Cost-Effectiveness of Parallel Versus Sequential Testing of Genetic Aberrations for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: A large number of targeted treatment options for stage IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer with specific genetic aberrations in tumor DNA is available. It is therefore important to optimize diagnostic testing strategies, such that patients receive adequate personalized treatment that improves survival and quality of life. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy (including diagnostic costs, turnaround time (TAT), unsuccessful tests, percentages of correct findings, therapeutic costs, and therapeutic effectiveness) of parallel next generation sequencing (NGS)-based versus sequential single-gene-based testing strategies routinely used in patients with metastasized non-small-cell lung cancer in the Netherlands. METHODS: A diagnostic microsimulation model was developed to simulate 100,000 patients with prevalence of genetic aberrations, extracted from real-world data from the Dutch Pathology Registry. These simulated patients were modeled to undergo different testing strategies composed of multiple tests with different test characteristics including single-gene and panel tests, test accuracy, the probability of an unsuccessful test, and TAT. Diagnostic outcomes were linked to a previously developed treatment model, to predict average long-term survival, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and cost-effectiveness of parallel versus sequential testing. RESULTS: NGS-based parallel testing for all actionable genetic aberrations is on average €266 cheaper than single-gene-based sequential testing, and detects additional relevant targetable genetic aberrations in 20.5% of the cases, given a TAT of maximally 2 weeks. Therapeutic costs increased by €8,358, and 0.12 QALYs were gained, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €69,614/QALY for parallel versus sequential testing. CONCLUSION: NGS-based parallel testing is diagnostically superior over single-gene-based sequential testing, as it is cheaper and more effective than sequential testing. Parallel testing remains cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 69,614 €/QALY upon inclusion of therapeutic costs and long-term outcomes.

Micro-costing diagnostics in oncology: from single-gene testing to whole- genome sequencing.

Purpose: Predictive diagnostics play an increasingly important role in personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based treatment selection is expected to rapidly increase worldwide. This study aimed to calculate and compare the total cost of currently used diagnostic techniques and of WGS in treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the Netherlands.Methods: The activity-based costing (ABC) method was conducted to calculate total cost of included diagnostic techniques based on data provided by Dutch pathology laboratories and the Dutch-centralized cancer WGS facility. Costs were allocated to four categories: capital costs, maintenance costs, software costs, and operational costs.Results: The total cost per cancer patient per technique varied from € 58 (Sanger sequencing, three amplicons) to € 2925 (paired tumor-normal WGS). The operational costs accounted for the vast majority (over 90%) of the total per cancer patient technique costs.Conclusion: This study outlined in detail all costing aspects and cost prices of current and new diagnostic modalities used in treatment of NSCLC, melanoma, CRC, and GIST in the Netherlands. Detailed cost differences and value comparisons between these diagnostic techniques enable future economic evaluations to support decision-making.

Assessment of tumour depth in early tongue cancer: Accuracy of MRI and intraoral ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Complete resection of tongue cancer is necessary to achieve local control. Unfortunately, deep resection margins are frequently inadequate. To improve deep margin control, accurate knowledge of tumour thickness is pivotal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoral ultrasound (ioUS) are frequently applied for tumour staging. This study explores the accuracy of these techniques to estimate depth of invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of patients with a T1-2 tongue cancer that had been treated surgically between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Measurements that had been taken by either MRI or ioUS were compared with those taken during histopathology. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients with tongue cancer had undergone a pre-operative MRI and 107 had been studied through an ioUS. Tumour thickness measured by MRI (r = 0.72) and ioUS (r = 0.78) correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with histopathological depth of invasion (DOI). In tumours with a DOI of 0-10 mm, MRI has a mean absolute difference with histopathology of 3.1 mm (SD 3.2 mm) and ioUS of 1.6 mm (SD 1.3 mm). In tumours with a DOI greater than 10 mm, MRI has a mean absolute difference of 3.5 mm (SD 3.0 mm) and ioUS of 4.7 mm (SD 3.5 mm). CONCLUSION: Estimation of histopathological DOI in tongue cancers with DOI till 10 mm is very accurate through use of ioUS. ioUS tends to underestimate DOI in tumors exceeding 10 mm DOI. MRI tends to overestimate DOI in both thin and thick tumours. Since ultrasound measurements can be performed during surgery, ioUS could potentially guide the surgeon in the achievement of adequate resection margins.

Digital pathology-aided assessment of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in advanced stage, HPV-negative head and neck tumors.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the presence and prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating T cells in the tumor epithelium in advanced stage, HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with primary chemoradiotherapy using digital pathology. METHODS: Pre-treatment biopsies from 80 oropharyngeal, 52 hypopharyngeal, and 29 laryngeal cancer patients were collected in a tissue microarray (TMA) and immunohistochemically stained for T-cell markers CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, and PD1, and for immune checkpoint PD-L1. For each marker, the number of positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) per mm2 tumor epithelium was digitally quantified and correlated to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC), as well as to clinicopathological characteristics. Differences in clinical outcome were estimated using Cox proportional hazard analysis and visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The patient cohort had a 3-year OS of 58%, with a median follow-up of 53 months. None of the T-cell markers showed a correlation with OS, DFS or LRC. A low N stage was correlated to a better prognosis (OS: HR 0.39, p = 0.0028, DFS: HR 0.34, p = < 0.001, LRC: HR 0.24, p = 0.008). High TIL counts were more often observed in PD-L1-positive tumors (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed an objective, digital pathology-aided method to assess TILs in the tumor epithelium. However, it did not provide evidence for a prognostic role of the presence of CD3 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , FoxP3 + , and PD1 + TILs in the tumor epithelium of advanced stage, HPV-negative HNSCC patients treated with primary chemoradiotherapy.

Comparison of next-generation sequencing and mutation-specific platforms in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To compare next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms with mutation-specific analysis platforms in a clinical setting, in terms of sensitivity, mutation specificity, costs, capacity, and ease of use. METHODS: We analyzed 25 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung cancer samples of different size and tumor percentage for known KRAS and EGFR hotspot mutations with two dedicated genotyping platforms (cobas [Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands] and Rotor-Gene [QIAGEN, Venlo, The Netherlands]) and two NGS platforms (454 Genome Sequencer [GS] junior [Roche Diagnostics] and Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine [Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands]). RESULTS: All platforms, except the 454 GS junior, detected the mutations originally detected by Sanger sequencing and high-resolution melting prescreening and detected an additional KRAS mutation. The dedicated genotyping platforms outperformed the NGS platforms in speed and ease of use. The large sequencing capacity of the NGS platforms enabled them to deliver all mutation information for all samples at once. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity for detecting mutations was highly comparable among all platforms. The choice for either a dedicated genotyping platform or an NGS platform is basically a trade-off between speed and genetic information.

Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images.

The proliferative activity of breast tumors, which is routinely estimated by counting of mitotic figures in hematoxylin and eosin stained histology sections, is considered to be one of the most important prognostic markers. However, mitosis counting is laborious, subjective and may suffer from low inter-observer agreement. With the wider acceptance of whole slide images in pathology labs, automatic image analysis has been proposed as a potential solution for these issues. In this paper, the results from the Assessment of Mitosis Detection Algorithms 2013 (AMIDA13) challenge are described. The challenge was based on a data set consisting of 12 training and 11 testing subjects, with more than one thousand annotated mitotic figures by multiple observers. Short descriptions and results from the evaluation of eleven methods are presented. The top performing method has an error rate that is comparable to the inter-observer agreement among pathologists.

Use of the 2-µm continuous wave thulium laser for the resection of oral squamous cell carcinomas does not impair pathological assessment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Current resection modalities for oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) vary from cold steel over CO2 laser to monopolar electro-surgery (MO). We compared thulium laser (TL) as a new modality with MO with regards to pathological assessment. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients who were treated for OSCC by either TL or MO were included. All resected specimens were assessed with special attention to margin interpretation and thermal damage. RESULTS: Depth of thermal damage ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 mm in the TL group compared to 1.0-4.0 mm in the MO group without interfering with the pathological assessment. The percentage of positive margin resections was three times higher in the MO group compared with the TL group. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows resections done by TL do not impair pathological assessment when compared to MO resections.

Discrepancy between routine and expert pathologists' assessment of non-palpable breast cancer and its impact on locoregional and systemic treatment.

Histopathological parameters are essential for deciding on adjuvant treatment following breast cancer surgery. We assessed the impact of inter-observer variability on treatment strategy in patients operated for clinically node negative, non-palpable breast carcinomas. In the context of a multicenter randomised controlled trial, clinical and histological data of 310 patients with clinically node negative non-palpable invasive breast cancer were prospectively collected. Histological assessment of the primary tumour and sentinel nodes was first performed in a routine setting, subsequently central review took place. In case of discordance between local en central assessments, we determined the impact on locoregional and systemic treatment strategy. Discordance between local and central review was observed in 13% of the patients for type (kappa 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.71), in 12% for grade (k=0.796, 95% CI 0.73-0.86), in 1% for ER status (k=0.898, 95% CI 0.80-1.0), in 2% for PR status (k=0.940 95% CI 0.89-0.99). Discrepancy in the assessment of the sentinel node(s) was seen in 2% of the patients (k=0.954, 95% CI 0.92-0.98). Applying current Dutch Guidelines, central review would have affected locoregional treatment in 2% (7/310), systemic treatment in 5% (16/310) and both in 1% (2/310) of the patients. For the 9 (3%) patients in whom central review would have led to additional systemic treatment, Adjuvant! predicted 10 years mortality and recurrence rate would have decreased with a median of 4.6% and 15%, respectively. Discordance between routine histological assessment and central review of non-palpable breast carcinoma specimens and sentinel nodes was observed in 24% of patients. This inter-observer variation would have impacted locoregional and/or systemic treatment strategies in 8% of the patients.