Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 106(1): 156-159, 2021 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34818625

RESUMO

Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies offer quick assessment of serostatus after natural infection or vaccination. We compared the field performance of the BioMedomics COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test against an ELISA in 303 participants enrolled in a SARS-CoV-2 household cohort study. The rapid antibody test was easily implemented with consistent interpretation across 14 users in a variety of field settings. Compared with ELISA, detection of seroconversion lagged by 5 to 10 days. However, it retained a sensitivity of 90% (160/177, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85-94%) and specificity of 100% (43/43, 95% CI 92-100%) for those tested 3 to 5 weeks after symptom onset. Sensitivity was diminished among those with asymptomatic infection (74% [14/19], 95% CI 49-91%) and early in infection (45% [29/64], 95% CI 33-58%). When used appropriately, rapid antibody tests offer a convenient way to detect symptomatic infections during convalescence.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Testes Imediatos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Estudos de Coortes , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/normas , Características da Família , Humanos , Testes Imediatos/normas , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA