoperative optimization and postoperative transition of care intervention. Our goal was to identify significant predictors of 30-d readmission in nonagenarians undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: Nonagenarians undergoing elective surgery from January 2011 to December 2012 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project participant use data files. This population was randomly divided into a 70% derivation cohort for model development and 30% validation cohort. Using multivariate step-down regression, predictive models were developed for 30-d readmission. RESULTS: Of 7092 nonagenarians undergoing elective surgery, 798 (11.3%) were readmitted within 30 d. Factors significant in univariate analysis were used to develop predictive models for 30-d readmissions. Diabetes (odds ratio [OR]: 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.84), dialysis dependence (OR: 2.97, CI: 1.77-4.99), functional status (OR: 1.52, CI: 1.29-1.79), American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or higher (American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification system; OR: 1.80, CI: 1.42-2.28), operative time (OR: 1.05, CI: 1.02-1.08), myocardial infarction (OR: 5.17, CI: 3.38-7.90), organ space surgical site infection (OR: 8.63, CI: 4.04-18.4), wound disruption (OR: 14.3, CI: 4.80-42.9), pneumonia (OR: 8.59, CI: 6.17-12.0), urinary tract infection (OR: 3.88, CI: 3.02-4.99), stroke (OR: 6.37, CI: 3.47-11.7), deep venous thrombosis (OR: 5.96, CI: 3.70-9.60), pulmonary embolism (OR: 20.3, CI: 9.7-42.5), and sepsis (OR: 13.1, CI: 8.57-20.1), septic shock (OR: 43.8, CI: 18.2-105.0), were included in the final model. This model had a c-statistic of 0.73, indicating a fair association of predicted probabilities with observed outcomes. However, when applied to the validation cohort, the c-statistic dropped to 0.69, and six variables lost significance. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable predictive model for readmission in nonagenarians undergoing elective surgery remains elusive. Investigation into other determinants of surgical outcomes, including social factors and access to skilled home care, might improve model predictability, identify areas for intervention to prevent readmission, and improve quality of care.

Alignment of site versus adjudication committee-based diagnosis with patient outcomes: Insights from the Providing Rapid Out of Hospital Acute Cardiovascular Treatment 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjudication by an adjudication committee in clinical trials plays an important role in the assessment of outcomes. Controversy exists regarding the utility of adjudication committee versus site-based assessments and their relationship to subsequent clinical events. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of the Providing Rapid Out of Hospital Acute Cardiovascular Treatment-3 trial, which randomized patients with chest pain or shortness of breath for biomarker testing in the ambulance. The emergency department physician diagnosis at the time of emergency department disposition was compared with an adjudicated diagnosis assigned by an adjudication committee. The level of agreement between emergency department and adjudication committee diagnosis was evaluated using kappa coefficient and compared to clinical outcomes (30-day re-hospitalization, 30-day and 1-year mortality). RESULTS: Of the 477 patients, 49.3% were male with a median age of 70 years; hospital admission rate was 31.2%. The emergency department physicians and the adjudication committee disagreed in 55 cases (11.5%) with a kappa of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.64, 0.78). The 30-day re-hospitalization, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were 22%, 1.9%, and 9.4%, respectively. Although there were similar rates of re-hospitalization irrespective of adjudication, in cases of disagreement compared to agreement between adjudication committee and emergency department diagnosis, there was a higher 30-day (7.3% vs 1.2%, p = 0.002) and 1-year mortality (27.3% vs 7.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial agreement between the diagnosis of emergency department physicians and adjudication committee, in the subgroup of patients where there was disagreement, there was significantly worse short-term and long-term mortality.

Childhood poverty and stress reactivity are associated with aberrant functional connectivity in default mode network.

