Effects of Maryland's global budget revenue model on emergency department utilization and revisits.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, Maryland (MD) implemented a "global budget revenue" (GBR) program that prospectively sets hospital budgets. This program introduced incentives for hospitals to tightly control volume and meet budget targets. We examine GBR's effects on emergency department (ED) visits, admissions, and returns. METHODS: We performed an interrupted time-series analysis with difference-in-differences comparisons using 2012 to 2015 Healthcare Cost Utilization and Project data from MD, New York (NY), and New Jersey (NJ). We examined GBR's effects on ED visits/1,000 population, admissions from the ED, and ED returns at 72 h and 9 days. We also examined rates of admission, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and in-hospital mortality among returns. To evaluate racial/ethnic and payer outcome disparities among ED returns, we performed a triple differences analysis. RESULTS: ED visits decreased with GBR adoption in MD relative to NY and NJ, by five and six visits/1,000 population, respectively. ED admissions declined relative to NY and NJ, by 0.6% and 1.8%, respectively. There was also a post-GBR decline in ED returns by 0.7%. Admissions among returns declined by 2%, while ICU and in-hospital mortality among returns remained relatively stable. ED return outcomes varied by racial/ethnic and payer group. Non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks experienced a similar decline in returns, while returns remained unchanged among Hispanics/Latinos, widening the disparity gap. Payer group disparities between privately insured and Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured individuals improved, with the disparity reduction most pronounced among the uninsured. CONCLUSIONS: GBR adoption was associated with lower ED utilization and admissions. ED returns and admissions among returns also decreased, while mortality and ICU stays among returns remained stable, suggesting that GBR has not led to adverse patient outcomes from fewer admissions. However, changes in ED return disparities varied by subgroup, indicating that improvements in care transitions may be uneven across patient populations.

Emergency department care coordination strategies and perceived impact under Maryland's hospital payment reforms.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) care coordination plays an important role in facilitating care transitions across settings. We studied ED care coordination processes and their perceived effectiveness in Maryland (MD) hospitals, which face strong incentives to reduce hospital-based care through global budgets. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to examine ED care coordination processes and perceptions of effectiveness. Interviews were conducted from January through October 2019 across MD hospital-based EDs. Results were reviewed to assign analytic domains and identify emerging themes. Descriptive statistics of ED care coordination staffing and processes were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 25 in-depth interviews across 18 different EDs were conducted with ED physician leadership (n = 14) and care coordination staff (CCS) (n = 11). Across all EDs, there was significant variation in the hours and types of CCS coverage and the number of initiatives implemented to improve care coordination. Participants perceived ED care coordination as effective in facilitating safer discharges and addressing social determinants of health; however, adequate access to outpatient providers was a significant barrier. The majority of ED physician leaders perceived MD's policy reform as having a mixed impact, with improved care transitions and overall patient care as benefits, but increased physician workloads and worsened ED throughput as negative effects. CONCLUSIONS: EDs have responded to the value-based care incentives of MD's global budgeting program with investments to enhance care coordination staffing and a variety of initiatives targeting specific patient populations. Although the observed care coordination initiatives were broadly perceived to produce positive results, MD's global budgeting policies were also perceived to produce barriers to optimizing ED care. Further research is needed to determine the association of the various strategies to improve ED care coordination with patient outcomes to inform practice leaders and policymakers on the efficacy of the various approaches.

Expanding Medicaid Coverage for Community-Based Long-Term Services and Supports: Lessons From Maryland's Community First Choice Program.

Community First Choice (CFC) is a Medicaid state plan option authorized through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that supports the delivery of long-term services and supports in home and community settings. We interviewed stakeholders in Maryland, one of the first states to adopt CFC, to assess challenges, benefits, and potential implications of this Medicaid option for state and federal policy makers. Study findings suggest that expanding coverage for home- and community-based services through CFC in Maryland has been financially feasible, expanded the personal care workforce, and supported a more equitable approach to personal care services. We conclude that greater coverage for home- and community-based long-term services is a promising avenue to improve access to care for high-need Medicaid beneficiaries.

Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans for dual eligibles: a primer.

The Special Needs Plan (SNP), a new type of Medicare Advantage plan created by the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), targets one of three special-needs populations--including beneficiaries who qualify both for Medicare and Medicaid benefits ("dual eligibles"), the focus of this issue brief. It identifies the key issues that underlie one of the MMA's central goals for dual eligible SNPs--"the potential to offer the full array of Medicare and Medicaid benefits, and supplemental benefits, through a single plan"--and it outlines their progress thus far. The brief observes that true coordination between SNPs and Medicaid programs, despite some state and federal initiatives, has largely failed to occur, and it discusses some of the reasons why. Consequently, the brief offers recommendations for improving dual-eligible SNPs' prospects and extending their lives (legal authorization for SNPs is scheduled to expire at year-end 2008).

Coordinating care for dual eligibles: options for linking state Medicaid programs with Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans.

Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans (SNPs) for dual eligibles--individuals who qualify both for Medicare and Medicaid benefits--have the potential to coordinate Medicare benefits with state-administered Medicaid benefits. States that aim to develop such programs may choose from among three potential models: 1) a Medicaid program in which the beneficiary voluntarily enrolls in a single managed care organization (MCO) that delivers both Medicaid and Medicare services; 2) a program in which the beneficiary is required to enroll in a Medicaid MCO but retains freedom of choice regarding whether to enroll in a capitated Medicare plan; and 3) an administrative services organization approach,in which Medicaid retains a vendor to coordinate Medicaid services with the SNPsoperating in the state. The authors also provide guidance on contractual issues important to state Medicaid agencies, and they discuss environmental factors that influence the choice of models and the program's prospects for success.