Specific dynamic action: the energy cost of digestion or growth?

The physiological processes underlying the post-prandial rise in metabolic rate, most commonly known as the 'specific dynamic action' (SDA), remain debated and controversial. This Commentary examines the SDA response from two opposing hypotheses: (i) the classic interpretation, where the SDA represents the energy cost of digestion, versus (ii) the alternative view that much of the SDA represents the energy cost of growth. The traditional viewpoint implies that individuals with a reduced SDA should grow faster given the same caloric intake, but experimental evidence for this effect remains scarce and inconclusive. Alternatively, we suggest that the SDA reflects an organism's efficacy in allocating the ingested food to growth, emphasising the role of post-absorptive processes, particularly protein synthesis. Although both viewpoints recognise the trade-offs in energy allocation and the dynamic nature of energy distribution among physiological processes, we argue that equating the SDA with 'the energy cost of digestion' oversimplifies the complexities of energy use in relation to the SDA and growth. In many instances, a reduced SDA may reflect diminished nutrient absorption (e.g. due to lower digestive efficiency) rather than increased 'free' energy available for somatic growth. Considering these perspectives, we summarise evidence both for and against the opposing hypotheses with a focus on ectothermic vertebrates. We conclude by presenting a number of future directions for experiments that may clarify what the SDA is, and what it is not.

Fish feeds supplemented with calcium-based buffering minerals decrease stomach acidity, increase the blood alkaline tide and cost more to digest.

Predatory fish in the wild consume whole prey including hard skeletal parts like shell and bone. Shell and bone are made up of the buffering minerals calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and calcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2). These minerals resist changes in pH, meaning they could have physiological consequences for gastric acidity, digestion and metabolism in fish. Using isocaloric diets supplemented with either CaCO3, Ca3(PO4)2 or CaCl2 as non-buffering control, we investigated the impacts of dietary buffering on the energetic cost of digestion (i.e. specific dynamic action or SDA), gastric pH, the postprandial blood alkalosis (the "alkaline tide") and growth in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Increases in dietary buffering were significantly associated with increased stomach chyme pH, postprandial blood HCO3-, net base excretion, the total SDA and peak SDA but did not influence growth efficiency in a 21 day trial. This result shows that aspects of a meal that have no nutritional value can influence the physiological and energetic costs associated with digestion in fish, but that a reduction in the SDA will not always lead to improvements in growth efficiency. We discuss the broader implications of these findings for the gastrointestinal physiology of fishes, trade-offs in prey choice in the wild, anthropogenic warming and feed formulation in aquaculture.