Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.

Inter- and Intrapersonal Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplant among Black Recipients and Donors.

CONTEXT: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is more common among Blacks, but Blacks are less likely to receive a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify barriers and coping mechanisms that Black LDKT recipients and donors experienced while receiving or donating a kidney. DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted using structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used for data interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: All 20 participants identified as Black, with two participants identifying themselves as multiracial. The mean age for the 14 recipients was 60, and the average age for the 6 living donors was 47. RESULTS: Themes emerging from the data suggest both recipients and donors faced barriers in the LDKT experience. Recipients faced barriers associated with their denial and avoidance of the severity of their ESRD, their desire to maintain the privacy of their health status, and their refusal to approach potential donors. Donors encountered negative responses from others about the donors' desire to donate and the initial refusal of recipients to accept a LDKT offer. Recipients identified faith as a coping mechanism, while donors identified normalization of donation as their method of coping. Various types of social support helped donors and recipients navigate the transplant process. CONCLUSION: Black LDKT recipients and donors must overcome barriers prior to receiving or donating a kidney. Most of these barriers arise from communication and interactions with others that are either lacking or undesirable. Future interventions to promote LDKT among Blacks may benefit by specifically targeting these barriers.

Utility of Applying Quality Assessment Tools for Kidneys With KDPI ≥80.

BACKGROUND: Kidneys with "high" Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) are often biopsied and pumped, yet frequently discarded. METHODS: In this multicenter study, we describe the characteristics and outcomes of kidneys with KDPI of 80 or greater that were procured from 338 deceased donors. We excluded donors with anatomical kidney abnormalities. RESULTS: Donors were categorized by the number of kidneys discarded: (1) none (n = 154, 46%), (2) 1 discarded and 1 transplanted (n = 48, 14%), (3) both discarded (n = 136, 40%). Donors in group 3 were older, more often white, and had higher terminal creatinine and KDPI than group 1 (all P < 0.05). Biopsy was performed in 92% of all kidneys, and 47% were pumped. Discard was associated with biopsy findings and first hour renal resistance. Kidney injury biomarker levels (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, IL-18, and kidney injury molecule-1 measured from donor urine at procurement and from perfusate soon after pump perfusion) were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate or graft failure between groups 1 and 2 (41.5 ± 18 vs 41.4 ± 22 mL/min per 1.73 m; P = 0.97 and 9% vs 10%; P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Kidneys with KDPI of 80 or greater comprise the most resource consuming fraction of our donor kidney pool and have the highest rates of discard. Our data suggest that some discarded kidneys with KDPI of 80 or greater are viable; however, current tools and urine and perfusate biomarkers to identify these viable kidneys are not satisfactory. We need better methods to assess viability of kidneys with high KDPI.