Recruitment strategies in couple intervention studies: A systematic review of recruitment methods and sample characteristics in the United States from 2015 to 2020.

Including diverse participants in couple intervention studies is critical for developing an evidence base that informs best practices for all potential clients. Research has shown that subgroups of clients respond differently to different interventions and that interventions that have been adapted to fit the needs of a given population are more effective than non-adapted interventions. Unfortunately, couple intervention samples often exclude participants with marginalized identities and culturally adapted couple intervention research is limited. The lack of information about best practices for diverse client subgroups perpetuates mental and relational health disparities. We conducted a systematic review to examine recruitment strategies and sampling characteristics of diverse races/ethnicities, incomes, ages, and sexual identities. We reviewed articles published between January 2015 and December 2020. Articles were eligible for inclusion in our review if they implemented an intervention with couples in the United States. Of 4054 articles identified, 54 articles were eligible for our review. Findings suggest that couple intervention studies lack diversity across multiple identity domains (i.e., races/ethnicities, incomes, ages, and sexual identities). Further, descriptions of recruitment strategies are often vague, limiting opportunities to better understand methods used to recruit diverse samples.

Representation of Diverse Populations in Couple and Family Therapy Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of Race/Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Age, and Income in the United States from 2014 to 2019.

Disparities in mental health care among marginalized populations have been well-documented. Without research designed to study interventions for diverse populations, disparities in the quality of services will persist. A systematic review of articles evaluating couple and family therapy (CFT) interventions was conducted to evaluate the representation of diverse populations. More specifically, researchers sought to examine race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, income level, and age of sample participants. One hundred ninety-six studies evaluating CFT interventions in the United States in ten journals were included in the analysis. Findings indicate that family therapy research is more representative of racial minority and low-income participants compared with studies of couple interventions. Couple therapy research is often still conducted with predominately white, middle- to high-income samples. Following whites, African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos were the most common racial/ethnic groups included in both couple therapy research and family therapy research. Participants in same-sex relationships were absent from family intervention research and under-researched in couple intervention studies. Only one couple therapy study recruited a sample in which the average age was late adulthood. These findings are cause for concern given the widening mental health disparities in the United States.

Las desigualdades en la atención para la salud mental entre poblaciones marginadas están muy bien documentadas. Si no se diseñan investigaciones para estudiar intervenciones orientadas a poblaciones diversas, las desigualdades en la calidad de los servicios y en los resultados de los tratamientos seguirán existiendo. Se realizó un análisis sistemático de artículos que evaluaban las intervenciones de la terapia familiar y de pareja para evaluar la representación de poblaciones diversas. Más específicamente, los investigadores intentaron analizar la raza/etnia, la orientación sexual, el nivel de ingresos y la edad de los participantes de la muestra. Se incluyeron en el análisis ciento noventa y seis estudios que evaluaban las intervenciones de la terapia familiar y de pareja en los Estados Unidos en diez revistas médicas. Los resultados indican que la investigación sobre terapia familiar es más representativa de la minoría racial y de los participantes de bajos recursos en comparación con los estudios de intervenciones para las parejas. La investigación sobre terapia de pareja generalmente se sigue realizando con muestras predominantemente blancas, de ingresos medios y altos. Después de los blancos, los afroestadounidenses y los hispanos/latinos fueron los grupos raciales/étnicos más comunes incluidos tanto en la investigación sobre terapia familiar como en la de pareja. Los participantes de relaciones del mismo sexo estuvieron ausentes en las investigaciones sobre intervenciones familiares y se investigaron poco en los estudios sobre intervenciones para parejas. Solo un estudio sobre terapia de pareja reunió una muestra en la cual la edad promedio fue la edad adulta tardía. Estos resultados son motivo de preocupación teniendo en cuenta las desigualdades crecientes en el ámbito de la salud mental en los Estados Unidos.

Strengthening Clinical Research in Marriage and Family Therapy: Challenges and Multilevel Solutions.

There is a critical need for high-quality and accessible treatments to improve mental health. Yet, there are indications that the research being conducted by contemporary marriage and family therapy (MFT) scholars focuses less on advancing and disseminating clinical interventions than in previous decades. In this article, we describe challenges to increasing rigorous clinical research in MFT. We use systems mapping and the intervention-level framework to identify strategic goals designed to drive innovation in clinical research in the field. It is our hope this article encourages dialog and action among MFT stakeholder groups to support clinical science that will improve the health and functioning of families.