Novel approach to adherence assessment based on parent drug and metabolite pharmacokinetics: pilot study with spironolactone.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to spironolactone in a group of unselected patients with arterial hypertension by analysis of measured serum spironolactone and canrenone concentrations according to a proposed two-step decision scheme based on pharmacokinetic considerations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulation of serum concentration-time profiles of spironolactone and canrenone based on population pharmacokinetic parameters described in literature and a body weight-normalized spironolactone dose / canrenone level nomogram derived from a group of adherent patients with conservatively treated primary hyperaldosteronism, were used to create a two-step decision scheme. 71 outpatients treated with spironolactone for resistant hypertension with spironolactone and canrenone serum concentrations measured between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed according to the proposed scheme. We compared our proposed methodology to the standard approach for adherence testing. RESULTS: With the most sensitive traditional approach to adherence assessment through detectable serum concentrations of spironolactone and/or canrenone, 9 (12.7%) non-adherent patients were identified. With our two-step assessment of adherence, we were able to identify 18 (25.4%) non-adherent patients. CONCLUSION: Consideration of the pharmacokinetic properties of parental drug and its metabolite led to improved sensitivity in non-adherence detection in patients with arterial hypertension. This approach enables better interpretation of measured spironolactone and canrenone serum concentrations and should be used in clinical practice.

Subtyping of Primary Aldosteronism in the AVIS-2 Study: Assessment of Selectivity and Lateralization.

CONTEXT: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the key test for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA), but its interpretation varies widely across referral centers and this can adversely affect the management of PA patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a real-life study the rate of bilateral success and identification of unilateral aldosteronism and their impact on blood pressure outcomes in PA subtyped by AVS. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: In a retrospective analysis of the largest international registry of individual AVS data (AVIS-2 study), we investigated how different cut-off values of the selectivity index (SI) and lateralization index (LI) affected rate of bilateral success, identification of unilateral aldosteronism, and blood pressure outcomes. RESULTS: AVIS-2 recruited 1625 individual AVS studies performed between 2000 and 2015 in 19 tertiary referral centers. Under unstimulated conditions, the rate of biochemically confirmed bilateral AVS success progressively decreased with increasing SI cut-offs; furthermore, with currently used LI cut-offs, the rate of identified unilateral PA leading to adrenalectomy was as low as <25%. A within-patient pairwise comparison of 402 AVS performed both under unstimulated and cosyntropin-stimulated conditions showed that cosyntropin increased the confirmed rate of bilateral selectivity for SI cut-offs ≥ 2.0, but reduced lateralization rates (P < 0.001). Post-adrenalectomy outcomes were not improved by use of cosyntropin or more restrictive diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSION: Commonly used SI and LI cut-offs are associated with disappointingly low rates of biochemically defined AVS success and identified unilateral PA. Evidence-based protocols entailing less restrictive interpretative cut-offs might optimize the clinical use of this costly and invasive test. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab XX: 0-0, 2020).

Biochemical Screening for Nonadherence Is Associated With Blood Pressure Reduction and Improvement in Adherence.

We hypothesized that screening for nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based biochemical analysis of urine/serum has therapeutic applications in nonadherent hypertensive patients. A retrospective analysis of hypertensive patients attending specialist tertiary care centers was conducted in 2 European countries (United Kingdom and Czech Republic). Nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment was diagnosed using biochemical analysis of urine (United Kingdom) or serum (Czech Republic). These results were subsequently discussed with each patient, and data on follow-up clinic blood pressure (BP) measurements were collected from clinical files. Of 238 UK patients who underwent biochemical urine analysis, 73 were nonadherent to antihypertensive treatment. Their initial urinary adherence ratio (the ratio of detected to prescribed antihypertensive medications) increased from 0.33 (0-0.67) to 1 (0.67-1) between the first and the last clinic appointments. The observed increase in the urinary adherence ratio in initially nonadherent UK patients was associated with the improved BP control; by the last clinic appointment, systolic and diastolic BPs were ≈19.5 and 7.5 mm Hg lower than at baseline (P=0.001 and 0.009, respectively). These findings were further corroborated in 93 nonadherent hypertensive patients from Czech Republic-their average systolic and diastolic BPs dropped by ≈32.6 and 17.4 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.001), on appointments after the biochemical analysis. Our data show that nonadherent hypertensive patients respond to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based biochemical analysis with improved adherence and significant BP drop. Such repeated biochemical analyses should be considered as a therapeutic approach in nonadherent hypertensive patients.

Precise assessment of noncompliance with the antihypertensive therapy in patients with resistant hypertension using toxicological serum analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of pseudo-resistance caused by noncompliance with treatment among patients with severe resistant hypertension and to analyze the contributing factors. METHOD: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients (195 men) with resistant essential hypertension were studied. The first group consisted of 176 patients admitted for hospitalization for exclusion of a secondary cause to our hypertension centre (103 men); the second one consisted of 163 out-patients (92 men) investigated for the first time in an out-patient hypertension clinic. Unplanned blood sampling for assessment of serum antihypertensive drug concentrations by means of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Our main finding is a surprisingly low compliance with drug treatment in out-patients with resistant hypertension (23% partially noncompliant and 24% totally noncompliant - in total, 47% prevalence of noncompliance). Eighty-one percent of hospitalized patients were positive, in 10% the results were partially positive and in 9% of the patients, the drugs were all negative. The compliance among hospitalized patients was probably better due to lower numbers of prescribed drugs and expected thorough investigation. More frequently, noncompliance was found in nonworking (potential purpose-built behaviour), younger and less well educated patients. The most frequent noncompliance was to doxazosine, spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide. We have observed a surprisingly low compliance with treatment among out-patients with severe hypertension. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs concentrations is a useful and precise method for assessment of noncompliance in patients with resistant hypertension. This evaluation is useful before starting the diagnostic work-up of secondary forms of hypertension and before assignment patients into protocols with new therapy modalities such as renal denervation.

Comparison of the insulin action parameters from hyperinsulinemic clamps with homeostasis model assessment and QUICKI indexes in subjects with different endocrine disorders.

The aim of this study was to compare insulin sensitivity expressed by the hyperinsulinemic clamp and by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and QUICKI indexes in subjects with various disorders influencing insulin action. We examined 41 type 2 diabetic patients, 20 insulinoma patients, 32 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 16 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism, 12 patients with essential high renin hypertension, and 47 healthy subjects. The metabolic clearance rate of glucose and the insulin sensitivity index calculated from the clamps were compared with both the HOMA and QUICKI indexes. The relationship of insulin action to body mass index, serum cholesterol, and triglycerides as well as to systolic and diastolic blood pressures was also evaluated. Body mass index was very strongly associated with the insulin sensitivity index (r = -0.70; P < 0.0001) in the entire cohort of 168 subjects. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure influenced insulin action in the healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic patients. A significant relationship was observed between the insulin sensitivity index and the HOMA or QUICKI indexes in healthy subjects (r = -0.66; P < 0.0001), type 2 diabetic patients (r = -0.68; P < 0.0001), and women with polycystic ovary syndrome (r = -0.65; P < 0.0001). We did not find any relationship between the above variables in the patients with insulinoma or primary hyperaldosteronism. The HOMA and QUICKI indexes do not offer the same information as glucose clamps in the rare cases with differently impaired peripheral or hepatic insulin action.