RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The lack of health insurance reduces access to care and often results in poorer health outcomes. The present study simultaneously assessed the effects of health insurance on cancer and chronic disease mortality, as well as the inter-relationships with diet, obesity, smoking, and inflammatory biomarkers. We hypothesized that public/no insurance versus private insurance would result in increased cancer/chronic disease mortality due to the increased prevalence of inflammation-related lifestyle factors in the underinsured population. METHODS: Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants (NHANES III;1988-1994) were prospectively examined to assess the effects of public/no insurance versus private insurance and inflammation-related lifestyle factors on mortality risk from cancer, all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to assess these relationships. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analyses revealed substantially greater risks of mortality ranging from 35% to 245% for public/no insurance versus private insurance for cancer (HR=1.35; 95% CI=1.09,1.66), all causes (HR=1.54; 95% CI=1.39,1.70), CVD (HR=1.62; 95% CI=1.38,1.90) and diabetes (HR=2.45; 95% CI=1.45,4.14). Elevated CRP, smoking, reduced diet quality and higher BMI were more prevalent in those with public insurance, and were also associated with increased risks of cancer/chronic disease mortality. DISCUSSION: Insurance status was strongly associated with cancer/chronic disease mortality after adjusting for lifestyle factors. The results suggest that inadequate health insurance coverage results in a substantially greater need for preventive strategies that focus on tobacco control, obesity, and improved dietary quality. These efforts should be incorporated into comprehensive insurance coverage programs for all Americans.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Doença Crônica/mortalidade , Dieta , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Amid the swirl of change in today's US health care system, there are opportunities for new care delivery models to slow rising costs and improve outcomes in family medicine. This review summarizes the possibilities.
Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/organização & administração , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Doença Crônica , Redução de Custos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Gestão da Informação em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
Hypertension and heart failure contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality in the United States. Suboptimal control of these disease processes is multifactorial and involves poorly understood mechanisms affected by the environment (socioeconomic factors) and genetics (cell biology). Dietary sodium is an illustrative case. Although physicians intuitively accept that sodium affects renal and cardiovascular physiology, the complex overlay of genetics, environment, and culture is not practically addressed to make a meaningful difference in patient care. Optimal control of hypertension and heart failure will require a personalized care plan for each patient that includes lifestyle changes and carefully selected pharmacotherapy and also accounts for sociogenetic factors that affect each patient's life and thus his or her disease process. Physicians' cultural biases and perceptions also must be factored into this complex patient care equation.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To understand African American patients' opinions as to barriers to hypertension treatment. METHODS: Focus groups (n=3) were led by a trained African American moderator of African American patients with hypertension (n=26) who receive their care from a large primary care network. Discussions were transcribed verbatim. Information was displayed in a data matrix and analyzed for emerging themes. Descriptive statistics were used to enhance the content validity of lifestyle modification efforts planned as part of this ongoing research. RESULTS: Most participants were female (n=20), and the mean age was 49 years. All participants were at least high school graduates. Four major levels of influence emerged from data analysis: (1) the health care system, (2) the community, (3) the family, and (4) the individual. The most prevalent concerns about hypertension centered on sodium, diet, neighborhoods, mistrust, and denial. Of great concern was lack of provider trust and a fatalistic, hopeless mindset. To improve trust, our participants suggested developing a hypertension education program and providing patients with culturally specific materials. CONCLUSIONS: Culturally sensitive materials need to be designed and tested to improve blood pressure control. Community input regarding cultural issues is essential for designing effective and successful programs for reducing health disparities.