Convergent research suggests that childhood poverty is associated with perturbation in the stress response system. This might extend to aberrations in the connectivity of large-scale brain networks, which subserve key cognitive and emotional functions. Resting-state brain activity was measured in adults with a documented history of childhood poverty (n=26) and matched controls from middle-income families (n=26). Participants also underwent a standard laboratory social stress test and provided saliva samples for cortisol assay. Childhood poverty was associated with reduced default mode network (DMN) connectivity. This, in turn, was associated with higher cortisol levels in anticipation of social stress. These results suggest a possible brain basis for exaggerated stress sensitivity in low-income individuals. Alterations in DMN may be associated with less efficient cognitive processing or greater risk for development of stress-related psychopathology among individuals who experienced the adversity of chronic childhood poverty.

Variations in practice and outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States and Canada: insights from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX AMI) trial.

BACKGROUND: Information on practice patterns and outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in Canada vs United States is limited. METHODS: We evaluated differences in clinical and angiographic features, practice patterns, and outcomes between Canada and United States in 2,086 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI in the APEX AMI trial. RESULTS: Of 2,086 patients, 335 (19%) were enrolled in Canada. Compared with US patients, Canadians were older with lower body mass index and creatinine clearance and less likely to have history of hypertension, smoking, or prior revascularization. Baseline infarct artery patency was higher, and the use of intra-aortic balloon pump and drug-eluting stents was lower in Canadian patients. Median door-to-PCI time was significantly shorter among Canadian patients (0.9 hours [interquartile range 0.6-1.3] vs 1.2 hours [interquartile range 0.8-1.7]). Clinical outcomes at 90 days were lower among Canadian patients, including shock (2.7% vs 4.2%), heart failure (3.6% vs 5.6%), bleeding (3.6% vs 9.6%), and atrial (3.6% vs 7.4%) and ventricular (3.0% vs 6.4%) arrhythmias. However, 90-day mortality (2.7% vs 4.8%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-1.28) and composite of death, shock, or heart failure (6.8% vs 11.5%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.47-1.27) were similar in the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with US patients, Canadian patients had shorter door-to-PCI time but similar 90-day outcomes. These data suggest an opportunity for US sites to examine and learn from the Canadian systems of processes of care and implement changes so as to improve the timeliness of primary PCI.

Assessment and management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS): a Canadian perspective on current guideline-recommended treatment--part 1: non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

Despite the reduction of coronary heart disease mortality over the past 40 years, hospital admissions for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) continue to increase. The goal of this 2-part article is to review the issues at each stage of assessment and management of the ACS patient, and to propose an optimal treatment strategy for the individual patient in the context of the realities, culture, and delivery of healthcare in Canada. ACS patients are categorized as either ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). For the patients with NSTE-ACS, prevention of recurrent ischemic events is the primary goal. Assessment of risk for recurrent ischemic and bleeding events helps to determine the net benefit of early cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intensive antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment. Those with higher ischemic risk features should be considered for an early invasive strategy and receive both dual antiplatelet therapy and an anticoagulant at the time of first medical assessment. Patients without high-risk features could be considered for medical treatment and a selectively invasive strategy; with coronary angiography and revascularization only if high-risk features become apparent. Long-term vascular protection with lifestyle modification (especially smoking cessation), lipid lowering, blood pressure and glycemic control, and the use of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade to prevent recurrent ischemic events, is important in all patients with ACS.

Assessment and management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS): a Canadian perspective on current guideline-recommended treatment--part 2: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) accounts for approximately 30% of all acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The high early mortality for patients with STEMI is largely due to the extent of the ischemic injury. However, immediate reperfusion either pharmacologically with fibrinolysis or mechanically by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) limits the size of the infarction and reduces mortality. Reperfusion therapy by primary PCI reduces mortality and the risk of reinfarction, beyond the benefits achieved by fibrinolysis, especially when the primary PCI is initiated within 90 minutes of first medical contact. The use of adjuvant therapy with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents is essential to enhance the results of reperfusion, and/or maintain vessel patency following either mode of reperfusion. This review discusses the assessment and management of the patient with an acute STEMI, using recommendations from the most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, and existing Canadian guidelines. It provides an updated perspective and critical appraisal with practical application of the recommendations within the Canadian Healthcare system.