Identifying Relevant FHIR Elements for Data Quality Assessment in the German Core Data Set.

The German Medical Informatics Initiative makes clinical routine data available for biomedical research. In total, 37 university hospitals have set up so-called data integration centers to facilitate this data reuse. A standardized set of HL7 FHIR profiles ("MII Core Data Set") defines the common data model across all centers. Regular Projectathons ensure continuous evaluation of the implemented data sharing processes on artificial and real-world clinical use cases. In this context, FHIR continues to rise in popularity for exchanging patient care data. As reusing data from patient care in clinical research requires high trust in the data, data quality assessments are a key point of concern in the data sharing process. To support the setup of data quality assessments within data integration centers, we suggest a process for finding elements of interest from FHIR profiles. We focus on the specific data quality measures defined by Kahn et al.

Professionalism of Information Management in Health Care: Development and Validation of the Construct and Its Measurement.

BACKGROUND: Against the background of a steadily increasing degree of digitalization in health care, a professional information management (IM) is required to successfully plan, implement, and evaluate information technology (IT). At its core, IM has to ensure a high quality of health data and health information systems to support patient care. OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to define what constitutes professional IM as a construct as well as to propose a reliable and valid measurement instrument. METHODS: To develop and validate the construct of professionalism of information management (PIM) and its measurement, a stepwise approach followed an established procedure from information systems and behavioral research. The procedure included an analysis of the pertaining literature and expert rounds on the construct and the instrument, two consecutive and comprehensive surveys at the national and international level, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as reliability and validity testing. RESULTS: Professionalism of information management was developed as a construct consisting of the three dimensions of strategic, tactical, and operational IM as well as of the regularity and cyclical phases of IM procedures as the two elements of professionalism. The PIM instrument operationalized the construct providing items that incorporated IM procedures along the three dimensions and cyclical phases. These procedures had to be evaluated against their degree of regularity in the instrument. The instrument proved to be reliable and valid in two consecutive measurement phases and across three countries. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that professionalism of information management is a meaningful construct that can be operationalized in a scientifically rigorous manner. Both science and practice can benefit from these developments in terms of improved self-assessment, benchmarking capabilities, and eventually, obtaining a better understanding of health IT maturity.

Quality Requirements for Electronic Health Record Systems*. A Japanese-German Information Management Perspective.

BACKGROUND: For more than 30 years, there has been close cooperation between Japanese and German scientists with regard to information systems in health care. Collaboration has been formalized by an agreement between the respective scientific associations. Following this agreement, two joint workshops took place to explore the similarities and differences of electronic health record systems (EHRS) against the background of the two national healthcare systems that share many commonalities. OBJECTIVES: To establish a framework and requirements for the quality of EHRS that may also serve as a basis for comparing different EHRS. METHODS: Donabedian's three dimensions of quality of medical care were adapted to the outcome, process, and structural quality of EHRS and their management. These quality dimensions were proposed before the first workshop of EHRS experts and enriched during the discussions. RESULTS: The Quality Requirements Framework of EHRS (QRF-EHRS) was defined and complemented by requirements for high quality EHRS. The framework integrates three quality dimensions (outcome, process, and structural quality), three layers of information systems (processes and data, applications, and physical tools) and three dimensions of information management (strategic, tactical, and operational information management). CONCLUSIONS: Describing and comparing the quality of EHRS is in fact a multidimensional problem as given by the QRF-EHRS framework. This framework will be utilized to compare Japanese and German EHRS, notably those that were presented at the second workshop.

Assessing the prognoses on Health care in the information society 2013--thirteen years after.

Health care and information technology in health care is advancing at tremendous speed. We analysed whether the prognoses by Haux et al. - first presented in 2000 and published in 2002 - have been fulfilled in 2013 and which might be the reasons for match or mismatch. Twenty international experts in biomedical and health informatics met in May 2013 in a workshop to discuss match or mismatch of each of the 71 prognoses. After this meeting a web-based survey among workshop participants took place. Thirty-three prognoses were assessed matching; they reflect e.g. that there is good progress in storing patient data electronically in health care institutions. Twenty-three prognoses were assessed mismatching; they reflect e.g. that telemedicine and home monitoring as well as electronic exchange of patient data between institutions is not established as widespread as expected. Fifteen prognoses were assessed neither matching nor mismatching. ICT tools have considerably influenced health care in the last decade, but in many cases not as far as it was expected by Haux et al. in 2002. In most cases this is not a matter of the availability of technical solutions but of organizational and ethical issues. We need innovative and modern information system architectures which support multiple use of data for patient care as well as for research and reporting and which are able to integrate data from home monitoring into a patient centered health record. Since innovative technology is available the efficient and wide-spread use in health care has to be enabled by systematic information management.

Past and next 10 years of medical informatics.

More than 10 years ago Haux et al. tried to answer the question how health care provision will look like in the year 2013. A follow-up workshop was held in Braunschweig, Germany, for 2 days in May, 2013, with 20 invited international experts in biomedical and health informatics. Among other things it had the objectives to discuss the suggested goals and measures of 2002 and how priorities on MI research in this context should be set from the viewpoint of today. The goals from 2002 are now as up-to-date as they were then. The experts stated that the three goals: "patient-centred recording and use of medical data for cooperative care"; "process-integrated decision support through current medical knowledge" and "comprehensive use of patient data for research and health care reporting" have not been reached yet and are still relevant. A new goal for ICT in health care should be the support of patient centred personalized (individual) medicine. MI as an academic discipline carries out research concerning tools that support health care professionals in their work. This research should be carried out without the pressure that it should lead to systems that are immediately and directly accepted in practice.

Modeling economic aspects of hospital information systems to give decision support for strategic information management.

Information systems require strategic planning in order to adapt their functionality and quality to the needs of health care organizations. Next to effectivity, cost efficiency in supplying and operating information systems is a particular objective. Hospital information systems with their technical infrastructure, their application systems and the hereby supported business functions can be described with the help of the meta model 3LGM2 and the 3LGM2 tool. The meta model and the 3LGM2 tool are extended by a generic approach to show supply and operation cost for all components of the information system and for the cost calculation between these components. This leads to the fact that all executives in hospitals are enabled to get the cost transparent which were caused by the support of the functions by the information system. The effects of planned extensions and modification of the information system can be analyzed in term of cost. In a prototypical modelling, the information system of a hospital of regular standards has been evaluated in nearly all its components and cost. An evaluation could show that information managers and executives are now delivered relevant cost information for planning, operating and control of information systems.