Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 29(9): 1689-1697, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780200

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Treatment options for recurrent or refractory Ewing's sarcoma (ES) are limited. Vigil is a novel autologous tumor cell therapy expressing bi-shRNA furin/GMCSF plasmid, which previously demonstrated monotherapy activity in advanced ES. Herein we report safety and evidence of benefit to Vigil for ES as potential treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this pilot trial, eligible patients with recurrent or refractory ES who failed initial standard-of-care therapy received treatment with temozolomide (TEM) 100 mg/m2/day oral and irinotecan (IRI) 50 mg/m2/day oral, Days 1 to 5, in combination with Vigil (1 × 106-107 cells/mL/day intradermal, Day 15), every 21 days (Vigil/TEM/IRI). Objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis was done by patient-specific droplet digital PCR on baseline and serially collected on-treatment samples. RESULTS: Eight of 10 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy (mean age 24.6; 12.6-46.1 years old); 2 did not receive Vigil. Seven of 8 patients previously received TEM/IRI. No Vigil-related adverse events were reported. Common ≥Grade 3 chemotherapy-related toxicity included neutropenia (50%) and thrombocytopenia (38%). We observed two partial response patients by RECIST; both showed histologic complete response without additional cancer therapy. Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-NA). Five patients showed stable disease or better for ≥6 months. Patient-specific EWS/FLI1 ctDNA was detectable in all 8 evaluable patients at baseline. Changes in ctDNA levels corresponded to changes in disease burden. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated safety of combination Vigil/TEM/IRI.


Assuntos
DNA Tumoral Circulante , Sarcoma de Ewing , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Criança , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Temozolomida/efeitos adversos , Sarcoma de Ewing/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoma de Ewing/genética , Sarcoma de Ewing/patologia , Projetos Piloto , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Modafinila/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos
2.
Am J Pathol ; 193(3): 341-349, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563747

RESUMO

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone cancer, whose standard treatment includes pre-operative chemotherapy followed by resection. Chemotherapy response is used for prognosis and management of patients. Necrosis is routinely assessed after chemotherapy from histology slides on resection specimens, where necrosis ratio is defined as the ratio of necrotic tumor/overall tumor. Patients with necrosis ratio ≥90% are known to have a better outcome. Manual microscopic review of necrosis ratio from multiple glass slides is semiquantitative and can have intraobserver and interobserver variability. In this study, an objective and reproducible deep learning-based approach was proposed to estimate necrosis ratio with outcome prediction from scanned hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images (WSIs). To conduct the study, 103 osteosarcoma cases with 3134 WSIs were collected. Deep Multi-Magnification Network was trained to segment multiple tissue subtypes, including viable tumor and necrotic tumor at a pixel level and to calculate case-level necrosis ratio from multiple WSIs. Necrosis ratio estimated by the segmentation model highly correlates with necrosis ratio from pathology reports manually assessed by experts. Furthermore, patients were successfully stratified to predict overall survival with P = 2.4 × 10-6 and progression-free survival with P = 0.016. This study indicates that deep learning can support pathologists as an objective tool to analyze osteosarcoma from histology for assessing treatment response and predicting patient outcome.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Aprendizado Profundo , Osteossarcoma , Humanos , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Prognóstico , Necrose/patologia , Osteossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Osteossarcoma/patologia
3.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(9): 963-972, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32756880

RESUMO

Importance: Persistent radiation-induced alopecia (pRIA) and its management have not been systematically described. Objective: To characterize pRIA in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors or head and neck sarcoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of patients from January 1, 2011, to January 30, 2019, was conducted at 2 large tertiary care hospitals and comprehensive cancer centers. Seventy-one children and adults diagnosed with primary CNS tumors or head and neck sarcomas were evaluated for pRIA. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical and trichoscopic features, scalp radiation dose-response relationship, and response to topical minoxidil were assessed using standardized clinical photographs of the scalp, trichoscopic images, and radiotherapy treatment plans. Results: Of the 71 patients included (median [range] age, 27 [4-75] years; 51 female [72%]), 64 (90%) had a CNS tumor and 7 (10%) had head and neck sarcoma. Alopecia severity was grade 1 in 40 of 70 patients (56%), with localized (29 of 54 [54%]), diffuse (13 of 54 [24%]), or mixed (12 of 54 [22%]) patterns. The median (range) estimated scalp radiation dose was 39.6 (15.1-50.0) Gy; higher dose (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.28) and proton irradiation (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.05-30.8) were associated with greater alopecia severity (P < .001), and the dose at which 50% of patients were estimated to have severe (grade 2) alopecia was 36.1 Gy (95% CI, 33.7-39.6 Gy). Predominant trichoscopic features included white patches (16 of 28 [57%]); in 15 patients, hair-shaft caliber negatively correlated with scalp dose (correlation coefficient, -0.624; P = .01). The association between hair density and scalp radiation dose was not statistically significant (-0.381; P = .16). Twenty-eight of 34 patients (82%) responded to topical minoxidil, 5% (median follow-up, 61 [interquartile range, 21-105] weeks); 4 of 25 (16%) topical minoxidil recipients with clinical images improved in severity grade. Two patients responded to hair transplantation and 1 patient responded to plastic surgical reconstruction. Conclusions and Relevance: Persistent radiation-induced alopecia among patients with primary CNS tumors or head and neck sarcomas represents a dose-dependent phenomenon that has distinctive clinical and trichoscopic features. The findings of this study suggest that topical minoxidil and procedural interventions may have benefit in the treatment of pRIA.


Assuntos
Alopecia/diagnóstico , Irradiação Craniana/efeitos adversos , Minoxidil/administração & dosagem , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Couro Cabeludo/cirurgia , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alopecia/etiologia , Alopecia/terapia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/radioterapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Cabelo/efeitos da radiação , Cabelo/transplante , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Couro Cabeludo/efeitos da radiação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA