RESUMO
Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' mandatory End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model, launched on January 1, 2021, randomly assigned approximately 30% of US dialysis facilities and managing clinicians to financial incentives to increase the use of home dialysis and kidney transplant. Objective: To assess the ETC's association with use of home dialysis and kidney transplant during the model's first 2 years and examine changes in these outcomes by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study used claims and enrollment data for traditional Medicare beneficiaries with kidney failure from 2017 to 2022 linked to same-period transplant data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. The study data span 4 years (2017-2020) before the implementation of the ETC model on January 1, 2021, and 2 years (2021-2022) following the model's implementation. Exposure: Receiving dialysis treatment in a region randomly assigned to the ETC model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were use of home dialysis and kidney transplant. A difference-in-differences (DiD) approach was used to estimate changes in outcomes among patients treated in regions randomly selected for ETC participation compared with concurrent changes among patients treated in control regions. Results: The study population included 724â¯406 persons with kidney failure (mean [IQR] age, 62.2 [53-72] years; 42.5% female). The proportion of patients receiving home dialysis increased from 12.1% to 14.3% in ETC regions and from 12.9% to 15.1% in control regions, yielding an adjusted DiD estimate of -0.2 percentage points (pp; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.3 pp). Similar analysis for transplant yielded an adjusted DiD estimate of 0.02 pp (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.04 pp). When further stratified by sociodemographic measures, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, dual Medicare and Medicaid enrollment, and poverty quartile, there was not a statistically significant difference in home dialysis use across joint strata of characteristics and ETC participation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the first 2 years of the ETC model were not associated with increased use of home dialysis or kidney transplant, nor changes in racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in these outcomes.
Assuntos
Hemodiálise no Domicílio , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Reembolso de Incentivo , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/economia , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , MedicareRESUMO
Importance: The End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model randomly selected 30% of US dialysis facilities to receive financial incentives based on their use of home dialysis, kidney transplant waitlisting, or transplant receipt. Facilities that disproportionately serve populations with high social risk have a lower use of home dialysis and kidney transplant raising concerns that these sites may fare poorly in the payment model. Objective: To examine first-year ETC model performance scores and financial penalties across dialysis facilities, stratified by their incident patients' social risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of 2191 US dialysis facilities that participated in the ETC model from January 1 through December 31, 2021. Exposure: Composition of incident patient population, characterized by the proportion of patients who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, living in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood, uninsured, or covered by Medicaid at dialysis initiation. A facility-level composite social risk score assessed whether each facility was in the highest quintile of having 0, 1, or at least 2 of these characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of home dialysis, waitlisting, or transplant; model performance score; and financial penalization. Results: Using data from 125â¯984 incident patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 54-74]; 41.8% female; 28.6% Black; 11.7% Hispanic), 1071 dialysis facilities (48.9%) had no social risk features, and 491 (22.4%) had 2 or more. In the first year of the ETC model, compared with those with no social risk features, dialysis facilities with 2 or more had lower mean performance scores (3.4 vs 3.6, P = .002) and lower use of home dialysis (14.1% vs 16.0%, P < .001). These facilities had higher receipt of financial penalties (18.5% vs 11.5%, P < .001), more frequently had the highest payment cut of 5% (2.4% vs 0.7%; P = .003), and were less likely to achieve the highest bonus of 4% (0% vs 2.7%; P < .001). Compared with all other facilities, those in the highest quintile of treating uninsured patients or those covered by Medicaid experienced more financial penalties (17.4% vs 12.9%, P = .01) as did those in the highest quintile in the proportion of patients who were Black (18.5% vs 12.6%, P = .001). Conclusions: In the first year of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' ETC model, dialysis facilities serving higher proportions of patients with social risk features had lower performance scores and experienced markedly higher receipt of financial penalties.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica , Reembolso de Incentivo , Diálise Renal , Autocuidado , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/métodos , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera , Autocuidado/economia , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Importance: Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program cover almost 50% of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). CSHCN often require specialty services and have been increasingly enrolled in Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans, but there is a dearth of recent national studies on specialty care access among publicly insured children and particularly CSHCN. Objective: To provide recent, nationwide evidence on the association of MMC penetration with specialty care access among publicly insured children, with a special focus on CSHCN. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationally representative data from the 2016 to 2019 National Survey of Children's Health to identify publicly insured children in 41 states that administered comprehensive managed care organizations for Medicaid. Data analysis was performed from May 2022 to March 2023. Exposure: Form CMS-416 data were used to measure state-year level share of Medicaid-enrolled children who were covered by MMC (ie, MMC penetration). Main Outcomes and Measures: Measures of specialty care access included whether, in the past year, the child had (1) any visit to non-mental health (MH) specialists, (2) any visit to MH professionals, and (3) any unmet health care needs and (4) whether the caregiver ever felt frustrated getting services for their child. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of MMC penetration with specialty care access among all publicly insured children, and separately for CSHCN and non-CSHCN. Results: Among 20â¯029 publicly insured children, 7164 (35.8%) were CSHCN, 9537 (48.2%) were female, 4110 (37.2%) were caregiver-reported Hispanic, and 2812 (21.4%) were caregiver-reported non-Hispanic Black (all percentages are weighted). MMC was not associated with significant changes in any visit to non-MH specialists and unmet health care needs. In addition, MMC penetration was positively associated with caregiver frustration among all children (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.48; P = .02) and was negatively associated with any visit to MH professionals among CSHCN (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study evaluating MMC and specialty care access for publicly insured children, increased MMC enrollment was not associated with improved specialty care access for publicly insured children, including CSHCN. MMC was associated with less access to specialties like MH and increased frustrations among caregivers seeking services for their children.
Assuntos
Medicaid , Medicina , Estados Unidos , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Seguro Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Programas de Assistência GerenciadaRESUMO
Medicaid managed care plans cover more than 80 percent of Medicaid-enrolled children, including many children with special health care needs (CSHCN). Federal rules require states to set network adequacy standards to improve specialty care access for Medicaid managed care enrollees. Using a quasi-experimental design and 2016-19 National Survey of Children's Health data, we examined the association between quantitative network adequacy standards and access to specialty care among 8,614 Medicaid-enrolled children, including 3,157 with special health care needs, in eighteen states. Outcomes included whether the child had any visit to non-mental health specialists, any visit to mental health professionals, or any unmet health care needs and whether the caregiver ever felt frustrated in getting services for the child in the past year. We observed no association between the adoption of any quantitative network adequacy standard and the above outcomes among Medicaid-enrolled children. Among CSHCN, however, adopting any quantitative standard was positively associated with caregivers feeling frustrated in getting services for the child, especially among CSHCN who visited non-mental health specialists. Without additional interventions, adopting new network adequacy standards may have unintended consequences for CSHCN.
Assuntos
Crianças com Deficiência , Medicina , Estados Unidos , Criança , Humanos , Medicaid , Crianças com Deficiência/psicologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The US kidney allocation system (KAS) changed in 2014, but dialysis facility staff (including nephrologists, social workers, nurse managers, and facility administrators) had low awareness of how this policy change could affect their patients' access to transplant. We assessed the effectiveness of a multicomponent and multilevel educational and outreach intervention targeting US dialysis facilities with low waitlisting, with a goal of increasing waitlisting and reducing Black versus White racial disparities in waitlisting. METHODS: The Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation (ASCENT) study was a cluster-randomized, pragmatic, multilevel, effectiveness-implementation trial including 655 US dialysis facilities with low waitlisting, randomized to receive either the ASCENT intervention (a performance feedback report, a webinar, and staff and patient educational videos) or an educational brochure. Absolute and relative differences in coprimary outcomes (1-year waitlisting and racial differences in waitlisting) were reported among incident and prevalent patients. RESULTS: Among 56,332 prevalent patients, 1-year waitlisting decreased for patients in control facilities (2.72%-2.56%) and remained the same for patients in intervention facilities (2.68%-2.75%). However, the proportion of prevalent Black patients waitlisted in the ASCENT interventions increased from baseline to 1 year (2.52%-2.78%), whereas it remained the same for White patients in the ASCENT intervention facilities (2.66%-2.69%). Among incident patients in ASCENT facilities, 1-year waitlisting increased among Black patients (from 0.87% to 1.07%) but declined among White patients (from 1.54% to 1.27%). Significant racial disparities in waitlisting were observed at baseline, with incident Black patients in ASCENT facilities less likely to waitlist compared with White patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.92), but 1 year after the intervention, this racial disparity was attenuated (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.42). CONCLUSIONS: The ASCENT intervention may have a small effect on extending the reach of the new KAS policy by attenuating racial disparities in waitlisting among a population of US dialysis facilities with low waitlisting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: National Institutes of Health ( NCT02879812 ). PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_03_08_CJN09760822.mp3.
Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Diálise Renal , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Rim , Grupos Raciais , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
Partnerships between mental health (MH) clinics and school systems in which providers deliver MH services on school grounds are growing. To date, however, there is little research examining MH clinic administrator perspectives on how this service delivery model affects continuity and quality of MH services among low-income youth. We conducted a state-wide (online and mail) survey of administrators at MH clinics (n = 60) to assess their perspectives on the advantages and challenges of school MH services for Medicaid-enrolled youth. Among survey respondents (n = 44), 86% reported that their clinic had at least one school partnership. With respect to advantages, more than four-fifths reported that school-based MH services (compared to clinic-based services) were very helpful or extremely helpful (versus not helpful at all, a little helpful, or somewhat helpful) for: (1) reducing gaps in MH treatment (86.8%); (2) improving communication between MH providers and teachers (86.9%), and (3) improving the overall quality of MH care (89.5%). In addition, the estimated no-show rate for appointments in school settings (7.2%) was lower than the estimated no show-rate for clinic appointments (23.9%; p < 0.01). Several challenges were also reported; more than two-thirds of respondents reported difficulties when delivering school-based services related to parent engagement (i.e., appointment attendance [89.5%], communication [81.6%], timely consent [68.4%]) that occurred sometimes, often, or always (versus rarely or never). As MH clinics continue to enter into and expand partnerships with schools, stakeholders should implement family-centered strategies to enhance engagement. Nevertheless, MH clinic administrators highlight potential benefits of school MH services (compared to clinic-based services) with respect to continuity and quality of MH care.
RESUMO
Importance: In 2021, Medicare launched the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model, which randomly assigned approximately 30% of dialysis facilities to new financial incentives to increase use of transplantation and home dialysis; these financial bonuses and penalties are calculated by comparing living-donor transplantation, transplant wait-listing, and home dialysis use in ETC-assigned facilities vs benchmarks from non-ETC-assigned (ie, control) facilities. Because model participation is randomly assigned, evaluators may attribute any downstream differences in outcomes to facility performance rather than any imbalance in baseline characteristics. Objective: To identify preintervention imbalances in dialysis facility characteristics that should be recognized in any ETC model evaluations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study compared ETC-assigned and control dialysis facility characteristics in the United States from 2017 to 2018. A total of 6062 facilities were included. Data were analyzed from February 2021 to May 2022. Exposures: Assignment to the ETC model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dialysis facilities' preintervention transplantations and home dialysis use, facility characteristics (notably, profit and chain status), patient demographic characteristics, and community socioeconomic characteristics. Results: Among 316â¯927 patients, with 6â¯178â¯855 attributed patient-months, the mean (SD) age in January 2017 was 59 (11) years, and 132â¯462 (42%) were female. Patients in ETC-assigned facilities had 9% (0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.2] percentage points) lower prevalence of living donor transplantation, 12% (3.2 [95% CI, 3.0-3.3] percentage points) lower prevalence of transplantation wait-listing, and 4% (0.4 [95% CI, 0.3-0.4] percentage points) lower prevalence of peritoneal dialysis use compared with control facilities. ETC-assigned facilities were 14% (5.1 [95% CI, 0.9-9.4] percentage points) more likely than control facilities to be owned by the second largest dialysis organization. Relative to control facilities, ETC-assigned facilities also treated 34% (6.6 [95% CI, 6.5-6.7] percentage point) fewer patients with Hispanic ethnicity and were located in communities with median household incomes that were 4% ($2500; 95% CI, $500-$4500) lower on average. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, dialysis facilities in ETC-assigned regions had lower preintervention prevalence of transplantation wait-listing, living donor transplantation, and peritoneal dialysis use, relative to control facilities. ETC-assigned and control facilities also differed with respect to other facility, patient, and community characteristics. Evaluators should account for these preintervention imbalances to minimize bias in their inferences about the model's association with postintervention outcomes.
Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Instituições Privadas de Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Introduction: Among adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD), comorbid mental illness is associated with poorer health outcomes and can impede access to transplantation. We provide the first US nationally representative estimates of the prevalence of mental illness and mental health (MH) treatment receipt among adults with self-reported CKD. Methods: Using 2015 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data, we conducted an observational study of 152,069 adults (age ≥22 years) reporting CKD (n = 2544), with no reported chronic conditions (n = 117,235), or reporting hypertension (HTN) or diabetes mellitus (DM) but not CKD (HTN/DM, n = 32,290). We compared prevalence of (past-year) any mental illness, serious mental illness (SMI), MH treatment, and unmet MH care needs across the groups using logistic regression models. Results: Approximately 26.6% of US adults reporting CKD also had mental illness, including 7.1% with SMI. When adjusting for individual characteristics, adults reporting CKD were 15.4 percentage points (PPs) and 7.3 PPs more likely than adults reporting no chronic conditions or HTN/DM to have any mental illness (P < 0.001) and 5.6 PPs (P < 0.001) and 2.2 PPs (P = 0.01) more likely to have SMI, respectively. Adults reporting CKD were also more likely to receive any MH treatment (21% vs. 12%, 18%, respectively) and to have unmet MH care needs (6% vs. 3%, 5%, respectively). Conclusion: Mental illness is common among US adults reporting CKD. Enhanced management of MH needs could improve treatment outcomes and quality-of-life downstream.
Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Instituições Acadêmicas , Pessoal Administrativo , Criança , Política de Saúde , HumanosAssuntos
Nefrologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Atenção à Saúde , Economia Comportamental , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medicare plans to extend financial structures tested through the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Initiative-an alternative payment model for maintenance dialysis providers-to promote high-value care for beneficiaries with kidney failure. The End-Stage Renal Disease Seamless Care Organizations (ESCOs) that formed under the CEC Initiative varied greatly in their ability to generate cost savings and improve patient health outcomes. This study examined whether organizational or community characteristics were associated with ESCOs' performance. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used a retrospective pooled cross-sectional analysis of all 37 ESCOs participating in the CEC Initiative during 2015-2018 (n=87 ESCO-years). Key exposures included ESCO characteristics: number of dialysis facilities, number and types of physicians, and years of CEC Initiative experience. Outcomes of interest included were above versus below median gross financial savings (2.4%) and standardized mortality ratio (0.93). We analyzed unadjusted differences between high- and low-performing ESCOs and then used multivariable logistic regression to construct average marginal effect estimates for parameters of interest. RESULTS: Above-median gross savings were obtained by 23 (52%) ESCOs with no program experience, 14 (32%) organizations with 1 year of experience, and seven (16%) organizations with 2 years of experience. The adjusted likelihoods of achieving above-median gross savings were 23 (95% confidence interval, 8 to 37) and 48 (95% confidence interval, 24 to 68) percentage points higher for ESCOs with 1 or 2 years of program experience, respectively (versus none). The adjusted likelihood of achieving above-median gross savings was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, -3 to -1) percentage points lower with each additional affiliated dialysis facility. Adjusted mortality rates were lower for ESCOs located in areas with higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller ESCOs, organizations with more experience in the CEC Initiative, and those located in more affluent areas performed better under the CEC Initiative.
Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Medicare/organização & administração , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Diálise Renal , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Medicare/economia , Características da Vizinhança , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Medicaid managed care plans employ cost containment tools such as prior authorization and preferred drug lists to achieve cost savings. Little is known about these tools' effects on quality of care for beneficiaries with chronic conditions. We surveyed physicians and nurse practitioners based in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Georgia to capture how they perceive these tools affect care and health outcomes for Medicaid-enrolled patients with chronic illnesses. We received 63 completed surveys, representing 19 (58%) of FQHCs in Georgia. Across multiple measures, 56.1-71.7% reported difficulties with prior authorization request denials, preferred medication prescribing, and specialist referrals "sometimes," "often," or "very often" when caring for patients with asthma. Greater difficulties with prior authorization request denials were associated with perceived poorer care quality (p=.03). Further research is needed to inform state policymaker decisions about potential restrictions on Medicaid managed care plans' use of cost containment tools with medically vulnerable beneficiaries.
Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Criança , Doença Crônica , Georgia , Humanos , Percepção , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Community health centers (CHCs) deliver affordable health services to underserved populations, especially uninsured and Medicaid enrollees. Since the early 2000s, CHCs have grown because of federal investments in CHC capacity and expansions of Medicaid eligibility. We review 24 relevant studies from 2000 to 2017 to evaluate the relationship between CHCs, policies that invest in services for low-income individuals, and access to care. Most included studies use quasi-experimental designs. Greater spending on CHCs improves access to care, especially for low-income and minority individuals. Medicaid expansions also increase CHC use. Some studies indicate that CHC investments complement Medicaid expansions to increase access cost-effectively. Further research should explore patient preferences and patterns of CHC utilization versus other sites of care and population subgroups for which expanding CHC capacity improves access to care most. Researchers should endeavor to use measures and sample definitions that facilitate comparisons with other estimates in the literature.
Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Grupos Minoritários , Definição da Elegibilidade , Humanos , Pobreza , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Medicaid expansions improved access to care for low-income populations, yet evidence is limited on how these gains differed by race/ethnicity. We examined how Medicaid expansions affected access to primary care, and how race/ethnicity moderated these effects. Using 2011-2016 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we found that low-income adults in Medicaid expansion states were 13.9 percentage points more likely to have insurance, 5.6 percentage points more likely to have a usual source of care, and 5.0 percentage points less likely to delay care due to cost post-expansion versus in non-expansion states. Insurance gains were 6.4 percentage points lower for Hispanic adults than White adults in expansion states post-expansion; otherwise, gains were similar by race/ethnicity. Baseline access disparities between White and minority adults persisted post-expansion, especially between White and Hispanic adults. Access may decline comparably for White and minority adults if ACA Medicaid expansions are repealed.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Importance: For-profit (vs nonprofit) dialysis facilities have historically had lower kidney transplantation rates, but it is unknown if the pattern holds for living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation, varies by facility ownership, or has persisted over time in a nationally representative population. Objective: To determine the association between dialysis facility ownership and placement on the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list, receipt of a living donor kidney transplant, or receipt of a deceased donor kidney transplant. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study that included 1â¯478â¯564 patients treated at 6511 US dialysis facilities. Adult patients with incident end-stage kidney disease from the US Renal Data System (2000-2016) were linked with facility ownership (Dialysis Facility Compare) and characteristics (Dialysis Facility Report). Exposures: The primary exposure was dialysis facility ownership, which was categorized as nonprofit small chains, nonprofit independent facilities, for-profit large chains (>1000 facilities), for-profit small chains (<1000 facilities), and for-profit independent facilities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Access to kidney transplantation was defined as time from initiation of dialysis to placement on the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list, receipt of a living donor kidney transplant, or receipt of a deceased donor kidney transplant. Cumulative incidence differences and multivariable Cox models assessed the association between dialysis facility ownership and each outcome. Results: Among 1â¯478â¯564 patients, the median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 55-76 years), with 55.3% male, and 28.1% non-Hispanic black patients. Eighty-seven percent of patients received care at a for-profit dialysis facility. A total of 109â¯030 patients (7.4%) received care at 435 nonprofit small chain facilities; 78â¯287 (5.3%) at 324 nonprofit independent facilities; 483â¯988 (32.7%) at 2239 facilities of large for-profit chain 1; 482â¯689 (32.6%) at 2082 facilities of large for-profit chain 2; 225â¯890 (15.3%) at 997 for-profit small chain facilities; and 98â¯680 (6.7%) at 434 for-profit independent facilities. During the study period, 121â¯680 patients (8.2%) were placed on the deceased donor waiting list, 23â¯762 (1.6%) received a living donor kidney transplant, and 49â¯290 (3.3%) received a deceased donor kidney transplant. For-profit facilities had lower 5-year cumulative incidence differences for each outcome vs nonprofit facilities (deceased donor waiting list: -13.2% [95% CI, -13.4% to -13.0%]; receipt of a living donor kidney transplant: -2.3% [95% CI, -2.4% to -2.3%]; and receipt of a deceased donor kidney transplant: -4.3% [95% CI, -4.4% to -4.2%]). Adjusted Cox analyses showed lower relative rates for each outcome among patients treated at all for-profit vs all nonprofit dialysis facilities: deceased donor waiting list (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.36]); receipt of a living donor kidney transplant (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.54]); and receipt of a deceased donor kidney transplant (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.45]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among US patients with end-stage kidney disease, receiving dialysis at for-profit facilities compared with nonprofit facilities was associated with a lower likelihood of accessing kidney transplantation. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind this association.
Assuntos
Instituições Privadas de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim , Propriedade , Diálise Renal , Humanos , Doadores Vivos , Diálise Renal/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medicaid is an important source of insurance coverage for those with mental health (MH) disorders in the United States. Although disruptions in Medicaid coverage are common, little is known about the dynamic relationship between Medicaid disenrollment and MH care utilization. OBJECTIVE: We estimated changes in all-cause and MH-related health care use post Medicaid disenrollment among a nationwide cohort of adults with MH disorders. SUBJECTS: We identified 8841 persons (197,630 person-months) ages 18-64 with MH disorders and Medicaid coverage from Panels 4 to 19 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental design and propensity weighting, we estimated logit models examining changes in service utilization per-person-per-month. We used a "post" indicator to estimate average differences in service use postdisenrollment (vs. those with continuous Medicaid coverage) and a count variable measuring total months since coverage loss to estimate changes over time. OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause outpatient visits, MH-related outpatient visits, and acute care visits. RESULTS: Becoming uninsured after Medicaid disenrollment was associated with average reductions of 52% [-14.75 percentage-points, 95% confidence interval (CI): -17.59, -11.91] in the likelihood of receiving any outpatient service, 35% (-2.23 percentage-points, 95% CI: -3.71, -0.75) in the likelihood of receiving any MH-related outpatient service, and 52% (-2.44 percentage-points; 95% CI: -3.35, -1.52) in the likelihood of receiving any acute service in a month. Health care use declined the most in the month immediately postdisenrollment, and declines continued over the next half-year (while uninsured). CONCLUSIONS: Insurance loss after disenrollment from Medicaid led to a persistent disruption in the receipt of health care services for beneficiaries with MH disorders.
Assuntos
Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
In late 2017, the 7 regional contractors responsible for paying dialysis claims in Medicare proposed new payment rules that would restrict payment for hemodialysis treatments in excess of 3 weekly to exceptional acute-care circumstances. Frequent hemodialysis is performed more frequently than the traditional thrice-weekly pattern, and many stakeholders-patients, providers, dialysis machine manufacturers, and others-have expressed concern that these payment rules will inhibit the growth of this treatment modality's use among US dialysis patients. In this Perspective, we explain the role of these contractors in the context of Medicare's in-center hemodialysis-centric dialysis payment system and assess how well this system accommodates the higher treatment frequencies of both peritoneal dialysis and frequent hemodialysis. Then, given the available evidence concerning the relative effectiveness of these modalities versus thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis and trends in their use, we discuss options for modifying Medicare's payment system to support frequent dialysis.
Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Diálise Renal/economia , Humanos , Medicare , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare access at community health centers (CHCs) vs private offices (non-CHCs) under the Affordable Care Act. DATA SOURCE: Ten state primary care audit conducted in 2012/2013 and 2016. STUDY DESIGN: CHCs and non-CHCs were called. We calculated difference in differences comparing CHCs vs non-CHCs by caller insurance type. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In both rounds, Medicaid and uninsured callers had higher appointment rates at CHC than non-CHCs. CHC appointment rates significantly increased between 2012/2013 and 2016 for both employer-sponsored and Medicaid callers, with no significant wait time changes. Appointment rates increased (13.5% points, P < 0.001) and wait times decreased (-5.7 days, P = 0.017) at CHCs relative to non-CHCs for employer-sponsored insurance. CONCLUSION: Appointment availability at CHCs improved after ACA implementation, without increased wait times.