Concurrent Surgery for Locoregional Gynecologic Cancers and Pelvic Floor Disorders in a Population of Patients With Medicare Insurance.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of concurrent surgery for locoregional gynecologic cancer and pelvic organ prolapse-urinary incontinence (POP-UI) and to assess the rate of surgery for POP-UI within 5 years for those who did not undergo concurrent surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify cases of local or regional endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2000 to 2017. Patients were followed up for 5 years from diagnosis. We used χ 2 tests to identify categorical variables associated with having a concurrent POP-UI procedure with hysterectomy or within 5 years of hysterectomy. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs adjusted for variables statistically significant (α=.05) in the univariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 30,862 patients with locoregional gynecologic cancer, only 5.5% underwent concurrent POP-UI surgery. Of those with a preexisting diagnosis related to POP-UI, however, 21.1% had concurrent surgery. Of the patients who had a diagnosis of POP-UI at the time of initial surgery for cancer and who did not undergo concurrent surgery, an additional 5.5% had a second surgery for POP-UI within 5 years. The rate of concurrent surgery remained constant over the time period (5.7% in 2000 and 2017) despite an increase in the frequency of POP-UI diagnosis in the same time frame. CONCLUSION: The rate of concurrent surgery for patients with an early-stage gynecologic cancer and POP-UI-associated diagnosis in women older than age 65 years was 21.1%. Of women who did not undergo concurrent surgery but had a diagnosis of POP-UI, 1 in 18 underwent surgery for POP-UI within 5 years of their index cancer surgery. Dedicated efforts must be made to identify patients who would most benefit from concurrent cancer and POP-UI surgery in those with locoregional gynecologic cancers and pelvic floor disorders.

Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: Black women experience worse survival effects with high-grade endometrial cancer. Differences in adjuvant treatment have been proposed to be major contributors to this disparity. However, little is known about the differences in type or timing of adjuvant treatment as it relates to race and ethnicity in the Medicare population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine patterns of adjuvant therapy and survival for non-Hispanic Black women vs non-Hispanic White women and Hispanic women who have undergone surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population. STUDY DESIGN: We used the Medicare-linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify women who underwent surgery as a primary treatment for uterine grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear-cell carcinoma, or serous carcinoma between the years 2000 and 2015. Women who did not identify as White or Black race or Hispanic ethnicity were excluded. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for receiving a treatment delay or not receiving adjuvant treatment (compared with those who received adjuvant treatment within 12 weeks) adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Overall survival was stratified by race and ethnicity, route of surgery, operative complications, and type and timing of adjuvant therapy, which were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of death by race and ethnicity adjusted for known predictors and surgical outcomes and adjuvant therapy patterns. RESULTS: A total of 12,201 women met the study inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic Black patients had a significantly worse 5-year overall survival than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients (30.9 months vs 51.0 months vs 53.6 months, respectively). Approximately 632 of 7282 patients (8.6%) who received adjuvant treatment experienced a treatment delay. Delay in treatment of ≥12 weeks was significantly different by race and ethnicity (P=.034), with 12% of Hispanic, 9% of non-Hispanic Black, and 8% of non-Hispanic White women experiencing a delay. After adjustment for the number of complications, age, histology (endometrioid vs nonendometroid), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, marital status, comorbidity count, surgical approach, lymph node dissection, and urban-rural code, Hispanic women had a 71% increased risk of treatment delay (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.38) for all stages of disease. In the same model, non-Hispanic Black race was independently predictive of decreased use of adjuvant treatment for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II and higher (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.68). Non-Hispanic Black race, number of perioperative complications, and nonendometrioid histology were predictive of worse survival in univariate models. Treatment delay was not independently predictive of worse 1- or 5-year survival at any stage. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black race was predictive of worse 5-year survival across all stages and was associated with omission of adjuvant treatment in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II or higher high-grade endometrial cancer. In unadjusted analyses, patients who experience treatment omission or delay experienced poorer overall survival, but these factors were not independently associated in multivariate analyses. This study suggests that race and ethnicity are independently associated with the type and timing of adjuvant treatment in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer. Further efforts to identify specific causes of barriers to care and timely treatment are imperative.