Enabling successful change in a high-demand working environment: a case study in a health care organization.

PURPOSE: The anticipation of organizational change and the transition process often creates uncertainty for employees and can lead to stress and anxiety. It is therefore essential for all organizations, especially those that operate in high-demand working environments, to support the well-being of staff throughout the change process. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Research on how employees respond to the organizational change of relocating to a new work space is limited. To fill this gap in the research, we present a case study examining the well-being of clinical and health care employees before and after a disruptive change: relocation in workplace facilities. In addition, factors that enabled successful change in this high-stress, high-demand working environment were investigated. Interviews were conducted with 20 participants before the relocation and 11 participants after relocation. Following an inductive approach, data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key themes. FINDINGS: Our findings suggest that a supportive team, inclusive leadership and a psychologically safe environment, may buffer negative employee well-being outcomes during disruptive organizational change. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This research contributes to the literature on successful organizational change in health care by highlighting the resources which support well-being throughout the change process and enabling the successful transition to a new facility.

Tumor mutational burden assessment and standardized bioinformatics approach using custom NGS panels in clinical routine.

BACKGROUND: High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was reported to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1, received FDA-approval for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic tumors with high TMB as determined by the FoundationOne®CDx test. It remains to be determined how TMB can also be calculated using other tests. RESULTS: FFPE/frozen tumor samples from various origins were sequenced in the frame of the Institut Curie (IC) Molecular Tumor Board using an in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. A TMB calculation method was developed at IC (IC algorithm) and compared to the FoundationOne® (FO) algorithm. Using IC algorithm, an optimal 10% variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off was established for TMB evaluation on FFPE samples, compared to 5% on frozen samples. The median TMB score for MSS/POLE WT tumors was 8.8 mut/Mb versus 45 mut/Mb for MSI/POLE-mutated tumors. When focusing on MSS/POLE WT tumor samples, the highest median TMB scores were observed in lymphoma, lung, endometrial, and cervical cancers. After biological manual curation of these cases, 21% of them could be reclassified as MSI/POLE tumors and considered as "true TMB high." Higher TMB values were obtained using FO algorithm on FFPE samples compared to IC algorithm (40 mut/Mb [10-3927] versus 8.2 mut/Mb [2.5-897], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We herein propose a TMB calculation method and a bioinformatics tool that is customizable to different NGS panels and sample types. We were not able to retrieve TMB values from FO algorithm using our own algorithm and NGS panel.

Meaningful Community-Engaged Partnerships: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Community Health Needs Survey among Asian American and Pacific Islander Subgroups.

BACKGROUND: Community-based needs assessments are instrumental to address gaps in data collection and reporting, as well as to guide research, policy, and practice decisions to address health disparities in under-resourced communities. OBJECTIVES: The New York University Center for the Study of Asian American Health collaboratively developed and administered a large-scale health needs assessment in diverse, low-income Asian American and Pacific Islander communities in New York City and three U.S. regional areas using an in-person or web-based, community-engaged approach. METHODS: Community-engaged processes were modified over the course of three survey rounds, and findings were shared back to communities of interest using community preferred channels and modalities. LESSONS LEARNED: Sustaining multiyear, on-the-ground engagement to drive community research efforts requires active bidirectional communication and delivery of tangible support to maintain trust between partners. CONCLUSIONS: Findings to facilitate community health programming and initiatives were built from lessons learned and informed by new and existing community-based partners.

COVID-19 and Asian Americans: Reinforcing the Role of Community-Based Organizations in Providing Culturally and Linguistically Centered Care.

Introduction: Community-based organizations (CBOs) have provided critical resources during the pandemic, particularly for marginalized communities, and are trusted liaisons who connect socially and linguistically isolated community members, such as the highly diverse Asian American population, to care during public health emergencies. Stereotypes such as the model minority myth have permeated public perception of Asian Americans' health status and health care access needs, fueling widespread belief that Asian Americans do not experience health disparities, and mask the high rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, hospitalization, and mortality among Asian Americans. The unequal burden of COVID-19 on Asian American communities has largely remained absent from the public health and national discourse, with exceptions such as community voices that have directed news media coverage and leading roles of CBOs in offering culturally adapted, in-language programming on COVID-19 infection prevention and control. Methods: CBOs and their staff are well-equipped with the cultural acuity, language capacity, and familiarity with local norms to improve structural gaps affecting health outcomes and support health care delivery. Results: We discuss the roles and responsibilities of CBOs in strengthening the health care workforce and expanding community-clinic linkages and provide two case studies illustrating the efforts of two community organizations serving Asian American and immigrant communities, who have been disproportionally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussion: CBOs are essential to supporting health service coordination and care delivery for structurally vulnerable populations, and are vital to sustaining the coordinated, multilevel public health response to improving community health. Conclusion: Bolstering the current infrastructure to support CBOs is necessary to facilitating immediate responses to serve community needs.

Determinants of Depression Risk among Three Asian American Subgroups in New York City.

Objective: Although the fastest growing minority group, Asian Americans receive little attention in mental health research. Moreover, aggregated data mask further diversity within Asian Americans. This study aimed to examine depression risk by detailed Asian American subgroup, and further assess determinants within and between three Asian ethnic subgroups. Methods: Needs assessment surveys were collected in 16 Asian American subgroups (six Southeast Asian, six South Asian, and four East Asian) in New York City from 2013-2016 using community-based sampling strategies. A final sample of N=1,532 completed the PHQ-2. Bivariate comparisons and multivariable logistic models explored differences in depression risk by subgroup. Results: Southeast Asians had the greatest depression risk (19%), followed by South Asians (11%) and East Asians (9%). Among Southeast Asians, depression risk was associated with lacking health insurance (OR=.2, 95% CI: 0-.6), not having a provider who speaks the same language (OR=3.2, 95% CI: 1.3-8.0), and lower neighborhood social cohesion (OR= .94, 95% CI: .71-.99). Among South Asians, depression risk was associated with greater English proficiency (OR=3.9, 95% CI: 1.6-9.2); and among East Asians, depression risk was associated with ≤ high school education (OR=4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.3). Additionally, among Southeast Asians and South Asians, the highest depression risk was associated with high levels of discrimination (Southeast Asian: OR=9.9, 95% CI: 1.8-56.2; South Asian: OR=7.3, 95% CI: 3.3-16.2). Conclusions: Depression risk and determinants differed by Asian American ethnic subgroup. Identifying factors associated with depression risk among these groups is key to targeting limited public health resources for these underserved communities.

Incidence and Management of Diarrhea With Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The APHINITY (BIG 4-11) study showed that pertuzumab significantly improved the rates of invasive disease-free survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, operable breast cancer when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Because diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise treatment administration, we evaluated the incidence and management of diarrhea in the APHINITY study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The APHINITY trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 year of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab or placebo. The diarrhea incidence, severity (National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0), onset, and management were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4805 patients were randomized. Diarrhea of any grade was the most common adverse event and occurred in 71% of patients in the pertuzumab arm versus 45% in the placebo arm. Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10% and 4% in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively. The greatest incidence of diarrhea was reported during the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and taxane (61% vs. 34% of patients experienced an event with pertuzumab vs. placebo, respectively). A marked decrease was observed on chemotherapy cessation. Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used, and diarrhea rarely caused treatment dose modifications or discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Diarrhea was a common adverse event in the APHINITY study. Most episodes were low grade and were generally manageable with common antidiarrheal agents. The incidence of diarrhea was greater with the combination of a taxane and HER2-targeted treatment and decreased once chemotherapy was stopped.

Identification of targets for improving access to care in persons with long term physical disabilities.

BACKGROUND: People with long-term physical disability (LTPD) continue to experience difficulties in accessing health care despite the focus of highlighting disparities in the last two decades. OBJECTIVES: To describe health care utilization, accommodations and barriers experienced while accessing health care, and reasons why individuals delay or skip health care among people with LTPD. METHODS: The current study was a part of a larger longitudinal survey administered to individuals with physical disability associated with one of four long-term conditions (MS; SCI; PPS; MD). Measures included demographics, health care utilization, barriers to health care, and reasons for delaying or skipping medical care from the sixth wave of data from 2015 to 2016. RESULTS: Roughly 90% of all participants (N = 1159) saw at least one medical provider within 12 months. The most encountered barrier participants reported experiencing within that time was an office that did not have a safe transfer device to move them to an exam table (69%). Participants' physical function, quality of life, status of living with a spouse, diagnostic condition, and sex (male) were significantly associated with endorsing a barrier in accessing health care. The inability to afford out of pocket expenses was the highest reported reason for delaying health care. CONCLUSIONS: People with LTPD access a variety of health care, including rehabilitation services, and continue to experience barriers when doing so. While understanding barriers individuals experience when accessing health care is important, it is equally important to document the type of care they delay or skip due to barriers.

Trauma assessment and follow up with integration of modern communication devices (TRAFIC). A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of prospectively collecting electronic PROMs on patients being assessed as a result of musculoskeletal trauma, using a web-based application (APP), administered onto tablet and desktop computers (TCs or DCs) in the outpatient setting. METHODS: Following local research ethics approval, a web-based APP (TRAFIC) was developed. It consisted of a total of 12 questions (demographic information, employment, and rehabilitation status as well as quality of life (EQ5D)). The APP was viewable on TCs, with DCs being used in review cubicles when necessary with assistance from a medical professional. Eligible patients were invited to use TRAFIC during the 'Lag period'; the time period from the patient 'booking in' to 'being called' for their appointment. An evaluation of the total time spent using the app (APP-time), was recorded as well as the total time spent in the outpatient department (CLINIC-time) for all patients recruited. CLINIC-time was also assessed for a control group of patients not utilising the APP during their outpatient assessment. RESULTS: One hundred patients were recruited for the study n = 50 males, n = 50 females with a mean age of 49.1 (± 17.6 years). All recruited patients completed the questionnaire items with a median APP-time of 5 min (range 2-118 min). The median 'Lag period' was 16 min. (Range 2-166 min), with a median CLINIC-time of 81 min (range 4-428). The CLINIC-time was higher than for the control group (median 67 min (range 18-242) but this was not statistically significant (Mann Whitney U test; p = 0.199). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic PROMs collection in the musculoskeletal trauma outpatient clinic using a web-based APP is feasible, with the APP-time falling well within the 'Lag period', and no significant impact on the total time spent for the appointment.

First French Pilot Quality Assessment of the EndoPredict Test for Early Luminal Breast Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Genomic signatures are needed for the determination of prognosis in patients with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers. EndoPredict test is a RNA-based multigene assay that assesses the risk of 10-year relapse in this context. Quality assessment is a mandatory requirement for a laboratory to address the analytical quality of these molecular analyses. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the robustness of this prognostic test, its usefulness for the patient's treatment strategy, at the national level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study presents a pilot quality assessment (QA) of the EndoPredict test using composite design, including the follow-up of internal control values (qREF) of the 12 genes of the assay for 151 independent tests and one formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) breast cancer sample. The evaluation of the test was performed by comparing the results of six independent medical laboratories. RESULTS: All measures were highly reproducible and quantification of the qREF showed a standard deviation of less than 0.50 and a coefficient of variation always of <2%. All laboratories found concordant results for the breast cancer samples. The mean EndoPredict (EP) score for the breast cancer sample was 4.97±0.24. The mean of EPclin score was 3.07±0.05. CONCLUSION: This first French independent reported QA assessed the robustness and reproducibility of the EndoPredict test. Such a simple composite design could represent an adapted QA for an expensive diagnostic test.

Why stay home? Temporal association of pain, fatigue and depression with being at home.

BACKGROUND: Community participation is important to most people with disabilities despite the fact that common secondary conditions like pain, fatigue and depression may increase the difficulty of leaving home. Despite decades of research on these secondary conditions, little is known about how they are associated with being at home. OBJECTIVE: We used Ecological Momentary Assessment data to examine within subject fluctuation in these secondary conditions to examine their effect on the likelihood that participants remain at or return home. METHODS: Participants (n = 139) were recruited from a population based sampling frame to complete an Ecological Momentary Assessment that queried their location and experience with secondary conditions six times a day for two weeks. RESULTS: Between subjects secondary condition ratings averaged across time periods indicated that pain and depression were associated with the share of measurement periods that respondents reported being at home. Within subject results indicated that a standard unit increase in pain, fatigue and depression was associated with being home one to two days later. Within day results indicated that increases in pain and fatigue were associated with increased likelihood of being home later, but increases in depression were associated with lower likelihood of being home later. CONCLUSION: These results suggest there may be a complicated relationship among these secondary conditions and community participation with effects observed both across and within days. One interpretation suggests that secondary condition severity is tempered by adjusting participation. These results may have implications for intervening on these secondary conditions.

What happens at work stays at work? Workplace supervisory social interactions and blood pressure outcomes.

We investigated the relationship between workplace supervisory social interactions and blood pressure outcomes using hourly diary entries and ambulatory blood pressure data from an experience sampling study of 55 long-term care employees. After accounting for relevant cardiovascular controls, significant effects of supervisory interactions on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery were found. Multilevel analyses revealed that negatively perceived supervisory interactions predicted higher systolic blood pressure at work (B = -1.59, p < .05, N observations = 422). Using time-lagged hierarchical regression analyses, the average perceived valence of supervisory interactions at work predicted average systolic blood pressure recovery after work (B = -14.52, p < .05, N = 33). Specifically, negatively perceived supervisory interactions at work predicted poorer cardiovascular recovery after work. Suggestions for improving practices in organizations and in experience sampling research are discussed.

Retrospective assessment of cancer pain management in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic using the Pain Management Index.

CONTEXT: The Pain Management Index (PMI) is a simple index linking the usual severity of cancer pain with the category of medication prescribed to treat it. Medication categories are derived from the World Health Organization's "analgesic ladder" approach to cancer pain, and the PMI is an indicator of the extent to which the medication prescribed corresponds to the recommended categories for mild, moderate, and severe pain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess prevalence of inadequate pain management in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic using the PMI. METHODS: All patients with bone metastases referred for palliative radiotherapy from 1999 to 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for patient-rated pain scores (0-10 scale) and analgesic consumption. Pain scores were assigned 0, 1, 2, and 3 when patients reported no pain (0), mild (1-4), moderate (5-6), or severe pain (7-10), respectively. Analgesic scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were assigned when patients were prescribed no pain medication, nonopioids, "weak" opioids, and "strong" opioids, respectively. The PMI score was calculated by subtracting the pain score from the analgesic score. A negative PMI score was considered an indicator of potentially inadequate pain management by the prescriber. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's r correlation, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the relationship of PMI over time, and the relationship with predictive factors. RESULTS: One thousand patients were included from January 1999 to December 2006. A negative PMI was calculated for 25.8% of patients at initial consultation. Prevalence of negative PMI significantly increased over years (P<0.0001). Higher Karnofsky Performance Status (P<0.0001) and breast primary cancer site (P<0.0001) were significantly associated with negative PMI after adjusting for year variable. CONCLUSION: Despite publication of numerous cancer pain management guidelines, undermedication appears to be a persistent problem for patients with painful bone metastases referred for radiotherapy.

Is response to radiotherapy in patients related to the severity of pretreatment pain?

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between the severity of pretreatment pain and response to palliative radiotherapy (RT) for painful bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The database for patients with bone metastases seen at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program at the Odette Cancer Center from 1999 to 2006 was analyzed. The proportion of patients with mild (scores 1-4), moderate (scores 5-6), or severe (scores 7-10) pain at baseline who experienced a complete response, partial response, stable response, or progressive response after palliative RT was determined according to International Bone Metastases Consensus definitions. RESULTS: During the 7-year study period 1,053 patients received palliative radiation for bone metastases. The median age was 68 years and the median Karnofsky performance status was 70. Of the patients, 53% had a complete or partial response at 1 month, 52% at 2 months, and 54% at 3 months post-RT. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in terms of the proportion of responders (patients with complete or partial response) and nonresponders in terms of painful bone metastases among patients presenting with mild, moderate, or severe pain. Patients with moderate pain should be referred for palliative RT.