The Geographic Distribution of Videolaryngostroboscopy in the United States.

PURPOSE: To study the geographic utilization of videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS) with the hypothesis that office-based voice care is unevenly distributed across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional database analysis of Medicare beneficiaries. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File from 2012 to 2017 was analyzed to evaluate VLS utilization. VLS distribution was assessed by calculating the density of VLS in each of the 306 hospital referral regions (HRRs) nationally. Associations between VLS density and population demographics and health system factors were assessed using Pearson correlation and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 957,648 outpatient VLS were billed to Medicare part B between 2012 and 2017. The annual VLS density per HRR ranged from 0 to 38.2 per 1,000 enrollees. Pearson correlation revealed positive correlations between VLS density and number of Medicare enrollees (r = 0.2584, P < 0.001), income (r = 0.1913, P = 0.0008), education (r = 0.2089, P = 0.0002), and density of otolaryngologists (r = 0.1589, P = 0.0053) and medical specialists (r = 0.2326, P < 0.0001). A negative Pearson correlation was observed between VLS density and percent male (r = -0.1338, P = 0.0192) and Medicare mortality rate (r = -0.1628, P = 0.0043). On multivariate regression positive associations between VLS and number of Medicare enrollees (P = 0.002) and otolaryngologists (P = 0.049), and negative association with Medicare mortality rates (P = 0.032) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of office-based voice care varies widely across the country, even when analysis by HRR should have homogenized access to specialty care. Greater availability of VLS is seen in HRRs with more Medicare enrollees, greater density of otolaryngologists, and lower mortality rates.

Encounters and management of oral conditions at general medical practices in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Poor oral health has been widely recognised as an ongoing public health issue. Patients with oral conditions may visit either a general practitioner (GP) or a dental practitioner for management. The aims of this study are to report (i) the GP management rate of oral health conditions by patient and GP demographics, (ii) what specific oral conditions were managed, and (iii) how GPs managed oral conditions. METHODS: Data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health study (2006 to 2016 inclusive) were analysed. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals around point estimates were used to summarise data. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the independent effect of patient and GP characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 972,100 GP encounters were included in the dataset, with oral condition-related encounters managed at a rate of 1.19 oral conditions per 100 GP encounters. Patients who were aged 54 years or younger, resided in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area, came from a non-English speaking background or Indigenous background were more likely to have oral conditions managed by GPs. The most commonly reported oral conditions were dental and oral mucosa-related. Over 60% of oral conditions were managed by GPs through prescribed medications. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided an overview of management of oral conditions by GPs in Australia. Patients from certain vulnerable demographic groups were more likely to attend a GP for management of oral conditions. Common oral conditions and management approaches were identified. The findings of this study contribute to public health and health policy discussions around optimising primary care provision in oral health.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hearing Aid Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVES: We examined individual-level factors associated with hearing aid use by race and ethnicity in a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We used the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (cycles 2016-2018) for 10,301 older adults with hearing loss and hearing aid use as the primary outcome. Covariates included education, income, urban residence, chronic conditions, functional limitations, and Medicaid eligibility. Multivariable logistic regression stratified by race and ethnicity was used to identify factors associated with hearing aid use. RESULTS: Factors associated with hearing aid use included higher education among White (OR = 1.35, 95%CI:1.16, 1.58), Black (OR = 1.76, 95%CI:1.02, 3.05), and Hispanic (OR = 1.77, 95%CI:1.17, 2.68) beneficiaries. Urban residence was associated with hearing aid use for Black participants (OR = 3.06, 95%CI:1.17, 8.03) and Medicaid eligibility for Hispanic participants (OR = 1.58, 95%CI:0.97, 2.59), although the confidence interval included the null hypothesis. DISCUSSION: ndividual-level factors associated with hearing aid use differed by race and ethnicity among Medicare beneficiaries.

Sensory Impairment and the Odds of Adverse Consequences of Unmet Needs for Care Among Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Vision and hearing impairments are highly prevalent conditions among older adults, and well-established links exist between sensory impairment and household, mobility, and self-care activity limitations. However, studies examining the impact of unmet long-term services and supports (LTSS) needs have not considered the role of vision and hearing impairment on the risk of experiencing adverse consequences, including wetting or soiling oneself. METHOD: Using Rounds 1 and 5 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older, we examine the association of vision and hearing impairment on the odds of experiencing an adverse consequence while accounting for other sociodemographic and health status factors. RESULTS: Among a weighted population of 49,770,947 community-living older adults with limitations in household, mobility, or self-care activities, 20.1% (95% CI: 19.2-21.0) experienced an adverse consequence as a result of unmet LTSS needs. In the fully adjusted regression, individuals with vision or hearing impairment had 96% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.64-2.34) and 43% increased odds (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24-1.65), respectively, of experiencing any adverse consequence. Hearing impairment was associated with higher odds of household or self-care adverse consequences, while vision impairment was associated with higher odds of mobility or self-care adverse consequences. DISCUSSION: Sensory impairment may increase the risk for adverse consequences for older adults with unmet LTSS needs. Activities that support older adults living safely in the community should consider the role of sensory impairment and how to address the unique needs of those with hearing or vision impairment.

Alternative Pathways for Hearing Care May Address Disparities in Access.

Background/Objectives: Low-uptake of hearing aids among older adults has long dogged the hearing care system in the U.S. and other countries. The introduction of over-the-counter hearing aids is set to disrupt the predominantly high-cost, specialty clinic-based delivery model of hearing care with the hope of increasing accessibility and affordability of hearing care. However, the current model of hearing care delivery may not be reaching everyone with hearing loss who have yet to use hearing aids. In this study, we examine the group of people who do not use hearing aids and describe their characteristics and health care utilization patterns. We also consider what other healthcare pathways may be utilized to increase access to hearing treatment. Design: Cross-sectional, the 2017 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Setting: Non-institutionalized adults enrolled in Medicare, the U.S. public health insurance program for older adults (65 years and older) and those with qualifying medical conditions and disabilities. Participants: A nationally representative sample of 7,361 Medicare beneficiaries with self-reported trouble hearing and/or hearing aid use. Measurements: Survey-weighted proportions described the population characteristics and health care utilization of those with hearing loss by hearing aid use, and the characteristics of those with untreated hearing loss by health care service type utilized. Results: Women, racial/ethnic minorities, and low-income Medicare beneficiaries with self-reported hearing trouble were less likely to report using hearing aids than their peers. Among those who do not use hearing aids, the most commonly used health care services were obtaining prescription drugs (64%) and seeing a medical provider (50%). Only 20% did not access either service in the past year. These individuals were more likely to be young and to have higher educational attainment and income. Conclusion: Alternative models of care delivered through pharmacies and general medical practices may facilitate access to currently underserved populations as they are particularly high touch-points for Medicare beneficiaries with untreated hearing trouble. As care needs will vary across a spectrum of hearing loss, alternative models of hearing care should look to complement not substitute for existing access pathways to hearing care.

Medicare Beneficiaries With Self-Reported Functional Hearing Difficulty Have Unmet Health Care Needs.

Hearing loss is associated with higher health care spending and use, but little is known about the unmet health care needs of people with hearing loss or difficulty. Analysis of 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for beneficiaries ages sixty-five and older reveals that those who reported a lot of trouble hearing in the past year were 49 percent more likely than those who reported no trouble hearing to indicate not having a usual source of care. Compared with those who reported no trouble hearing, those who reported some trouble hearing were more likely to indicate not having obtained medical care in the past year when they thought it was needed, as well as not filling a prescription, with the risk for both behaviors being greater among those reporting a lot of trouble hearing versus a little. Interventions that improve access to hearing services and aid communication may help older Medicare beneficiaries meet their health care needs.

Healthcare-Seeking Behaviors Among Medicare Beneficiaries by Functional Hearing Status.

Objective: Hearing loss is associated with higher health expenditures and poor healthcare utilization. This study aims to build on these findings by characterizing the association between hearing status and healthcare-seeking behaviors among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: Cross-sectional log-binominal regression was used to assess the association between self-report hearing and healthcare-seeking behaviors (avoidance or delay of care, personal health concerns, and sharing health status) using the 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (N = 12,140). Results: Beneficiaries with trouble hearing had significantly higher risks of avoiding and delaying health care compared to those without trouble hearing. Conversely, trouble hearing was not associated with concern for health status or sharing health status. Discussion: These findings may help explain higher costs associated with hearing loss as avoidance of care can exacerbate health problems. Further work is needed to understand underlying causes and whether addressing hearing loss modifies the observed association.

Hearing Loss and Home Health: An Unmet Need and an Opportunity for Action.

The purpose of this study was to identify unmet hearing care needs among older adults receiving home healthcare as a potential method to reach a population unserved by clinic-based care. Cross-sectional analyses were used to identify hearing loss and hearing aid use among beneficiaries enrolled in home care, using data from the nationally representative 2017 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). Survey participants who reported enrollment in home healthcare services in 2017 (n = 3,183,693) were included for the purposes of analyses. Home health and hearing status were assessed through MCBS questionnaires, reported by Medicare beneficiaries or an appointed proxy, along with hearing status evaluated at initial home care intake. Among older Medicare beneficiaries receiving home healthcare, 51.8% self-reported hearing concerns. Of this population, only 16.1% reported hearing aid use. Recipients with hearing difficulty received an average of 30 visits per year, totaling to $5,208.25 in expenditure. By self-report, 44% of older home care recipients with hearing difficulty were misclassified as having "adequate" hearing on initial assessment and 31% of initial assessments identified hearing loss among those who self-reported no difficulty hearing. Effective management of chronic health conditions is core to healthy aging, including sensory health. Hearing loss represents a largely unaddressed need among home care recipients and frequently goes unidentified. Home-based hearing services that integrate into existing assessments and practices may be an avenue in identifying hearing loss and extending care to older adults who have traditionally gone without access to hearing intervention.

Satisfaction With Quality of Health Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Functional Hearing Loss.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nearly 38 million Americans have hearing loss. Understanding how sensory deficits such as hearing loss, which limit communication, impact satisfaction has implications for Medicare value-based reimbursement mechanisms. The aim of this study was to characterize the association of functional hearing loss and dissatisfaction with quality of health care over the past year among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of satisfaction with quality of health care among Medicare beneficiaries with self-reported trouble hearing from the 2015 Medicare Current Beneficiaries Survey. There were 11,441 Medicare beneficiaries representing a 48.6 million total weighted nationally representative sample. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of Medicare beneficiaries reported a little or a lot of trouble hearing. Medicare beneficiaries with a little trouble hearing (odds ratio=1.496; 95% confidence interval, 1.079-2.073; P=0.016) and a lot of trouble hearing (odds ratio=1.769; 95% confidence interval, 1.175-2.664; P=0.007) had 49.6% and 76.9% higher odds of being dissatisfied with the quality of their health care over the previous year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with functional hearing loss had higher odds of dissatisfaction with health care over the past year compared to those without functional hearing loss. Given Medicare's reliance on patient satisfaction as a value-based measure for hospital reimbursement, interventions to address hearing loss in the health care system are needed.

Accompaniment to healthcare visits: the impact of sensory impairment.

BACKGROUND: Millions of older adults in the United States experience hearing, vision, and dual sensory impairment (concurring hearing and vision impairment) yet little research exists on their needs in interactions with the healthcare system. This piece aims to determine the use of accompaniment in healthcare interactions by persons with sensory impairment. METHODS: These cross-sectional analyses included data from the 2015 Medicare Current Beneficiaries Survey and survey weighting provided by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Adjusted odds of reporting accompaniment to healthcare visits and given reasons for accompaniment among United States Medicare beneficiaries with self-reported sensory impairment (hearing, vision, and dual sensory impairment) were examined. RESULTS: After excluding observations with missing data, 10,748 Medicare beneficiaries remained representing a 46 million total weighted nationally representative sample, of which 88.9% reported no sensory impairment, 5.52% reported hearing impairment, 3.56% reported vision impairment, and 0.93% reported dual sensory impairment. Those with vision impairment and dual sensory impairment had 2.139 (95% confidence interval [CI] =1.605-2.850) and 2.703 (CI = 1.549-4.718) times the odds of reporting accompaniment to healthcare visits relative to those without sensory impairment. A secondary analysis suggests communication needs as the primary reason for accompaniment among persons with hearing loss, while those with vision impairment were more likely to indicate transportation needs. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare accompaniment is common for persons with sensory loss and healthcare systems should consider accommodations for and leveraging accompaniment to improve healthcare for persons with sensory impairments. In light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, as hospitals limit visitors to reduce the spread of infection, arrangements should be made to ensure that the communication and transportation needs of those with sensory impairment are not neglected.

Understanding Medicare: Hearing Loss and Health Literacy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Medicare has become an increasingly complex program to navigate with numerous choices available to beneficiaries with important implications for their financial exposure and access to care. Although research has identified poor health literacy as a barrier to understanding Medicare, little information is available on the experience of individuals with hearing loss. This study examined how hearing loss impacts Medicare beneficiaries in understanding the program, their ability to compare and review plan options, and their satisfaction with available information. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using multivariate ordinal logistic regression. SETTING: Nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey [MCBS]) 2017. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,510 Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed, representing 50,084,169 beneficiaries with survey weights applied. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was difficulty understanding Medicare, determined by this MCBS question: "Overall, how easy or difficult do you think the Medicare program is to understand?" The predictor of interest was self-reported hearing loss measured categorically as no trouble, a little trouble, and a lot of trouble hearing. Covariates included age, sex, race, educational attainment, household income relative to the federal poverty level, enrollment in either traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage, dementia diagnosis, trouble with vision, and number of chronic conditions. RESULTS: Medicare beneficiaries with a little or a lot of trouble hearing had 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] odds ratio [OR] = 1.10-1.27) and 25% (95% CI OR = 1.07-1.47) increased odds of reporting greater difficulty with understanding Medicare, respectively, compared with those with no hearing trouble. About one in five Medicare beneficiaries with hearing loss identified that their hearing made it difficult to find Medicare information. CONCLUSION: The existing tools to support Medicare beneficiaries' understanding and navigation of the program must evolve to meet the needs of those with hearing loss, a highly prevalent condition among Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2336-2342, 2020.

Dental, Vision, And Hearing Services: Access, Spending, And Coverage For Medicare Beneficiaries.

Among Medicare beneficiaries, dental, vision, and hearing services could be characterized as high need, high cost, and low use. While Medicare does not cover most of these services, coverage has increased recently as a result of changes in state Medicaid programs and increased enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, many of which offer these services as supplemental benefits. Using data from the 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, this analysis shows that MA plans are filling an important gap in dental, vision, and hearing coverage, particularly among low- and middle-income beneficiaries. In 2016 only 21 percent of beneficiaries in traditional Medicare had purchased a stand-alone dental plan, whereas 62 percent of MA enrollees were in plans with a dental benefit. Among Medicare beneficiaries with coverage overall, out-of-pocket expenses still made up 70 percent of dental spending, 62 percent of vision spending, and 79 percent of hearing spending. While Medicare beneficiaries are enrolling in private coverage options, they are not getting adequate financial protection. This article examines these findings in the context of recent proposals in Congress to expand Medicare coverage of dental, vision, and hearing services.

Cost-Effective Care Coordination for People With Dementia at Home.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People with dementia (PWD) represent some of the highest-need and highest-cost individuals living in the community. Maximizing Independence (MIND) at Home is a potentially cost-effective and scalable home-based dementia care coordination program that uses trained, nonclinical community workers as the primary contact between the PWD and their care partner, supported by a multidisciplinary clinical team with expertise in dementia care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cost of care management services based on actual time spent by care management personnel over first 12 months of MIND at Home intervention was calculated for 342 MIND at Home recipients from Baltimore, Maryland and surrounding areas participating in a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) funded Health Care Innovation Award demonstration project. Difference-in-differences analysis of claims-based Medicaid spending of 120 dually-eligible MIND at Home participants with their propensity score matched comparison group (n = 360). RESULTS: The average cost per enrollee per month was $110, or $1,320 per annum. Medicaid expenditures of dually-eligible participants grew 1.12 percentage points per quarter more slowly than that of the matched comparison group. Most savings came from slower growth in inpatient and long-term nursing home use. Net of the cost of the 5-year MIND at Home intervention, 5-year Medicaid savings are estimated at $7,052 per beneficiary, a 1.12-fold return on investment. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Managed care plans with the flexibility to engage community health workers could benefit from a low-cost, high-touch intervention to meet the needs of enrollees with dementia. Limitations for using and reimbursing community health workers exist in Medicare fee-for-service, which CMS should address to maximize benefit for PWD.

Expanding Medicaid Coverage for Community-Based Long-Term Services and Supports: Lessons From Maryland's Community First Choice Program.

Community First Choice (CFC) is a Medicaid state plan option authorized through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that supports the delivery of long-term services and supports in home and community settings. We interviewed stakeholders in Maryland, one of the first states to adopt CFC, to assess challenges, benefits, and potential implications of this Medicaid option for state and federal policy makers. Study findings suggest that expanding coverage for home- and community-based services through CFC in Maryland has been financially feasible, expanded the personal care workforce, and supported a more equitable approach to personal care services. We conclude that greater coverage for home- and community-based long-term services is a promising avenue to improve access to care for high-need Medicaid beneficiaries.

Financial Stress and Risk for Entry into Medicaid Among Older Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spending in the Medicaid program is a significant concern to both state and federal policy makers. Medicaid spending is driven by program enrollment and services use. Older adults with high health care needs incur a disproportionate proportion of program spending. This analysis identifies factors that place older Medicare beneficiaries at increased risk for entering into Medicaid. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We use multinomial logistic regression and the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to examine the risks among older Medicare beneficiaries for entering into Medicaid over a 6-year follow-up period. We examine both time-invariant and time-varying factors to measure the impact of social and health and functioning changes at older ages. RESULTS: The risk of entry into Medicaid was higher for older adults who relocated to a nursing home (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 7.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.33-11.26) or other residential care setting (RRR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.96-1.92) compared to those who remained in traditional community settings. Older adults who reported skipping a meal in the last month because there was not enough money to buy food were 2.4 times (95% CI: 1.10-5.21) more likely to enter Medicaid than those who did not. Similarly, older adults who reported not having enough money to pay household utility bills in the last year were 1.89 times (95% CI: 1.08-3.30) more likely to enter Medicaid. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Study findings suggest that trouble paying for basic needs increases the risk of entry into Medicaid. Further research is required to examine whether addressing these needs through improved access to social services that enable older adults to live safely in their home may delay or mitigate entry into Medicaid.

Access to adults' hearing aids: policies and technologies used in eight countries.

As the proportion of older adults in the world's total population continues to grow, the adverse health outcomes of age-related hearing loss are becoming increasingly recognized. While research has shown that age-related hearing loss is the single greatest modifiable risk factor for dementia, use of hearing aids remains low worldwide, even in many middle- and high-income countries. Reasons for poor uptake of hearing aids are likely to involve a combination of factors, ranging from increasing costs of hearing aid technology to a widespread lack of insurance coverage. This article aims to identify the current state of access to hearing aids, focusing on eight middle- and high-income countries. We discuss how to facilitate greater access to hearing aids for patients by addressing changes in how devices are regulated, technological advancements in hearing devices, the need to adjust reimbursement schemes and the importance of adaptation among the community workforce for hearing-care.

Alors que la proportion de personnes âgées au sein de la population mondiale totale continue à croître, les effets néfastes sur la santé de la perte de l'acuité auditive liée à l'âge sont de plus en plus reconnus. Bien que la recherche ait démontré que la perte de l'acuité auditive liée à l'âge est le principal facteur de risque modifiable de la démence, l'utilisation de prothèses auditives reste limitée à l'échelle mondiale, y compris dans de nombreux pays à revenu intermédiaire et élevé. Les raisons de ce recours limité aux prothèses auditives tiennent probablement à une combinaison de facteurs qui vont des coûts croissants de la technologie des appareils auditifs à un manque généralisé de couverture médicale. Cet article vise à déterminer l'état actuel de l'accès aux prothèses auditives en se concentrant sur huit pays à revenu intermédiaire et élevé. Nous étudions comment permettre aux patients d'accéder plus facilement aux prothèses auditives en tenant compte de la réglementation applicable aux appareils, des progrès technologiques relatifs aux appareils auditifs, de la nécessité d'ajuster les systèmes de remboursement et de l'importance de l'adaptation au sein de la main-d'œuvre locale pour les soins auditifs.

A medida que la proporción de adultos mayores en la población total del mundo continúa creciendo, los resultados adversos para la salud de la pérdida de audición relacionada con la edad son cada vez más reconocidos. Aunque las investigaciones han demostrado que la pérdida de audición relacionada con la edad es el mayor factor de riesgo modificable para la demencia, el uso de audífonos sigue siendo bajo en todo el mundo, incluso en muchos países de ingresos medios y altos. Las causas de la escasa aceptación de los audífonos pueden ser una combinación de factores, que van desde el aumento de los costes de la tecnología de los audífonos hasta la falta generalizada de cobertura de seguro. Este artículo pretende identificar el estado actual del acceso a los audífonos, centrándose en ocho países de ingresos medios y altos. Discutimos cómo facilitar un mayor acceso a los audífonos para los pacientes abordando los cambios en cómo se regulan los dispositivos, los avances tecnológicos en los audífonos, la necesidad de ajustar los esquemas de reembolso y la importancia de la adaptación entre los trabajadores de la comunidad para el cuidado de la audición.

The High Coverage of Dental, Vision, and Hearing Benefits Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees.

While the traditional Medicare program does not cover dental, vision, and hearing services, Medicare Advantage (MA) plans have been given the flexibility to do so. However, it is not known how many MA enrollees are in plans that cover these services. The 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey linked to MA plan benefit data is used to examine enrollment levels in plans that cover dental, vision, and/or hearing services in MA. Medicaid beneficiaries are excluded from this analysis as coverage of supplemental benefits is largely determined by the state. The highest coverage of supplemental services is vision, followed by hearing and dental (71%, 56%, and 41%, respectively). Across all supplemental services, coverage for supplemental benefits is highest among low-income beneficiaries and those who have not completed high school. Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries had the highest enrollment in plans that offered a supplemental benefit, and white Medicare beneficiaries tended to have the lowest enrollment in these plans. Unlike in traditional Medicare, MA enrollees have access to health plans that offer supplemental benefits, including dental, vision, and/or hearing services. This analysis shows that enrollment in these plans is highest among low-income MA enrollees who may not have the means to purchase stand-alone insurance for these services in traditional Medicare. More analysis is warranted to examine the generosity of the coverage of these services in MA plans. However, for federal policy makers to consider offering supplemental coverage in traditional Medicare, the MA experience suggests this type of benefit would be valuable.