Clinical and Budget Impact of Treating Preoperative Anemia in Major Orthopedic Surgery-A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia (POA) in elective surgery is associated with worse outcome. In this retrospective study, in elective hip and knee arthroplasties, the prevalence of POA and its associations with outcome were analyzed, followed by a model estimating the budget impact of screening and treatment of POA. METHODS: All elective hip/knee arthroplasties performed during the period 2016-2018 were included. Patients with normal hemoglobin and patients with POA (hemoglobin < 13.0 g/dL in men and <12.0 g/dL in women) were compared. Outcome measures were allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT), length of stay (LOS), complications, mortality, and costs. The budget impact of screening for POA and treatment with intravenous iron when relevant was modeled based on the results of the costs related to POA. RESULTS: In 881 procedures, the prevalence of POA was 21.5%. POA independently predicted increased risks of ABT (odds ratio [OR]adj, 9.5 [confidence interval-CI, 6.4-13.9]), prolonged LOS (ORadj, 2.8 [CI, 1.8-4.2]), and was associated with increased complications (ORadj, 1.9 [CI, 0.7-4.9]) and mortality (ORadj, 3.2 [CI, 0.8-13.5]). POA resulted in increased costs per patient (P < .001). The budget impact model showed a cost reduction of 254 euros per patient based on the assumption that patients screened and treated for iron-deficient anemia would have the same outcome as non-POA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of POA in elective orthopedic surgery in Sweden is at the same level as previously reported by others. Screening and treatment of POA would reduce costs based on less ABT and decreased LOS and may reduce complications in elective major orthopedic surgery.

Evaluation of a Decision Tree for Efficient Antenatal Red Blood Cell Antibody Screening.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to maternal red blood cell alloimmunization can have serious consequences. Because early detection enables careful monitoring of affected pregnancies, programs to routinely screen all pregnant women have been widely adopted. Due to the low prevalence of alloimmunization, these require large investments of resources to detect a small number of cases. METHODS: We conducted a validation study of a decision tree developed in the Netherlands for determining whether to screen for alloimmunization. In a Swedish cohort, we compared the performance of that decision tree to two alternative models that used maternal characteristics, obstetric history, and transfusion history to identify high-risk women for screening or low-risk women who might be exempt from screening. The models were compared for predictive ability and potential reduction in the volume of screening. RESULTS: The decision tree applied to our study population identified 89% of alloimmunized women with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.7% by screening 62% of the population. To achieve the same NPV, our model exempting low-risk women captured 90% of alloimmunizations by screening 63% of the population. In contrast, the model identifying high-risk women for screening while maintaining a similar NPV captured 63% of alloimmunized women by screening 20% of the population. CONCLUSIONS: We validated that an existing decision tree for selecting women for maternal screening performed well in our population, identifying a large proportion of women who became alloimmunized, with a predictive performance almost identical to that of a more elaborate model.

Blood use in hematologic malignancies: a nationwide overview in Sweden between 2000 and 2010.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic malignancies receive large numbers of blood transfusions, and transfusion practices for this patient group are increasingly being scrutinized by randomized controlled trials. However, no studies so far have presented current transfusion statistics on a population level for this patient group. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted that was based on the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusions Database (SCANDAT2), which includes data on all blood donations and transfusions in Sweden and Denmark since the 1960s. Incident cases of hematologic malignancies were identified in the Swedish Cancer Register between 2000 and 2010. Cases were divided into nine patient groups based on diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 28,693 patients were included in the cohort. Overall, the transfusion pattern varied depending on diagnosis and age. Patients with aggressive and acute diagnoses generally received more transfusions with immediate decline in transfusion incidence after diagnosis, whereas chronic diagnoses generally maintained more stable, but lower, transfusion incidence. In general, patients with leukemia received more transfusions than patients with lymphoma, and patients with acute leukemia as well as patients that had undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantations received the most transfusions. Within 2 years after diagnosis, patients with acute myeloid leukemia diagnosed at ages 0 to 65 years received on average between 30 to 40 red blood cell transfusions and platelet transfusions, respectively, corresponding to direct material costs close to 200,000 SEK (23,809 USD). CONCLUSION: Results from this population-based overview of blood use in hematologic malignancies showed high variability depending on diagnosis and age.