Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies: The Role of Socioeconomic Status in Ingestion Patterns.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) are common and can result in serious complications. Little is known about the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on EFB ingestion in children. The goal was to study SES as a risk factor for dangerous foreign body ingestion and in-hospital complications in children. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children presenting to a tertiary care pediatric hospital with an esophageal foreign body from 2010 to 2021. SES was assessed for each patient by linking their postal code to the Ontario Marginalization Index to determine a quintile score across four dimensions of deprivation: residential instability, material deprivation, dependency, and ethnic concentration. Dangerous EFBs were defined as magnets, batteries, sharp objects, or bones. In-hospital complications included: intensive care unit admission, prolonged length of stay, and postoperative sequelae. RESULTS: A total of 680 patients were included. Dangerous EFB ingestion was higher for children with increased residential instability (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.6) and increased material deprivation (OR, 2.2; CI, 1.9-2.8), which was similarly true for odds of complications. Odds of dangerous EFB ingestion were higher in older children (OR, 1.1; CI, 1.0-1.1) and odds of complications were higher in children with comorbidities (OR, 1.1; CI, 1.0-1.3). CONCLUSION: Higher levels of housing instability and material deprivation are associated with dangerous EFB ingestion and complications related to EFB ingestion. These findings emphasize the role that SES plays on child health outcomes and the need for initiatives to mitigate these disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2945-2953, 2024.

Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Esophagoscopy: International Modified Delphi Consensus.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric esophagoscopy with foreign body removal. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded modified Delphi consensus process. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: A list of 25 potential items was sent via the Research Electronic Data Capture database to 66 expert surgeons who perform pediatric esophagoscopy. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove" and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts rated the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was determined with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. RESULTS: The response rate was 38/64 (59.4%) in the first round and returned questionnaires were 100% complete. Experts wanted to "keep" all items and 172 comments were incorporated. Twenty-four task-specific and 7 previously-validated global rating items were distributed in the second round, and the response rate was 53/64 (82.8%) with questionnaires returned 97.5% complete. Of the task-specific items, 9 reached consensus, 7 were near consensus, and 8 did not achieve consensus. For global rating items that were previously validated, 6 reached consensus and 1 was near consensus. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach consensus about the important steps involved in rigid esophagoscopy with foreign body removal using a modified Delphi consensus technique. These items can now be considered when evaluating trainees during this procedure. This tool may allow trainees to focus on important steps of the procedure and help training programs standardize how trainees are evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5. Laryngoscope, 131:1168-1174, 2021.

Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Tracheotomy: International Modified Delphi Consensus.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, modified, Delphi consensus process. METHODS: Using the REDCap database, a list of 31 potential items was circulated to 65 expert surgeons who perform pediatric tracheotomy. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove," and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. RESULTS: The first round achieved a response rate of 39/65 (60.0%), and returned questionnaires were 99.5% complete. All items were rated as "keep," and 137 comments were incorporated. In the second round, 30 task-specific and seven previously validated global rating items were distributed, and the response rate was 44/65 (67.7%), with returned questionnaires being 99.3% complete. Of the Task-Specific Items, 13 reached consensus, 10 were near consensus, and 7 did not achieve consensus. For the 7 previously validated global rating items, 5 reached consensus and two were near consensus. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to reach consensus on the important steps involved in pediatric tracheotomy using a modified Delphi consensus process. These items can now be considered to create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Such a tool will hopefully allow trainees to focus on the important aspects of this procedure and help teaching programs standardize how they evaluate trainees during this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 130:2700-2707, 2020.

Tracheostomy care: Clinical practice patterns of pediatric otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons in a publicly funded (Canadian) health care system.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate variability in pediatric tracheostomy tube care practice patterns and access to resources across Canada. METHODS: Canadian pediatric otolaryngologists-head & neck surgeons reported their own practice patterns for children with chronic tracheostomy tubes using a web-based, 29-item multiple choice and short answer questionnaire. Domains investigated included tracheostomy team membership, inpatient care practices, caregiver education, homecare resources, speech and communication, and completeness of emergency tracheostomy kits. RESULTS: The response rate was 86.4% (38/44). Most respondents care for children with tracheostomy tubes as part of an inter-professional team (25/36; 69.4%) and arrange routine follow-up with a speech and language pathologist (22/36; 61.1%). However, the majority (23/34; 67.6%) of respondents do not formally reassess caregiver competencies (i.e. cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emergency tracheostomy care). Notably, respondents were also unsure 36.1% (13/36) of how frequently Shiley tracheostomy tubes should be washed and reused with the majority (15/36; 41.7%) reporting never. Most (15/36; 41.7%) respondents were also unsure of reuse recommendations for Bivona tracheostomy tubes. One third (12/36; 33.3%) of respondents were unsure about government-funded homecare services being provided in their community to children with tracheostomy tubes. CONCLUSION: There is much variability in pediatric tracheostomy tube care practice patterns across Canada. Results suggest that an evidence-based Canadian clinical practice guideline may help to streamline care provided to Canadian children with tracheostomy tubes.

Polysomnography: assessment of decannulation readiness in chronic upper airway obstruction.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the clinical value of polysomnography in patients with a tracheotomy due to chronic upper airway obstruction prior to attempting decannulation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Subjects with chronic upper airway obstruction were identified using a clinical database between 2000 and 2014. All subjects had a tracheotomy, were assessed by the senior author in a tertiary care academic center, and underwent polysomnography prior to attempting decannulation. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo polysomnography or had severe obstructive sleep apnea as the primary indication for tracheotomy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified. The majority (87.5%) of patients were successfully decannulated after their first polysomnography showed acceptable results when carried out with the tracheotomy occluded. Obstructive sleep apnea was identified in four of the nine patients who tolerated overnight tracheotomy occlusion, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was initiated. An additional four of the remaining six patients were decannulated after subsequent polysomnography demonstrated improvement with CPAP, and two required an additional airway procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic upper airway obstruction requiring tracheotomy can be challenging to treat and successfully decannulate. Indirect laryngoscopy is essential to evaluate the anatomy of the larynx; however, it cannot assess potential increased obstruction during sleep. The study indicates that polysomnography can assist with the evaluation of decannulation readiness in patients with chronic upper airway obstruction as an adjunct measure in addition to imaging and laryngoscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.