Complications nearly double the cost of care after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable data focused on the morbidity of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the financial impact of complications has been infrequently analyzed. This study evaluates the impact of the most common complications associated with PD on the cost of care. Additionally, we identified cost centers that were significantly affected by complications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database in a network of community-based teaching hospitals was performed. All patients (n = 145) who underwent PD were included for years 2005 to 2009. Of these, 144 had complete in-hospital cost data. Complications were assessed and classified into major and minor categories according to Dindo et al. Forty-nine cost centers were analyzed for their association with the cost of complications. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed. Significance was reported for P < .05. RESULTS: The median cost for PD was $30,937. Patients with major complications had significantly higher median cost compared with those without ($56,224 vs $29,038; P < .001). Independent predictors of increased cost included reoperation; sepsis; pancreatic fistula; bile leak; delayed gastric emptying; and pulmonary, renal, and thromboembolic complications. Cost center analysis showed significant added charges for patients with major complications for blood bank ($1,018), clinical laboratory ($3,731), a computed tomography scan ($4,742), diagnostic imaging ($697), intensive care unit ($4,986), pharmacy ($33,850) and respiratory therapy ($1,090) (P < .05, all). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the major complications of PD, which are significantly associated with a higher cost. Substantial cost center increases were associated with major complications, particularly in pharmacy ($33,850). Measures aimed at limiting complications through centralization of care or care pathways may reduce the overall cost of care for patients after pancreatic resection.

Hepatic resection vs minimally invasive radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: a Markov analysis.

HYPOTHESIS: Current literature evaluating radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of colorectal liver metastases describes high-risk surgical candidates or patients with unresectable disease. This creates bias when comparing RFA and hepatic resection. A Markov analysis would define theoretical outcomes necessary for RFA to demonstrate equivalence to resection. DESIGN: A multistate Markov decision analytic model was constructed. Second-order Monte Carlo analysis was used to simulate a randomized controlled trial. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the projected outcomes necessary for RFA to achieve equivalence with resection. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A systematic review of published literature was performed, identifying studies involving patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with RFA or resection. Data were also included from a prospective database of patients undergoing laparoscopic RFA at our institution. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous or laparoscopic RFA and hepatic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life expectancy and quality of life-adjusted survival. RESULTS: The base-case analysis (60-year-old man) demonstrated a mean ± SD quality-adjusted life expectancy of 5.67 ± 0.71 years and a 5-year survival of 38.2% following resection. Based on current literature, the mean ± SD quality-adjusted life expectancy for RFA was 3.61 ± 0.49 years, with a 5-year survival of 27.2%. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that RFA becomes the preferred strategy if the median disease-free survival reaches 1.42 years. When limited to patients from our institution with resectable lesions, the quality-adjusted life expectancy for RFA improved to a mean ± SD of 5.72 ± 0.50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Classical Markov analysis demonstrates that based on current literature, resection is superior to RFA in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. When input is limited to laparoscopic RFA in patients with resectable lesions, projected 5-year survival is superior to that of hepatic resection.