Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 273(2): 197-201, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941284

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the complexity of operations performed by female versus male surgeons. BACKGROUND: Prior literature has suggested that female surgeons are relatively underemployed when compared to male surgeons, with regards to operative case volume and specialization. METHODS: Operative case records from a large academic medical center from 1997 to 2018 were evaluated. The primary end point was work relative value unit (wRVU) for each case with a secondary end point of total wRVU per month for each surgeon. Multivariate linear analysis was performed, adjusting for surgeon race, calendar year, seniority, and clinical subspecialty. RESULTS: A total of 551,047 records were analyzed, from 131 surgeons and 13,666 surgeon-months. Among them, 104,424 (19.0%) of cases were performed by female surgeons, who make up 20.6% (n = 27) of the surgeon population, and 2879 (21.1%) of the surgeon months. On adjusted analysis, male surgeons earned an additional 1.65 wRVU per case, compared to female surgeons (95% confidence interval 1.57-1.74). Subset analyses found that sex disparity increased with surgeon seniority, and did not improve over the 20-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: Female surgeons perform less complex cases than their male peers, even after accounting for subspecialty and seniority. These sex differences are not due to availability from competing professional or familial obligations. Future work should focus on determining the cause and mitigating this underemployment of female surgeons.


Assuntos
Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Escalas de Valor Relativo
2.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 16(3): 414-419, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether previously noted racial disparities in the use of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) for the management of pediatric obesity could be mitigated by accounting for primary insurance. OBJECTIVES: To examine utilization of pediatric MBS across race and insurance in the United States. SETTING: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients 12 to 19 years old undergoing MBS from 2015 to 2016, and these data were combined with national estimates of pediatric obesity obtained from the 2015 to 2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Severe obesity was defined as class III obesity, or class II obesity plus hypertension, dyslipidemia, or type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: A total of 1,659,507 (5.0%) adolescents with severe obesity were identified, consisting of 35.0% female, 38.0% white, and 45.0% privately insured adolescents. Over the same time period, 2535 MBS procedures were performed. Most surgical patients were female (77.5%), white (52.8%), and privately insured (57.5%). Black and Hispanic adolescents were less likely to undergo MBS than whites (odds ratio .50, .46, respectively; P < .001 both), despite adjusting for primary insurance. White adolescents covered by Medicaid were significantly more likely to undergo MBS than their privately insured counterparts (odds ratio 1.66; P < .001), while the opposite was true for black and Hispanic adolescents (odds ratio .29, .75, respectively; P < .001 both). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric obesity disproportionately affects racial minorities, yet MBS is most often performed on white adolescents. Medicaid insurance further decreases the use of MBS among nonwhite adolescents, while paradoxically increasing it for whites, suggesting expansion of government-sponsored insurance alone is unlikely to eliminate this race-based disparity.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Seguro , Obesidade Mórbida , Obesidade Infantil , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , Obesidade Infantil/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Surg ; 220(1): 69-75, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Practice pattern and work environment differences may impact career advancement opportunities and contribute to the gender gap within highly competitive surgical specialties. METHODS: Using a 2000-2015 New York statewide dataset, we compared board-certified pediatric surgeons by specialist case volume and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), which quantifies surgeon focus within specialist case mix. RESULTS: 51 pediatric surgeons were analyzed for 461 surgeon-years. Female surgeons had lower case volume (159 cases/year versus 214, p < 0.01), lower shares of specialist cases (14.1% versus 16.7%, p = 0.04), and less focused practices (HHI 0.16 versus 0.20, p = 0.03). Female surgeons' networks had fewer colleagues (7.2 versus 12.1, p < 0.01), and lower annual total (388 versus 726, p < 0.01) and specialist case volume (83 versus 159, p < 0.01), even after accounting for career length. However, female surgeons performed more cases within their networks (49% versus 36%, p = 0.04) and worked at major teaching hospitals as often as men (76% versus 76%, p = 0.97). CONCLUSION: The challenges that female surgeons face may be reflective of organizational inequities that necessitate intentional scrutiny and change.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , New York , Fatores Sexuais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA