Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr ; 18(3): 291-296, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462389

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography cardiac angiography (CTCA) is recommended for the evaluation of patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The BYPASS-CTCA study demonstrated that CTCA prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in CABG patients leads to significant reductions in procedure time and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), alongside improved patient satisfaction. However, whether CTCA information was used to facilitate selective graft cannulation at ICA was not protocol mandated. In this post-hoc analysis we investigated the influence of CTCA facilitated selective graft assessment on angiographic parameters and study endpoints. METHODS: BYPASS-CTCA was a randomized controlled trial in which patients with previous CABG referred for ICA were randomized to undergo CTCA prior to ICA, or ICA alone. In this post-hoc analysis we assessed the impact of selective ICA (grafts not invasively cannulated based on the CTCA result) following CTCA versus non-selective ICA (imaging all grafts irrespective of CTCA findings). The primary endpoints were ICA procedural duration, incidence of CIN, and patient satisfaction post-ICA. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of procedural complications and 1-year major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: In the CTCA cohort (n â€‹= â€‹343), 214 (62.4%) patients had selective coronary angiography performed, whereas 129 (37.6%) patients had non-selective ICA. Procedure times were significantly reduced in the selective CTCA â€‹+ â€‹ICA group compared to the non-selective CTCA â€‹+ â€‹ICA group (-5.82min, 95% CI -7.99 to -3.65, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) along with reduction of CIN (1.5% vs 5.8%, OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.98). No difference was seen in patient satisfaction with the ICA, however procedural complications (0.9% vs 4.7%, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.87) and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (13.1% vs 20.9%, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.96) were significantly lower in the selective group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior CABG, CTCA guided selective angiographic assessment of bypass grafts is associated with improved procedural parameters, lower complication rates and better 12-month outcomes. Taken in addition to the main findings of the BYPASS-CTCA trial, these results suggest a synergistic approach between CTCA and ICA should be considered in this patient group. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03736018.


Assuntos
Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Angiografia Coronária , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Satisfação do Paciente , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Nefropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Duração da Cirurgia , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos
3.
BMJ Open ; 9(9): e028753, 2019 09 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519672

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the economic and psychological impact of the cancellation of operations due to winter pressures on patients, their families and the economy. DESIGN: This questionnaire study was designed with the help of patient groups. Data were collected on the economic and financial burden of cancellations. Emotions were also quantified on a 5-point Likert scale. SETTING: Five NHS Hospital Trusts in the East Midlands region of England. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 796 participants who had their elective operations cancelled between 1 November 2017 and 31 March 2018 and received responses from 339 (43%) participants. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were posted a modified version of a validated quality of life questionnaire with a prepaid return envelope. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the financial and psychological impact of the cancellation of elective surgery on patients and their families. RESULTS: Of the 339 respondents, 163 (48%) were aged <65 years, with 111 (68%) being in employment. Sixty-six (19%) participants had their operations cancelled on the day. Only 69 (62%) of working adults were able to return to work during the time scheduled for their operation, with a mean loss of 5 working days (SD 10). Additional working days were lost subsequently by 60 (54%) participants (mean 7 days (SD 10)). Family members of 111 (33%) participants required additional time off work (mean 5 days (SD 7)). Over 30% of participants reported extreme levels of sadness, disappointment, anger, frustration and stress. At least moderate concern about continued symptoms was reported by 234 (70%) participants, and 193 (59%) participants reported at least moderate concern about their deteriorating condition. CONCLUSIONS: The cancellation of elective surgery during the winter had an adverse impact on patients and the economy, including days of work lost and health-related anxiety. We recommend better planning, and provision of more notice and better support to patients.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estações do Ano , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , Eficiência Organizacional , Inglaterra , Hospitais de Distrito , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos Humanos
4.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 16: 18, 2016 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26790953

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical assessment of patients with chest pain of recent onset remains difficult. This study presents a critical review of clinical predictive tools for the assessment of patients with chest pain. METHODS: Systematic review of observational studies and estimation of probabilities of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chest pain. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies reporting tools, with at least three variables from clinical history, physical examination or ECG, produced with multivariate analysis, to estimate probabilities of CAD in patients with chest pain of recent onset, published from inception of the database to the 31st July 2015. The references of previous relevant reviews were hand searched. The methodological quality was assessed with standard criteria. Since the incidence of CAD has changed in the past few decades, the date of publication was acknowledged to be relevant in order to use the tool in clinical practice, and more recent papers were considered more relevant. Probabilities of CAD according to the studies of highest quality were estimated and the evidence provided was graded. RESULTS: Twelve papers were included out of the 19126 references initially identified. The methodological quality of all of them was high. The clinical characteristics of the chest pain, age, past medical history of cardiovascular disease, gender, and abnormalities in the ECG were the predictors of CAD most commonly reported across the studies. The most recent papers, with highest methodological quality, and most practical for use in clinical settings, reported prediction or exclusion of CAD with area under the curve 0.90 in Primary Care, 0.91 in Emergency department, and 0.79 in Cardiology. These papers provide evidence of high level (1B) and the recommendation to use their results in the management of patients with chest pain is strong (A). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of CAD can be estimated on clinical grounds in patients with chest pain in different clinical settings with high accuracy. The estimation of probabilities of CAD presented in these studies could be used for a better management of patients with chest pain and also in the development of future predictive tools.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores Etários , Área Sob a Curva , Cardiologia , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Eletrocardiografia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicações , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Fatores Sexuais
5.
BMJ Open ; 5(4): e007251, 2015 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25877275

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The recognition of coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients who report chest pain remains difficult in primary care. This study investigates the association between chest pain (specified, unspecified or musculoskeletal) and prodromes (dyspepsia, fatigue or dyspnoea), with first-ever acute CAD, and increased longer term cardiovascular risk. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Anonymised clinical data recorded electronically by general practitioners from 140 primary care surgeries in London (UK) between April 2008 and April 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted for all patients aged 30 years and over at the beginning of the study period, registered in the surgeries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical data included chest pain, dyspepsia, dyspnoea and fatigue, first-ever CAD and long-term cardiovascular risk (QRisk2). Regression models were used to analyse the association between chest pain together with prodromes and CAD and QRisk2≥20%. RESULTS: 354,052 patients were included in the study. 4842 patients had first-ever CAD of which 270 reported chest pain in the year before the acute event. 257,019 patients had QRisk2 estimations. Chest pain was associated with a higher risk of CAD. HRs: 21.12 (16.68 to 26.76), p<0.001; 7.51 (6.49 to 8.68), p<0.001; and 1.84 (1.14 to 3.00), p<0.001 for specified, unspecified and musculoskeletal chest pain. Dyspepsia, dyspnoea or fatigue was also associated with a higher risk of CAD. Chest pain of all subtypes, dyspepsia and dyspnoea were also associated with an increased 10-year cardiovascular risk of 20% or more. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with chest pain, including those with atypical symptoms, require careful assessment for acute and longer term cardiovascular risk. Prodromes may have independent diagnostic value in the estimation of cardiovascular disease risk.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Dispneia/diagnóstico , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Dispepsia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Sintomas Prodrômicos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
6.
EuroIntervention ; 10(10): e1-8, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701263

RESUMO

AIMS: The relation between socio-economic status (SES) and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been established. We sought to determine whether or not socio-economic status impacts on prognosis after PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an observational cohort study of 13,770 consecutive patients who underwent PCI at a single centre between 2005 and 2011. Patient socio-economic status was defined by the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score, according to residential postcode. Patients were analysed by quintile of IMD score (Q1, least deprived; Q5, most deprived). Median follow-up was 3.7 (IQR: 2.0-5.1) years and the primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Patients in Q5 (most deprived) were younger, more commonly South Asian, and had higher rates of smoking, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, previous MI, and previous PCI than patients in Q1. Rates of long-term mortality increased progressively across the five quintiles of IMD score in a linear fashion (p=0.0004), as did rates of recurrent MI, target vessel revascularisation, and CABG. The difference in mortality rates persisted after adjustment for other potential confounding factors after multivariate analysis (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.38-2.69). CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary cohort of patients receiving PCI, socio-economic status was associated with prognosis in a linear fashion.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Angina Estável/cirurgia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Classe Social , Estatística como Assunto , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Idoso , Angina Estável/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/epidemiologia
7.
Med Educ ; 42(4): 364-73, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18338989

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and feasibility of assessing the performance of medical specialist registrars (SpRs) using three methods: the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX), directly observed procedural skills (DOPS) and multi-source feedback (MSF) to help inform annual decisions about the outcome of SpR training. METHODS: We conducted a feasibility study and generalisability analysis based on the application of these assessment methods and the resulting data. A total of 230 SpRs (from 17 specialties) in 58 UK hospitals took part from 2003 to 2004. Main outcome measures included: time taken for each assessment, and variance component analysis of mean scores and derivation of 95% confidence intervals for individual doctors' scores based on the standard error of measurement. Responses to direct questions on questionnaires were analysed, as were the themes emerging from open-comment responses. RESULTS: The methods can provide reliable scores with appropriate sampling. In our sample, all trainees who completed the number of assessments recommended by the Royal Colleges of Physicians had scores that were 95% certain to be better than unsatisfactory. The mean time taken to complete the mini-CEX (including feedback) was 25 minutes. The DOPS required the duration of the procedure being assessed plus an additional third of this time for feedback. The mean time required for each rater to complete his or her MSF form was 6 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first attempt to evaluate the use of comprehensive workplace assessment across the medical specialties in the UK. The methods are feasible to conduct and can make reliable distinctions between doctors' performances. With adaptation, they may be appropriate for assessing the workplace performance of other grades and specialties of doctor. This may be helpful in informing foundation assessment.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Avaliação de Desempenho Profissional/métodos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/normas , Medicina , Especialização , Análise de Variância , Estudos de Viabilidade , Retroalimentação , Reino Unido , Local de Trabalho
8.
NMR Biomed ; 21(2): 111-9, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17506036

RESUMO

This study presents computerized automatic image analysis for quantitatively evaluating dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in an ischemic rat hindlimb model. MRI at 7 T was performed on animals in a blinded placebo-controlled experiment comparing multipotent adult progenitor cell-derived progenitor cell (MDPC)-treated, phosphate buffered saline (PBS)-injected, and sham-operated rats. Ischemic and non-ischemic limb regions of interest were automatically segmented from time-series images for detecting changes in perfusion and late enhancement. In correlation analysis of the time-signal intensity histograms, the MDPC-treated limbs correlated well with their corresponding non-ischemic limbs. However, the correlation coefficient of the PBS control group was significantly lower than that of the MDPC-treated and sham-operated groups. In semi-quantitative parametric maps of contrast enhancement, there was no significant difference in hypo-enhanced area between the MDPC and PBS groups at early perfusion-dependent time frames. However, the late-enhancement area was significantly larger in the PBS than the MDPC group. The results of this exploratory study show that MDPC-treated rats could be objectively distinguished from PBS controls. The differences were primarily determined by late contrast enhancement of PBS-treated limbs. These computerized methods appear promising for assessing perfusion and late enhancement in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.


Assuntos
Imagem Ecoplanar/métodos , Membro Posterior/patologia , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Isquemia/patologia , Células-Tronco Multipotentes/transplante , Células-Tronco Adultas/transplante , Animais , Meios de Contraste , Grupos Controle , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Membro Posterior/transplante , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Ratos , Método Simples-Cego , Transplantes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA