Assessment of the respiratory sensitization potential of proteins using an enhanced mouse intranasal test (MINT).

There remains a need for a simple and predictive animal model to identify potential respiratory sensitizers. The mouse intranasal test (MINT) was developed to assess the relative allergic potential of detergent enzymes, however, the experimental endpoints were limited to evaluation of antibody levels. The present study was designed to evaluate additional endpoints (serum and allergic antibody levels, pulmonary inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR)) to determine their value in improving the predictive accuracy of the MINT. BDF1 mice were intranasally instilled on days 1, 3, 10, 17 and 24 with subtilisin, ovalbumin, betalactoglobulin, mouse serum albumin or keyhole limpet hemocyanin; challenged with aerosolized methacholine or the sensitizing protein on day 29 to assess AHR, and sacrificed on day 29 or 30. Under the conditions of this study, evaluation of AHR did not improve the predictive power of this experimental model. Allergic antibody responses and IgG isotype characterization proved to be the most sensitive and reliable indicators of the protein allergenic potential with BAL responses providing additional insight. These data highlight that the evaluation of the respiratory sensitization potential of proteins can be best informed when multiple parameters are evaluated and that further improvements and refinements of the assay are necessary.

Potency values from the local lymph node assay: application to classification, labelling and risk assessment.

Hundreds of chemicals are contact allergens but there remains a need to identify and characterise accurately skin sensitising hazards. The purpose of this review was fourfold. First, when using the local lymph node assay (LLNA), consider whether an exposure concentration (EC3 value) lower than 100% can be defined and used as a threshold criterion for classification and labelling. Second, is there any reason to revise the recommendation of a previous ECETOC Task Force regarding specific EC3 values used for sub-categorisation of substances based upon potency? Third, what recommendations can be made regarding classification and labelling of preparations under GHS? Finally, consider how to integrate LLNA data into risk assessment and provide a rationale for using concentration responses and corresponding no-effect concentrations. Although skin sensitising chemicals having high EC3 values may represent only relatively low risks to humans, it is not possible currently to define an EC3 value below 100% that would serve as an appropriate threshold for classification and labelling. The conclusion drawn from reviewing the use of distinct categories for characterising contact allergens was that the most appropriate, science-based classification of contact allergens according to potency is one in which four sub-categories are identified: 'extreme', 'strong', 'moderate' and 'weak'. Since draining lymph node cell proliferation is related causally and quantitatively to potency, LLNA EC3 values are recommended for determination of a no expected sensitisation induction level that represents the first step in quantitative risk assessment.

Toxicology and humoral immunity assessment of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) following a 28-day whole body vapor inhalation exposure in Fischer 344 rats.

Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, D4, is a low viscosity, silicone fluid consisting of four dimethyl-siloxy units ((CH3)2SiO)4 in a cyclic structure. It is primarily used as a building block in the industrial synthesis of long chain silicone polymers. The combination of D4 with decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) is commonly referred to as cyclomethicone which has a wide range of applications as a formulation aid in personal care products. To extend the existing database regarding the biological activities of D4, a 28 day whole body vapor inhalation study was conducted using Fischer 344 rats at 0 (room air), 7, 20, 60, 180 and 540 ppm for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week. Parameters measured included body weights, organ weights, gross pathology, histopathology, serum chemistries, and urinalysis. In addition to these standard toxicological endpoints, the ability of D4 exposed animals to mount an IgM antibody response was evaluated by a splenic antibody forming cell (AFC) assay and a serum enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). The results of this 28-day inhalation study indicate that D4 exposure caused no adverse effects on body weight, food consumption, or urinalysis parameters. In addition, there were no exposure related histopathological alterations at any site for any exposure group. A statistically significant increase in liver weight and the liver to body weight ratio was observed in both male (180-540 ppm) and female (20-540 ppm) rats, which was not observed in the 14-day recovery group animals. There were no other significant organ weight changes. Although statistically significant changes were observed in several hematological and serum chemistry parameters in both the terminal and 14-day recovery animals, the changes were marginal and within the normal range of values for the rat. Under these experimental conditions, there were no alterations noted in immune system function at any of the D4 exposure levels.