Iatrogenic Opioid Withdrawal in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Assessment Tools and Management.

OBJECTIVE: To (1) provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and risk factors of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients and (2) conduct a literature review of assessment and management of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1946-June 2017), EMBASE (1974-June 2017), and CINAHL (1982-June 2017) with the terms opioid withdrawal, opioid, opiate, critical care, critically ill, assessment tool, scale, taper, weaning, and management. Reference list of identified literature was searched for additional references as well as www.clinicaltrials.gov . STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We restricted articles to those in English and dealing with humans. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 2 validated pediatric critically ill opioid withdrawal assessment tools: (1) Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 (WAT-1) and (2) Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms Scale (SOS). Neither tool differentiated between opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal. WAT-1 was evaluated in critically ill adults but not found to be valid. No other adult tool was identified. For management, we identified 5 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective studies, and 2 systematic reviews. Most studies were small and only 2 studies utilized a validated assessment tool. Enteral methadone, α-2 agonists, and protocolized weaning were studied. CONCLUSION: We identified 2 validated assessment tools for pediatric intensive care unit patients; no valid tool for adults. Management strategies tested in small trials included methadone, α-2 agonists, and protocolized sedation/weaning. We challenge researchers to create validated tools assessing specifically for opioid withdrawal in critically ill children and adults to direct management.

Epidemiology and management of atrial fibrillation in medical and noncardiac surgical adult intensive care unit patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiology and management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in noncardiac surgery critically ill patients in a retrospective, observational study at 3 mixed medical-surgical, university-affiliated intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted during a 1-year period with any documentation of AF during ICU stay were identified. Demographic data, risk factors, interventions, and outcomes were collected from the medical record. RESULTS: A total of 3081 patients were admitted during the 1-year study period in which 348 consecutive patients (10.5%) had documented AF. Atrial fibrillation was of new onset in 139 patients (4.5%) and preexisting in 186 patients (6.0%). Hemodynamic instability developed in 37% and 10% of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively. Most (73%) patients with new-onset AF had at least 1 modifiable risk factor. Pharmacologic rhythm conversion was attempted in 76% and 26% of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively. Although initially successful in 87% of new-onset cases, 42% reverted back to AF. Electrical conversion was successful in 7 (27%) of 26 and 0 (0%) of 5 of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively. In total, 18% and 62% of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively, who survived to ICU discharge left the ICU in AF. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation is common but transient in most ICU patients. Electrical cardioversion is often unsuccessful, and pharmacologic rhythm conversion is often only transiently effective. Modifiable risk factors are common among these patients. Future studies are needed to address the management of AF in the ICU.